Faye-Peterson, O, Crombleholme, T. Twin-twin transfusion: part 2: infant anomalies, clinical intervention and placental examination. Neoreviews. 2008;9(9):e380.Google Scholar

Bamberg, C, Hecher, K. Update on twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;58:55–65.Google Scholar

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Simpson LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(1):3–18.Google Scholar

Michelfelder, E, Gottliebson, W, Border, W, et al. Early manifestations and spectrum of recipient twin cardiomyopathy in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: relation to Quintero stage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(7):965–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, A. Diagnosis and management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(3):611–631.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999; 19(8 Pt 1):550–555.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Rodgers, M, Baschat, A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–263.Google Scholar

Oepkes, D, Sueters, M. Antenatal fetal surveillance in multiple pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:59–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stagnati, V, Zanardini, C, Fichera, A, et al. Early prediction of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):573–582.Google Scholar

Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):136–144.Google Scholar

Salomon, LJ, Ortqvist, L, Aegerter, P, et al. Long-term developmental follow-up of infants who participated in a randomized clinical trial of amniocentesis vs laser photocoagulation for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):444.e1–444.e7.Google Scholar

Ville, Y, Hyett, J, Hecher, K, Nicolaides, K. Preliminary experience with endoscopic laser surgery for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(4):224–227.Google Scholar

Slaghekke, F, Oepkes, D. Solomon technique versus selective coagulation for twin-twin transfusion. Twin Research Hum Genet. 2016;19(3):217–221.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Comas, C, Bornick, PW, et al. Selective versus non-selective laser photocoagulation of placental vessels in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(3):230–236.Google Scholar

Ngamprasertwong, P, Habli, M, Boat, A, et al. Maternal hypotension during fetoscopic surgery: incidence and its impact on fetal survival outcomes. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:709059.Google Scholar

Van Mieghem, T, Klaritsch, P, Done, E, et al. Assessment of fetal cardiac function before and after therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):400.e1–400.e7.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Oepkes, D, Klumper, FJ, Walther, FJ, Vandenbussche, FP. Residual anastomoses after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: frequency, associated risks and outcome. Placenta. 2007; 28(2-3):204–208.Google Scholar

Gupta, R, Kilby, M, Cooper, G. Fetal surgery and anaesthetic implications. BJA Educ. 2008;8(2):71–75.Google Scholar

Rossi, AC, Kaufman, MA, Bornick, PW, Quintero, RA. General vs local anesthesia for the percutaneous laser treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):137.e1–137.e7.Google Scholar

Lewi, L, Jani, J, Blickstein, I, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(5):514.e1–514.e8.Google Scholar

Slaghekke, F, Zhao, DP, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Antenatal management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016;9(8):815–820.Google Scholar

Van de Velde, M, Van Schoubroeck, D, Lewi, LE, et al. Remifentanil for fetal immobilization and maternal sedation during fetoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blind comparison with diazepam. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(1):251–258.Google Scholar

Middeldorp, JM, Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, et al. Laparoscopically guided uterine entry for fetoscopy in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with completely anterior placenta: a novel technique. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22(6):409–415.Google Scholar

Papanna, R, Johnson, A, Ivey, RT, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted fetoscopy for laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome with anterior placentation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:65–70.Google Scholar

Shamshirsaz, AA, Javadian, P, Ruano, R, et al. Comparison between laparoscopically assisted and standard fetoscopic laser ablation in patients with anterior and posterior placentation in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a single center study. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(4):376–381.Google Scholar

Verla, MA, Style, CC, Olutoye, OO. Prenatal intervention for the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(6):579–587.Google Scholar

Allan, DW, Greer, JJ. Pathogenesis of nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia in fetal rats. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(2):338–347.Google Scholar

Butler, N, Claireaux, AE. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia as a cause of perinatal mortality. Lancet. 1962;1(7231):659–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Estes, JM, Howell, LJ. A prospective study of the outcome for fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia. JAMA. 1994;271(5):382–384.Google Scholar

Mah, VK, Zamakhshary, M, Mah, DY, et al. Absolute vs relative improvements in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival: what happened to “hidden mortality.” J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(5):877–882.Google Scholar

Mehollin-Ray, AR, Cassady, CI, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO. Fetal MR imaging of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1067–1084.Google Scholar

Mesas Burgos, C, Hammarqvist-Vejde, J, Frenckner, B, Conner, P. Differences in outcomes in prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia compared to postnatal detection: a single-center experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39(4):241–247.Google Scholar

Akinkuotu, AC, Cruz, SM, Abbas, PI, et al. Risk-stratification of severity for infants with CDH: Prenatal versus postnatal predictors of outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(1):44–48.Google Scholar

Jani, J, Nicolaides, KH, Keller, RL, et al. Observed to expected lung area to head circumference ratio in the prediction of survival in fetuses with isolated diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):67–71.Google Scholar

Zamora, IJ, Olutoye, OO, Cass, DL, et al. Prenatal MRI fetal lung volumes and percent liver herniation predict pulmonary morbidity in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(5):688–693.Google Scholar

Kohl, T. Minimally invasive fetoscopic interventions: an overview in 2010. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):2056–2067.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Ali, RA, Patel, P, et al. Fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: indications, outcomes, and future directions. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(3):147–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peiro, JL, Carreras, E, Guillen, G, et al. Therapeutic indications of fetoscopy: a 5-year institutional experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(2):229–236.Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, Olutoye, OO, Cass, DL, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of fetoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe left diaphragmatic hernia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):20–29.Google Scholar

Deprest, J, Nicolaides, K, Done, E, et al. Technical aspects of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(1):22–32.Google Scholar

Kohl, T, Muller, A, Franz, A, et al. Temporary fetoscopic tracheal balloon occlusion enhanced by hyperoncotic lung distension: is there a role in the treatment of fetal pulmonary hypoplasia from early preterm premature rupture of membranes? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22(6):462–465.Google Scholar

Kohl, T, Geipel, A, Tchatcheva, K, et al. Life-saving effects of fetal tracheal occlusion on pulmonary hypoplasia from preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113 (2 Pt 2):480–483.Google Scholar

Lally, KP. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia – the past 25 (or so) years. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(5):695–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Bullard, KM, et al. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VII: a prospective trial. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(11):1637–1642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Longaker, MT, et al. Successful repair in utero of a fetal diaphragmatic hernia after removal of herniated viscera from the left thorax. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(22):1582–1584.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW, Jennings, RW. The CDH two-step: a dance of necessity. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(6):813–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW, et al. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. Hard-earned lessons. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(10):1411–1417.Google Scholar

MacGillivray, TE, Jennings, RW, Rudolph, AM, et al. Vascular changes with in utero correction of diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(8):992–996.Google Scholar

Skarsgard, ED, Meuli, M, VanderWall, KJ, et al. Fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (‘Fetendo-PLUG’) for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(10):1335–1338.Google Scholar

Alcorn, D, Adamson, TM, Lambert, TF, et al. Morphological effects of chronic tracheal ligation and drainage in the fetal lamb lung. J Anat. 1977;123(Pt 3):649–660.Google ScholarPubMed

Carmel, JA, Friedman, F, Adams, FH. Fetal tracheal ligation and lung development. Am J Dis Child. 1965;109(5):452–456.Google ScholarPubMed

Lanman, JT, Schaffer, A, Herod, L, et al. Distensibility of the fetal lung with fluid in sheep. Pediatr Res. 1971;5:586.Google Scholar

Wilson, JM, DiFiore, JW, Peters, CA. Experimental fetal tracheal ligation prevents the pulmonary hypoplasia associated with fetal nephrectomy: possible application for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(11):1433–1439.Google Scholar

Beierle, EA, Langham, MR, Jr., Cassin, S. In utero lung growth of fetal sheep with diaphragmatic hernia and tracheal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(1):141–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bealer, JF, Skarsgard, ED, Hedrick, MH, et al. The ‘PLUG’ odyssey: adventures in experimental fetal tracheal occlusion. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(2):361–364.Google Scholar

DiFiore, JW, Fauza, DO, Slavin, R, et al. Experimental fetal tracheal ligation reverses the structural and physiological effects of pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(2):248–256.Google Scholar

Hedrick, MH, Estes, JM, Sullivan, KM, et al. Plug the lung until it grows (PLUG): a new method to treat congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(5):612–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW, et al. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VIII: Response of the hypoplastic lung to tracheal occlusion. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(10):1339–1348.Google Scholar

Mychaliska, GB, Bealer, JF, Graf, JL, et al. Operating on placental support: the ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(2):227–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, MR, Albanese, CT, Hawgood, SB, et al. Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion by means of detachable balloon for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(3):730–733.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Sydorak, RM, Farrell, JA, et al. Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prelude to a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(7):1012–1020.Google Scholar

Chiba, T, Albanese, CT, Farmer, DL, et al. Balloon tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: experimental studies. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(11):1566–1570.Google Scholar

Longaker, MT, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, et al. Maternal outcome after open fetal surgery. A review of the first 17 human cases. JAMA. 1991;265(6):737–741.Google Scholar

Deprest, J, Gratacos, E, Nicolaides, KH. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(2):121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luks, FI, Gilchrist, BF, Jackson, BT, Piasecki, GJ. Endoscopic tracheal obstruction with an expanding device in a fetal lamb model: preliminary considerations. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1996;11(1):67–71.Google Scholar

Kohl, T. Fetoscopic surgery: where are we today? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(4):315–321.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Yoshisaki, CT, da Silva, MM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion versus postnatal management of severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(1):20–27.Google Scholar

Deprest, J, Jani, J, Gratacos, E, et al. Fetal intervention for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the European experience. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(2):94–103.Google Scholar

Jani, J, Gratacos, E, Greenough, A, et al. Percutaneous fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48(4):910–922.Google Scholar

Peralta, CF, Sbragia, L, Bennini, JR, et al. Fetoscopic endotracheal occlusion for severe isolated diaphragmatic hernia: initial experience from a single clinic in Brazil. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(1):71–77.Google Scholar

Jani, JC, Nicolaides, KH, Gratacos, E, et al. Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(3):304–310.Google Scholar

Gardiner, HM, Kovacevic, A, Tulzer, G, et al. Natural history of 107 cases of fetal aortic stenosis from a European multicenter retrospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):373–381. doi: 10.1002/uog.15876 [doi].Google Scholar

Moon-Grady, AJ, Morris, SA, Belfort, M, et al. International fetal cardiac intervention registry: A worldwide collaborative description and preliminary outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(4):388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.037 [doi].Google Scholar

Freud, LR, McElhinney, DB, Marshall, AC, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty for evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Postnatal outcomes of the first 100 patients. Circulation. 2014;130(8):638–645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009032 [doi].Google Scholar

Mallmann, MR, Herberg, U, Gottschalk, I, et al. Fetal cardiac intervention in critical aortic stenosis with severe mitral regurgitation, severe left atrial enlargement, and restrictive foramen ovale. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(5):440–447. doi: 10.1159/000502840 [doi].Google Scholar

Tulzer, A, Arzt, W, Gitter, R, et al. Immediate effects and outcome of in-utero pulmonary valvuloplasty in fetuses with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum or critical pulmonary stenosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(2):230–237. doi: 10.1002/uog.19047 [doi].Google Scholar

Jantzen, DW, Moon-Grady, AJ, Morris, SA, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact or restrictive atrial septum: A report from the international fetal cardiac intervention registry. Circulation. 2017;136(14):1346–1349. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025873 [doi].Google Scholar

Friedman, KG, Sleeper, LA, Freud, LR, et al. Improved technical success, postnatal outcome and refined predictors of outcome for fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(2):212–220. doi: 10.1002/uog.17530 [doi].Google Scholar

Nugent, AW, Kowal, RC, Juraszek, AL, Ikemba, C, Magee, K. Model of magnetically guided fetal cardiac intervention: Potential to avoid direct cardiac puncture. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(18):1778–1781. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.818116 [doi].Google Scholar

Bakker, MK, Bergman, JEH, Krikov, S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and prevalence of critical congenital heart defects: An international retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e028139-2018–028139. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028139 [doi].Google Scholar

Lytzen, R, Vejlstrup, N, Bjerre, J, et al. Live-born major congenital heart disease in Denmark: Incidence, detection rate, and termination of pregnancy rate from 1996 to 2013. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(9):829–837. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2009 [doi].Google Scholar

Idorn, L, Olsen, M, Jensen, AS, et al. Univentricular hearts in Denmark 1977 to 2009: Incidence and survival. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(4):1311–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.182 [doi].Google Scholar

Egbe, A, Uppu, S, Lee, S, Ho, D, Srivastava, S. Changing prevalence of severe congenital heart disease: A population-based study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(7):1232–1238. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0921-7 [doi].Google Scholar

Donofrio, MT, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(21):2183–2242. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d [doi].Google Scholar

Kirk, JS, Riggs, TW, Comstock, CH, Lee, W, Yang, SS, Weinhouse, E. Prenatal screening for cardiac anomalies: The value of routine addition of the aortic root to the four-chamber view. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(3):427–431.Google Scholar

Del Bianco, A, Russo, S, Lacerenza, N, et al. Four chamber view plus three-vessel and trachea view for a complete evaluation of the fetal heart during the second trimester. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):309–312. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.059 [doi].Google Scholar

Bahtiyar, MO, Dulay, AT, Weeks, BP, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in monochorionic/diamniotic twin gestations: A systematic literature review. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(11):1491–1498. doi: 26/11/1491[pii].Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Bokenkamp, R, Rijlaarsdam, M, et al. Congenital heart disease in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Congenit Heart Dis. 2007;2(1):38–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2007.00070.x [doi].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stumpflen, I, Stumpflen, A, Wimmer, M, Bernaschek, G. Effect of detailed fetal echocardiography as part of routine prenatal ultrasonographic screening on detection of congenital heart disease. Lancet. 1996;348(9031):854–857. doi: S0140-6736(96)04069-X [pii].Google Scholar

Yagel, S, Weissman, A, Rotstein, Z, et al. Congenital heart defects: Natural course and in utero development. Circulation. 1997;96(2):550–555. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.550 [doi].Google Scholar

Rakha, S, El Marsafawy, H. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fetal echocardiography for high-risk pregnancies in a tertiary center in Egypt. Arch Pediatr. 2019;26(6):337–341. doi: S0929-693X(19)30117-4 [pii].Google Scholar

Pinheiro, DO, Varisco, BB, Silva, MBD, et al. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac MalformationsAcuracia do diagnostico pre-natal de cardiopatias congenitas. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(1):11–16. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676058 [doi].Google Scholar

Pasierb, MM, Penalver, JM, Vernon, MM, Arya, B. The role of regional prenatal cardiac screening for congenital heart disease: A single center experience. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13(4):571–577. doi: 10.1111/chd.12611 [doi].Google Scholar

Yu, D, Sui, L, Zhang, N. Performance of first-trimester fetal echocardiography in diagnosing fetal heart defects: Meta-analysis and systematic review. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(3):471–480. doi: 10.1002/jum.15123 [doi].Google Scholar

McBrien, A, Hornberger, LK. Early fetal echocardiography. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(8):370–379. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1414 [doi].Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Ayres, N, Cuneo, B, et al. American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(7):803–810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.04.011 [doi].Google Scholar

Hornberger, LK, Sahn, DJ. Rhythm abnormalities of the fetus. Heart. 2007;93(10):1294–1300. doi: 93/10/1294[pii].Google Scholar

Stewart, PA, Wladimiroff, JW. Fetal echocardiography and color doppler flow imaging: The Rotterdam experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993;3(3):168–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1993.03030168.x [doi].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Copel, JA, Morotti, R, Hobbins, JC, Kleinman, CS. The antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease using fetal echocardiography: Is color flow mapping necessary? Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(1):1–8.Google Scholar

Gembruch, U, Chatterjee, MS, Bald, R, et al. Color doppler flow mapping of fetal heart. J Perinat Med. 1991;19(1–2):27–32.Google Scholar

Moon-Grady, A, Shahanavaz, S, Brook, M, et al. Can a complete fetal echocardiogram be performed at 12 to 16 weeks’ gestation? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(12):1342–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.09.003 [doi].Google Scholar

Comas Gabriel, C, Galindo, A, Martinez, JM, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis of major cardiac anomalies in a high-risk population. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22(7):586–593. doi: 10.1002/pd.372 [doi].Google Scholar

Fouron, JC, Fournier, A, Proulx, F, et al. Management of fetal tachyarrhythmia based on superior vena cava/aorta doppler flow recordings. Heart. 2003;89(10):1211–1216. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.10.1211 [doi].Google Scholar

Carvalho, JS, Prefumo, F, Ciardelli, V, et al. Evaluation of fetal arrhythmias from simultaneous pulsed wave doppler in pulmonary artery and vein. Heart. 2007;93(11):1448–1453. doi: hrt.2006.101659 [pii].Google Scholar

Copel, JA, Pilu, G, Kleinman, CS. Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: Associations and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154(5):1121–1132. doi: 0002-9378(86)90773-8 [pii].Google Scholar

Cai, M, Huang, H, Su, L, et al. Fetal congenital heart disease: Associated anomalies, identification of genetic anomalies by single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis, and postnatal outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(50):e13617. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013617 [doi].Google Scholar

Sun, H, Yi, T, Hao, X, et al. Contribution of single-gene defects to congenital cardiac left-sided lesions in the prenatal setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):225–232. doi: 10.1002/uog.21883 [doi].Google Scholar

Lord, J, McMullan, DJ, Eberhardt, RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): A cohort study. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):747–757. doi: S0140-6736(18)31940-8 [pii].Google Scholar

Schidlow, DN, Freud, L, Friedman, K, Tworetzky, W. Fetal interventions for structural heart disease. Echocardiography. 2017;34(12):1834–1841. doi: 10.1111/echo.13667 [doi].Google Scholar

Krishnan, A, Arya, B, Moak, JP, Donofrio, MT. Outcomes of fetal echocardiographic surveillance in anti-SSA exposed fetuses at a large fetal cardiology center. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(12):1207–1212. doi: 10.1002/pd.4454 [doi].Google Scholar

Co-Vu, J, Lopez-Colon, D, Vyas, HV, et al. Maternal hyperoxygenation: A potential therapy for congenital heart disease in the fetuses? A systematic review of the current literature. Echocardiography. 2017;34(12):1822–1833. doi: 10.1111/echo.13722 [doi].Google Scholar

Cuneo, BF, Moon-Grady, AJ, Sonesson, SE, et al. Heart sounds at home: Feasibility of an ambulatory fetal heart rhythm surveillance program for anti-SSA-positive pregnancies. J Perinatol. 2017;37(3):226–230. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.220 [doi].Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Khalek, N, Gaynor, JW, et al. Fetal intrapericardial teratoma: Natural history and management including successful in utero surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):780.e1-780.e7. doi: S0002-9378(16)30575-0 [pii].Google Scholar

Riskin-Mashiah, S, Moise, KJ, Jr., Wilkins, I, et al. In utero diagnosis of intrapericardial teratoma: A case for in utero open fetal surgery. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(12):1328–1330. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199812)18:123.0.CO;2-7 [pii].Google Scholar

Edwards, LA, Lara, DA, Sanz Cortes, M, et al. Chronic maternal hyperoxygenation and effect on cerebral and placental vasoregulation and neurodevelopment in fetuses with left heart hypoplasia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(1):45–57. doi: 10.1159/000489123 [doi].Google Scholar

Arunamata, A, Axelrod, DM, Bianco, K, et al. Chronic antepartum maternal hyperoxygenation in a case of severe fetal Ebstein’s anomaly with circular shunt physiology. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;10(3):284–287. doi: 10.4103/apc.APC_20_17 [doi].Google Scholar

Lara, DA, Morris, SA, Maskatia, SA, et al. Pilot study of chronic maternal hyperoxygenation and effect on aortic and mitral valve annular dimensions in fetuses with left heart hypoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):365–372. doi: 10.1002/uog.15846 [doi].Google Scholar

Zeng, S, Zhou, Q, Zhang, M, et al. Features and outcome of fetal cardiac aneurysms and diverticula: A single center experience in China. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(1):68–73. doi: 10.1002/pd.4714 [doi].Google Scholar

Garcia Rodriguez, R, Rodriguez Guedes, A, Garcia Delgado, R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cardiac diverticulum with pericardial effusion in the first trimester of pregnancy with resolution after early pericardiocentesis. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:154690. doi: 10.1155/2015/154690 [doi].Google Scholar

Carpenter, RJ, Jr., Strasburger, JF, Garson A, Jr., et al. Fetal ventricular pacing for hydrops secondary to complete atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8(6):1434–1436. doi: S0735-1097(86)80319-9 [pii].Google Scholar

Zhou, L, Vest, AN, Chmait, RH, et al. A percutaneously implantable fetal pacemaker. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4459–4463. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944614 [doi].Google Scholar

Nassr, AA, Shazly, SA, Morris, SA, et al. Prenatal management of fetal intrapericardial teratoma: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(9):849–863. doi: 10.1002/pd.5113 [doi].Google Scholar

Heerema-McKenney, A, Harrison, MR, Bratton, B, et al. Congenital teratoma: A clinicopathologic study of 22 fetal and neonatal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(1):29–38. doi: 00000478-200501000-00004 [pii].Google Scholar

Gardiner, HM. In utero intervention for severe congenital heart disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;58:42–54. doi: S1521-6934(19)30003-3 [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gellis, L, Tworetzky, W. The boundaries of fetal cardiac intervention: Expand or tighten? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(6):399–403. doi: S1744-165X(17)30095-1 [pii].Google Scholar

Kovacevic, A, Ohman, A, Tulzer, G, et al. Fetal hemodynamic response to aortic valvuloplasty and postnatal outcome: A European multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(2):221–229. doi: 10.1002/uog.18913 [doi].Google Scholar

Freud, LR, Moon-Grady, A, Escobar-Diaz, MC, et al. Low rate of prenatal diagnosis among neonates with critical aortic stenosis: Insight into the natural history in utero. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):326–332. doi: 10.1002/uog.14667 [doi].Google Scholar

Makikallio, K, McElhinney, DB, Levine, JC, et al. Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation. 2006;113(11):1401–1405. doi: CIRCULATIONAHA.105.588194 [pii].Google Scholar

Tworetzky, W, Wilkins-Haug, L, Jennings, RW, et al. Balloon dilation of severe aortic stenosis in the fetus: Potential for prevention of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Candidate selection, technique, and results of successful intervention. Circulation. 2004;110(15):2125–2131. doi: 01.CIR.0000144357.29279.54 [pii].Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Rome, JJ, Collins, MH, et al. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum: Atrial morphology, pulmonary vascular histopathology and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(2):554–560. doi: S0735-1097(99)00225-9 [pii].Google Scholar

Vlahos, AP, Lock, JE, McElhinney, DB, van der Velde, ME. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact or highly restrictive atrial septum: Outcome after neonatal transcatheter atrial septostomy. Circulation. 2004;109(19):2326–2330. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128690.35860.C5 [doi].Google Scholar

Goltz, D, Lunkenheimer, JM, Abedini, M, et al. Left ventricular obstruction with restrictive inter-atrial communication leads to retardation in fetal lung maturation. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(5):463–470. doi: 10.1002/pd.4559 [doi].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arai, S, Fujii, Y, Kotani, Y, et al. Surgical outcome of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(9):1034–1038. doi: 10.1177/0218492315606581 [doi].Google Scholar

Bichell, D. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(3):833–834. doi: S0003-4975(19)31550-4 [pii].Google Scholar

Salve, GG, Datar, GM, Perumal, G, et al. Impact of high-risk characteristics in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(4):475–484. doi: 10.1177/2150135119852319 [doi].Google Scholar

Vida, VL, Bacha, EA, Larrazabal, A, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact or highly restrictive atrial septum: Surgical experience from a single center. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(2):581–585; discussion 586. doi: S0003-4975(07)00729-1 [pii].Google Scholar

Glatz, JA, Tabbutt, S, Gaynor, JW, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with atrial level restriction in the era of prenatal diagnosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(5):1633–1638. doi: S0003-4975(07)01367-7 [pii].Google Scholar

Gellis, L, Drogosz, M, Lu, M, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of neonatal illness severity in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction with intact or restrictive atrial septum. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(10):788–794. doi: 10.1002/pd.5322 [doi].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Divanovic, A, Hor, K, Cnota, J, et al. Prediction and perinatal management of severely restrictive atrial septum in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction: Clinical experience using pulmonary venous doppler analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(4):988–994. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.043 [doi].Google Scholar

Chaturvedi, RR, Ryan, G, Seed, M, et al. Fetal stenting of the atrial septum: Technique and initial results in cardiac lesions with left atrial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2029–2036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.173 [doi].Google Scholar

Kalish, BT, Tworetzky, W, Benson, CB, et al. Technical challenges of atrial septal stent placement in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(1):77–85. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25098 [doi].Google Scholar

Rogers, LS, Peterson, AL, Gaynor, JW, et al. Mitral valve dysplasia syndrome: A unique form of left-sided heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1381–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.002 [doi].Google Scholar

Vogel, M, McElhinney, DB, Wilkins-Haug, LE, et al. Aortic stenosis and severe mitral regurgitation in the fetus resulting in giant left atrium and hydrops: Pathophysiology, outcomes, and preliminary experience with pre-natal cardiac intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(3):348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.636 [doi].Google Scholar

Ide, T, Miyoshi, T, Kitano, M, et al. Fetal critical aortic stenosis with natural improvement of hydrops fetalis due to spontaneous relief of severe restrictive atrial communication. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(7):1137–1140. doi: 10.1111/jog.12681 [doi].Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, Morris, SA, Espinoza, J, et al. Thulium laser-assisted atrial septal stent placement: First use in fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(3):417–418. doi: 10.1002/uog.20161 [doi].Google Scholar

Tulzer, G, Arzt, W, Franklin, RC, et al. Fetal pulmonary valvuloplasty for critical pulmonary stenosis or atresia with intact septum. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1567–1568. doi: S0140-6736(02)11531-5 [pii].Google Scholar

Gomez Montes, E, Herraiz, I, Mendoza, A, Galindo, A. Fetal intervention in right outflow tract obstructive disease: Selection of candidates and results. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:592403. doi: 10.1155/2012/592403 [doi].Google Scholar

Polat, T, Danisman, N. Pulmonary valvulotomy in a fetus with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: First experience in Turkey. Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2012;14(3):6–11.Google Scholar

Tworetzky, W, McElhinney, DB, Marx, GR, et al. In utero valvuloplasty for pulmonary atresia with hypoplastic right ventricle: Techniques and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3):e510-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2014 [doi].Google Scholar

Roman, KS, Fouron, JC, Nii, M, et al. Determinants of outcome in fetal pulmonary valve stenosis or atresia with intact ventricular septum. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(5):699–703. doi: S0002-9149(06)02277-6 [pii].Google Scholar

Gardiner, HM. In-utero intervention for severe congenital heart disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(1):49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.06.003.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, I, Strizek, B, Menzel, T, et al. Severe pulmonary stenosis or atresia with intact ventricular septum in the fetus: The natural history. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(5):420–428. doi: 10.1159/000502178 [doi].Google Scholar

Marshall, AC, Levine, J, Morash, D, et al. Results of in utero atrial septoplasty in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(11):1023–1028. doi: 10.1002/pd.2114 [doi].Google Scholar

Jaeggi, E, Renaud, C, Ryan, G, Chaturvedi, R. Intrauterine therapy for structural congenital heart disease: Contemporary results and Canadian experience. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016;26(7):639–646. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.04.006 [doi].Google Scholar

Ferschl, MB, Feiner, J, Vu, L, et al. A comparison of spinal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care with local anesthesia in minimally invasive fetal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(2):409–415. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003947 [doi].Google Scholar

McElhinney, DB, Marshall, AC, Wilkins-Haug, LE, et al. Predictors of technical success and postnatal biventricular outcome after in utero aortic valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2009;120(15):1482–1490. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.848994 [doi].Google Scholar

Arzt, W, Wertaschnigg, D, Veit, I, et al. Intrauterine aortic valvuloplasty in fetuses with critical aortic stenosis: Experience and results of 24 procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(6):689–695. doi: 10.1002/uog.8927 [doi].Google Scholar

Galindo, A, Gomez-Montes, E, Gomez, O, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty: Experience and results of two tertiary centers in Spain. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(4):262–270. doi: 10.1159/000460247 [doi].Google Scholar

Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:182–192.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Platt, LD. Maternal hypoxemia and fetal breathing movements. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:758–760.Google Scholar

Boddy, K, Dawes, GS, Fisher, R, et al. Foetal respiratory movements, electrocortical and cardiovascular responses to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia in sheep. J Physiol. 1974;243:599–618.Google Scholar

Natale, R, Clewlow, F, Dawes, GS. Measurement of fetal forelimb movements in the lamb in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:545–551.Google Scholar

Murata, Y, Martin, CB, Jr., Ikenoue, T, et al. Fetal heart rate accelerations and late decelerations during the course of intrauterine death in chronically catheterized rhesus monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:218–223.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Sipes, SL, Wenstrom, K. The effect of fetal age upon normal fetal laboratory values and venous pressure. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:713–718.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:755–763.Google Scholar

Freeman, RK, Anderson, G, Dorchester, W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus nonstress test for primary surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:778–781.Google Scholar

Boehm, FH, Salyer, S, Shah, DM, Vaughn, WK. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:566–568.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:880–884.Google Scholar

Miller, DA, Rabello, YA, Paul, RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:812–817.Google Scholar

Thacker, SB, Berkelman, RL. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum fetal surveillance techniques. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1986;41:121–141.Google Scholar

Pearson, JF, Weaver, JB. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. Br Med J. 1976;1:1305–1307.Google Scholar

Andersen, HF, Johnson, TR, Jr., Flora, JD, Jr., Barclay, ML. Gestational age assessment. II. Prediction from combined clinical observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:770–774.Google Scholar

Neldam, S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well-being. Dan Med Bull. 1983;30:274–278.Google Scholar

O’Neill, E, Thorp, J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:722–730.Google Scholar

Patrick, J, Campbell, K, Carmichael, L, et al. Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:363–371.Google Scholar

Moore, TR, Piacquadio, K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:1075–1080.Google Scholar

Grant, A, Elbourne, D, Valentin, L, Alexander, S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2:345–349.Google Scholar

Mangesi, L, Hofmeyr, GJ, Smith, V, Smyth, RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD004909.Google Scholar

Evertson, LR, Gauthier, RJ, Schifrin, BS, Paul, RH. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;133:29–33.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.Google Scholar

Macones, GA, Hankins, GD, Spong, CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:510–515.Google Scholar

Tan, KH, Smyth, RM, Wei, X. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;CD002963.Google Scholar

Wheeler, T, Murrills, A. Patterns of fetal heart rate during normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978;85:18–27.Google Scholar

Bishop, EH. Fetal acceleration test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:905–909.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML, Gratacos, J, Keegan, KA, Paul, RH. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. VII. The significance of fetal bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:194–198.Google Scholar

Lavin, JP, Jr., Miodovnik, M, Barden, TP. Relationship of nonstress test reactivity and gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:338–344.Google Scholar

Park, MI, Hwang, JH, Cha, KJ, et al. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate parameters by gestational age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;74:157–164.Google Scholar

Sadovsky, G, Nicolaides, KH. Reference ranges for fetal heart rate patterns in normoxaemic nonanaemic fetuses. Fetal Ther. 1989;4:61–68.Google Scholar

Hatjis, CG, Meis, PJ. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern associated with butorphanol administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:377–380.Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007863.Google Scholar

ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68:175–185.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Gaffney, SE, Salinger, LM, et al. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:196–201.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Bondaji, N, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. VIII. The incidence of cerebral palsy in tested and untested perinates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:696–706.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:245–249.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Harman, CR, Morrison, I, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. IV. An analysis of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:703–709.Google Scholar

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;CD006593.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Gaffney, SE, Salinger, LM, et al. The relationships among the fetal biophysical profile, umbilical cord pH, and Apgar scores. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:627–31.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Campbell, WA, Nochimson, DJ, Weinbaum, PJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:527–533.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Fleming, AD, Scorza, WE, et al. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:707–713.Google Scholar

Martin, CB, Jr. Normal fetal physiology and behavior, and adaptive responses with hypoxemia. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:239–242.Google Scholar

Dayal, AK, Manning, FA, Berck, DJ, et al. Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: An eighteen-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1231–1236.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26:557–577,v.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Sabey, P, Jolley, K. Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:694–697.Google Scholar

Rutherford, SE, Phelan, JP, Smith, CV, Jacobs, N. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:353–356.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Lange, IR, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. I. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:343–350.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Menticoglou, S, Harman, CR, et al. Antepartum fetal risk assessment: the role of the fetal biophysical profile score. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;1:55–72.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7:146–149.Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Baschat, AA. A uniform management approach to optimize outcome in fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015;42:275–288.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD007529.Google Scholar

Berkley, E, Chauhan, SP, Abuhamad, A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:300–308.Google Scholar

DeVore, GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:5–15.Google Scholar

Dunn, L, Sherrell, H, Review, Kumar S. Systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2017;54:68–75.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Morales-Rosello, J, Townsend, R, et al. Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:74–80.Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Miller, JL, Block-Abraham, D, Baschat, AA. Ductus venosus Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular health: an updated practical approach. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:635–644.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Harman, CR. Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13:161–168.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, S, Tulzer, G, Huhta, JC, Marsal, K. Venous Doppler in the fetus with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:262–267.Google Scholar

Hofstaetter, C, Dubiel, M, Gudmundsson, S. Two types of umbilical venous pulsations and outcome of high-risk pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2001;61:111–117.Google Scholar

Erskine, RL, Ritchie, JW. Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal and growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:605–610.Google Scholar

Giles, WB, Trudinger, BJ, Baird, PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:31–38.Google Scholar

Reuwer, PJ, Bruinse, HW, Stoutenbeek, P, Haspels, AA. Doppler assessment of the fetoplacental circulation in normal and growth-retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984;18:199–205.Google Scholar

Devoe, LD, Gardner, P, Dear, C, Faircloth, D. The significance of increasing umbilical artery systolic-diastolic ratios in third-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:684–687.Google Scholar

Giles, W, Bisits, A. Clinical use of Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy: information from six randomised trials. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;8:247–255.Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Tian, Z, Cohen, MS, et al. Acute cardiovascular effects of fetal surgery in the human. Circulation. 2004;110:1549–1556.Google Scholar

Howley, L, Wood, C, Patel, SS, et al. Flow patterns in the ductus arteriosus during open fetal myelomeningocele repair. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:564–570.Google Scholar