Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T05:11:01.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Pierre Demeulenaere
Edited by
Pierre Demeulenaere
Pierre Demeulenaere
Affiliation:
University of Paris-Sorbonne
Pierre Demeulenaere
Affiliation:
Université de Paris IV
Get access

Summary

Why should we introduce the notion of “analytical sociology” into the field of sociology, and why should it be linked to the concept of “mechanism”?

I do not believe there to be any great need to introduce new paradigms into a discipline already encumbered with so many antagonizing trends, schools and paradigms. Analytical sociology should not therefore be seen as a manifesto for one particular way of doing sociology as compared with others, but as an effort to clarify (“analytically”) theoretical and epistemological principles which underlie any satisfactory way of doing sociology (and, in fact, any social science). The social sciences already command a considerable stock of substantive descriptions and explanations; and some of the alternatives to these are either redundant, or resistant to proof, even false or imprecise, quite regardless of their status with respect to one or other established paradigm. Analytical sociology should seek to define a set of sound epistemological and methodological principles underlying all previously established and reliable sociological findings. The aim of analytical sociology is to clarify the basic epistemological, theoretical and methodological principles fundamental to the development of sound description and explanation.

The recurrent use of the term “analytical” in sociology derives mainly from the accepted notion of “analyticity,” designating a division into basic elements, the difficulty being in the determination of these clear-cut basic elements, since such division is not universally accepted – recently the notion of “holism” has been associated with a refusal to accept such a separation (see, for example, Demeulenaere 2000; Descombes 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms , pp. 1 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2007. “Mechanisms and relations,” Sociologica 2.Google Scholar
Barbera, Filippo. 2004. Meccanismi Sociali; Elementi di sociologia analitica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, J. and Stovel, K.. 2004. “Chains of affection: the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks,” American Journal of Sociology 110: 44–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Nicolas. 2010. “Sociologie analytique, mécanismes et causalité: Histoire d'une relation complexe,” L'Année Sociologique 60(2): 421–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1998. Etudes sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 2001. The Origin of Values. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario A. 1997. “Mechanism and explanation,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27: 410–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. “Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(3): 371–81.Google Scholar
Cherkaoui, Mohamed. 2005. Invisible Codes. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1986. “Social theory, social research, and a theory of action,” American Journal of Sociology 91: 1309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (ed.) 2000. Normativity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Demeulenaere, Pierre. 2000. “Individualism and holism: new controversies in philosophy of social sciences,” Mind and Society 2(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descombes, Vincent. 1996. Les institutions du sens. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1999. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2007. Explaining Social Behaviour. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2009. Le désintéressement. Traité critique de l'homme économique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Fararo, Thomas J. 1989. The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology. Tradition and Formalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2009. “A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms,” American Sociological Review 74: 358–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1972. The Philosophies of Science. An Introductory Survey. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 2001. “What have we learned about the emergence of norms?” in Hechter, Michael and Opp, Karl-Dieter (eds.), Social Norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 394–416.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Bearman, Peter. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Edling, Christopher. 2009. “Tocqueville and analytical sociology,” in Cherkaoui, Mohamed and Hamilton, Peter (eds.), Raymond Boudon. A Life in Sociology. Essays in Honour of Raymond Boudon. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.) 1998. Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hedström, Peter and Udéhn, Lars. 2009. “Analytical sociology and theories of the middle range,” in Hedström, Peter and Bearman, Peter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press, 25–47.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1967. The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Homans, George C. 1984. Coming to My Senses. The Autobiography of a Sociologist. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1987. “Behaviourism and after,” in Giddens, Anthony and Turner, Jonathan (eds.), Social Theory Today. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 58–81.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1989. “Explanatory unification and causal structure,” in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 13. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 410–505.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 2009. “The heterogeneous social: new thinking about the foundations of the social sciences,” in Chrysostomos, Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press, 154–78.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos. 2005. Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzo, Gianluca. 2010. “Analytical sociology and its critics,” European Journal of Sociology 51(1): 129–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, Carl. 1996 [1883]. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. Grove City: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, S.L. and Winship, C.. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 2005. “Explanations by mechanisms in the social sciences. Problems, advantages, and alternatives,” Mind and Society 4(2): 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platts, Mark. 1979. Ways of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis. 2002. Causation and Explanation. Montreal and Kingston, Ithaca: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2000. “Explaining normativity: on rationality and the justification of reason,” in Dancy, Jonathan (ed.), Normativity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. 1998. Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 6(4): 317–44.
Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1991. “The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social sciences,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21(3): 367–88. Reprinted in Aage B. Sørensen and Seymour Spilerman (eds.). 1993. Social Theory and Social Policy: Essays in Honor of James S. Coleman. Westport: Praeger, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udéhn, Lars. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J.W.N. 1957. “Historical explanation in the social sciences,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8: 104–17. Reprinted in P. Gardiner (ed.) 1959. Theories of History. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippler, R. 1978. “The structural-individualistic approach in Dutch sociology,” The Netherlands Journal of Sociology 14: 135–55.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Pierre Demeulenaere, Université de Paris IV
  • Book: Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921315.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Pierre Demeulenaere, Université de Paris IV
  • Book: Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921315.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Pierre Demeulenaere, Université de Paris IV
  • Book: Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921315.001
Available formats
×