Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
17 - Cognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
Summary
Outlines the broad field of cognition, focusing on several key concepts driving research in the study of language in the mind: conceptual metaphor, metonymy, blending, and force-dynamics.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 292 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
17.5 References
Antović, M. (2018). Waging war against oneself: A conceptual blend at the heart of Christian ascetic practice. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, Language, and the Human Mind (pp. 386–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biernacka, E. (2013). The role of metonymy in political discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2017). Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2018). Hoc est corpus: Deixis and the integration of ritual space. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, Language, and the Human Mind (pp. 407–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics Society of Korea (eds.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–37). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W., & Santa Cruz, M. J. (2012). Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 299–311.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Dabrowska, E. & Divjak, D. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Howe, B., & Green, J. B. (eds.). (2014). Cognitive Linguistic Explorations in Biblical Studies. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, H. (2018). Snakes, leaves, and poisoned arrows: Metaphors of emotion in early Buddhism. In Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M. (eds.), Religion, Language, and the Human Mind (pp. 210–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2011). The biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In Brdar, M., Gries, S. T. & Fuchs, M. Z. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion (pp. 325–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought, and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, F. (2019). Meet the evangelists saving souls in Wall Street. Catholic Herald. https://catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2019/05/13/meet-the-evangelists-saving-souls-in-wall-street/.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2018). Religious Talk Online: The Evangelical Discourse of Muslims, Christians, and Atheists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. & Mueller, C. (2019). Moving yet being still: Exploring source domain reversal and force in explanations of enlightenment. Language and Cognition, 11, 310–39.Google Scholar
Richardson, P., & Nagashima, M. (2018). Perceptions of danger and co-occurring metaphors in Buddhist dhamma talks and Christian sermons. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 133–54.Google Scholar
Silvestre-López, A. J. (2016). The discourse of mindfulness: What language reveals about the mindfulness experience. In Ordóñez-López, P. & Edo-Marzá, N. (eds.), New Insights into the Analysis of Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and popular Settings (pp. 173–98). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Van Wolde, E. (2014). Cognitive grammar at work in Sodom and Gomorrah. In Howe, B., & Green, J. B. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Explorations in Biblical Studies (pp. 193–223). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2009). Buddhism of the Heart: Reflections on Shin Buddhism and Inner Togetherness. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
Zaimov, S. (2016). Theologian Norman Geisler explains how America abandoned God, and what it can do to reclaim His favor. www.christianpost.com/news/theologian-norman-geisler-explains-how-america-abandoned-god-what-it-can-do-reclaim-his-favor.html, www.christianpost.com/news/theologian-norman-geisler-explains-how-america-abandoned-god-what-it-can-do-reclaim-his-favor.html.Google Scholar