Abbati, M. C., Cirelli, R., Mania’, A., and Michor, P. 1989. The Lie group of automorphisms of a principal bundle. J. Geom. Phys., 6(2), 215–235.Google Scholar

Abraham, R., Marsden, J. E., and Ratiu, T. 1988. Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications. Second ed. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 75. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Agrachev, A. A., and Caponigro, M. 2009. Controllability on the group of diffeomorphisms. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire, 26(6), 2503–2509.Google Scholar

Alzaareer, H., and Schmeding, A. 2015. Differentiable mappings on products with different degrees of differentiability in the two factors. Expo. Math., 33(2), 184–222.Google Scholar

Amiri, H., Glöckner, H., and Schmeding, A. 2020. Lie groupoids of mappings taking values in a Lie groupoid. Arch. Math., 56(5), 307–356.Google Scholar

Amiri, H., and Schmeding, A. 2019. A differentiable monoid of smooth maps on Lie groupoids. J. Lie Theory, 29(4), 1167–1192.Google Scholar

Amiri, H., and Schmeding, A. 2019. Linking Lie groupoid representations and representations of infinite-dimensional Lie groups. Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 55(4), 749–775.Google Scholar

Arnold, V. 1966. Sur la géométrie différentielle des groupes de Lie de dimension infinie et ses applications à l’hydrodynamique des fluides parfaits. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 16(1), 319–361.Google Scholar

Atkin, C. J. 1975. The Hopf-Rinow theorem is false in infinite dimensions. Bull. London Math. Soc., 7(3), 261–266.Google Scholar

Atkin, C. J. 1997. Geodesic and metric completeness in infinite dimensions. Hokkaido Math. J., 26(1), 1–61.Google Scholar

Baez, J. C. 1997. An introduction to n-categories. Pages 1–33 of: Category Theory and Computer Science. 7th International Conference, CTCS ’97, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, September 4–6, 1997. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Banyaga, A. 1988. On isomorphic classical diffeomorphism groups. II. J. Differ. Geom., 28(1), 23–35.Google Scholar

Bastiani, A. 1964. Applications différentiables et variétés différentiables de dimension infinie. J. Analyse Math., 13, 1–114.Google Scholar

Bauer, M., and Modin, K. 2020. Semi-invariant Riemannian metrics in hydrodynamics. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 59(2), 25. Id/No 65.Google Scholar

Bauer, M., Bruveris, M., and Michor, P. W. 2014. Homogeneous Sobolev metric of order one on diffeomorphism groups on real line. J. Nonlinear Sci., 24(5), 769–808.Google Scholar

Bauer, M., Bruveris, M., and Michor, P. W. 2014. Overview of the geometries of shape spaces and diffeomorphism groups. J. Math. Imaging Vis., 50(1–2), 60–97.Google Scholar

Baum, H. 2014. Eichfeldtheorie. Eine Einführung in die Differentialgeometrie auf Faserbündeln. Second revised ed. Springer Spektrum, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Beggs, E. J. 1987. The de Rham complex on infinite-dimensional manifolds. Quart. J. Math. Oxford II Ser., 38(150), 131–154.Google Scholar

Belti¸ta˘, D., Golin´ski, T., and Tumpach, A.-B. 2018. Queer Poisson brackets. J. Geom. Phys., 132, 358–362.Google Scholar

Belti¸ta˘, D., Golin´ski, T., Jakimowicz, G., and Pelletier, F. 2019. Banach–Lie groupoids and generalized inversion. J. Funct. Anal., 276(5), 1528–1574.Google Scholar

Bertram, W., Glöckner, H., and Neeb, K.-H. 2004. Differential calculus over general base fields and rings. Expo. Math., 22(3), 213–282.Google Scholar

Bogfjellmo, G., and Schmeding, A. 2017. The Lie group structure of the Butcher group. Found. Comput. Math., 17(1), 127–159.Google Scholar

Bogfjellmo, G., and Schmeding, A. 2018. The geometry of characters of Hopf algebras. Pages 159–185 of: Computation and Combinatorics in Dynamics, Stochastics and Control. The Abel Symposium, Rosendal, Norway, August 16–19, 2016. Selected papers. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Bogfjellmo, G., Dahmen, R., and Schmeding, A. 2016. Character groups of Hopf algebras as infinite-dimensional Lie groups. Ann. Inst. Fourier, 66(5), 2101–2155.Google Scholar

Boman, J. 1967. Differentiability of a function and of its compositions with functions of one variable. Math. Scand., 20, 249–268.Google Scholar

Bonic, R., and Frampton, J. 1966. Smooth functions on Banach manifolds. J. Math. Mech., 15, 877–898.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. 1998. Lie groups and Lie algebras. Chapters 1–3. Elements of Mathematics. Springer, Berlin. Translated from the French, reprint of the 1989 English translation.Google Scholar

Bridson, M. R., and Haefliger, A. 1999. Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Bröcker, T., and Tom Dieck, T. 1995. Representations of Compact Lie Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 98. Springer, New York. Translated from the German manuscript, corrected reprint of the 1985 translation.Google Scholar

Bruveris, M. 2018. The L2-metric on C∞(M, N). arXiv:1804.00577Google Scholar

Bruveris, M. 2019. Riemannian Geometry for Shape Analysis and Computational Anatomy. Lecture Notes Series, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore. Pages 15–44. www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789811200137_0002Google Scholar

Celledoni, E., Eslitzbichler, M., and Schmeding, A. 2016. Shape analysis on Lie groups with applications in computer animation. J. Geom. Mech., 8(3), 273–304.Google Scholar

Celledoni, E., Eidnes, S., and Schmeding, A. 2018. Shape analysis on homogeneous spaces: a generalised SRVT framework. Pages 187–220 of: Computation and Combinatorics in Dynamics, Stochastics and Control. The Abel Symposium, Rosendal, Norway, August 16–19, 2016. Selected Papers. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Chevyrev, I., and Kormilitzin, A. 2016. A Primer on the Signature Method in Machine Learning. arXiv:1603.03788Google Scholar

Curry, C., Ebrahimi-Fard, K., Manchon, D., and Munthe-Kaas, H. Z. 2020. Planarly branched rough paths and rough differential equations on homogeneous spaces. J. Differ. Equations, 269(11), 9740–9782.Google Scholar

Dahmen, R., and Schmeding, A. 2020. Lie groups of controlled characters of combinatorial Hopf algebras. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré D, Comb. Phys. Interact. (AIHPD), 7(3), 395–456.Google Scholar

del Hoyo, M., and Fernandes, R. L. 2018. Riemannian metrics on Lie groupoids. J. Reine Angew. Math., 735, 143–173.Google Scholar

do Carmo, M. P. 1992. Riemannian Geometry. Translated from the Portuguese by Francis Flaherty. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Dobrowolski, T. 1995. Every infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is real-analytically isomorphic with its unit sphere. J. Funct. Anal., 134(2), 350–362.Google Scholar

Duistermaat, J. J., and Kolk, J. A. C. 2000. Lie Groups. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Ebin, D. G. 2015. Groups of diffeomorphisms and fluid motion: reprise. Pages 99– 105 of: Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics. The Legacy of Jerry Marsden. Selected papers presented at a focus program, Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, Canada, July 2012. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Ebin, D. G., and Marsden, J. 1970. Groups of diffeomorphisms and the motion of an incompressible fluid. Ann. of Math., 92(2), 102–163.Google Scholar

Eells, Jr., J. 1966. A setting for global analysis. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 72, 751–807.Google Scholar

Eftekharinasab, K., and Petrusenko, V. 2020. Finslerian geodesics on Fréchet manifolds. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Bras. III: Math. Inform. Phys., 13(62), 129–152. doi:10.31926/but.mif.2020.13.62.1.11Google Scholar

Engelking, R. 1989. General Topology. Second ed. Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics, vol. 6. Heldermann Verlag, Berlin. Translated from the Polish by the author.Google Scholar

Filipkiewicz, R. P. 1982. Isomorphisms between diffeomorphism groups. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 2(2), 159–171 (1983).Google Scholar

Folland, G. B., and Stein, E. M. 1982. Hardy Spaces on Homogeneous Groups. Vol. 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Friz, P. K., and Hairer, M. 2020. A Course on Rough Paths. With an Introduction to Regularity Structures. Second ed. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Friz, P. K., and Victoir, N. B. 2010. Multidimensional Stochastic Processes as Rough Paths. Theory and Applications. Vol. 120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Frölicher, A., and Kriegl, A. 1988. Linear Spaces and Differentiation Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar

Gallot, S., Hulin, D., and Lafontaine, J. 2004. Riemannian Geometry. Third ed. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H., and Neeb, K.-H. Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups. in preparation.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H. 2002. Infinite-dimensional Lie groups without completeness restrictions. Pages 43–59 of: Geometry and Analysis on Finiteand Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups (Bedlewo, 2000). Banach Center Publications, vol. 55. Polish Acad. Sci. Inst. Math., Warsaw.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H. 2006. Discontinuous non-linear mappings on locally convex direct limits. Publ. Math. Debrecen, 68(1–2), 1–13.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H. 2006. Implicit functions from topological vector spaces to Banach spaces. Israel J. Math., 155, 205–252.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H. 2007. Implicit Functions from Topological Vector Spaces to Fréchet Spaces in the Presence of Metric Estimates. arXiv:math/0612673v5Google Scholar

Glöckner, H. 2016. Fundamentals of Submersions and Immersions between Infinite-Dimensional Manifolds. arXiv:1502.05795v4Google Scholar

Glöckner, H., and Neeb, K.-H. 2012. When unit groups of continuous inverse algebras are regular Lie groups. Studia Math., 211(2), 95–109.Google Scholar

Glöckner, H., and Schmeding, A. 2022. Manifolds of Mappings on Cartesian Products. Ann Glob Anal Geom 61, 359–398. doi:10.1007/s10455-021-09816-yGoogle Scholar

Gray, W. S., Palmstrøm, M., and Schmeding, A. 2022. Continuity of Formal Power Series Products in Nonlinear Control Theory. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, doi:10.1007/s10208-022-09560-0Google Scholar

Grong, E., Markina, I., and Vasil’ev, A. 2015. Sub-Riemannian geometry on infinitedimensional manifolds. J. Geom. Anal., 25(4), 2474–2515.Google Scholar

Gubinelli, M. 2010. Ramification of rough paths. J. Differ. Equations, 248(4), 693–721.Google Scholar

Hamilton, R. S. 1982. The inverse function theorem of Nash and Moser. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 7(1), 65–222.Google Scholar

Hilgert, J., and Neeb, K.-H. 2012. Structure and Geometry of Lie Groups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Hirsch, M. W. 1994. Differential Topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 33. Springer, New York. Corrected reprint of the 1976 original.Google Scholar

Hjelle, E. O., and Schmeding, A. 2017. Strong topologies for spaces of smooth maps with infinite-dimensional target. Expo. Math., 35(1), 13–53.Google Scholar

Hofmann, K. H., and Neeb, K.-H. 2009. Pro-Lie groups which are infinite-dimensional Lie groups. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 146(2), 351–378.Google Scholar

Hofmann, K. H., and Morris, S. A. 2007. The Lie Theory of Connected Pro-Lie Groups. A Structure Theory for Pro-Lie Algebras, Pro-Lie Groups, and Connected Locally Compact Groups. Vol. 2. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich.Google Scholar

Husemoller, D. H. 1993. Fibre Bundles. Third ed. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Iglesias-Zemmour, P. 2013. Diffeology. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 185. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Inci, H., Kappeler, T., and Topalov, P. 2013. On the Regularity of the Composition of Diffeomorphisms. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Jarchow, H. 1981. Locally Convex Spaces. B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Keller, H. H. 1974. Differential Calculus in Locally Convex Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 417. Springer, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar

Khesin, B., and Wendt, R. 2009. The Geometry of Infinite-Dimensional Groups. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. Third Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 51. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Klingenberg, W. P. A. 1995. Riemannian Geometry. Second ed. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 1. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin.Google Scholar

Kolev, B. 2008. Geometric differences between the Burgers and the Camassa–Holm equations. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 15(suppl. 2), 116–132.Google Scholar

Kriegl, A., and Michor, P. W. 1997. The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 53. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Lang, S. 1999. Fundamentals of Differential Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 191. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Larotonda, G. 2019. Metric geometry of infinite-dimensional Lie groups and their homogeneous spaces. Forum Math., 31(6), 1567–1605.Google Scholar

Le Donne, E., and Züst, R. 2021. Space of signatures as inverse limits of Carnot groups. ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var., 27, 14. Id/No 37.Google Scholar

Lee, J. M. 2013. Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Second ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Lenells, J. 2007. The Hunter–Saxton equation describes the geodesic flow on a sphere. J. Geom. Phys., 57(10), 2049–2064.Google Scholar

Lenells, J. 2008. The Hunter–Saxton equation: a geometric approach. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 40(1), 266–277.Google Scholar

Lindenstrauss, J., and Tzafriri, L. 1971. On the complemented subspaces problem. Isr. J. Math., 9, 263–269.Google Scholar

Lyons, T., and Victoir, N. 2007. An extension theorem to rough paths. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire, 24(5), 835–847.Google Scholar

Lyons, T. J. 1998. Differential equations driven by rough signals. Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 14(2), 215–310.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, K. C. H. 2005. General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 213. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Maeda, Y., Rosenberg, S., and Torres-Ardila, F. 2015. The geometry of loop spaces. I: H s-Riemannian metrics. Int. J. Math., 26(4), 26. Id/No 1540002.Google Scholar

Magnani, V., and Tiberio, D. 2020. A remark on vanishing geodesic distances in infinite dimensions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 148(8), 3653–3656.Google Scholar

Manchon, D. 2008. Hopf algebras in renormalisation. Pages 365–427 of: Handbook of Algebra. Volume 5. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Margalef-Roig, J., and Outerelo Domínguez, E. 1992. Differential Topology. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Marquis, T., and Neeb, K.-H. 2018. Half-Lie groups. Transform. Groups, 23(3), 801–840.Google Scholar

Maurelli, M., Modin, K., and Schmeding, A. 2019. Incompressible Euler Equations with Stochastic Forcing: A Geometric Approach. arXiv:1909.09982Google Scholar

McAlpin, J. 1965. Infinite-Dimensional Manifolds and Morse Theory. PhD thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Meinrencken, E. 2017. Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids. www.math.toronto.edu/mein/teaching/MAT1341_LieGroupoids/Groupoids.pdfGoogle Scholar

Meise, R., and Vogt, D. 1997. Introduction to Functional Analysis. Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 2. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York. Translated from the German by M. S. Ramanujan and revised by the authors.Google Scholar

Meyer, R., and Zhu, C. 2015. Groupoids in categories with pretopology. Theory Appl. Categ., 30, 1906–1998.Google Scholar

Micheli, M., Michor, P. W., and Mumford, D. 2013. Sobolev metrics on diffeomorphism groups and the derived geometry of spaces of submanifolds. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 77(3), 109–138.Google Scholar

Michor, P. W., and Vizman, C. 1994. n-transitivity of certain diffeomorphism groups. Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. (N.S.), 63(2), 221–225.Google Scholar

Michor, P. W. 1980. Manifolds of Differentiable Mappings. Shiva Mathematics Series, vol. 3. Shiva Publishing, Nantwich.Google Scholar

Michor, P. W. 2020. Manifolds of mappings for continuum mechanics. Pages 3–75 of: Geometric Continuum Mechanics, Segev, Reuven and Epstein, Marcelo (eds). Advances in Continuum Mechanics, vol. 42. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Michor, P. W., and Mumford, D. 2006. Riemannian geometries on spaces of plane curves. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 8(1), 1–48.Google Scholar

Milnor, J. 1982. On Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups. Preprint, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.Google Scholar

Milnor, J. 1984. Remarks on infinite-dimensional Lie groups. Pages 1007–1057 of: Relativity, Groups and Topology, II (Les Houches, 1983). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Mio, W., Srivastava, A., and Joshi, S. 2007. On shape of plane elastic curves. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 73, 307–324.Google Scholar

Modin, K. 2019. Geometric hydrodynamics: from Euler, to Poincaré, to Arnold. Pages 71–91 of: 13th Young Researchers Workshop on Geometry, Mechanics and Control. Three Mini-Courses, Coimbra, Portugal, December 6–13, 2018. Universidade de Coimbra, Departamento de Matemática, Coimbra.Google Scholar

Moerdijk, I., and Pronk, D. A. 1997. Orbifolds, sheaves and groupoids. K-Theory, 12(1), 3–21.Google Scholar

Moerdijk, I., and Mrcˇun, J. 2003. Introduction to Foliations and Lie Groupoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Müller, O. 2008. A metric approach to Fréchet geometry. J. Geom. Phys., 58(11), 1477–1500.Google Scholar

Murua, A., and Sanz-Serna, J. M. 2017. Word series for dynamical systems and their numerical integrators. Found. Comput. Math., 17(3), 675–712.Google Scholar

Neeb, K.-H. 2005. Monastir Summer School: Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups. Third cycle. Monastir (Tunisie).Google Scholar

Neeb, K.-H. 2006. Towards a Lie theory of locally convex groups. Jpn. J. Math., 1(2), 291–468.Google Scholar

Neeb, K.-H. 2010. On differentiable vectors for representations of infinite dimensional Lie groups. J. Funct. Anal., 259(11), 2814–2855.Google Scholar

Omori, H. 1974. Infinite Dimensional Lie Transformation Groups. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Omori, H. 1978. On Banach–Lie groups acting on finite-dimensional manifolds. Tôhoku Math. J. II Ser., 30, 223–250.Google Scholar

Omori, H. 1981. A remark on non-enlargeable Lie algebras. J. Math. Soc. Japan, 33(4), 707–710.Google Scholar

Palais, R. S. 1957. A Global Formulation of the Lie Theory of Transformation Groups. American Mathematical Society (AMS), Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Palais, R. S. 1968. Foundations of Global Non-linear Analysis. Mathematics Lecture Note Series. W. A. Benjamin, New York, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. 1901. Sur une forme nouvelle des équations de la mécanique. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 132, 369–371.Google Scholar

Pressley, A., and Segal, G. 1986. Loop Groups. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Qian, Z., and Tudor, J. 2011. Differential structure and flow equations on rough path space. Bull. Sci. Math., 135(6–7), 695–732.Google Scholar

Ree, R. 1958. Lie elements and an algebra associated with shuffles. Ann. Math. (2), 68, 210–220.Google Scholar

Reutenauer, C. 1993. Free Lie Algebras. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Rudin, W. 1991. Functional Analysis. Second ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Rybicki, T. 1995. Isomorphisms between groups of diffeomorphisms. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 123(1), 303–310.Google Scholar

Rybicki, T. 2002. A Lie group structure on strict groups. Publ. Math., 61(3–4), 533– 548.Google Scholar

Schmeding, A. 2020. The Lie group of vertical bisections of a regular Lie groupoid. Forum Math., 32(2), 479–489.Google Scholar

Schmeding, A, and Wockel, C. 2015. The Lie group of bisections of a Lie groupoid. Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 48(1), 87–123.Google Scholar

Schmeding, A., and Wockel, C. 2016. (Re)constructing Lie groupoids from their bisections and applications to prequantisation. Differential Geom. Appl., 49, 227–276.Google Scholar

Schmid, R. 2010. Infinite-dimensional Lie groups and algebras in mathematical physics. Advances in Mathematical Physics. Vol. 2010, Article ID 280362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/280362Google Scholar

Sergeev, A. G. 2020. In search of infinite-dimensional Kähler geometry. Russ. Math. Surv., 75(2), 321–367.Google Scholar

Sharpe, R. W. 1997. Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Smolentsev, N. K. 2007. Diffeomorphism groups of compact manifolds. J. Math. Sci., New York, 146(6), 6213–6312.Google Scholar

Stacey, A. 2008. How to Construct a Dirac Operator in Infinite Dimensions. arXiv:0809.3104Google Scholar

Steenrod, N. E. 1967. A convenient category of topological spaces. Michigan Math. J., 14, 133–152.Google Scholar

Takens, F. 1979. Characterization of a differentiable structure by its group of diffeomorphisms. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat., 10(1), 17–25.Google Scholar

Tapia, N., and Zambotti, L. 2020. The geometry of the space of branched rough paths. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 121(2), 220–251.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. E. 2011. Partial Differential Equations I. Basic Theory. Second ed. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 115. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Thompson, D. W. 1942. On Growth and Form. New edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Treves, F. 2006. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY. Unabridged republication of the 1967 original.Google Scholar

Vizman, C. 2008. Geodesic equations on diffeomorphism groups. SIGMA, Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 4, paper 030, 22.Google Scholar

Voigt, J. 1992. On the convex compactness property for the strong operator topology. Note Mat., 12, 259–269.Google Scholar

Walter, B. 2012. Weighted diffeomorphism groups of Banach spaces and weighted mapping groups. Dissertationes Math., 484, 128.Google Scholar

Werner, D. 2000. Funktionalanalysis. Extended ed. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Whitney, H. 1934. Analytic extensions of differentiable functions defined in closed sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 36(1), 63–89.Google Scholar

Wockel, C. 2006. Infinite-Dimensional Lie Theory for Gauge Groups. PhD thesis, TU Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Wockel, C. 2014. Infinite-Dimensional and Higher Structures in Differential Geometry. unpublished lecture notes.Google Scholar

Wockel, C. 2007. Lie group structures on symmetry groups of principal bundles. J. Funct. Anal., 251(1), 254–288.Google Scholar

Wurzbacher, T. 1995. Symplectic geometry of the loop space of a Riemannian manifold. J. Geom. Phys., 16(4), 345–384.Google Scholar

Young, L. C. 1936. An inequality of the Hölder type, connected with Stieltjes integration. Acta Math., 67, 251–282.Google Scholar