Book contents
- The Analogy between States and International Organizations
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 138
- The Analogy between States and International Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Select Table of Key Documents
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Case for an Analogy
- Part II Objections to the Analogy
- Part III Limits of the Analogy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2018
Book contents
- The Analogy between States and International Organizations
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 138
- The Analogy between States and International Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Select Table of Key Documents
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Case for an Analogy
- Part II Objections to the Analogy
- Part III Limits of the Analogy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Analogy between States and International Organizations , pp. 246 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abi-Saab, G. ‘La Commission du Droit International, la codification et le processus de formation de droit international’ in United Nations, Making Better International Law: Proceedings of the United Nations Colloquium on Progressive Development and Codification of International Law (1998)Google Scholar
Ahlborn, C. ‘The rules of international organizations and the law of international responsibility’ (2012) 8 IOLR 397Google Scholar
Akande, D. ‘International organizations’ in Evans, M. (ed.), International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Alland, D. ‘The definition of countermeasures’ in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Oleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. ‘Book review: international organisations and their exercise of sovereign powers’ (2007) 101 AJIL 674Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C. F. Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C. F. ‘International legal personality revisited’ (1995) 47 Austrian Journal of Public and International Law 123Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C. F. ‘Liability to third parties of member states of international organizations: practice, principle and judicial precedent’ (1991) 85 AJIL 259Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G. ‘International law and interindividual law’ in Nijman, J. and Nollkaemper, A. (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Bankowski, Z. ‘Analogical reasoning and legal institutions’ in Nerhot, P. (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Analogy: Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991)Google Scholar
Beaulac, S. ‘An inquiry into the international rule of law’ (2007), EUI Max Weber Programme Series, Working Paper No. 2007/14 <http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/6957> accessed 11 Feb 2017+accessed+11+Feb+2017>Google Scholar
Berman, F. ‘The ILC within the UN’s legal framework: its relationship with the Sixth Committee’ (2007) 49 GYIL 107Google Scholar
Besson, S. ‘Theorizing the sources of international law’ in Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Bianchi, A. ‘Epistemic communities’ in D’Aspremont, J. and Singh, S., (eds.), Concepts for International Law (forthcoming with Edward Elgar, 2018)Google Scholar
Blokker, N. ‘International organizations and customary international law: is the international law commission taking international organizations seriously?’ (2017) 14 IOLR 1Google Scholar
Blokker, N. ‘Member State responsibility for wrongdoings of international organizations: beacon of hope or delusion?’ (2015) 12 IOLR 319Google Scholar
Blokker, N. ‘Preparing articles on responsibility of international organizations: does the International Law Commission take international organizations seriously? A mid-term review’ in Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011)Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. ‘Non liquet and the incompleteness of international law’ in Charzournes, B. and Sands, P. (eds.), International law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Bogdandy, A., Damm, P. and Goldmann, M., ‘Developing the publicness of public international law: towards a legal framework for global governance activities’ in von Bogdandy, A. and others (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Heidelberg: Springer, 2010)Google Scholar
Bordin, F .L. ‘Reflections of customary international law: the authority of codification conventions and ILC draft articles in international law’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 535Google Scholar
Bordin, F .L. ‘Continuation of membership in the United Nations revisited: lessons from fifteen years of inconsistency in the jurisprudence of the ICJ’ (2011) 10 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 315Google Scholar
Bothe, M. ‘The WHO request’ in Charzournes, B. and Sands, P. (eds.), International law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Brewer, S. ‘Exemplary reasoning: semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by analogy’ (1996) 109 HLR 923Google Scholar
Brölmann, C. The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organizations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart, 2005)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C. ‘The 1986 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: the history of draft article 36bis’ in Klabbers, J. (ed.), Essays on the Law of Treaties (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1996)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C. ‘Member states and international legal responsibility: developments of the institutional veil’ (2015) 12 IOLR 358Google Scholar
Brownlie, I. ‘The responsibility of states for the acts of international organisations’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2005)Google Scholar
Byers, M. ‘Abuse of rights: an old principle, a new age’ (2002) 47 McGill Law Journal 339Google Scholar
Canaris, K. W. Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz: Entwickelt am Beispiel des deutschen Privatrechts (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1983)Google Scholar
Cançado Trindade, A. A. The Access of Individuals to International Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Chinkin, C. Third Parties in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (ed.). Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Chance, order, change: the course of international law’ (2013) 365 RdC 13Google Scholar
Crawford, J. State Responsibility: General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Sovereignty as a legal value’ in Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Companion of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge, 2012)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J. ‘Abuse of legal personality of international organizations and the responsibility of member States’ (2007) IOLR 91Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J. and Dopagne, F. ‘Kadi: The ECJ’s reminder of the elementary divide between legal orders’ (2008) 5 IOLR 371Google Scholar
Daillier, P., Forteau, M. and Pellet, A. Droit International Public, 8th edn (Paris: LGDJ, 2009)Google Scholar
Dannenbaum, T. ‘Dual attribution in the context of military operations’ (2015) 12 IOLR 401Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K. ‘How and why international law binds international organizations’ (2016) 57 Harvard International Law Journal 325Google Scholar
David, E. ‘Article 34’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P., (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, v. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Dugard, J. ‘The secession of states and their recognition in the wake of Kosovo’ (2013) 375 RdC 9Google Scholar
Dugard, J. ‘How effective is the International Law Commission in the development of international law? A critique of the ILC on the occasion of its fiftieth anniversary’ (1998) 23 South African Journal of International Law 33Google Scholar
Dupuy, R. J. ‘Coutume sage et coutume sauvage’ in Bastid, S., (ed.), Mélanges Offerts à Charles Rousseau: La Communauté Internationale (Paris: Pedone, 1974)Google Scholar
Engisch, K. Einführung in das juristische Denken, 2nd edn (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1959)Google Scholar
Facsaneanu, L. ‘Le droit interne de l’Organisation des Nations Unies’ (1957) III Annuaire Français de Droit International 319Google Scholar
Feldman, D. ‘Monism, dualism and constitutional legitimacy’ (1999) 20 Australian Year Book of International Law 105Google Scholar
Fennessy, J. G. ‘The 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character’ (1976) 70 AJIL 62Google Scholar
Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The general principles of international law considered from the standpoint of the rule of law’ (1957) 92 RdC 1Google Scholar
Forni, F. ‘Diplomatic protection in EU law: what’s new under the sun?’ (2014) 9 The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 150Google Scholar
Franck, T. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Fry, J. ‘Assumption of Responsibility’ in Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalor, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Gaillard, E. and Pingel-Lenuzza, I. ‘International organisations and immunity from jurisdiction: to restrict or to bypass’ (2002) 51 ICLQ 1Google Scholar
Gaja, G. ‘A “new” Vienna Convention on Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations: a critical commentary’ (1988) BYIL 253Google Scholar
Geslin, A. ‘Réflexions sur la repartition de la responsabilité entre l’organisation internationale et ses etats membres’ (2005) 109 RGDIP 539Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P. Legal Traditions of the World, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Glick, R. ‘Lip service to the laws of war: humanitarian law and United Nations armed forces’ (1995–96) 17 Michigan Journal of International Law 53Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. and Levinson, D. ‘Law for States: international law, constitutional law, public law’ (2009) 122 HLR 1791Google Scholar
Hafner, G. ‘Is the topic of responsibility of international organizations ripe for codification? Some critical remarks’ in Fastenrath, U. and others (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Hahn, H .J. ‘Euratom: The Conception of an International Personality’ (1958) 71 HLR 1001Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. ‘The capacity of international organizations to conclude treaties’ in Zemanek, K. (ed.), Agreements of International Organizations and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Vienna: Springer, 1971)Google Scholar
Hernández, G. The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. The Responsibility of International Organizations towards Third Parties: Some Principles (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1995)Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, F. ‘Litigating against the European Union and its member States: who responds under the ILC’s draft articles on international responsibility of international organizations?’ (2010) 21 EJIL 723Google Scholar
Jenks, C. W. ‘International legal personality of international organizations’ (1945) 22 BYIL 267Google Scholar
Jennings, R. ‘Foreword’ in Bekker, P., The Legal Position of Intergovernmental Organizations: A Functional Necessity Analysis of Their Legal Status and Immunities (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1994)Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, G. ‘Gaps, the “Nuclear Weapons” advisory opinion and the structure of international legal argument between theory and practice’ (2009) 80 BYIL 333Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, G. ‘Uncertainty in the formal sources of international law: customary international law and some of its problems’ (2004) 15 EJIL 523Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1945)Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. ‘Recognition in international law: theoretical observations’ (1941) 35 AJIL 605Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. A Critique of Adjudication: {fin de siècle} (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. ‘The International Legal Order’ in Cane, P. and Tushnet, M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. and Donaldson, M. ‘From bilateralism to publicness in international law’ in Fastenrath, U. and others (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R. ‘The emergence of global administrative law’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘Sources of international organizations’ law: reflections on accountability’ in d’Aspremont, J. and Besson, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. An Introduction to International Organizations Law, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘Unity, diversity, accountability: the ambivalent concept of international organisation’ (2013) 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘Global governance before the ICJ: re-reading the WHA opinion’ (2009) Max-Planck Yearbook of United Nations LawGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘On Seyersted and his Common Law of International Organizations’ (2008) 5 IOLR 381Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘The life and times of the law of international organizations’ (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 287Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘Presumptive personality: the European Union in international law’ in Koskenniemi, M. (ed.), International Law Aspects of the European Union (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998)Google Scholar
Klein, P. La Responsabilité des Organisations Internationales dans les Ordres Juridiques Internes et en Droit des Gens (Brussels: Bruylant, 1998)Google Scholar
Kohen, M. and Heathcote, S. ‘Article 42’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, v. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Kolb, R. La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public: Contribution à l’Étude des Principes Généraux de Droit (Paris: Pr Univ de France, 2000)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Ladeur, K. H. ‘The analogy between logic and dialogic of law’ in Nerhot, P. (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Analogy: Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991)Google Scholar
Larenz, K. and Canaris, C. W. Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3rd edn (Berlin: Springer, 1996)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E. ‘Judicial review of acts of international organizations’ in Chazournes, L. B. and Sands, P. (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. ‘Some observations on the prohibition of “non liquet” and the completeness of the law’ in Lauterpacht, E. (ed.), International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1970–2004)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens, 1958)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (Archon Books, 1937)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, D. ‘(Dis)solving the chronological paradox in customary international law: a Hartian approach’ (2008) 21 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 129Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Massineo, F. ‘Attribution of conduct’ in Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalor, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
McCorquodale, R. ‘Defining the international rule of law: defying gravity?’ (2016) 65 ICLQ 277Google Scholar
Mendelson, M. ‘The definition of “international organization” in the international law commission’s current project on the responsibility of international organizations’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005)Google Scholar
Morgenstern, F. Legal Problems of International Organizations (Cambridge: Grotius, 1986)Google Scholar
Mosler, H. ‘Réflexions sur la personnalité juridique en droit international public’ in Baugniet, , (ed.), Mélanges Offerts à Henri Rolin (Paris: Pedone, 1964)Google Scholar
Murphy, S. ‘Codification, progressive development, or scholarly analysis? The art of packaging the ILC’s work product’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), The Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2013)Google Scholar
Murray, O. ‘Piercing the corporate veil: the responsibility of member states of an international organization’ (2011) IOLR 291Google Scholar
Neff, S. ‘In search of clarity: non liquet and international law’ in Homi, K. and Bohlander, M. (eds.), International Law and Power: Perspectives on Legal Order and Justice (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2009)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. ‘Dual attribution: liability of the Netherlands for conduct of Dutchbat in Srebrenica’ (2011) 9 Journal of International Criminal Law 1143Google Scholar
Odermatt, J. ‘The development of customary international law by international organizations’ (2017) 66 ICLQ 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A. ‘Responsibility and immunities: similarities and differences between international organizations and States’ (2014) 11 IOLR 114Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A. Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Orzan, M. ‘International organizations and immunity from legal process: an uncertain evolution’ in Virzo, R. and Ingravallo, I. (eds.), Evolutions in the Law of International Organizations (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2015)Google Scholar
Paasivirta, E. ‘Responsibility of a member state of an international organization: where will it end? (2010) 7 IOLR 49Google Scholar
Paasivirta, E. and Kuijper, P. J. ‘Does one size fit all?: the European Community and the responsibility of international organizations’ (2007) 36 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 169Google Scholar
Paddeu, F. Justification and Excuse in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Palwankar, U. ‘Applicability of international humanitarian law to United Nations peace-keeping forces’ (1993) 23 International Review of the Red Cross 227Google Scholar
Parlett, K. The Individual in the International Legal System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Paul, V. ‘The abuse of rights and bona fides in international law’ (1977) 28 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 107Google Scholar
Paulus, A. ‘The international legal system as a constitution’ in Dunoff, J., and Trachtman, J., (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘International organizations are definitely not States: cursory remarks on the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), The Responsibility of International Organizations (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2013)Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘Article 19 – Convention of 1969’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P., (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, v. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘Responding to new needs through codification and progressive development’ in Gowlland-Debbas, V . (ed.) Multilateral Treaty-Making: The Current Status of Challenges to and Reforms Needed in the International Legislative Process (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1998)Google Scholar
Portmann, R. Legal Personality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Pronto, A. ‘Reflections on the scope of application of the articles on the responsibility of international organizations’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2013)Google Scholar
Proulx, V. J. ‘An uneasy transition? Linkages between the law of State responsibility and the law governing the responsibility of international organizations’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2013)Google Scholar
Rama-Montaldo, M. ‘International legal personality and implied powers of international organizations’ (1970) 44 BYIL 111Google Scholar
Raz, J. ‘Legal reasons, sources and gaps’ in Raz, J., (ed.) The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Raz, J. ‘The rule of law and its virtue’ in Raz, J., The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. ‘Sources of international organizations’ law: why custom and general principles are crucial’ in Besson, S. and D’Aspremont, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. International Organizations before National Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Reuter, P. ‘La Conférence de Vienne sur le Droit des Traités entre Etats et Organisations Internationales ou entre Organisations Internationales’ in Capotorti, F. and others (eds.), Du Droit International au Droit de l’Intégration (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1987)Google Scholar
Roberts, A. ‘Clash of paradigms: actors and analogies shaping the investment treaty system’ (107) AJIL 45Google Scholar
Rosenne, S. Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Roulet, D. J. Le Caractère Artificiel de la Théorie de l’Abus de Droit en Droit International Public (Neuchâtel: Ed de la Baconnière, 1958)Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘The immunity of international organizations before domestic courts: recent trends’ (2010) 7 IOLR, 121Google Scholar
Sales, P. and Clemens, J. ‘International law in domestic courts: the developing framework’ (2008) 124 Law Quarterly Review 388Google Scholar
Sarooshi, D. ‘The role of domestic public law analogies in the law of international organizations’ (2008) 5 IOLR 237Google Scholar
Schachter, O. ‘The invisible college of international lawyers’ (1977) 72 Northwestern University Law Review 217Google Scholar
Schermers, H. ‘The legal bases of international organization action’ in Dupuy, R. J. (ed.), A Handbook on International Organizations, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1998)Google Scholar
Schermers, H. and Blokker, N. International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, 5th edn (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2011)Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K. ‘International organizations or institutions, general aspects’ (2006) Max-Planck Encyclopedia of Public International LawGoogle Scholar
Scobbie, I. ‘International organizations and international relations’ in Dupuy, R. J. (ed.), A Handbook on International Organizations, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1998)Google Scholar
Seidl-Hoheverden, I. Corporations in and under International Law (Cambridge: Grotius, 1987)Google Scholar
Seyersted, F. International personality of intergovernmental organizations: do their capacities really depend upon their constitutions?’ (1964) 4 Indian Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, S. and Pak, N. ‘Cessation and reparation in the GATT/WTO legal system: a view from the law of State responsibility’ (2007) 41 Journal of World Trade 1237Google Scholar
Shraga, D. ‘UN peacekeeping operations: applicability of international humanitarian law and responsibility for operations-related damage’ (2000) 94 AJIL 406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, B. and Pulkowski, D. ‘Of planets and the universe: self-contained regimes in international law’ (2006) 17 EJIL 483Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. F. ‘Towards a postcolonial genealogy of international organizations law’ (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International LawGoogle Scholar
Siorat, L. Le Problème des Lacunes en Droit International: Contribution à l’Étude des Sources du Droit et de la Fonction Judiciaire (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1958)Google Scholar
Sorensen, M. ‘Autonomous legal orders: some considerations relating to a systems analysis of international organisations in the world legal order’ (1983) 32 ICLQ 559Google Scholar
Spiermann, O. ‘Lotus and the double structure of international legal argument’ in Charzournes, B. and Sands, P. (eds.), International law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Stone, J. ‘Non-liquet and the function of law in the international community’ (1959) 35 BYIL 124Google Scholar
Talmon, S. ‘Determining customary international law: the ICJ’s methodology between induction, deduction and assertion’ (2015) 26 EJIL 417Google Scholar
Talmon, S. ‘Responsibility of international organizations: does the European Community require special treatment?’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2005)Google Scholar
Talmon, S. ‘The Constitutive versus the declaratory theory of recognition: tertium non datur? (2004) 75 BYIL 101Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Thirlway, H. ‘Concepts, principles, rules and analogies: international and municipal legal reasoning’ (2002) 294 RdC 265Google Scholar
Tomka, P. ‘Custom and the International Court of Justice’ (2013) 12 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 195Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. ‘International organizations as third parties under the law of international treaties’ in Cannizzaro, (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Triepel, H. ‘Les rapport entre le droit interne et le droit international’ (1923) 1 RdC 77Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A. Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Verdirame, G. The UN and Human Rights: Who Guards the Guardians? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Verdirame, G. ‘“The divided west”: international lawyers in Europe and America’ (2007) 18 EJIL 553Google Scholar
Villa, V. ‘Legal analogy between interpretive arguments and productive arguments’ in Nerhot, P. (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Analogy: Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991)Google Scholar
Villalpando, S. ‘Codification light: a new trend in the codification of international law at the United Nations’ (2013) VIII Brazilian Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar
Virally, M. ‘Definition and classification of international organizations: a legal approach’ in Abi-Saab, G. (ed.), The Concept of International Organization (Paris: Unesco, 1981)Google Scholar
Waldron, J. ‘Are sovereigns entitled to the benefit of the international rule of law?’ (2011) 22 EJIL 315Google Scholar
Watts, A. and Jennings, R. (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Harlow: Longman, 1992)Google Scholar
Webb, P. ‘Should the “2004 UN State Immunity Convention” serve as a model/starting point for a future UN convention on the immunity of international organizations?’ (2013) 10 IOLR 319Google Scholar
White, N. The Law of International Organisations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Wilde, R. ‘Enhancing accountability at the international level: the tension between international organisation and member state responsibility and the underlying issues at stake’ (2006) 12 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 395Google Scholar
Williams, J. F. ‘The legal character of the bank for international settlements’ (1930) 24 AJIL 665Google Scholar
Wolff, C., The Law of Nations Treated According to a Scientific Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934)Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Do international organizations enjoy immunity under customary international law?’ (2013) 10 IOLR 287Google Scholar
‘“Weighing” the Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations’Google Scholar
Wouters, J. and Odermatt, J. ‘Are all international organizations created equal?’ (2012) 9 IOLR 7Google Scholar
Zaccaria, G. ‘Analogy as legal reasoning: the hermeneutic foundation of the analogical procedure’ in Nerhot, P. (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Analogy: Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991)Google Scholar
Zemanek, K. ‘The United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations: the unrecorded history of its “general agreement”’ in Böckstiegel, K. H. (ed.), Völkerrecht, Recht der internationalen Organisationen, Weltwirtschaftsrecht: Festschrift für Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern (Cologne: Heymann, 1988)Google Scholar