Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:05:08.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Regulatory enforcement and compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bronwen Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Karen Yeung
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the previous chapter, we considered various techniques of regulation. In so doing, our aim was to answer the question of how to regulate; this chapter deepens and extends that inquiry by considering questions of regulatory enforcement and compliance. The previous chapter's analysis of regulatory techniques sought to understand the range of instruments used in pursuit of regulatory goals. But all regulatory techniques must be given flesh through the enforcement process if they are to achieve their intended purpose. By focusing on enforcement and compliance, we begin to draw into focus the dynamic, messy and socially contextual nature of the regulatory process.

Before proceeding, it is helpful to clarify our terminology. Within regulatory regimes that rest upon a command and control framework, there is a tendency in common parlance to equate enforcement with the prosecution of offences: the formal invocation of the legal process in order to impose sanctions for violating the law. One important contribution of the regulatory compliance and enforcement literature, however, is to highlight the pervasiveness of informal practices throughout the enforcement process. As Hutter points out:

Compliance is a concept relevant to all forms of enforcement, but the concept is used in a variety of ways in the regulation literature … A theme running through much regulation literature is that compliance with regulatory legislation should be regarded as much as a process as an event. Regulatory officials may regard compliance both as a matter of instant conformity and an open-ended and long-term process which may take several years to attain. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to Law and Regulation
Text and Materials
, pp. 151 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, A. 2000. ‘Is The criminal law a lost cause?’, Law Quarterly Review 116: 225–256.Google Scholar
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the regulation debate, New York: Oxford University Press, 19–53.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. and Kagan, R. 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. and Stigler, G. 1974. ‘Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers’, Journal of Legal Studies 3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. 2005. ‘What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system’, ESRC Discussion Paper Series: No. 0501.
Black, J. 1997. Rules and Regulators, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 5–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 1998. ‘Talking about regulation’, Public Law, 77–105.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 1985. To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Grabosky, P. and Walker, J. 1987. ‘An enforcement taxonomy of regulatory agencies’, Law and Policy 9: 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. Jr 1992. ‘Paradigms lost: The blurring of the criminal and civil law models – and what can be done about it’, Yale Law Journal 101: 1875–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diver, C. 1983. ‘The optimal precision of administrative rules’, Yale Law Journal 93: 65–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. E., Petterson, S., Chambliss, E. and Howard, S. E. 1991. ‘Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: affirmative action officers’ dilemma', Law and Policy 13: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C. A. E. 1984. Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. 1954. Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. and Braithwaite, J. 1986. Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. 1984. Environment and Enforcement, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutter, B. 1997. Compliance: Regulation and Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. 1994. ‘Regulatory enforcement’ in Schwartz and Rosenbloom, (eds.) Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law, New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Landes, W. and Posner, R. 1975. ‘The private enforcement of law’, Journal of Legal Studies 4: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeGrand, J. 2003. Motivation, Agency and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K. 1992. ‘Punitive civil sanctions: The middle ground between criminal and civil law’, Yale law journal 101: 1795–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C. 1991. ‘The elusive spirit of the law: Formalism and the struggle for legal control’, Modern Law Review 54: 848–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, H. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 1989. ‘Formalism’, Yale Law Journal 97: 509–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, J. 1984. ‘Deterrence, cooperation and the ecology of regulatory enforcement’, Law and Society Review 18: 179–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waismann, F. 1951. ‘Verifiability’ in Flew, A. G. N. (ed.), Logic and Language: First Series, Blackwell: Oxford, 117–44.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (Anscombe, G. E. M., trans.) 1968. Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. 1998. ‘Privatising competition regulation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18: 581–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. 2004. Securing Compliance, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. 1990. ‘Why rules don't work’, Modern Law Review 53: 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardach, E. and Kagan, R. 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Black, D. 1976. The Behavior of Law, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office, 1999. Modernizing Government (Cm 4310), London: The Stationery Office. http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310/4310.htm.
Campbell, D. 2000. ‘Of coase and corn: A (sort of) defence of private nuisance’, Modern Law Review 63: 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, D. and Marsh, A. 2001. ‘There's regulatory crime, and then there's landlord crime: From “Rachmanites” to “Partners”, Modern Law Review 64: 855–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, P. 2004. Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. 2003. Law as Last Resort, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A. 1994. ‘Compliance with what? The fundamental regulatory question’, British Journal of Criminology 34: 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. 1991. ‘Adversarial legalism and American government’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10: 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. and Scholtz, J. 1984. ‘The “Criminology of the corporation” and regulatory enforcement strategies’ in Hawkins, and Thomas, (eds.) Enforcing Regulation, Massachusetts: Kluwer Nijhoff, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, S. 1999. ‘Redrawing the civil-criminal boundary’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review 2: 679–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofstedt, R. E. and Vogel, D. 2001. ‘The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the United States’, Risk Analysis 21: 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M., Shekelle, P., Brook, R. and Leatherman, S. 2000. Dying to Know: Public Release of Information about Quality of Care, London: The Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. and Kornhauser, L. 1979. ‘Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce’, Yale Law Journal 88: 950–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. 1999. ‘Compliance professionalism and regulatory community: The Australian trade practices regime’, Journal of Law and Society 26: 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A. and Shavell, S. (in press). ‘The theory of public enforcement of law’, in Polinsky and Shavell (eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, Handbooks in Economices, Vol 1.
Pontin, B. 1998. ‘Tort law and Victorian government growth: The historiographical significance of tort in the shadow of chemical pollution and factory safety regulation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18: 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. 1987. ‘Strict liability for regulatory crime’, Criminal Law Review295–306.Google Scholar
Richardson, G., Ogus, A. and Burrows, P. 1984. Policing Pollution, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rowan-Robinson, J., Watchman, P. and Barker, C. 1990. Crime and Regulation: a Study of the Enforcement of Regulatory Codes, Edinburgh: TandT Clarke.Google Scholar
Scott, C. 2002. ‘Private regulation of the public sector: A neglected facet of contemporary governance’, Journal of Law and Society 29: 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S. 1993. ‘The optimal structure of law enforcement’, Journal of Law and Economics 36: 255–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R. B. and Sunstein, C. R. 1982. ‘Public programs and private rights’, Harvard Law Review 95: 1193–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, M. 2000. The Regulatory Craft, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Reiss Jr, A. J. 1984. ‘Selecting strategies of social control over organisational life’, in Hawkins, and Thomas, (eds.), Enforcing Regulation, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff (1984) 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. 1995. ‘Private law and the environment: Nuisance in context’, Legal Studies 15: 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, F. E. 1992. ‘The multiple middlegrounds between civil and criminal law’, Yale Law Journal 101: 1901–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×