Beauty and form

Richard Eldridge

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107300538.004

3 - Beauty and form

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Richard Eldridge

Show author details

Richard Eldridge: Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Beauty, absorption, and pleasure

It has long been recognized that human beings find various visual and auditory appearances to be deeply absorbing. Certain sunsets, flowers, bird-songs, and beautiful bodies, among natural things, and certain pots, carvings, vocalizations, and marked surfaces, among humanly made things, seem to engage eye or ear together with attentive mind. In experiencing such things, we feel we want the experience to continue for “its own sake,” at least for some further time. Greek uses the phrase to kalon – the fine, the good, or the beautiful – to describe many sorts of things that are attractive to mind and eye or ear, without sharply distinguishing natural beauty from artistic merit (or moral goodness). In the Symposium, Socrates reports that the priestess Diotima once instructed him in how “a lover who goes about this matter correctly must begin in his youth to devote himself to beautiful bodies,” first loving one body, then many (as he comes to understand that they are alike in beauty), next beautiful minds, beautiful laws and customs, beautiful ideas and theories, until finally he will come to love “the Beautiful itself, absolute, pure, unmixed, not polluted by human flesh or colors or any other great nonsense of mortality.”

It is natural to think of the affording of such experiences as a central aim of art. Many artists seem to seek to engage and entrance eye or ear and mind. They monitor and revise their products – rearranging colors, shapes, notes, words, or postures – with a view to deepening the product’s affordance of absorbing experience, where this affordance seems to be a function of the arrangement, form, or pattern of elements composing the work.

Type: Chapter
Information: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art , pp. 53 - 74

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300538.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Plato, , Symposium, trans. Nehamas, Alexander and Woodruff, Paul (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989), 210A, p. 57Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, Two Books of the Proficience and Advancement of Learning, Human and Divine in Bacon, Works, ed. Spedding, Ellis, and Heath, , 3 vols. (London: Longmans, 1879), vol. I, pp. 343–44Google Scholar

Beardsley, Monroe, Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History (University, AL: University of Alabama Press, 1975), p. 170Google Scholar

Addison, Joseph, The Spectator, ed. Chalmers, Alexander (New York: D. Appleton, 1879), paper no. 409, vol. V, p. 20Google Scholar

Kivy, Peter, “Recent Scholarship and the British Tradition: A Logic of Taste – The First Fifty Years,” in Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, ed. Dickie, George and Sclafani, Richard J. (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1977), pp. 626–42 at p. 628Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis, An Inquiry Concerning Beauty, Harmony, and Design, ed. Kivy, Peter (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), p. 40Google Scholar

Bell, Clive, Art (1914), chapter 1, “The Aesthetic Hypothesis,” reprinted in Philosophy of Art, ed. Neill and Ridley, pp. 99–110, at pp. 100ff

Kant, ’s “Definition of the beautiful inferred from this third moment” in Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric (Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 120CrossRef Google Scholar

Seel, Martin, Aesthetics of Appearing, trans. Farrell, John (Stanford University Press, 2005), pp. 29, 31Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger, Beauty (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 6CrossRef Google Scholar

Pillow, Kirk, Sublime Understanding (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Gould, Timothy, “The Audience of Originality: Kant and Wordsworth on the Reception of Genius,” in Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, ed. Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 179–93Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, “The Language of Paradox,” in The Language of Poetry, ed. Tate, Allen (Princeton University Press, 1942), pp. 358–66, later reprinted as chapter 1 of Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn (New York: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1947)Google Scholar

Baxandall, Michael, Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 43Google Scholar

Fried, Michael, Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Fried, Michael, Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews (University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William, “Preface to Lyrical Ballads,” in Wordsworth, Selected Poems and Prefaces, ed. Stillinger, Jack (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1965), pp. 445–64 at p. 454Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C., “The Space of Beauty: Review of The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts by Rudolf Arnheim,” New Republic (November 15, 1982), pp. 32B–35B at p. 32B

Danto, , The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art (Peru, IL: Open Court, 2003)Google Scholar

Danto, , Embodied Meanings: Critical Essays and Aesthetic Meditations (New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 1994), p. xGoogle Scholar

Binkley, Timothy, “Piece: Contra Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (1977), pp. 265–77, reprinted in Philosophy Looks at the Arts, revised edn, ed. Joseph Margolis (Philadelphia, PN: Temple University Press, 1978), pp. 25–44 at p. 26CrossRef Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall, “Categories of Art,” Philosophical Review 79 (1970), pp. 334–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Danto, , The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), p. 1Google Scholar

Feagin, Susan develops an argument of this kind in characterizing the pleasures of tragedy: “The Pleasures of Tragedy,” American Philosophical Quarterly 20, 1 (January1983), pp. 95–104Google Scholar

Eldridge, Richard, “Form and Content: An Aesthetic Theory of Art,” British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (1985)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaufman, , “Lyric Commodity Critique, Benjamin Adorno Marx, Baudelaire Baudelaire Baudelaire,” PMLA 123, 4 (January 2008), pp. 207–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Eldridge, Richard, “Introduction: Philosophy and Literature as Forms of Attention,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, ed. Eldridge, Richard (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 3–15CrossRef Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Thomas M., “Clive Bell’s Aesthetic: Tradition and Significant Form,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35, 4 (summer 1977), pp. 433–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - Beauty and form

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive