Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T12:28:23.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

Karen Yeung
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Sofia Ranchordás
Affiliation:
Tilburg University, The Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to Law and Regulation
Text and Materials
, pp. 393 - 400
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by Ritter, M.. Sage.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., and Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T. (1994). Reinventing Government. Penguin.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1977). ‘On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry’. The American Economic Review, 67(5), 809822.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., and Willig, R. D. (1983). ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Reply’. The American Economic Review, 73(3), 491496.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica N.S., 4, 386405. Reprinted in Stigler, G. J. and Boulding, K. E. (eds.), Readings in Price Theory. Richard D. Irwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’. Science, 162(3859), 12431248. www.jstor.org/stable/1724745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. Times Books.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. L. (2018). Microeconomics. 9th ed. Pearson.Google Scholar
Sen, S. C., Nordhaus, W., and Samuelson, P. A. (2019). Economics 20th ed. McGrawHill.Google Scholar
Sianesi, B., and Van Reenen, J. (2003). ‘The Returns to Education: Macroeconomics’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 157200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1982). ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. (2009). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. 8th ed. W. W. Norton Company.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1979). ‘Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233261.Google Scholar
6, P. (2014). ‘Elementary Forms and Their Dynamics: Revisiting Mary Douglas’. Anthropological Forum, 24(3), 287307. DOI:10.1080/00664677.2014.933090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aven, T., and Renn, O. (2010). Risk Management and Governance, Concepts, Guidelines and Applications. Vol. 16. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Black, J. (2010). ‘The Role of Risk in Regulatory Processes’. In Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation. Oxford University Press, 302348.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., and Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O. (1998). ‘Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges’. Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risk, J. (1995). Risk. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandin, P., Peterson, M., Hansson, S. O., Rudén, C., and Juthe, A. (2012). ‘Five Charges against the Precautionary Principle’. In Bird, A. and Ladyman, J. (eds.), Arguing about Science. Routledge, 617628.Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2016). ‘Precaution in the Governance of Technology’. in Brownsword, R., Scotford, E. and Yeung, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation and Technology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A. (2023). Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R., Scotford, E., and Yeung, K. (2016). ‘Law, Regulation and Technology: The Field, Frame, and Focal Questions’. In Brownsword, R., Scotford, E., and Yeung, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law and Regulation of Technology. Oxford University Press, 338.Google Scholar
Moses, L. B. (2007). ‘Recurring Dilemmas: The Law’s Race to Keep up with Technological Change’. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, 239.Google Scholar
Murrey, A. (2020). ‘Colonialism’. In Kobayashi, A. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 2nd ed. Elsevier, 315326. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-08-102295-5.10804-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. (2018). ‘Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation’. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1991). ‘Tripartism: Regulatory Capture and Empowerment’. Law & Social Inquiry, 16, 435496.Google Scholar
Barber, A. (2021). ‘Consumed – The Need for Collective Change’. Colonialism, Climate Change & Consumerism. Octopus, 98102.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976). ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’. The Journal of Law & Economics, 19(2), 245248. www.jstor.org/stable/725165.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. (2013). Preventing Regulatory Capture. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1968). ‘Why Regulate Utilities?’. The Journal of Law & Economics, 11(1), 5565. www.jstor.org/stable/724970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Hertog, J. A. (2010). ‘Review of Economic Theories of Regulation’. Discussion Paper Series, Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, 10(18). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/309815.Google Scholar
Downer, J. (2010). ‘Trust and Technology: The Social Foundations of Aviation Regulation’. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 83106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunningham, N., and Johnstone, R. (1999). Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, M. E., and Forrence, J. L. (1990). ‘Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a Synthesis’. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6, 167198. www.jstor.org/stable/764987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to Systems Theory. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. W. (1987). Making Sense of Human Rights: Philosophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. (1976). ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1969). ‘Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation’. Stanford Law Review, 21(3), 548643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1974). ‘Theories of Economic Regulation’. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1971). ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suraci, O. (2021). ‘The Best-dressed Polluter Regulation and Sustainability in the Fashion Industry’. Hastings Environmental Law Journal, 27(2), 225242.Google Scholar
Tollison, R. D. (1988). ‘Public Choice and Legislation’. Virginia Law Review, 74(2), 339371. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2022). ‘The Value of Systems Thinking for and in Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis’. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221106172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M. D., and Posner, E. A. (1999). ‘Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis’. The Yale Law Journal, 109(2), 165247. https://doi.org/10.2307/797489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M., and Posner, E. A. (2001). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Economic, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M., and Posner, E. A. (2006). New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alberto, A. (2022). ‘EU Citizen Participation “in the Union’s Democratic Life”: A Policy and Legal Analysis, The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections, 23–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12338-2_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, A. (2015). ‘How Much Better Is Better Regulation? Assessing the Impact of the Better Regulation Package on the European Union: A Research Agenda’. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(3), 344356. www.jstor.org/stable/24769555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Francesco, F., and Radaelli, C. M. (eds.). (2023). The Elgar Companion to the OECD. Elgar Companions to International Organisations. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, C. A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C. M., and Russel, D. (2012). ‘The Many Uses of Regulatory Impact Assessment: A Meta-analysis of EU and UK Cases’. Regulation & Governance, 6: 2345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01123.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J., Radaelli, C. M., Taffoni, G., and Wagemann, C. (2020). ‘Does Consultation Count for Corruption? The Causal Relations in the EU-28’. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 17181741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1784984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, M., and Revesz, R. (2021). Reviving Rationality: Saving Our Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Sake of the Environment and Our Health. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, H. H., Binderkrantz, A. S., and Christiansen, P. M. (2014). ‘Legislative Process in Denmark’. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39: 199225. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnhagen, K. P., and Feindt, P. H. (2015). ‘Better Regulatory Impact Assessment: Making Behavioural Insights Work for the Commission’s New Better Regulation Strategy’. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(3), 361368. www.jstor.org/stable/24769558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli,, C. M. (2004). ‘The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practice or Lesson-drawing?’. European Journal of Political Research, 43: 723747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00172.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, R. L., and Livermore, M. A. (2008). Retaking Rationality: How Cost-benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2013). ‘Precaution, Proportionality, and Cost/Benefit Analysis: False Analogies’. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(2), 281286. www.jstor.org/stable/24323368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). ‘Cost-Benefit Default Principles’. Michigan Law Review, 99(7), 16511723. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2019) The Cost-Benefit Revolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wegrich, K. (2015). ‘Which Results? Better Regulation and Institutional Politics’. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(3), 369371. www.jstor.org/stable/24769559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., and Vedung, E. O. (eds.). (2011). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Vol. 1. Transaction, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lessing, L. (2009). Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nemitz, P. (2018). ‘Constitutional Democracy and Technology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2133), 20180089.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, G. (ed.). (1991). Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life. Sage.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. (2012). ‘Governance Networks’. In Levi-Faur, D (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press, 99112.Google Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medzini, R. (2022). ‘Enhanced Self-regulation: The Case of Facebook’s Content Governance’. New Media & Society 24(10), 22272251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A. (1995). ‘Rethinking Self-Regulation’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 97108, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.1.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J. V. (1996). Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety since Three Mile Island. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bevan, G., and Hood, C. (2006). ‘What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System’. Public Administration, 84, 517538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (1998). ‘Talking about Regulation’. Public Law, 77–105.Google Scholar
Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for Reality. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranchordás, S. (2022). ‘Empathy in the Digital Administrative State’. Duke Law Journal, 71, 1341.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spinardi, G. (2019). ‘Performance-based Design, Expertise Asymmetry, and Professionalism: Fire Safety Regulation in the Neoliberal Era’. Regulation & Governance, 13, 520539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. (2022). ‘The New Public Analytics as an Emerging Paradigm in Public Sector Administration’. Tilburg Law Review, 27, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Walker, J., and Grabosky, P. (1987). ‘An Enforcement Taxonomy of Regulatory Agencies.’ Law & Policy, 9(3), 323351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, L. (2011). ‘The Private Governance of Food: Equitable Exchange or Bizarre Bazaar?’. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 345352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2024). Regulatory Framework Proposal on Artificial Intelligence, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai.Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. N., and Braithwaite, J. (1986). Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, P. (2005). Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement. HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, B. M. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R., and Scholtz, J. (1984). ‘The Criminology of the Corporation and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies’. In Hawkins, J. and Thomas, J. (eds.), Enforcing Regulation. Kluwer-Nijhoff, 6795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. (2004). Securing Compliance. Hart.Google Scholar
Cane, P. (2002). Responsibility in Law and Morality. Bloomsbury/Hart.Google Scholar
Chevalier, E. (2020). ‘Standing before French Administrative Courts and Environmental Protection: Not Specific Enough for an Effective Access to Justice?’. Persona e Amministrazione. 317(1). https://doi.org/10.14276/2610-9050.2207.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N., and Ginsburg, T. (2009). ‘Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence’. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(1), 103134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, S. (2007). ‘Regulating after the Fact’. DePaul Law Review, 56, 375.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2000). Sword and the Scales. Hart.Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J. (2017). Imposing Risk: A Normative Framework. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. (2013). ‘Better Regulation, Administrative Sanctions and Constitutional Values’. Legal Studies, 33(2), 312339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. (2019). A Study of the Implications of Advanced Digital Technologies (including AI Systems) on the Concept of Responsibility within a Human Rghts Framework. Council of Europe, MSI-AUT.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., and Snidal, D. (2017). ‘Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model’. The Annals of the American Academy, 670, 1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. (1994). ‘The Rule of Law’. in Allan, T. R. S. (ed.), Law, Liberty and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., and Pedersen, H. H. (2015). ‘Interest Group Access’. Governance, 28: 95112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A. (2019). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P. (2000). Global Business Regulation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, C., and Busuioc, M. (2020). ‘Stakeholder Engagement as a Conduit for Regulatory Legitimacy?’. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 15991611, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1817133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D. (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cashore, B. (2002). ‘Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule Making Authority’. Governance 15, 503529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, S. (2005). ‘Administrative Law without the State? The Challenge of Global Regulation’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37, 663.Google Scholar
Curtin, D. (2009). Executive Power in the European Union: Law, Practice, and Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C., and Rawlings, R. (2007). ‘Promoting Accountability in Multi-Level Governance: A Network Approach’. European Law Journal 13, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, A. (1983). ‘The Concept of Legitimation in the Sociology of Law’. Wisconsin Law Review, 379–476.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). ‘Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism’. In Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, 143163.Google Scholar
Scott, C. (2000). ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’. Journal of Law and Society, 27, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1990). After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, M. (2002). ‘Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, R. C. (1968). ‘The Theory of Charismatic Leadership’. Daedalus, 97(3):731756.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Weber, M. ([1922] 1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1948). ‘Bureaucracy’. In Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C. (eds.), Max Weber, Essays in Sociology. Routledge, 196266.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Edited by Parsons, T.. Free Press.Google Scholar
Albanese, R., Dacin, M. T., and Harris, I. C. (1997). ‘Agents as Stewards’. Academy of Management Review 22(3): 609611. doi: 10.5465/amr.1997.15868807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2005). ‘Public Accountability’. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. and Pollitt, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford University Press, 182208.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007). ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, N. M., and Solomon, J. (2008). ‘Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885906. doi: 10.1108/09513570810907401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, E. M., and Lodge, M. (2016). ‘The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability’. Governance, 29(2), 247263. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, M. (2013). European Agencies: Law and Practices of Accountability. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., and Donaldson, L. (1997). ‘The Distinctiveness of Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory (reply)’. Academy of Management Review 22(3), 611613.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., and Donaldson, L. (2018). ‘Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management’. In Singer, Alan E. (ed.), Business Ethics and Strategy. Volumes I and II. Routledge, 473500.Google Scholar
Gilad, S. (2008). ‘Accountability or Expectations Management? The Role of the Ombudsman in Financial Regulation’. Law & Policy, 30(2), 227253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00275.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. W., and Keohane, R. O. (2005). ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’. American Political Science Review, 99, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, R. (2022). ‘The Ombud as a Chameleon: A Story of Adaptation to Different Administrative Cultures’. In Hertogh, M. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Administrative Justice. Oxford University Press, 89114.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2006). ‘Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance’. In Dowdle, M. W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 115156.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding Power to Account. Accountability in Modern Democracies. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. (2015). ‘The Problem of Many Hands in International Law’. In Fabricotti, A. (ed.), The Political Economy of International Law: A European Perspective. Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
Otter, C. (2008). The Victorian Eye: A Political History of Light and Vision in Britain, 1800–1910. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillemans, T., and Busuioc, M. (2015). ‘Predicting Public Sector Accountability: From Agency Drift to Forum Drift’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillemans, T., and Bjurstrøm, K. H. (2020). ‘Trust and Verification: Balancing Agency and Stewardship Theory in the Governance of Agencies’. International Public Management Journal, 23(5), 650676, doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1553807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. F. (1980). ‘Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands’. American Political Science Review, 74(4), 905916.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., and Iacobucci, E. M. (2002). ‘Privatization and Accountability’. Harvard Law Review, 116, 1422. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK House of Lords. (2004). ‘The Regulatory State: Ensuring its Accountability’. Report. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldconst/68/68.pdf.Google Scholar
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A. (2023). Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Karen Yeung, University of Birmingham, Sofia Ranchordás, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
  • Book: An Introduction to Law and Regulation
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009379007.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Karen Yeung, University of Birmingham, Sofia Ranchordás, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
  • Book: An Introduction to Law and Regulation
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009379007.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Karen Yeung, University of Birmingham, Sofia Ranchordás, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
  • Book: An Introduction to Law and Regulation
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009379007.017
Available formats
×