Select bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anatomy of Flowering PlantsAn Introduction to Plant Structure and Development, pp. 122 - 134Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Select bibliography
Ahl, LI, Mravec, J, Jørgensen, B, Rudall, PJ and Rønsted, N. 2019. Polysaccharide composition of folded cell walls in drought-stressed succulent Aloe species. Plant Cell and Environment 42: 2458–2471.Google Scholar
Ambrose, BA, Lerner, DR, Ciceri, P, Padilla, CM, Yanofsky, MF and Schmidt, RJ. 2000. Molecular and genetic analyses of the silky1 gene reveals conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Molecular Cell 5: 569–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angyalossy, V, Pace, MR, Evert, RF, Marcati, CR, Oskolski, AA, Terrazas, T, Kotina, E, Lens, F, Mazzoni-Viveiros, SC, Angeles, G, Machado, SR, Crivellaro, A, Rao, KS, Junikka, L, Nikolaeva, N and Baas, P. 2016. IAWA list of microscopic bark features. IAWA Journal 37: 517–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, A. 1925. Monocotyledons: a morphological study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Avery, GS. 1933. Structure and development of the tobacco leaf. American Journal of Botany 20: 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, IW and Swamy, BGL. 1951. The conduplicate carpel of dicotyledons and its initial trends of specialization. American Journal of Botany 38: 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, PW. 1975. The root cap. Pp. 21–54 in: Torrey, JG, CIarkson, DT, eds. The development and form of roots. Academic Press, New York, USA, and London, UK.Google Scholar
Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W, Neinhuis, C, Cutler, DF, Ditsch, F, Meusel, I, Theisen, I and Wilhelmi, H. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 237–260.Google Scholar
Bateman, RM, Hilton, J and Rudall, PJ. 2006. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches to inferring the likely characteristics of the first flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 3471–3503.Google Scholar
Behnke, HD. 1991. Distribution and evolution of forms and types of sieve tube plastids in the dicotyledons. Aliso 13: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, S, Wortley, AH, Skvarla, JJ and Rowley, JR. 2007. Pollen wall development in flowering plants. New Phytologist 174: 483–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesewinkel, FD and Bouman, F. 1984. The seed: structure. Pp. 567–610 in: Johri, BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Boke, NH. 1951. Histogenesis of the vegetative shoot in Echinocereus. American Journal of Botany 38: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodribb, TJ and Feild, TS. 2010. Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification. Ecology Letters 13: 175–183.Google Scholar
Bünning, E. 1952. Morphogenesis in plants. Pp. 105–140 in: Avery, GS, ed. Survey of biological progress II. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Casson, SA and Lindsey, K. 2003. Genes and signalling in root development. New Phytologist 158: 11–38.Google Scholar
Choat, B, Cobb, AR and Jansen, S. 2008. Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytologist 177: 608–626.Google Scholar
Clowes, FAL. 1994. Origin of the epidermis in root meristems. New Phytologist 127: 335–347.Google Scholar
Conklin, PA, Strable, J, Li, S and Scanlon, MJ. 2019. On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves. New Phytologist 221: 706–724.Google Scholar
Corner, EJH. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Crespi, M and Frugier, F. 2008. De novo organ formation from differentiated cells: root nodule organogenesis. Science Signaling 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Cronk, QCB. 2009. The molecular organography of plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, WG. 1996. Anthers and stamens and what they do. Pp. 1–24 in: D’Arcy, WG, Keating, RC, eds. The anther: form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Datta, S, Kim, CM, Pernas, M, Pires, ND, Proust, H, Tam, T, Vijayakumar, P and Dolan, L. 2011. Root hairs: development, growth and evolution at the plant-soil interface. Plant Soil 346: 1–14.Google Scholar
Davis, GL. 1967. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London, UK.Google Scholar
DeMason, DA. 1983. The primary thickening meristem: definition and function in monocotyledons. American Journal of Botany 70: 955–962.Google Scholar
Diggle, PK and DeMason, DA. 1983. The relationship between the primary thickening meristem and the secondary thickening meristem in Yucca whipplei Torr. II. Ontogenetic relationship within the vegetative stem. American Journal of Botany 70: 1205–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, AJ and MacDaniels, LH. 1925. An introduction to plant anatomy. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Edwards, EJ. 2019. Evolutionary trajectories, accessibility and other metaphors: the case of C4 and CAM photosynthesis. New Phytologist 223: 1742–1755.Google Scholar
Endress, PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary trends in tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Endress, PK. 2001. The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 111–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, PK. 2011. Evolutionary diversification of the flowers in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 98: 370–396.Google Scholar
Erbar, C. 2014. Nectar secretion and nectaries in basal angiosperms, magnoliids and non-core eudicots and a comparison with core eudicots. Plant Diversity and Evolution 131: 63–143.Google Scholar
Evert, RF. 2006. Meristems, cells and tissues of the plant body: their structure, function and development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Feldman, LJ. 1984. The development and dynamics of the root apical meristem. American Journal of Botany 71: 1308–1314.Google Scholar
Foster, AS. 1956. Plant idioblasts; remarkable examples of cell specialisation. Protoplasma 46: 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, AS and Gifford, EM. 1989. Comparative morphology of vascular plants. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Furness, CA and Rudall, PJ. 2001. The tapetum in basal angiosperms: early diversity. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 375–392.Google Scholar
Furness, CA and Rudall, PJ. 2003. Apertures with lids: distribution and significance of operculate pollen in monocots. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 835–854.Google Scholar
Furness, CA and Rudall, PJ. 2004. Pollen aperture evolution – a crucial factor for eudicot success? Trends in Plant Science 9: 1360–1385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furness, CA, Rudall, PJ and Sampson, FB. 2002. Evolution of microsporogenesis in angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatis, B and Apostolakos, P. 2004. The role of the cytoskeleton in morphogenesis and function of stomatal complexes. New Phytologist 161: 613–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, SB, Waller, RF and McFadden, GI. 2008. Plastid evolution. Annual Reviews in Plant Biology 59: 491–517.Google Scholar
Graven, P, De Koster, CG, Boon, JJ and Bouman, F. 1996. Structure and macromolecular composition of the seed coat of the Musaceae. Annals of Botany 77: 105–122.Google Scholar
Groh, B, Hübner, C and Lendzian, KJ. 2002. Water and oxygen permeance of phellems isolated from trees: the role of waxes and lenticels. Planta 215: 794–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grootjen, CJ and Bouman, F. 1988. Seed structure in Cannaceae: taxonomic and ecological implications. Annals of Botany 61: 363–371.Google Scholar
Hagemann, W and Gleissberg, S. 1996. Organogenetic capacity of leaves: the significance of marginal blastozones in angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 199: 121–152.Google Scholar
Heimsch, C and Seago, JL. 2008. Organization of the root apical meristem in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 95: 1–21.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1968. Wall development within the microspore tetrad of Lilium longiflorum. Canadian Journal of Botany 46: 1185–1192.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1987. Pollen germination and pollen-tube growth. International Reviews in Cytology 107: 1–78.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J and Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1982. The specialized cuticles of the receptive surfaces of angiosperm stigmas. Pp. 27–37 in: Cutler, DF, Alvin, KL, Price, CE, eds. The plant cuticle. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, Y and Shivanna, KR. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41: 1233–1258.Google Scholar
Hickey, LJ. 1973. A classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60: 17–33.Google Scholar
Horner, HT and Arnott, HJ. 1966. Histochemical and ultrastructural study of pre- and post-germinated Yucca seeds. Botanical Gazette 127: 48–64.Google Scholar
Howard, RA. 1974. The stem-node-leaf continuum of the Dicotyledonae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 125–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, LJ and Cameron, DD. 2009. You are what you eat: interactions between root parasitic plants and their hosts. Advances in Botanical Research 50: 87–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, E, Verbelen, JP and Vissenberg, K. 2014. Review on shape formation in epidermal pavement cells of the Arabidopsis leaf. Functional Plant Biology 41: 914–921.Google Scholar
Janssen, BJ, Lund, L and Sinha, N. 1998. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LET6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiology 117: 771–786.Google Scholar
Jarvis, MC, Briggs, SPH and Knox, JP. 2003. Intercellular adhesion and cell separation in plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 977–989.Google Scholar
Jernstedt, J. 1984. Root contraction in hyacinth. I. Effects of IAA on differential cell expansion. American Journal of Botany 71: 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, SD and Edwards, TJ. 2000. The structure and function of orchid pollinaria. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 243–269.Google Scholar
Kaplan, DR. 1973. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons. Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 437–457.Google Scholar
Kaplan, DR. 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Botanische Jahrbücher 95: 1–105.Google Scholar
Kauff, F, Rudall, PJ and Conran, JG. 2000. Systematic root anatomy of Asparagales and other monocotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, QON, Daoud, HS and Stirton, CH. 1981. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, EA. 2001. Evolutionary history of the grasses. Plant Physiology 125: 1198–1205.Google Scholar
Knox, RB. 1984. The pollen grain. Pp. 197–272 in: Johri, BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Kutschera, U. 2008. The growing outer epidermal wall: design and physiological role of a composite structure. Annals of Botany 101: 615–621.Google Scholar
Larsen, PR. 1984. The role of subsidiary trace bundles in stem and leaf development of the Dicotyledonae. Pp. 109–143 in: White, RA, Dickison, WC, eds. Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Lawson, T. 2009. Guard cell photosynthesis and stomatal function. New Phytologist 181: 13–34.Google Scholar
Lee, K and Seo, PJ. 2018. Dynamic epigenetic changes during plant regeneration. Trends in Plant Science 23: 235–247.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An introduction to the embryology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, P. 1975. Evolution of the laticifer in Euphorbia as interpreted from starch grain morphology. American Journal of Botany 62: 577–583.Google Scholar
Markmann, K and Parniske, M. 2008. Evolution of root endosymbiosis with bacteria: how novel are nodules? Trends in Plant Science 14: 77–86.Google Scholar
McCully, ME. 1975. The development of lateral roots. Pp. 105–124 in: Torrey, JG, Clarkson, DT, eds. The development and function of roots. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Merckx, VSFT. 2013. Mycoheterotrophy: the biology of plants living on fungi. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Müller, HM, Schäfer, N, Bauer, H, Geiger, D, Lautner, S, Fromm, J, Riederer, M, Bueno, A, Nussbaumer, T, Mayer, K, Alquraishi, SA, Alfarhan, AH, Neher, E, Al‐Rasheid, KAS, Ache, P and Hedrich, R. 2017. The desert plant Phoenix dactylifera closes stomata via nitrate-regulated SLAC1 anion channel. New Phytologist 216: 150–162.Google Scholar
Mustafa, A, Ensikat, HJ and Weigend, M. 2018. Stinging hair morphology and wall biomineralization across five plant families: conserved morphology versus divergent cell wall composition. American Journal of Botany 105: 1–14.Google Scholar
Nadeau, JA and Sack, FD. 2002. Stomatal development in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis Book 1: e0066.Google Scholar
Natesh, S and Rau, MA. 1984. The embryo. Pp. 377–444 in: Johri, BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Nezhad, AS and Geitmann, A. 2013. The cellular mechanics of an invasive lifestyle. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 4709–4728.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, DJ. 1982. Pearl bodies as ant food: an ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica 14: 40–49.Google Scholar
Pacini, E, Franchi, GG and Hesse, M. 1985. The tapetum: its form, function and possible phylogeny in Embryophyta. Plant Systematics and Evolution 149: 155–185.Google Scholar
Parre, E and Geitmann, A. 2005. More than a leak sealant: the mechanical properties of callose in pollen tubes. Plant Physiology 137: 274–286.Google Scholar
Pate, JS and Gunning, BES. 1972. Transfer cells. Annual Reviews in Plant Physiology 23: 173–196.Google Scholar
Payne, WW. 1979. Stomatal patterns in embryophytes: their evolution, ontogeny and interpretation. Taxon 28: 117–132.Google Scholar
Péret, B, De Rybel, B, Casimiro, I, Benková, E, Swarup, R, Laplaze, L, Beeckman, T and Bennett, MJ. 2009. Arabidopsis lateral root development: an emerging story. Trends in Plant Science 14: 399–408.Google Scholar
Prychid, CJ, Rudall, PJ and Gregory, M. 2003. Systematics and biology of silica bodies in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 69: 377–440.Google Scholar
Punt, W, Blackmore, S, Nilsson, S and Le Thomas, A. 1994. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. LPP Foundation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Radja, A, Horsley, EM, Lavrentovich, MO and Sweeney, AM. 2019. Pollen cell wall patterns form from modulated phases. Cell 176: 856–868.Google Scholar
Reeder, JR. 1957. The embryo in grass systematics. American Journal of Botany 44: 756–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiser, L and Fischer, RL. 1993. The ovule and the embryo sac. The Plant Cell 5: 1291–1301.Google Scholar
Remizowa, MV, Sokoloff, DD and Rudall, PJ. 2010. Evolutionary history of the monocot flower. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 97: 617–645.Google Scholar
Ronse De Craene, LP. 2010. Floral diagrams. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 1987. Laticifers in Euphorbiaceae – a conspectus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 143–163.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 1991. Lateral meristems and stem thickening growth in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 57: 150–163.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 1994. Laticifers in Crotonoideae (Euphorbiaceae): homology and evolution. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 270–282.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 1997. The nucellus and chalaza in monocotyledons: structure and systematics. Botanical Review 63: 140–184.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 2002. Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectaries in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, PJ. 2010. All in a spin: centrifugal organ formation and floral patterning. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 108–114.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ and Buzgo, M. 2002. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf. Pp. 432–458 in: Cronk, QCB, Bateman, RM, Hawkins, J, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ and Clark, L. 1992. The megagametophyte in Labiatae. Pp. 65–84 in: Harley, RM, Reynolds, TR, eds. Advances in Labiate Science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ, Hilton, J and Bateman, RM. 2013. Several developmental and morphogenetic factors govern the evolution of stomatal patterning in land plants. New Phytologist 200: 598–614.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ, Julier, ACM and Kidner, CA. 2018. Ultrastructure and development of non-contiguous stomatal clusters and helicocytic patterning in Begonia. Annals of Botany 122: 767–776.Google ScholarPubMed
Rudall, PJ, Prychid, CJ and Gregory, T. 2014. Epidermal patterning and silica phytoliths in grasses: an evolutionary history. Botanical Review 80: 59–71.Google Scholar
Rudall, PJ, Stuppy, W, Cunniff, J, Kellogg, EA and Briggs, BG. 2005. Evolution of reproductive structures in grasses (Poaceae) inferred by sister-group comparison with their putative closest living relatives, Ecdeiocoleaceae. American Journal of Botany 92: 1432–1443.Google Scholar
Runions, A and Tsiantis, M. 2017. The shape of things to come: from typology to predictive models for leaf diversity. American Journal of Botany 104: 1437–1441.Google Scholar
Ryding, O. 2001. Myxocarpy in the Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) with notes on myxodiaspory in general. Systematics and Geography of Plants 71: 503–514.Google Scholar
Sack, FD. 1987. The development and structure of stomata. Pp. 59–89 in: Zeiger, E, Farquhar, GD, Cowan, IR, eds. Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA.Google Scholar
Sack, S and Scoffoni, C. 2013. Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. New Phytologist 198: 983–1000.Google Scholar
Sage, RF. 2004. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. New Phytologist 161: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, FB. 2000. Pollen diversity in some modern magnoliids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S193–S210.Google Scholar
Sapala, A, Runions, A, Routier-Kierzkowska, AL, Das Gupta, M, Hong, L, Hofhuis, H, Verger, S, Mosca, G, Li, CB, Hay, A, Hamant, O, Roeder, AHK, Tsiantis, M, Prusinkiewicz, P and Smith, RS. 2018. Why plants make puzzle cells, and how their shape emerges. eLife 7: e32794.Google Scholar
Shishkoff, N. 1987. Distribution of the dimorphic hypodermis of roots in angiosperm families. Annals of Botany 60: 1–15.Google Scholar
Skinner, DJ, Hill, TA and Gasser, CS. 2004. Regulation of ovule development. The Plant Cell 16: S32–S45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicer, R and Groover, A. 2010. Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth. New Phytologist 186: 577–592.Google Scholar
Steeves, TA and Sussex, IM. 1989. Patterns in plant development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Stevenson, DW. 1980. Radial growth in Beaucarnea recurvata. American Journal of Botany 67: 476–489.Google Scholar
Stevenson, DW and Fisher, JB. 1980. The developmental relationship between primary and secondary thickening growth in Cordyline (Agavaceae). Botanical Gazette 141: 264–268.Google Scholar
Stewart, WN and Rothwell, GW. 1993. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Stone, DE, Seller, SC and Kress, WJ. 1979. Ontogeny of exineless pollen in Heliconia, a banana relative. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 701–730.Google Scholar
Stuppy, W and Kesseler, R. 2011. Fruit: edible, inedible, incredible. Papadakis, London, UK.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, K, Jiao, Y and Meyerowitz, EM. 2010. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Developmental Cell 18: 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, AW. 2000. Division decisions and the spatial regulation of cytokinesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 58–66.Google Scholar
Tilton, VR and Horner, HT. 1980. Stigma, style and obturator of Ornithogalum caudatum (Liliaceae) and their function in the reproductive process. American Journal of Botany 67: 1113–1131.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, PB and Zimmerman, MH. 1969. Vascular anatomy of monocotyledons with secondary growth – an introduction. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50: 159–179.Google Scholar
Tucker, SC. 1972. The role of ontogenetic evidence in floral morphology. Pp. 359–369 in: Murty, YF, Johri, BM, Moham Ram, YY, Varghese, TM, eds. Advances in plant morphology. Sarita Prakashan, Meerut, India.Google Scholar
Tucker, SC. 1975. Carpellary vasculature and the ovular vascular supply in Drimys. American Journal of Botany 62: 191–197.Google Scholar
Uhl, NW and Moore, HE. 1977. Centrifugal stamen initiation in phytelephantoid palms. American Journal of Botany 64: 1152–1161.Google Scholar
Van Bel, AJE, Ehlers, K and Knoblauch, M. 2002. Sieve elements caught in the act. Trends in Plant Science 7: 126–132.Google Scholar
Vignolini S, MP Davey, RM Bateman, PJ Rudall, E Moyroud, J Tratt, S Malmgren, U Steiner and Glover, BJ. 2012. The mirror crack’d: both structure and pigment contribute to the intense blue colour of the labellum of Ophrys speculum. New Phytologist 196: 1038–1047.Google Scholar
Vignolini, S, Thomas, MM, Kolle, M, Wenzel, T, Rowland, A, Rudall, PJ, Baumberg, JJ, Glover, BJ and Steiner, U. 2012. Directional scattering from the glossy flower of Ranunuculus: how the buttercup lights up your chin. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9: 1295–1301.Google Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, MR and Prabhakar, K. 1984. The endosperm. Pp. 319–376 in: Johri, BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1990. The role of scent glands in pollination: on the structure and function of osmophores. Amerind, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Volkov, AG, Carrell, H, Baldwin, A and Markin, VS. 2009. Electrical memory in Venus flytrap. Bioelectrochemistry 75: 142–147.Google Scholar
Warner, KA, Rudall, PJ and Frohlich, MW. 2009. Environmental control of sepalness and petalness in perianth organs of waterlilies – a new Mosaic Theory on the evolutionary origin of a differentiated perianth. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 3559–3574.Google Scholar
Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Werker, E. 2000. Trichome diversity and development. Advances in Botanical Research 31: 1–35.Google Scholar
West, MAL and Harada, JJ. 1993. Embryogenesis in higher plants: an overview. The Plant Cell 5: 1361–1369.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, HP. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf). Pp. 97–117 in: Metcalfe, CR, Chalk, L, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2nd ed., Vol I. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Willemse, MTM and Van Went, JL. 1984. The female gametophyte. Pp. 159–196 in: Johri, BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Williams, JH. 2008. Novelties of the flowering plant pollen tube underlie diversification of a key life history stage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 11259–11263.Google Scholar
Yadegari, R and Drews, GN. 2004. Female gametophyte development. The Plant Cell 16: S133–S141.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, T, Yano, S and Tsukaya, H. 2010. Genetic framework for flattened leaf blade formation in unifacial leaves of Juncus prismatocarpus. The Plant Cell 22: 2141–2155.Google Scholar
Yanga, X, Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC and Huang, Z. 2012. More than just a coating: ecological importance, taxonomic occurrence and phylogenetic relationships of seed coat mucilage. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14: 434–442.Google Scholar
Yeung, EC and Meinke, DW. 1993. Embryogenesis in angiosperms: development of the suspensor. The Plant Cell 5: 1361–1369.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, MH and Tomlinson, PB. 1972. The vascular system of monocotyledonous stems. Botanical Gazette 133: 141–155.Google Scholar