Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T15:07:09.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - A historical, not comparative, method: breakthroughs and limitations in the theory and methodology of Michael Mann's analysis of power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Jack A. Goldstone
Edited by
John A. Hall  and
Ralph Schroeder
Jack A. Goldstone
Affiliation:
Professor of Public Policy George Mason University
John A. Hall
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Ralph Schroeder
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Michael Mann's work ranges over such a vast array of periods and places – the prestate peoples of prehistory in the Old and New World; the ancient empires of Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Athens, Hellas, Rome; the varied states of Europe from the Middle Ages to the present; and excursions into India, China and the lands of Islam – that one's first reaction to my title might be: how could anyone claim that Mann's method is not comparative? Let me consult an expert who should know: Michael Mann. On p. 503 of the Sources of Social Power, Volume I (1986), he says: ‘Historical, not comparative, sociology has been my principal method.’ My purpose in this chapter is to explore the implications of this statement. I believe that this approach has allowed Mann to make several major breakthroughs in our understanding of states, their emergence and their development. For this, we will always be in his debt. At the same time, I wish to suggest that the limitations imposed by this choice have also led to problems in his theory of the emergence of the modern world.

Breakthroughs Mann's theory of state formation and development

Mann's theory of state formation and development offers some of the most striking and significant advances since Weber. This advance does not lie in his four-fold typology of power, the now famous IEMP quartet: ideological, economic, military and political power.

Type
Chapter
Information
An Anatomy of Power
The Social Theory of Michael Mann
 , pp. 263 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashton, T. S. 1948. The Industrial Revolution, 1760–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1976. Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll-Burke, P. 2001. Tools, Instruments, and Engines: Getting a Handle on the Specificity of Engine Science. Social Studies of Science, 31(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Harley, C. K.. 1992. Output Growth and the Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts–Harley View. Economic History Review, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, A. 1997. The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davids, K. 1995. Shifts of Technological Leadership in Early Modern Europe. In Davids, K. and Lucassen, J. (eds.), A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vries, J. 2000. Dutch Economic Growth in Comparative Historical Perspective, 1500–2000. De Economist, 148(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, M. 1973. The Pattern of the Chinese Past. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feingold, M. 1996. Reversal of Fortunes: The Displacement of Cultural Hegemony from the Netherlands to England in the Seventeenth and early Eighteenth Centuries. In Hoak, D. and Feingold, M. (eds.), The World of William and Mary: Anglo-Dutch Perspectives on the Revolution of 1688–89. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. 1998. The Pilgrim Art: The Culture of Porcelain in World History. Journal of World History, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A. G. 1998. Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 1987. Cultural Orthodoxy, Risk, and Innovation: The Divergence of East and West in the Early Modern World. Sociological Theory, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 1997. Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology. Comparative Social Research, 16.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 1998. The Problem of the ‘Early Modern’ World. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2000. The Rise of the West – or Not? A Revision to Socio-economic History. Sociological Theory, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2002a. Europe's Peculiar Path: Would the World be ‘Modern’ if William III's Invasion of England in 1688 had Failed? In Lebow, N., Parker, G. and Tetlock, P. (eds.), Counterfactual History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2002b. Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking the ‘Rise of the West’ and the Industrial Revolution. Journal of World History, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2002c. Comparative-Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions. In Reuschemeyer, D. and Mahoney, J. (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1996. The East in the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A. 1985. Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, M., and Reid, D.. 2001. Technical Knowledge and the Mental Universe of Manchester's Early Cotton Manufacturers. Canadian Journal of History, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landes, D. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lavely, W., and Wong, R. B.. 1998. Revising the Malthusian Narrative: The Comparative Study of Population Dynamics in Late Imperial China. Journal of Asian Studies, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., and Wang, F.. 1999. One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, D. 2001. At the Dawn of Modernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, B. 1998. Agricultural Development in Jiangnan, 1620–1850. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malanima, P. 2001. The Energy Basis for Early Modern Growth, 1650–1820. In Prak, M. (ed.), Early Modern Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1984. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Nature, Causes and Consequences. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. A. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History from the Beginning to 1760 AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. A. 2000. Modernity and Globalization. Unpublished, given as the Wiles Lectures at Queen's University, Belfast.
Mokyr, J. 1999 (2nd edn). The British Industrial Revolution. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 2002. Gifts of Athena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, K. 2000a. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, K. 2000b. Re-thinking the Late Imperial Chinese Economy: Development, Disaggregation and Decline, circa 1730–1930. Itinerario, 22(3/4).Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., and Somers, M.. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macro-social Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunzelmann, G. N. 1978. Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wong, R. B. 1997. China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. 1967. A Simple Model of London's Importance in Changing English Society and Economy, 1650–1750. Past and Present, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. 1988. Continuity, Chance, and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×