Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-tgq86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T10:59:15.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Infrastructural power, economic transformation, and globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Linda Weiss
Edited by
John A. Hall  and
Ralph Schroeder
Linda Weiss
Affiliation:
Professor Department of Government and International Relations University of Sydney
John A. Hall
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Ralph Schroeder
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

This chapter attempts two things. One is to show how Mann's theory of state power continues to generate new insights that advance the debates on state capacity, economic transformation, and globalization. The other is to suggest how these insights are at odds with some aspects of Mann's recent work on globalization.

Mann's theoretical and historical work on state power, as even the most cursory survey would reveal, has influenced scholars young and old across the social science disciplines. His theory of state power and the distinction between infrastructural and despotic power have offered particularly fertile soil for scholars of comparative politics and political economy. Many scholars of comparative politics have applied his concepts to explain failed or weak states in the developing world (e.g. Lucas 1998; Centeno 1997), to account for developmental blockages or breakthroughs in transition economies (Stoner-Weiss 2002; Zhu 2002), to revise conventional explanations for the rise of the West (Hall 1985), and to explain why some states, whether European or Asian, have been more effective than others at economic development (Weiss and Hobson 1995). In recent years, young sociologists have also sought to extend Mann's idea of the modern state's infrastructural power (IP) to symbolic and social infrastructures (e.g. Loveman). As the range of applications attests, Mann's theoretical and conceptual innovations continue to bear fruit.

Infrastructural power and economic transformation

In general, Mann's theory of state power has been most fruitfully applied to explain broad historical differences in types of state and contrasts in state autonomy.

Type
Chapter
Information
An Anatomy of Power
The Social Theory of Michael Mann
 , pp. 167 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alamgir, J. 2003. Managing Openness in India: The Social Construction of a Globalist Narrative. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, M. A. 1997. Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth-Century Latin America. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieply, S. 2001. Bridging Capital Gaps to Promote Innovation in France. Industry and Innovation, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, W. 2001. State Power, Transformative Capacity and Adapting to Globalization: An Analysis of French Agricultural Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2).Google Scholar
Coleman, W.2003. Governing Global Finance: Financial Derivatives, Liberal States, and Transformative Capacity. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doner, R., and A. Ramsay. 2003. The Challenges of Economic Upgrading in Liberalising Thailand. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. 2001. Globalization Fails to Make the Money Go Around. Sydney Morning Herald, 26 July.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. 1998. Global Markets and National Policies: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle. International Organisation, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A. 1985. Powers and Liberties. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J.. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. 2003. Disappearing Taxes or a Race to the Middle? In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, M. 2000. Has Germany Finally Fixed its High-Tech Problem? The Recent Boom in German Technology-Based Entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, J. 1998. The Tension between Despotic and Infrastructural Power: The Military and Political Class in Nigeria, 1985–1993. Studies in Comparative International Development, 33(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History from the Beginning to 1760 AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1997. Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?Review of International Political Economy, 4(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann M.2000. Modernity and Globalization. Unpublished, given as the Wiles Lectures at Queen's University, Belfast.
Mann M.2001. Globalization, Global Conflict and September 11. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘Globalization and its Challenges’, University of Sydney, 12–14 Dec., 2001.
Quinn, D. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S., and Tolbert, C.. 1998. Do Institutions Really Matter? Taxation in Industrial Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner-Weiss, K. 2002. Local Heroes: The Political Economy of Russian Regional Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. 2003. Withering Welfare? globalization, Political Economic Institutions, and Contemporary Welfare States. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, V., and Schuknecht, L.. 2000. Public Spending in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilton, M. 2003. Ideas, Institutions, and Interests in the Shaping of Telecommunications Reform: Japan and the USA. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, L.2001. Does Size Matter Less when Domestic Institutions Count? Paper prepared for the Conference on ‘Small States in World Markets – Fifteen Years Later’, Gothenburg, Sweden, 27–29 September 2001.
Weiss, L. 2003a. States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L.2003b. Guiding globalization in East Asia: New Roles for Old Developmental States. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L., and Hobson, J. M.. 1995. States and Economic Development. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Woo-Cummings, M. 2003. Diverse Paths towards the ‘Right Institutions’: Law, the State and Economic Reform in East Asia. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, T., 2003. Building Institutional Capacity for China's New Economic Opening. In Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×