Congressional Research Service. The Federal Land Management Agencies. Report by K. Hoover, coordinator, specialist in Natural Resources Policy. IF10585 (Washington, DC: February 16, 2021). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10585.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. US Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Federal and Nonfederal Areas. Report by M. Humphries, specialist in Energy Policy. R42432 (Washington, DC: October 23, 2018). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R42432.Google Scholar

Light v. United States, 220 US 523, 537 (Supreme Court 1911).Google Scholar

Pidot, J. R.. “Compensatory Mitigation and Public Lands.” Boston College Law Review 61, no. 3 (March 30, 2020): 1045–1110. https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol61/iss3/5.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, C. F.. “The Public Trust Doctrine in Public Land Law.” Colorado Law Scholarly Commons 14 (1980): 269–316. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2098&context=articles.Google Scholar

Holden, E., Tobias, J. and Chang, A.. “Revealed: The Full Extent of Trump’s ‘Meat Cleaver’ Assault on US Wilderness.” The Guardian, October 26, 2020. www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2020/oct/26/revealed-trump-public-lands-oil-drilling.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management Alaska. “Notice of Sale to Be Issued for Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Dec. 7.” News release, December 3, 2020. www.blm.gov/press-release/notice-sale-be-issued-coastal-plain-oil-and-gas-leasing-program-dec-7.Google Scholar

Lipton, E.. “In Last Rush, Trump Grants Mining and Energy Firms Access to Public Lands.” New York Times, December 19, 2020. www.nytimes.com/2020/12/19/us/politics/in-last-rush-trump-grants-mining-and-energy-firms-access-to-public-lands.html.Google Scholar

Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process: Final Rule. 40 Code of Federal Regulations 83. Environmental Protection Agency. 85 Federal Register 84130–84157 (December 23, 2020). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/23/2020-27368/increasing-consistency-and-transparency-in-considering-benefits-and-costs-in-the-clean-air-act.Google Scholar

Wilderness Society and Avarna Group. “How Did Public Lands Come to Be?” In Public Lands in the United States: Examining the Past to Build a More Equitable Future (July 2019). www.wilderness.org/sites/default/files/media/file/Module%202%20-%20Reading.pdf.Google Scholar

Wilderness Society and Avarna Group. Public Lands in the United States: Examining the Past to Build a More Equitable Future (July 2019). www.wilderness.org/sites/default/files/media/file/Public%20Lands%20in%20the%20United%20States.pdf.Google Scholar

Kantor, I.. “Ethnic Cleansing and America’s Creation of National Parks.” Public Land and Resources Law Review 28 (2007): 41–64. https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1267&context=plrlr.Google Scholar

Ruple, J. C.. “The Transfer of Public Lands Movement: The Battle to Take Back Lands That Were Never Theirs.” Colorado Natural Resources Energy & Environmental Law Review 29, no. 1 (2018): 1–78. www.colorado.edu/law/sites/default/files/attached-files/ruple_final_1-5-web_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Sax, J. L.. “Why We Will Not (Should Not) Sell the Public Lands: Changing Conceptions of Private Property.” Utah Law Review, no. 2 (1983): 313–326.Google Scholar

Sax, J. L.. “The Legitimacy of Collective Values: The Case of the Public Lands.” University of Colorado Law Review 56 (1984): 537–558.Google Scholar

Leshy, J. D.. “Public Land Policy after the Trump Administration: Is This a Turning Point?” Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review 31, no. 3 (2020): 472–507. www.colorado.edu/law/sites/default/files/attached-files/002_leshy_final_copy.pdf.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data. Report by C. H. Vincent, specialist in Natural Resources Policy; L. A. Hanson, senior research librarian; and L. F. Bermejo, research assistant. R42346 (Washington, DC: October 23, 2020). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42346.pdf.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Revenues and Disbursements from Oil and Natural Gas Production on Federal Lands. Report by B. S. Tracy, analyst in Energy Policy. R46537 (Washington, DC: September 22, 2020). www.everycrsreport.com/files/2020-09-22_R46537_a7dc7a1cdb61406e0cd5344716eccaf9e960bc72.pdf.Google Scholar

Bilmes, L. J. and Loomis, J. B.. Valuing US National Parks and Programs: America’s Best Investment. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office. Oil and Gas: Bureau of Land Management Should Address Risks from Insufficient Bonds to Reclaim Wells. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (September 2019). www.gao.gov/assets/710/701450.pdf.Google Scholar

Department of the Interior and US Geological Survey. Federal Lands Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sequestration in the United States: Estimates for 2005–14. Report by M. D. Merrill, B. M. Sleeter, P. A. Freeman, J. Liu, P. D. Warwick and B. C. Reed (Reston, VA: 2018). https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2018/5131/sir20185131.pdf.Google Scholar

Department of the Interior, Office of Policy Analysis. US Department of the Interior Economic Report FY 2018 (September 30, 2019). www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy-2018-econ-report-final-9-30-19-v2.pdf.Google Scholar

National Park Service and Department of the Interior. 2019 National Park Visitor Spending Effects: Economic Contributions to Local Communities, States, and the Nation. Report by C. C. Thomas and L. Koontz (Fort Collins, CO: April 2020). www.nps.gov/subjects/socialscience/vse.htm.Google Scholar

Costanza, R. et al. “Twenty Years of Ecosystem Services: How Far Have We Come and How Far Do We Still Need to Go?” Ecosystem Services 28 (June 4, 2017): 1–16. www.robertcostanza.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017_J_Costanza-et-al.-20yrs.-EcoServices.pdf.Google Scholar

Environmental Protection Agency. The Economic Benefits of Protecting Healthy Watersheds (April 2012). www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/economic_benefits_factsheet3.pdf.Google Scholar

Congressional Budget Office. Options for Increasing Federal Income from Crude Oil and Natural Gas on Federal Lands. Report by A. Stocking and P. Beider. (Washington, DC: April 2016). www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/51421-oil_and_gas_options.pdf.Google Scholar

Walls, M., Lee, P. and Ashenfarb, M.. “National Monuments and Economic Growth in the American West.” Science Advances 6, no. 12 (March 18, 2020). https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/12/eaay8523/tab-pdf.Google Scholar

Dinerstein, E. et al. “A Global Deal for Nature: Guiding Principles, Milestones, and Targets.” Science Advances 5, no. 4 (April 19, 2019). https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/4/eaaw2869.Google Scholar

Conservation Science Partners. Executive Summary: Loss and Fragmentation of Natural Lands in the Conterminous US from 2001 to 2017. Report by D. M. Theobald, I. Leinwand, J. J. Anderson, V. Landau and B. G. Dickson (January 18, 2019). www.csp-inc.org/public/CSP%20Disappearing%20US%20Exec%20Summary%20011819.pdf.Google Scholar

State of the Rockies Project. Key Findings: The 2021 Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Eight Western States. Report by L. Weigel and D. Metz (January 2021). www.coloradocollege.edu/other/stateoftherockies/conservationinthewest/2021/2021-State-of-the-Rockies-D2a1.pdf.Google Scholar

Shiffman, D.. “An Ambitious Strategy to Preserve Biodiversity.” Scientific American, October 4, 2020. www.scientificamerican.com/article/an-ambitious-strategy-to-preserve-biodiversity.Google Scholar

Center for Western Priorities. Winning the West: Election 2018 (January 2019). https://westernpriorities.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Winning-the-West_2018.pdf.Google Scholar

Center for Western Priorities. Winning the West: Election 2020 (December 2020). https://westernpriorities.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WinningTheWest2020_CWP.pdf.Google Scholar

Bolton, A.. “McConnell Gives Two Vulnerable Senators a Boost with Vote on Outdoor Recreation Bill.” The Hill, May 21, 2020. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/499084-mcconnell-gives-two-vulnerable-senators-a-boost-with-vote-on-recreation-bill.Google Scholar

Edelstein, K.. The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines. FracTracker Alliance (February 28, 2019). www.fractracker.org/2019/02/the-growing-web-of-oil-and-gas-pipelines.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas and Crude Oil: Federal and State Regulatory Authority. Report by B. J. Murrill, legislative attorney. R44432 (Washington, DC: March 28, 2016). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44432.pdf.Google Scholar

Squillace, M. et al. “Presidents Lack the Authority to Abolish or Diminish National Monuments.” Virginia Law Review Online 103 (June 9, 2017): 55–71. www.virginialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Hecht%20PDF.pdf.Google Scholar

Ruple, J. C.. “The Trump Administration and Lessons Not Learned from Prior National Monument Modifications.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 43, no. 1 (2019): 1–76.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Congressional Roll Call Votes on the Keystone XL Pipeline. Report by L. J. Cunningham, senior research librarian. R42432 (Washington, DC: June 7, 2019). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43870.pdf.Google Scholar

Call for Nominations and Comments for the Coastal Plain Alaska Oil and Gas Lease Sale: Notice. 19X.LLAK930000.L13100000.EI0000.241A. Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. 85 Federal Register 73292–73293 (November 17, 2020). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/17/2020-25316/call-for-nominations-and-comments-for-the-coastal-plain-alaska-oil-and-gas-lease-sale.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR): An Overview. Report by L. B. Comay, M. Ratner and R. E. Crafton. RL33872 (Washington, DC: January 9, 2018). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33872.pdf.Google Scholar

Resource Management Planning: Final Rule. 43 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1600. Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. 81 Federal Register 89580–89671 (December 28, 2018). www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-12-12/pdf/2016-28724.pdf.Google Scholar

Burr, T.. “Effort to Shrink Bears Ears National Monument Started before Donald Trump Was Elected President.” Salt Lake Tribune, December 3, 2017. www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2017/12/03/effort-to-shrink-bears-ears-national-monument-started-before-donald-trump-was-elected-president/.Google Scholar

Cama, T.. “GOP Lawmaker Withdraws Bill to Sell Federal Land.” The Hill, February 2, 2017. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/317514-gop-rep-pulls-bill-to-sell-federal-land.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. and O’Neil, C.. “Who Controls Trump’s Environmental Policy?” New York Times, January 14, 2020. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/14/climate/fossil-fuel-industry-environmental-policy.html.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.. “Inspector General Says Official at Interior Dept. Violated Ethics Rules.” New York Times, December 11, 2019.Google Scholar

Patterson, B.. “Zinke Donors Include Oil and Gas Firms Using Public Land.” E&E News, January 13, 2017. www.eenews.net/stories/1060048348.Google Scholar

Natter, A. and Dlouhy, J. A.. “Ryan Zinke Is Now Taking Clients from Industries He Oversaw in Trump’s Cabinet.” Bloomberg, July 23, 2019. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-23/former-interior-chief-zinke-now-enlisting-energy-mining-clients.Google Scholar

Western Values Project. The Curious Case of Interior Secretary David Bernhardt’s Recusals (August 2, 2019). https://westernvaluesproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/20190802-WVP-Report-Curious-Case-of-Bernhardts-Recusal.pdf.Google Scholar

Pendley, W. P.. “The Federal Government Should Follow the Constitution and Sell Its Western Lands.” National Review, January 19, 2016. www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/federal-government-should-sell-western-land-follow-constitution.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. Oversight Hearing on BLM Disorganization: Examining the Proposed Reorganization and Relocation of the Bureau of Land Management Headquarters to Grand Junction, Colorado. Committee on Natural Resources. 116th Congress, 1st Sess. September 10, 2019.Google Scholar

Meghani, Z. and Kuzma, J.. “The ‘Revolving Door’ between Regulatory Agencies and Industry: A Problem That Requires Reconceptualizing Objectivity.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24, no. 6 (September 17, 2010): 575–599.Google Scholar

Blanes i Vidal, J., Draca, M. and Fons-Rosen, C.. “Revolving Door Lobbyists.” American Economic Review 102, no. 7 (December 2012): 3731–3748.Google Scholar

Bertrand, M., Bombardini, M. and Trebbi, F.. “Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process.” American Economic Review 104, no. 12 (December 2014): 3885–3920.Google Scholar

Fennell, A.-M. and Rusco, F., directors of Natural Resources and Environment. Bureau of Land Management: Agency’s Reorganization Efforts Did Not Substantially Address Key Practices for Effective Reforms. Submitted to R. Grijalva, chairman of the Committee on Natural Resources. March 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Friedman, L.. “A War against Climate Science, Waged by Washington’s Rank and File.” New York Times, July 14, 2020.Google Scholar

Tabuchi, H.. “A Trump Insider Embeds Climate Denial in Scientific Research.” New York Times, March 2, 2020.Google Scholar

Goldman, G. T. et al. “Perceived Losses of Scientific Integrity under the Trump Administration: A Survey of Federal Scientists.” PLoS ONE 15, no. 4 (April 23, 2020): e0231929. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231929.Google Scholar

Abbey, B. and Caswell, J.. “The Stealth Plan to Erode Public Control of Public Lands.” Politico, December 12, 2019. www.politico.com/news/agenda/2019/12/12/public-lands-bureau-land-management-082689;.Google Scholar

Freemuth, J. and Skillen, J. R.. “Moving Bureau of Land Management Headquarters to Colorado Won’t Be Good for Public Lands.” The Conservation, January 8, 2020. https://theconversation.com/moving-bureau-of-land-management-headquarters-to-colorado-wont-be-good-for-public-lands-126990.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, D.. 22 Secretarial Order 3369: Promoting Open Science (September 28, 2018). www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so_3369_promoting_open_science.pdf.Google Scholar

Doyle, M.. “Interior Department Moves to Impose New Rules on Use of Science in Decision-Making.” Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), February 27, 2020. www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/interior-department-moves-impose-new-rules-use-science-decision-making.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management. Air Resources Management Program Strategy. Report by K. E. Rodgers, R. A. Boyd, T. H. Alexander and L. A. Ford (February 2015). www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/AirResourceProgramStrategy.pdf.Google Scholar

Freedom of Information Act Regulations. 43 Code of Federal Regulations 2. Environmental Protection Agency. 83 Federal Register 67175–67180 (December 28, 2018). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/28/2018-27561/freedom-of-information-act-regulations.Google Scholar

McGrath, D.. Interior’s Proposed FOIA Rule Threatens Transparency and Accountability. American Oversight (January 29, 2019). www.americanoversight.org/interiors-proposed-foia-rule-threatens-transparency-and-accountability.Google Scholar

Townsend, M. E.. open government staff attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. Comments on the US Department of the Interior’s Freedom of Information Act Rule Revisions, Docket No. DOI-2018-0017. Submitted to C. Cafaro, Office of Executive Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs. January 29, 2019.Google Scholar

Brown, B. D., executive director of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Proposed Revisions to the Department of the Interior’s Freedom of Information Act Regulations, RIN 1093-AA26/Docket No. DOI-2018-0017. Submitted to Office of the Secretary, the Interior. January 28, 2019.Google Scholar

United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 US 749 (Supreme Court 1989).Google Scholar

Wilderness Society and Center for Western Priorities. America’s Public Lands Giveaway (April 2020). https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36d517f10bb0424493e88e3d22199bb3.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. Oil and Gas Statistics (2019). www.blm.gov/programs/energy-and-minerals/oil-and-gas/oil-and-gas-statistics.Google Scholar

Center for Western Priorities. Dashboard: Oil and Gas Leasing (2021). https://westernpriorities.org/dashboard-oil-gas-leasing.Google Scholar

Bucks, D. R.. A Fair Return for the American People: Increasing Oil and Gas Royalties from Federal Lands (March 2019). https://naturalresources.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony%20Attachment%20-%20Dan%20Bucks%20-%20EMR%20Leg%20Hrg%2009.24.19.pdf.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Federal Oil and Gas Revenue: Actions Needed to Improve BLM’s Royalty Relief Policy. Report by F. Rusco, director Natural Resources and Environment (October 6, 2020). www.gao.gov/assets/720/710030.pdf.Google Scholar

Department of the Interior. Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Prevention Rule. (2016). www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/methane_waste_prevention_rule_factsheet.pdf.Google Scholar

California v. Bernhardt, 472 F. Supp. 3d 573 (N.D. Cal. 2020).Google Scholar

Anchondo, C.. “‘Roller Coaster’: Judge Scraps Obama-Era Methane Rule.” ClimateWire, October 9, 2020. www.eenews.net/climatewire/stories/1063715891?t=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eenews.net%2Fstories%2F1063715891.Google Scholar

Oil and Gas; Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands; Rescission of a 2015 Rule: Final Rule. 43 Code of Federal Regulations 3160. Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 82 Federal Register 61924–61949 (December 29, 2017) www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/29/2017-28211/oil-and-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-on-federal-and-indian-lands-rescission-of-a-2015-rule.Google Scholar

Oil and Gas; Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands: Final Rule. 43 Code of Federal Regulations 3160. Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 80 Federal Register 16127–16222 (March 26, 2015) www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/03/26/2015-06658/oil-and-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-on-federal-and-indian-lands.Google Scholar

Taxpayers for Common Sense. Locked Out: The Cost of Speculation on Oil and Gas Leases on Federal Land (October 2017). www.taxpayer.net/wp-content/uploads/ported/images/downloads/LOCKED_OUT_Energy_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Center for American Progress. Oil and Gas Companies Gain by Stockpiling America’s Federal Land. Report by M. K. DeSantis (August 29, 2018). www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/reports/2018/08/29/455226/oil-gas-companies-gain-stockpiling-americas-federal-land.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Oil and Gas: Onshore Competitive and Noncompetitive Lease Revenues. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (November 19, 2020). www.gao.gov/products/GAO-21-138.Google Scholar

New York Times Staff. “Documents: Leaked Industry Emails and Reports.” New York Times, August 2011. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/natural-gas-drilling-down-documents-4.html.Google Scholar

Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting: Final Rule. 17 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 210 and 211. Securities and Exchange Commission. 74 Federal Register 2158–2197 (January 14, 2009) www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-8995fr.pdf.Google Scholar

Glick, R. and Christiansen, M.. “FERC and Climate Change.” Energy Law Journal 40, no. 1 (2019). www.eenews.net/assets/2019/05/06/document_gw_02.pdf.Google Scholar

Bateman, C. J. and Tripp, J. T. B.. “Toward Greener FERC Regulation of the Power Industry.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 38 (2014): 275–333.Google Scholar

Flyer, A.. “FERC Compliance under NEPA: FERC’s Obligation to Fully Evaluate Upstream and Downstream Environmental Impacts Associated with Siting Natural Gas Pipelines and Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals.” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 27 (2015): 301–319. https://gielr.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/flyer-final-pdf-27-2.pdf.Google Scholar

John, J. S.. “Senate Confirms Democrat Clements, Republican Christie to FERC.” GreenTech Media, December 1, 2020. www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/senate-confirms-democrat-clements-republican-christie-to-ferc#.Google Scholar

Analysis Group. FERC’s Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Facilities. Report by S. F. Tierney (Washington, DC: November 2019). www.analysisgroup.com/globalassets/content/insights/publishing/revising_ferc_1999_pipeline_certification.pdf.Google Scholar

Glick, R., chairman of the Federal Regulatory Commission. Dissent on PennEast Pipeline Co. LLC. Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Docket No. CP15-558-001. August 10, 2018.Google Scholar

Glick, R., chairman of the Federal Regulatory Commission. Dissent Regarding Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P. (Jordan Cove LNG Terminal). Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. May 21, 2020.Google Scholar

LaFleur, C. A.. Dissent on Order Issuing Certificates and Granting Abandonment Authority (Mountain Valley Pipeline and Atlantic Coast Pipeline). Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Docket Nos. CP15-554-000 CP16-10-000. October 13, 2017.Google Scholar

LaFleur, C. A.. Testimony at the Hearing on the Natural Gas Act. Submitted to United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy. February 5, 2020.Google Scholar

McNamee, B. L., Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Order Issuing Certificates and Approving Abandonment. Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. July 17, 2020.Google Scholar

Webb, R.. “Climate Change, FERC, and Natural Gas Pipelines: The Legal Basis for Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.” NYU Environmental Law Journal 28, no. 2 (2019): 179–226.Google Scholar

Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 867 F.3d 1357, 1374 (D.C. Cir. 2017).Google Scholar

Final Environmental Impact Statement – Midcontinent Supply Header Interstate Pipeline Project. Staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission PF17-3, CP17-458 (2018). www.ferc.gov/final-environmental-impact-statement-midcontinent-supply-header-interstate-pipeline-projectGoogle Scholar

Birckhead v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 925 F.3d 510 (D.C. Cir. 2019).Google Scholar

Klass, A. B.. “Eminent Domain Law As Climate Policy.” Wisconsin Law Review 49, no. 1 (June 8, 2020): 50–83.Google Scholar

City of Oberlin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 937 F.3d 599, 601, 603 (D.C. Cir. 2019).Google Scholar

Klass, A. B.. “The Public Use Clause in an Age of US Natural Gas Exports.” Stanford Law Review Online 72 (April 2019): 103–111. https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/03/72-Stan.-L.-Rev.-Online-Klass.pdf.Google Scholar

Bookbinder, D. and Gibson, M., Niskanen Center. Comments on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Jordan Cove Energy Project. Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. PF17-4-000. January 2020.Google Scholar

Allegheny Defense Project v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 964 F.3d. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2020).Google Scholar

House Committee on Oversight and Reform. “Subcommittee Releases Preliminary Findings Showing FERC Pipeline Approval Process Skewed Against Landowners.” News release, April 28, 2020. https://oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/subcommittee-releases-preliminary-findings-showing-ferc-pipeline-approval.Google Scholar

Ewing, R.. “Pipeline Companies Target Small Farmers and Use Eminent Domain for Private Gain.” North Carolina Central Law Review 38, no. 2 (2016): 125–141.Google Scholar

Bell, J.. “Big Changes May Be Ahead for Natural Gas Pipelines, If FERC Does Its Job.” Utility Dive, September 16, 2020. www.utilitydive.com/news/big-changes-may-be-ahead-for-natural-gas-pipelines-if-ferc-does-its-job/585182/.Google Scholar

Limiting Authorizations to Proceed with Construction Activities Pending Rehearing: Final Rule. 18 Code of Federal Regulations Part 153 and 157. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Docket No. RM20-15-000; Order No. 871 (June 9, 2020). www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/RM20-15-000.pdf.Google Scholar

Hayes, D., staff attorney at Sierra Club. Comments on the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Proposal to Reissue and Modify Nationwide Permit 12, Docket No. COE-2015-0017. Submitted to US Army Corps of Engineers (August 1, 2016).Google Scholar

Northern Plains Resource Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. CV-19-44-GF-BMM, F.Supp. 3d, 2020 WL 1875455 (D. Mont. April 15, 2020).Google Scholar

Frazin, R.. “Overnight Energy: Supreme Court Reinstates Fast-Track Pipeline Permit Except for Keystone, Judge Declines to Reverse Dakota Access Pipeline Shutdown.” The Hill, July 7, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/506266-overnight-energy-supreme-court-reinstates-fast-track-pipeline.Google Scholar

Feldman, H. J., senior director of Regulatory and Scientific Affairs. Re: EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 (82 FR 17793) Comments in Response to the EPA’s Solicitation of Input from the Public to Inform Its Regulatory Reform Task Force’s Evaluation of Existing Regulations. Submitted to S. K. Dravis, regulatory reform officer and associate administrator in the Office of Policy at the Environmental Protection Agency. May 15, 2017.Google Scholar

American Petroleum Institute. Attachment 1: Comments on Specific Regulations (Washington, DC: May 15, 2017). www.api.org/~/media/Files/News/Letters-Comments/2017/5-15-17-API-Comments-on-specific-regulations.pdf.Google Scholar

Feldman, H. J., senior director of Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, Black, A. J., president and CEO of Association of Oil Pipelines and Van Liew, D., vice president of IAGC. Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 85 Fed. Reg. 1,684 (January 10, 2020). Submitted to E. A. Boling, Council on Environmental Quality. March 10, 2020.Google Scholar

Turner, A. J., counsel for the ESA Cross-Industry Coalition, et al. Comments in Response to the Three Proposals from the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to Amend Their Endangered Species Act Regulations. Submitted to US Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. September 24, 2018.Google Scholar

Indigenous Environmental Network v. United States Department of State, 347 F. Supp. 3d 561 (D. Mont.) order amended and supplemented, 369 F. Supp. 3d 1045 (D. Mont. 2018), and appeal dismissed and remanded sub nom. Indigenous Environmental Network v. United States Department of State, No. 18-36068, 2019 WL 2542756 (9th Cir. June 6, 2019).Google Scholar

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. v. US Army Corps of Engineers, 471 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C 2020), affirmed in part, revised in part sub nom. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 985 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 20-5197, 2020 WL 4548123 (D.C. Cir. August 5, 2020).Google Scholar

WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke, 368 F. Supp. 3d 41 (D.D.C. 2019).Google Scholar

WildEarth Guardians v. Bernhardt, No. CV 16-1724 (RC), 2019 WL 3253685 (D.D.C. July 19, 2019).Google Scholar

WildEarth Guardians v. US Bureau of Land Management, 457 F. Supp. 3d 880 (D. Mont. 2020).Google Scholar

Liptak, A.. “Supreme Court Won’t Block Ruling to Halt Work on Keystone XL Pipeline.” New York Times, July 8, 2020.Google Scholar

Western Watersheds Project v. Zinke, 441 F. Supp. 3d 1042 (D. Idaho 2020).Google Scholar

Montana Wildlife Federation v. David Bernhardt, No. CV-18-69-GF-BMM, 2020 WL 2615631 (D. Mont. May 22, 2020), appeal dismissed, No. 20-35609, 2020 WL 6194597 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2020).Google Scholar

Freeman, M.. “Court Strikes Down Trump Administration’s Sage-Grouse Directive, Canceling Hundreds of Oil and Gas Leases.” News release, May 26, 2020, https://earthjustice.org/news/press/2020/court-strikes-down-trump-administrations-sage-grouse-directive-canceling-hundreds-of-oil-and-gas-leases.Google Scholar

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Protest in Opposition to the Petition for Declaratory Order Filed by Jordan Cove Energy Project LP and Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, LP. Submitted to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. May 2020.Google Scholar

Council on Environmental Quality. Major Cases Interpreting the National Environmental Policy Act. June 1997. https://ceq.doe.gov/docs/laws-regulations/Major_NEPA_Cases.pdfGoogle Scholar

Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act: Final Rule. 40 Code of Federal Regulations 1500–1508, 1515–1518. Council on Environmental Quality. 85 Federal Register 43304–43376 (July 16, 2020) www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/16/2020-15179/update-to-the-regulations-implementing-the-procedural-provisions-of-the-national-environmental.Google Scholar

State of California v. Council on Environmental Quality WL 672540 (N.D. Cal. 2021).Google Scholar

Environmental Justice Health Alliance et al. v. Council on Environmental Quality et al, No. 1:20CV06143 (S.D.N.Y. 2020).Google Scholar

Buccino, S., senior director of Lands Division at Natural Resources Defense Council. Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council on CEQ’s proposed Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. Submitted to M. Neumayr, chairman of Council on Environmental Quality. March 10, 2020.Google Scholar

Attorneys General of Washington, California, New York, District of Columbia, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 85 Fed. Reg. 1684 (Jan. 10, 2020) Docket ID No. CEQ-2019-0003. Submitted to E. A. Boling, associate director for the National Environmental Policy Act, and V. Z. Seale, chief of staff and general counsel for Council on Environmental Quality. March 10, 2020.Google Scholar

Sierra Club v. Babbitt, 65 F. 3d. 1502, 1509 (9th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. The Legal Framework of the National Environmental Policy Act. Report by N. M. Hart and L. Tsang (Washington, DC: October 22, 2020).Google Scholar

Endangered Species Act. 16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, 87 Stat. 884. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior (1973). www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/ESAall.pdf.Google Scholar

Campbell, T. IV et al. “Protecting the Lesser Prairie Chicken under the Endangered Species Act: A Problem and an Opportunity for the Oil and Gas Industry.” Texas Environmental Law Journal 45, no. 1 (February 2015): 31–50.Google Scholar

Galperin, J.. “Trust Me, I’m a Pragmatist: A Partially Pragmatic Critique of Pragmatic Activism.” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 42, no. 2 (2017): 425–496.Google Scholar

Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt, No. 19-CV-05206-JST, 2020 WL 4188091 (N.D. Cal. May 18, 2019).Google Scholar

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, California v. David Bernhardt, 472F. Supp. 3d 573 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (No. 4:18-cv-05712-YGR).Google Scholar

Attorneys General of Massachusetts, California, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. Comments on the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Proposed Rules. Submitted to R. K. Zinke, secretary of the Department of the Interior and W. Ross, secretary of the Department of Commerce. September 24, 2018.Google Scholar

Comments on Proposed Revisions to Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat. Submitted to G. Frazer, assistant director for Endangered Species Ecological Services Program and S. D. Rauch III, deputy assistant administrator for Regulatory Programs Office of Protected Resources. Docket ID: FWS–HQ–ES–2020–0047. September 3, 2020.Google Scholar

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants. 50 Code of Federal Regulations Part 17. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. 84 Federal Register 44753–44760 (August 27, 2019). www.regulations.gov/document?D=FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0007-69538.Google Scholar

Endangered and Threatened Species, Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat: Final Rule. 50 Code of Federal Regulations Part 424. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. 84 Federal Register 45020–45053 (August 27, 2019). www.regulations.gov/document?D=FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0006-64025.Google Scholar

Duncan, D.. “Clean Water Act Section 401: Balancing States’ Rights and the Nation’s Need for Energy Infrastructure.” Hastings Environmental Law Journal 25, no. 2 (2019): 235–262.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Clean Water Act Section 401: Background and Issues. Report by C. Copeland, specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy. 97-488 (Washington, DC: July 2, 2015). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/97-488.pdf.Google Scholar

Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule: Draft of Final Rule. 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0405; FRL-10009-80-OW (June 2020). www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-06/documents/pre-publication_version_of_the_clean_water_act_section_401_certification_rule_508.pdf.Google Scholar

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Suquamish Tribe et al. v. Andrew Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency (N.D. Cal. 2019) (No. 3:20CV06137).Google Scholar

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, State of California et al. v. Andrew R. Wheeler et al., WL 9172918 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (Nos 20-cv-04869-WHA, 20-cv-04636-WHA).Google Scholar

Attorneys General of California, Connecticut, Maryland, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Objection to the Clean Water Act Section 401 Guidance for Federal Agencies, States, and Authorized Tribes. Submitted to A. R. Wheeler, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. July 25, 2019.Google Scholar

Nasmith, M., staff attorney at Earthjustice, et al. Comments on EPA Proposed Rule Updating Regulations on Water Quality Certification. Submitted to A. R. Wheeler, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA–HQ–OW–2019–0405. October 21, 2019.Google Scholar

Bellon, M. D., director of Washington State Department of Ecology. Decision on the Request for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Submitted to K. Gaines, Millennium Bulk Terminals-Longview, LLC. September 26, 2017.Google Scholar

Ogsbury, J. D., executive director of Western Governors’ Association, et al. Comments in Response to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Proposed Rule, Updating Regulations on Water Quality Certification. Submitted to A. R. Wheeler, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0405. October 16, 2019.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service Legal Sidebar. Wading into the “Waters of the United States.” Report by S. P. Mulligan, legislative attorney. LSB10236 (Washington, DC: December 28, 2018). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10236.pdf.Google Scholar

Chung, D. Y. and Frost, L. P.. “Dueling Navigable Waters Protection Rule Decisions Leave Uncertainty in Their Wake.” Trends (American Bar Association), October 30, 2020. www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/publications/trends/2020-2021/november-december-2020/dueling-navigable-water.Google Scholar

The Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”: Final Rule. 33 Code of Federal Regulations 328 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations 110, 112, 116, 117, 120, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, 401. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency. 85 Federal Register 22250–22342 (April 21, 2020) www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/21/2020-02500/the-navigable-waters-protection-rule-definition-of-waters-of-the-united-states.Google Scholar

Sullivan, S. M. P., Rains, M. C. and Rodewald, A. D.. “The Proposed Change to the Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’ Flouts Sound Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, no. 24 (June 11, 2019): 11558–11561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907489116. www.pnas.org/content/116/24/11558.Google Scholar

Sullivan, S. M. P. et al. “Distorting Science, Putting Water at Risk.” Science 369, no. 6505 (August 14, 2020): 766–768.Google Scholar

Honeycutt, M., chair of the Science Advisory Board. Draft Commentary on the Proposed Rule Defining the Scope of Waters Federally Regulated under the Clean Water Act. Submitted to A. R. Wheeler, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-SAB-20-xxx. October 16, 2019.Google Scholar

Environmental Protection Agency. Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence (Final Report). EPA/600/R-14/475 F (Washington, DC: 2015). https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=296414.Google Scholar

Alexander, L. C.. “Science at the Boundaries: Scientific Support for the Clean Water Rule.” University of Chicago Press Journal 34, no. 4 (August 7, 2015). www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/684076.Google Scholar

Science Advisory Board. SAB Review of the Draft EPA Report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence. Submitted to G. McCarthy, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. October 17, 2014.Google Scholar

Boyle, K. J., Kotchen, M. J. and Smith, V. K.. “Deciphering Dueling Analyses of Clean Water Regulations.” Science 358, no. 6359 (October 6, 2017): 49–50. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/358/6359/49.summary.Google Scholar

Creed, I. F. et al. “Enhancing Protection for Vulnerable Waters.” Nature Geoscience, no. 10 (October 2, 2017): 809–815. www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3041?WT.feed_name=subjects_law.Google Scholar

Complaint, Conservation Law Foundation et al. v. US Environmental Agency et al., WL 8669769 (D. Mass. 2020) (No. 1:20-cv-10820-DPW).Google Scholar

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, California. v. Wheeler, 472 F. Supp. 3d 573 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (No 4:18-cv-05712-YGR 2020).Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. P. and King, P.. “Biden Races Courts for Chance to Torpedo Trump Water Rule.” E&E News, April 28, 2021.Google Scholar

Lalley, T.. “Fifteen State AGs Challenge Rule Allowing Transport of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) by Rail.” News release, NYU School of Law State Energy & Environmental Impact Center, August 18, 2020, www.law.nyu.edu/centers/state-impact/press-publications/press-releases/lng-by-rail-challenge.Google Scholar

Associated Press. “A Timeline of Recent Oil Train Crashes in the US and Canada.” Associated Press, June 13, 2016. https://apnews.com/article/oil-spills-fires-north-dakota-accidents-canada-84b1e8273d854697b34af57bc60badc2.Google Scholar

Campbell, B.. The Lac-Mégantic Rail Disaster: Public Betrayal, Justice Denied. Toronto, ON: Lorimer, 2018.Google Scholar

Cama, T.. “Trump Officials Roll Back Obama Oil Train Safety Rule.” The Hill, September 24, 2018. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/408125-trump-admin-rolls-back-obama-oil-train-safety-rule.Google Scholar

Hazardous Materials: Liquefied Natural Gas by Rail: Final Rule. 49 Code of Federal Regulations 172–174, 179, 180. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation. 85 Federal Register 44994–45030 (July 24, 2020). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/24/2020-13604/hazardous-materials-liquefied-natural-gas-by-rail.Google Scholar

Marshall, B., staff attorney at Earthjustice. Comments Objecting to the Proposed Rulemaking to Authorize the Transportation of Methane, Refrigerated Liquid by Rail, Docket No. PHMSA‐2018‐0025 (HM‐264). Submitted to D. Pearce, deputy administrator for the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration. January 13, 2020.Google Scholar

Maykuth, A.. “Plan to Send LNG Trains through Philly to S. Jersey Port Sparks Outrage from Residents, Environmentalists.” Philadelphia Inquirer, September 20, 2020. www.inquirer.com/business/philadelphia-lng-gibbstown-new-fortress-energy-port-drbc-fracking-trains-20200920.html.Google Scholar

Petition for Review, State of Maryland et al. v. United States Department of Transportation et al., D.C. No. 20-___ (Court of Appeals 2020).Google Scholar

Petition for Review, Sierra Club et al. v. United States Department of Transportation et al., D.C. No. 20-___ (Court of Appeals 2020).Google Scholar

Attorneys General of Maryland, New York, California, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia. Comments to Voice Their Strong Objection to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Submitted to D. Pearce, deputy administrator for the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration. January 13, 2020.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Rail Transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas: Safety and Regulation. Report by P. W. Parfomak, specialist in Energy and Infrastructure Policy and J. Frittelli, specialist in Transportation Policy. R46414 (Washington, DC: July 28, 2020). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R46414.pdf.Google Scholar

Mehrbani, R. A., Spitzer fellow and senior counsel at Brennan Center for Justice. Written Testimony at Hearing on H.R. 1: Strengthening Ethics Rules for the Executive Branch. Submitted to US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform. February 6, 2019.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. For the People Act of 2019. H.R. 1, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in House January 3, 2019.Google Scholar

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. What Democracy Looks Like. Report by J. Ahearn, C. Shaw, G. Lezra, M. Woodard and H. Hammado (Washington, DC: December 2, 2020). www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-reports/democracy-reform-blueprint-accountable-inclusive-ethical-government.Google Scholar

Yale Center for Business and the Environment; Wilderness Society. Key Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy on Public Lands. Report by N. Springer, Yale Center for Business and the Environment, and A. Daue, Wilderness Society (May 2020). www.wilderness.org/sites/default/files/media/file/CBEY_WILDERNESS_Renewable%20Energy%20Report_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Grassley, S. C. and Udall, S. T.. “End the Taxpayer Giveaway to Big Oil and Gas.” New York Times, December 2, 2020. www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-udall-nyt-op-ed-end-taxpayer-giveaway-big-oil-and-gas.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Restoring Community Input and Public Protections in Oil and Gas Leasing Act of 2020. H.R. 3225, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in House June 12, 2019.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Oil, Gas, and Coal Royalties: Raising Federal Rates Could Decrease Production on Federal Lands But Increase Federal Revenue. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (Washington, DC: June 2017). www.gao.gov/assets/690/685335.pdf.Google Scholar

Rusco, F., director Natural Resources and Environment. Testimony on Federal Energy Development: Challenges to Ensuring a Fair Return for Federal Energy Resources. Submitted to Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, House of Representatives (September 24, 2019).Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. Expressing the Sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government Should Establish a National Goal of Conserving at Least 30 Percent of the Land and Ocean of the United States by 2030. H.R.___ 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in Senate January 8, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. A Resolution Expressing the Sense of the Senate that the Federal Government Should Establish a National Goal of Conserving at Least 30 Percent of the Land and Ocean of the United States by 2030. S. 372 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in Senate October 22, 2019.Google Scholar

South Carolina General Assembly. State Senate. To Establish the Goal of Protecting Thirty Percent of the State of South Carolina by Not Later than 2030. Bill 1024, 123rd Sess. Introduced in State Senate January 21, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act. S. 47, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in Senate January 8, 2019.Google Scholar

Beitsch, R.. “House GOP Seeks to Cement Trump Rollback of Bedrock Environmental Law.” The Hill, September 22, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/517619-house-gop-seeks-to-cement-trump-rollback-of-bedrock-environmental.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Encouraging the Environmental Protection Agency to Maintain and Strengthen Requirements under the Clean Water Act and Reverse Ongoing Administrative Actions to Weaken This Landmark Law and Protections for United States Waters. H.R. 797, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in House January 14, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. A Resolution Encouraging the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Maintain and Strengthen Requirements under the Clean Water Act and Reverse Ongoing Administrative Actions to Weaken the Clean Water Act and Protections for Waters of the United States. S. 714, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in Senate September 9, 2019.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Encouraging the Trump Administration to Maintain Protections under the National Environmental Policy Act and Reverse Ongoing Administrative Actions to Weaken this Landmark Law and Its Protections for American Communities. H.Con.Res. 89, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in House February 11, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. A Resolution Encouraging the Trump Administration to Maintain Protections under the National Environmental Policy Act and Reverse Ongoing Administrative Actions to Weaken This Landmark Law and Its Protections for American Communities. S. 537, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in Senate March 10, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Clean Water for All Act. H.R. 6745, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in House May 8, 2020.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Federal Regulatory Certainty for Water Act. H.R. 2287, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in House April 10, 2019.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. Pipelines over People: How FERC Tramples Landowner Rights in Natural Gas Projects. Committee on Oversight and Reform. 116th Congress, 2nd sess. December 9, 2020.Google Scholar

Bullock v. Bureau of Land Management, Case No. 4:20-cv-00062-BMM (D. Montana September 25, 2020).Google Scholar

Rapanos v. United States, 547 US 715 (US Supreme Court 2006).Google Scholar

Cantu, A. and Galbraith, R.. Oil and Gas Industry Dominates Federal Agency Responsible for Pipeline Approvals. Public Accountability Initiative (2017).Google Scholar

Trump, D. J. An America First Energy Plan. Trump White House. March 2017.Google Scholar

Gardner, T. and Chiacu, D.. “Biden to Nominate Democrat Willie Phillips to US Energy Regulator – White House.” Reuters, September 9, 2021. www.reuters.com/business/energy/biden-nominate-lawyer-willie-phillips-ferc-white-house-2021-09-09.Google Scholar

Revenue Watch Institute. United States Native American Lands and Natural Resource Development. Report by M. Grogan, R. Morse and A. Youpee-Roll (2011). https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/documents/rwi_native_american_lands_2011.pdf.Google Scholar

Koenig, A. and Stein, J.. “Federalism and the State Recognition of Native American Tribes: A Survey of State-Recognized Tribes and State Recognition Processes Across the United States.” Santa Clara Law Review 48, no. 79 (2008): 82–83.Google Scholar

Day, S.. “Implications of Tribal Sovereignty, Federal Trust Responsibility, and Congressional Plenary Authority for Native American Lands.” In The Environmental Politics & Policy of Western Public Lands, edited by Wolters, E. A. and Steel, B. S.. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Smith, A. V.. “Federal Lands Are Becoming Tribal Lands Again.” Mother Jones, August 17, 2019. www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/08/federal-lands-are-becoming-tribal-lands-again.Google Scholar

Kalt, J. P. and Singer, J. W.. “Myths and Realities of Tribal Sovereignty: The Law and Economics of Indian Self-Rule.” Native Issues Research Symposium, no. RWP04-016 (March 2004).Google Scholar

Cobb, A. J.. “Understanding Tribal Sovereignty: Definitions, Conceptualizations, and Interpretations.” American Studies 46, no. 3/4 (2005): 115–132.Google Scholar

Tsosie, R.. “Tribal Environmental Policy in an Era of Self-Determination: The Role of Ethics, Economics, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge.” Vermont Law Review 21 (1996): 225–234.Google Scholar

Tsosie, R.. “Land, Culture, and Community: Reflections on Native Sovereignty and Property in America.” Indiana Law Review 34, no. 4 (2001): 1291–1312.Google Scholar

Hoffman, H. M. and Mills, M.. A Third Way: Decolonizing the Laws of Indigenous Cultural Protection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, C. F.. Blood Struggle: The Rise of Modern Indian Nations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. E. and Lomawaima, K. T.. Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Goldberg, C.E. et al. American Indian Law: Native Nations and the Federal System. LexisNexis, 2015.Google Scholar

Dunbar-Ortiz, R.. An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Blackhawk, N.. Violence over the Land: Indians and Empires in the Early American West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kronk Warner, E. A.. “Tribal Treaty Rights: A Powerful Tool in Challenges to Energy Infrastructure.” Connecticut Law Review 51 (2019): 843–888.Google Scholar

Volcovici, V.. “Trump Advisors Aim to Privatize Oil-Rich Indian Reservations.” Reuters, December 5, 2016. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-tribes-insight-idUSKBN13U1B1.Google Scholar

Ambler, M.. Breaking the Iron Bonds: Indian Control of Energy Development. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990.Google Scholar

Allison III, J. R.. Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Voyles, T. B.. Wastelanding: Legacies of Uranium Mining in Navajo Country. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Tsosie, R.. “Climate Change, Sustainability, and Globalization: Charting the Future of Indigenous Environmental Self-Determination.” Environment & Energy Law & Policy 4, no. 2 (2009): 188–255.Google Scholar

Obama, B.. Presidential Proclamation: Establishment of the Bears Ears National Monument. White House Office of the Press Secretary. 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/28/proclamation-establishment-bears-ears-national-monument.Google Scholar

Whyte, K. P.. “The Dakota Access Pipeline, Environmental Injustice, and US Settler Colonialism.” In The Nature of Hope: Grassroots Organizing, Environmental Justice, and Political Change, edited by Miller, C. and Crane, J.. 320–337. Louisville: University of Colorado Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Estes, N.. Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. London: Verso Books, 2019.Google Scholar

Loor, K. P.. “Tear Gas + Water Hoses + Dispersal Orders: The Fourth Amendment Endorses Brutality in Protest Policing.” Boston University Law Review 100 (May 2020): 817–848.Google Scholar

Tuell, L.. “The Obama Administration and Indian Law: A Pledge to Build a True Nation-to-Nation Relationship.” Federal Lawyer, April 2016, 44–48. www.fedbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Obama-pdf-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Executive Office of the President. A Renewed Era of Federal-Tribal Relations. Obama Administration. White House Tribal Nations Conference (January 2017). https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/whncaa_report.pdf.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. The Indian Trust Fund Litigation: An Overview of Cobell v. Salazar. Report by T. Garvey. RL34628 (July 13, 2010). www.everycrsreport.com/files/20100713_RL34628_d9b8f6b0182b2147928f22d7a214a825294e9e1f.pdf.Google Scholar

Cultural Survival Staff. “Presidents Day 2020: 11 Ways Trump Dishonors Native Americans & How Natives Fight Back.” Cultural Survival, February 17, 2020. www.culturalsurvival.org/news/presidents-day-2020-11-ways-trump-dishonors-native-americans-how-natives-fight-back.Google Scholar

Perez, T.. “Op-Ed: Trump Is Breaking the Federal Government’s Promises to Native Americans.” Los Angeles Times, August 7, 2017. www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-perez-native-american-indians-trump-20170807-story.html.Google Scholar

Udall, T.. Memo: Fact Checking the Trump Administration’s Attempt to Re-write Its Native American Record, False Promises to Tribes. US Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. October 23, 2020.Google Scholar

Lipton, E. and Friedman, L.. “Oil Was Central in Decision to Shrink Bears Ears Monument.” New York Times, March 2, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/03/02/climate/bears-ears-national-monument.html.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. Oversight Hearing on BLM Disorganization: Examining the Proposed Reorganization and Relocation of the Bureau of Land Management Headquarters to Grand Junction, Colorado. Committee on Natural Resources. 116th Congress, 1st sess. September 10, 2019.Google Scholar

Maffly, B.. “Feds’ Top Land Manager Remains the Attorney for Two Utah Counties in a Grand-Staircase Monument Lawsuit.” Salt Lake Tribune, August 31, 2019. www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2019/08/31/feds-top-land-manager.Google Scholar

US Senate. “Proceedings and Debates of the 116th Congress, Second Session.” Congressional Record 166, no. 159 (September 15, 2020). www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2020-09-15/pdf/CREC-2020-09-15-senate.pdf.Google Scholar

Brown, M.. “Drilling, Mines, Other Projects Hastened by Trump Order.” AP News, September 2, 2020. https://apnews.com/article/cb443d7b291f62ae649ba2acd80fe9b7.Google Scholar

Carpenter, K. A. and Riley, A. R.. “Privatizing the Reservation?” Stanford Law Review 71 (2019): 791–878. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2345&context=articles.Google Scholar

US Commission on Civil Rights. Broken Promises: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans (Washington, DC: December 2018). www.usccr.gov/pubs/2018/12-20-Broken-Promises.pdf.Google Scholar

Deloria, V., Jr. and Lytle, C. M.. American Indians, American Justice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Newton, N. J., ed. Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law. New York: LexisNexis, 2012.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, C. F. and Briggs, E. R.. “The Evolution of the Termination Policy.” American Indian Law Review 5 (1977): 139–184. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2122&context=articles.Google Scholar

Taylor, R.. “Trump Administration Revokes Reservation Status for Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Amid Coronavirus Crisis.” Vox, April 2, 2020. www.vox.com/identities/2020/4/2/21204113/mashpee-wampanoag-tribe-trump-reservation-native-land.Google Scholar

Riley, A. R.. “The History of Native American Lands and the Supreme Court.” Journal of the Supreme Court 38, no. 3 (2014): 369–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5818.2013.12024.x.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Indian Programs: Interior Should Address Factors Hindering Tribal Administration of Federal Programs. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (January 2019). www.gao.gov/assets/700/696330.pdf.Google Scholar

Wolfley, J.. “Embracing Engagement: The Challenges and Opportunities for the Energy Industry and Tribal Nations on Projects Affecting Tribal Rights and Off Reservation Lands.” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 19, no. 2 (2018): 115–163.Google Scholar

Wood, M. C.. “Indian Trust Responsibility: Protecting Tribal Lands and Resources Through Claims of Injunctive Relief against Federal Agencies.” Tulsa Law Review 39, no. 2 (Winter 2003): 355–368.Google Scholar

Riley, K. M.. “Congress, Tribal Recognition, and Legislative-Administrative Multiplicity.” Indiana Law Review 91, no. 3 (2016): 955–1021.Google Scholar

Rey-Bear, D. and Fletcher, M. L. M.. “We Need Protection from Our Protectors: The Nature, Issues, and Future of the Federal Trust Responsibility.” Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 6, no. 2 (2017): 397–462.Google Scholar

United States v. Winans, 198 US 371 (Supreme Court 1905).Google Scholar

Winters v. United States, 207 US 564 (Supreme Court 1908).Google Scholar

Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 US 543 (Supreme Court 1823).Google Scholar

Williams, R. A.. “Columbus’s Legacy: Law As an Instrument of Racial Discrimination against Indigenous Peoples’ Rights of Self-Determination.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 8, no. 2 (1991): 51–76.Google Scholar

Kades, E.. “The Dark Side of Efficiency: Johnson v. M’Intosh and the Expropriation of American Indian Lands.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148, no. 4 (2000): 1065–1190.Google Scholar

Seifert, J. L.. “The Myth of Johnson v. M’Intosh.” UCLA Law Review 52 (2004): 289–332.Google Scholar

Hoffman, H. M.. “Congressional Plenary Power and Indigenous Environmental Stewardship: The Limits of Environmental Federalism.” Oregon Law Review 97, no. 353 (2019): 354–396. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/24696/Hoffman_OLR97%282%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar

Newton, N. J.. “Federal Power Over Indians: Its Sources, Scope, and Limitations.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132, no. 2 (January 1984): 195–288.Google Scholar

United States v. Kagama, 118 US 375 (Supreme Court 1886).Google Scholar

Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 US 553 (Supreme Court 1903).Google Scholar

Tribal Business Committee v. Weeks, 448 US 371 (Supreme Court 1977).Google Scholar

United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 US 371 (Supreme Court 1980).Google Scholar

Leeds, S. L.. “By Eminent Domain or Some Other Name: A Tribal Perspective on Taking Land.” Tulsa Law Review 41, no. 1 (Fall 2005): 51–78.Google Scholar

McGirt v. Oklahoma, 587 US ___ (Supreme Court 2020).Google Scholar

United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 US 162 (Supreme Court 2011).Google Scholar

Washington v. United States, 584 US ___ (Supreme Court 2018).Google Scholar

Wood, M. C.. “Tribal Tools & Legal Levers for Halting Fossil Fuel Transport & Exports Through the Pacific Northwest.” American Indian Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2018): 249–357. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj/vol7/iss1/5.Google Scholar

Du Bey, R., Fuller, A. S. and Miner, E.. “Tribal Treaty Rights and Natural Resource Protection: The Next Chapter United States v. Washington – The Culverts Case.” American Indian Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2019): 54–72.Google Scholar

North Cheyenne Tribe v. Hodel, 12 Indian L. Rptr. 3065, 3066 Indian L. Rptr 3065, 3066 (D. Mont. 1985).Google Scholar

Northwest Sea Farm v. US Army Corps of Engineers, 931 F. Supp. 1515 (W.D. Wash. 1996).Google Scholar

Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 391 US 404 (Supreme Court 1968).Google Scholar

Walch, M. C.. “Terminating the Indian Termination Policy.” Stanford Law Review 35, no. 6 (1999): 1181–1215.Google Scholar

Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, 526 US 172 (Supreme Court 1999).Google Scholar

Herrera v. Wyoming, 587 US ___ (Supreme Court 2019).Google Scholar

Krakoff, S.. “Public Lands, Conservation, and the Possibility of Justice.” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review (2018): 213–258.Google Scholar

Krakoff, S.. “Not Yet America’s Best Idea: Law, Inequality, and Grand Canyon National Park.” University of Colorado Law Review 91 (2020): 559–648.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Federal Land Designations: A Brief Guide. Report by L. B. Comay, R. E. Crafton, C. H. Vincent and K. Hoover. R45340 (Washington, DC: October 11, 2018). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45340.pdf.Google Scholar

Tsosie, R.. “The Conflict between the ‘Public Trust’ and the ‘Indian Trust’ Doctrines: Federal Public Land Policy and Native Nations.” Tulsa Law Review 39, no. 271 (2003): 309–310.Google Scholar

Newton, N. J.. “At the Whim of the Sovereign: Aboriginal Title Reconsidered.” Hastings Law Journal 31 (1980): 1215–1285. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1199.Google Scholar

Berkey, C. G.. Legal Challenges Regarding Native Land Ownership. Continuing Legal Education discussion paper. July 8, 2013. www.berkeywilliams.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Native-Land-Ownership-CLE-Paper-7.8.2013.pdf.Google Scholar

Mitchel v. United States, 34 US (9 Pet.) 711, 746 (Supreme Court 1835).Google Scholar

Blumm, M. C.. “Why Aboriginal Title Is a Fee Simple Absolute.” Lewis & Clark Review 15, no. 4 (2012): 975–993. https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/10655-lcb154art4blummpdf.Google Scholar

Cramer v. United States, 261 US 219 (Supreme Court 1923).Google Scholar

United States ex rel Huaipai Indians v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad, 314 US 339 (Supreme Court 1941).Google Scholar

United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks, 329 US 40, 46 (Supreme Court 1946).Google Scholar

Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, 348 US 272 (Supreme Court 1955).Google Scholar

Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 US 439 (Supreme Court 1988).Google Scholar

McKenna, P.. “Wisconsin Tribe Votes to Evict Oil Pipeline from Its Reservation.” Inside Climate News, January 16, 2017. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16012017/dakota-access-pipeline-standing-rock-enbridge-line-5-native-american-protest.Google Scholar

Associated Press. “Michigan Governor Seeks Shutdown of Enbridge Pipeline in Great Lakes.” CBC News, November 13, 2020. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/michigan-gov-shutdown-great-lake-pipe-line-1.5801015.Google Scholar

Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. BNSF Railway Company, 951 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2020).Google Scholar

Montana v. United States, 450 US 544, 565 (Supreme Court 1981).Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Tribal Consultation: Additional Federal Actions Needed for Infrastructure Projects. Report by A.-M. Fennell (March 2019). www.gao.gov/assets/700/697694.pdf.Google Scholar

Emanuel, R. E. and Wilkins, D. E.. “Breaching Barriers: The Fight for Indigenous Participation in Water Governance.” Water 12, no. 8 (July 25, 2020): 2113–2150.Google Scholar

Bureau of Indian Affairs. Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States. Department of the Interior (2016). www.bia.gov/sites/bia.gov/files/assets/public/webteam/pdf/idc1-028635.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of State. Factsheet: The Keystone XL Pipeline. Bureau of Public Affairs (2011).Google Scholar

Climate Alliance Mapping Project. Keystone XL Pipeline Map. Collaboration between Indigenous Environmental Network and Keystone Mapping Project and Climate Alliance Mapping Project. https://climatealliancemap.org/kxl.Google Scholar

Sack, C.. “Map: The Black Snake in Sioux County Showing the Dakota Access Pipeline Reroute through Former Sioux Lands and Its Consequences.” HuffPost, February 11, 2016. www.huffpost.com/entry/a-nodapl-map_b_581a0623e4b014443087af35.Google Scholar

Tompkins, H. C.. Tribal Treaty and Environmental Statutory Implications of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Submitted to secretary of the Interior. No. 1:16-cv-1534-JEB. December 4, 2016.Google Scholar

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in Connection with Dakota Access, LLC’s Request for an Easement to Cross Lake Oahe, North Dakota. Department of the Army, Department of Defense. 82 Federal Register 5543–5544 (January 18, 2017). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/18/2017-00937/notice-of-intent-to-prepare-an-environmental-impact-statement-in-connection-with-dakota-access-llcs.Google Scholar

Memorandum Opinion. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al. v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al. District Court for the District of Columbia Case No. 1:16-cv-01534-JEB: Doc. 496 (D.D.C. Mar. 25, 2020). https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/standing-rock-sj.pdfGoogle Scholar

Faitsch, M.. “‘Highest Responsibility and Trust’: The National Environmental Policy Act & the Dakota Access Pipeline.” Connecticut Law Review 51, no. 4 (2019): 1043–1072.Google Scholar

Soraghan, M.. “Pipelines: Trail of Spills Haunts Dakota Access Developer.” E&E News, May 26, 2020.Google Scholar

Associated Press Staff. “Keystone Pipeline Spill in South Dakota Twice As Big As First Thought.” Associated Press, April 7, 2018. www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2018/04/07/keystone-pipeline-spill-south-dakota-twice-big-first-thought/496613002.Google Scholar

Mufson, S. and Mooney, C.. “Keystone Pipeline Spills about 210,000 Gallons of Oil in South Dakota.” Washington Post, November 17, 2017.Google Scholar

Rueb, E. S. and Chokshi, N.. “Keystone Pipeline Leaks 383,000 Gallons of Oil in North Dakota.” New York Times, October 31, 2019.Google Scholar

Greenpeace. Dangerous Pipelines: Enbridge’s History of Spills Threatens Minnesota Waters. Report by T. Donaghy (November 2018).Google Scholar

Lipton, E.. “A Lobbyist, A Condo Deal, A Green Light.” New York Times, April 3, 2018.Google Scholar

Song, L. and McGowan, E.. “Federal Agency Blames ‘Complete Breakdown of Safety at Enbridge’ for 2010 Oil Spill.” Inside Climate News, July 10, 2012. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/10072012/national-transportation-safety-board-ntsb-kalamazoo-enbridge-6b-pipeline-marshall-michigan.Google Scholar

Trump, D. J.. Memorandum for the Secretary of the Army on the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Office of the Press Secretary, 2017. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3410448/Construction-of-the-Dakota-Access-Pipeline.pdfGoogle Scholar

Notice of Termination of the Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in Connection with Dakota Access, LLC’s Request for an Easement to Cross Lake Oahe, North Dakota. Department of the Army, Department of Defense. 82 Federal Register 11021 (February 17, 2017). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/02/17/2017-03204/notice-of-termination-of-the-intent-to-prepare-an-environmental-impact-statement-in-connection-with.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. Army Corps Easement Process and Dakota Access Pipeline Easement Status. Report by N. T. Carter (February 14, 2017). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10644.pdf.Google Scholar

Berman, M.. “Dakota Pipeline Protest Camp: Ten Arrested, Dozens More Believed to Remain after Evacuation Deadline.” Washington Post, February 23, 2017.Google Scholar

Fortin, J. and Friedman, L.. “Dakota Pipeline Is Ordered to Shut Down During Environmental Review.” New York Times, July 7, 2020.Google Scholar

Frazin, R.. “Court Cancels Shutdown of Dakota Access Pipeline.” The Hill, August 5, 2020.Google Scholar

Blum, J.. “Federal Appeals Court Sets Nov. 4 Court Date for Dakota Access Pipeline Fight.” S&P Global, September 18, 2020. www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/091820-federal-appeals-court-sets-nov-4-court-date-for-dakota-access-pipeline-fight.Google Scholar

Sick, A.. “Judge Allows Dakota Access Pipeline to Keep Operating.” Bismarck Tribune, May 22, 2021.Google Scholar

McKenna, P.. “Dakota Pipeline Was Approved by Army Corps Over Objections of Three Federal Agencies.” Inside Climate News, August 30, 2016. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/30082016/dakota-access-pipeline-standing-rock-sioux-army-corps-engineers-approval-environment.Google Scholar

Bell, R. A.. “The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 and the Sioux: Is the United States Honoring the Agreements It Made?” Indigenous Policy Journal 28, no. 3 (2018): 1–13.Google Scholar

LaVelle, J. P.. “Rescuing Paha Sapa: Achieving Environmental Justice by Restoring the Great Grasslands and Returning the Sacred Black Hills to the Great Sioux Nation.” Great Plains Natural Resources Journal 4 (2001): 40–101.Google Scholar

Rome, A.. “Black Snake on the Periphery: The Dakota Access Pipeline and Tribal Jurisdictional Sovereignty.” North Dakota Law Review 93, no. 1 (2018): 57–86. https://law.und.edu/_files/docs/ndlr/pdf/issues/93/1/93ndlr57.pdf.Google Scholar

Public Seminar. The Supreme Law of the Land: Standing Rock and the Dakota Access Pipeline. Report by J. Ostler and N. Estes (February 3, 2017). https://publicseminar.org/2017/02/the-supreme-law-of-the-land/.Google Scholar

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers and Dakota Access LLC, WL 7189653 (D.D.C. 2016).Google Scholar

Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Donald J. Trump, WL 1456413 (D. Mont. 2020).Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act. 114th Cong. 1st sess. Introduced in Senate February 11, 2015.Google Scholar

Babcock, H. M.. “Issuance of the Keystone XL Permit: Presidential Prerogative or Presidential ‘Chutzpah.’” Montana Law Review 81, no. 1 (2020): 5–57. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3290&context=facpub.Google Scholar

Trump, D. J.. Presidential Memorandum Regarding Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. 2017. www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-regarding-construction-keystone-xl-pipeline.Google Scholar

Issuance of Permits with Respect to Facilities and Land Transportation Crossings at the International Boundaries of the United States. E.O. 13867. Executive Office of the President. 84 Federal Register 15491–15493 (April 10, 2019) www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/04/15/2019-07645/issuance-of-permits-with-respect-to-facilities-and-land-transportation-crossings-at-the.Google Scholar

Canadian Press. “TC Energy to Start Building Keystone XL Pipeline after Alberta Government Invests $1.1B US.” CBC News, March 31, 2020. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/tc-energy-keystone-xl-pipeline-1.5515850.Google Scholar

Tuttle, R. and Bellusci, M.. “Covid-19 May Finish Keystone XL for Good, with a Little Help from Biden.” World Oil, October 27, 2020. www.worldoil.com/news/2020/10/27/covid-19-may-finish-keystone-xl-for-good-with-a-little-help-from-biden.Google Scholar

Indigenous Environmental Network v. Department of State, 347 F. Supp. 3d 561 (D. Mont. 2018).Google Scholar

“Indigenous Environmental Network v. Department of State.” Harvard Law Review 132, no. 8 (2019): 2368. https://harvardlawreview.org/2019/06/indigenous-environmental-network-v-department-of-state.Google Scholar

Chiu, A., Eilperon, J. and Dennis, B.. “Sending Rebuke, Judge Halts Keystone XL Pipeline.” Washington Post, November 10, 2018.Google Scholar

Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump, 428 F. Supp. 3d. 282 (D. Mont. 2019).Google Scholar

Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pompeo, David Hale, US Department of Interior, David L. Bernhardt, Transcanada Corporation, and Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP., WL 2373054 (D. Mont. 2019).Google Scholar

Indigenous Environmental Network v. Trump, 428 F. Supp. 3d 296 (D. Mont. 2019).Google Scholar

Hayes, D. et al. Comments on the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Proposal to Reissue and Modify Nationwide Permit 12, Docket No. COE-2015–0017. Submitted to US Army Corps of Engineers. August 1, 2016.Google Scholar

Northern Plains Resource Council v. US Army Corps of Engineers, 460 F. Supp. 3d. 1030 (D. Mont. 2020).Google Scholar

Frazin, R.. “Supreme Court Reinstates Fast-Track Pipeline Permitting Except for Keystone XL.” The Hill, July 6, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/506112-supreme-court-reinstates-fast-track-pipeline-permitting-except-for.Google Scholar

Farah, N. H. and Anchondo, C.. “If Lawsuits Don’t Kill Ore. LNG Terminal, Pandemic Might.” E&E News, September 9, 2020.Google Scholar

Dembicki, G.. “They’re Trying to Take My House.” The Tyee, September 8, 2020. https://thetyee.ca/News/2020/09/08/Theyre-Trying-To-Take-My-House.Google Scholar

Reuters Staff. “US FERC Delivers Blow to Oregon LNG Terminal, Upholds State’s Permit Denial.” Reuters, January 19, 2021.Google Scholar

Blumm, M. C. and Litwak, J. B.. “Democratizing Treaty Fishing Rights: Denying Fossil-Fuel Exports in the Pacific Northwest.” Colorado Natural Resources, Energy, & Environmental Law Review 30, no. 1 (Winter 2019): 1–34.Google Scholar

Edge of Morning: Native Voices Speak for the Bears Ears. Salt Lake City, UT: Torrey House, 2017.Google Scholar

Keller, R. H. and Turek, M. F.. American Indians and National Parks. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Spence, M. D.. Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal and the Making of the National Parks. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hirst, S.. I Am the Grand Canyon: The Story of the Havasupai People. Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon Association, 2006.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Utah Public Lands Initiative Act. H.R. 5780, 114th Congress, 2nd Sess. Introduced in House July 14, 2016.Google Scholar

Chapoose, S. et al. “Op-Ed: PLI Would Be the First Indian Land Grab in 100 Years.” Salt Lake Tribune, September 17, 2016. https://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=4358069&itype=CMSID.Google Scholar

Maffly, B.. “Ute Tribe Rejects State’s Plan for Reservation Lands.” Salt Lake Tribune, September 23, 2016. https://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=4387082&itype=CMSID.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. Hearing on H.R. 5780, to Provide Greater Conservation, Recreation, Economic Development and Local Management of Federal Lands in Utah, and for Other Purposes, “Utah Public Lands Initiative Act.” Subcommittee on Federal Lands of the Committee on Natural Resources. 114th Cong. 2nd sess. September 14, 2016.Google Scholar

Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition. Proposal to President Barack Obama for the Creation of Bears Ears National Monument. Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition: A Partnership of the Hopi, Navajo, Uintah and Ouray Ute, Ute Mountain Ute, and Zuni Government. October 15, 2015. https://utahdinebikeyah.org/full-proposal.Google Scholar

Archaeology Southwest et al. Request That the Department of Interior Continue to Support the Designation of the Bears Ears National Monument. Submitted to R. K. Zinke, secretary of the Interior. March 3, 2017.Google Scholar

Cummings, E. E., ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “Documents Obtained by Oversight Committee Refute Republican Claims That Obama Administration Did Not Consult on Bears Ears Monument Designation.” News release, April 13, 2017, https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/documents-obtained-by-oversight-committee-refute-republican-claims-that-obama.Google Scholar

Department of the Interior. Bears Ears National Monument Boundary Modification. 2017. www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/benm_12012017.pdf.Google Scholar

Center for Biological Diversity. Oil and Gas Expressions of Interest in Bears Ears. Report by K. Clauser (2017). http://insideenergy.org/2017/09/01/oil-gas-eyes-bears-ears-fringes.Google Scholar

Grand Canyon National Trust. Active Mining Claims around Bears Ears National Monument. Report by S. Smith (2018). www.grandcanyontrust.org/map-active-mining-claims-around-bears-ears-national-monument-february-2018.Google Scholar

Burr, T.. “Effort to Shrink Bears Ears National Monument Started before Donald Trump Was Elected President.” Salt Lake Tribune, December 3, 2017. www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2017/12/03/effort-to-shrink-bears-ears-national-monument-started-before-donald-trump-was-elected-president/+&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca.Google Scholar

Siegler, K.. “Utah Representative Wants Bears Ears Gone and He Wants Trump to Do It.” NPR, February 5, 2017. www.npr.org/2017/02/05/513492389/utah-representative-wants-bears-ears-gone-and-he-wants-trump-to-do-it.Google Scholar

Trump, D. J.. Presidential Executive Order on the Review of Designations Under the Antiquities Act. 2017. www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-review-designations-antiquities-act.Google Scholar

Zinke, R. K.. Final Report Summarizing Findings of the Review of Designations under the Antiquities Act. Submitted to D. J. Trump. December 2017. www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/revised_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar

Trump, D. J.. Presidential Proclamation Modifying the Bears Ears National Monument. 2017. www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-modifying-bears-ears-national-monument.Google Scholar

Clinton, B.. Proclamation 6920 – Establishment of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. 1996. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1996-09-23/pdf/WCPD-1996-09-23-Pg1788.pdf.Google Scholar

Ruple, J. C., Henderson, M. and Caitlin, C.. “Up for Grabs – The State of Fossils Protection in (Recently) Unprotected National Monuments.” Georgetown Law Review Online, October 5, 2018. www.law.georgetown.edu/environmental-law-review/blog/up-for-grabs-the-state-of-fossils-protection-in-recently-unprotected-national-monuments.Google Scholar

The Wilderness Society, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.; Grand Staircase Escalante Partners, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., WL 1904809 (D.D.C. 2020).Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management. “BLM Restores Access with a Blueprint for Managing National Monuments and Public Lands in Utah.” News release, February 6, 2020. www.blm.gov/press-release/blm-restores-access-blueprint-managing-national-monuments-and-public-lands-utah.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.. “Trump Opens National Monument Land to Energy Exploration.” New York Times, February 6, 2020. www.nytimes.com/2020/02/06/climate/trump-grand-staircase-monument.html.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. Bears Ears National Monument: Proposed Monument Management Plans and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Report by S. Jáa and Indian Creek Unites (July 2019). https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/lup/94460/20000105/250000108/Volume1_Chapters_1-4_Bears_Ears_Proposed_MMPs-Final_EIS.pdf.Google Scholar

Records of Decision and Approved Monument Management Plans for the Bears Ears National Monument Indian Creek and Shash Jáa Units, Utah: Notice of Availability. Docket No. 20X 1109AF LLUT930000 L16100000.DR0000.LXSSJ0650000. Bureau of Land Management, Interior and Forest Service, USDA. 85 Federal Register 9800–9801 (February 20, 2020). www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/20/2020-03375/notice-of-availability-of-the-records-of-decision-and-approved-monument-management-plans-for-the.Google Scholar

Eilperin, J.. “Uranium Firm Sought Bears Ears Cut.” Washington Post, December 10, 2017.Google Scholar

Natural Resource Defense Council. Uranium Development Potential in Bears Ears National Monument. 2017.Google Scholar

Weiss, A.. Documents: When a Uranium Mining Company Lobbied for Bears Ears National Monument Action, the Trump Administration Acted. Center for Western Priorities. 2017.Google Scholar

Hopi Tribe, et al. and Utah Dine Bikeyah, et al. v. Donald J. Trump; Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, WL 7943150 (D.D.C. 2019).Google Scholar

The Wilderness Society, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.; Grand Staircase Escalante Partners, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., WL 7902967 (D.D.C. 2019).Google Scholar

Hopi Tribe v. Trump, No. 17-CV-2590 (TSC), 2019 WL 2494161 (D.D.C. Mar. 20, 2019).Google Scholar

Squillace, M. et al. “Presidents Lack the Authority to Abolish or Diminish National Monuments.” Virginia Law Review Online 103 (2017): 55–71. www.virginialawreview.org/sites/virginialawreview.org/files/Hecht%20PDF.pdf.Google Scholar

Ruple, J. C.. “The Trump Administration and Lessons Not Learned from Prior National Monument Modifications.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 43 (2019): 1–76.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service. National Monuments and the Antiquities Act. Report by C. H. Vincent, specialist in Natural Resources Policy (November 30, 2018). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41330.pdf.Google Scholar

Groom, N.. “Trump Public Lands Agenda Threatened by New Court Ruling.” Reuters, September 29, 2020. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-drilling-lawsuit-idUSKBN26K3NK.Google Scholar

Frazin, R.. “Court Removes Pendley from Role As Public Lands Chief.” The Hill, September 25, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/518376-court-removes-pendley-from-role-as-public-lands-chief.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. Report 116–224: Chaco Cultural Heritage Area Protection Act of 2019. Report by R. M. Grijalva. 116th Congress 1st Sess. (Washington, DC: 2019). www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-116hrpt224/html/CRPT-116hrpt224.htm.Google Scholar

National Parks Conservation Association. Spoiled Parks: The 12 National Parks Most Threatened by Oil and Gas Development. www.npca.org/reports/oil-and-gas-report.Google Scholar

Streater, S.. “Bernhardt Commits to Leasing Moratorium Near Chaco Canyon.” E&E News, May 29, 2019.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. Farmington Mancos-Gallup Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement. Report by T. Spisak and B. W. Stevens (February 28, 2020). https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/lup/68107/20013477/250018467/FMG_DraftRMPA-EIS_Vol-1_508.pdf.Google Scholar

Grant, S.. “Aggregate Airs: Atmospheres of Oil and Gas in the Greater Chaco.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (2020): 534–554.Google Scholar

Kakol, M., Upson, D. and Sood, A.. “Susceptibility of Southwestern American Indian Tribes to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19).” Journal of Rural Health 37, no. 1 (January 2021): 197–199.Google Scholar

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. “BLM and BIA to Host Five Virtual Public Meetings for the Farmington Mancos-Gallup Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement.” News release, April 29, 2020, www.blm.gov/press-release/blm-and-bia-host-five-virtual-public-meetings-farmington-mancos-gallup-resource.Google Scholar

Higgins, T.. “With Push to Drill in Nevada, a Failure to Consult Native Peoples.” Earth Island Journal, April 3, 2019. www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/drill-nevada-failure-to-consult-native-peoples.Google Scholar

US House of Representatives. National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Subcommittee Legislative Hearing on H.R. 1373 and H.R. 2181. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands. 116th Congress, 1st sess. June 5, 2019.Google Scholar

Osborne, J.. “Trump Turns Oil Firms Loose on the American West.” Houston Chronicle, April 17, 2018. www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/Is-Trump-selling-America-s-wilderness-to-energy-12840533.php.Google Scholar

Maruca, M.. “From Exploitation to Equity: Building Native-Owned Renewable Energy Generation in Indian Country.” William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 43, no. 2 (2019): 391–500. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol43/iss2/3.Google Scholar

Patterson, B.. “Fossil Fuels: Tribes Divided over Unlocking Energy Wealth.” E&E News, November 16, 2016.Google Scholar

Sandia National Laboratories. Identifying Barriers and Pathways for Success for Renewable Energy Development on American Indian Lands. Report by T. E. Jones and L. E. Necefer (November 2016). www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/05/f34/Sandia_Report_2016-311J.pdf.Google Scholar

Kronk Warner, E. A.. “Tribal Energy Resource Agreements: The Unintended ‘Great Mischief for Indian Energy Development’ and the Resulting Need for Reform.” Pace Environmental Law Review 29, no. 3 (October 11, 2012): 811–859.Google Scholar

Bureau of Indian Affairs. Oil and Gas Outlook in Indian Country (2013).Google Scholar

Thompson, J.. “The Ute Paradox.” High Country News, July 12, 2010. www.hcn.org/issues/42.12/the-ute-paradox.Google Scholar

Olguin, James M.. The GAO Report on Indian Energy Development: Poor Management by BIA Has Hindered Development on Indian Lands. Submitted to US Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. October 21, 2015.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. E. B.. “The Double-Edged Sword of Sovereignty by the Barrel: How Native Nations Can Wield Environmental Justice in the Fight against the Harms of Fracking.” UCLA Law Review 63, no. 6 (August 2016): 1818–1860.Google Scholar

Center for Indian Country Development. “Southern Ute Reservation.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 2017. www.minneapolisfed.org/indiancountry/resources/reservation-profiles/southern-ute-reservation.Google Scholar

Southern Ute Indian Tribe. Final Report for 2017 Southern Ute Indian Tribe Comprehensive Emissions Inventory for Criteria Pollutants, Hazardous Air Pollutants, and Greenhouse Gases (2019).Google Scholar

Crouse, A.. “Idle Oil, Gas Wells Threaten Indian Tribes while Energy Companies, Regulators Do Little.” Investigate West, September 5, 2018.Google Scholar

Energy Information Administration. “North Dakota: State Profile and Energy Estimates.” April 16, 2020. www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=ND#113.Google Scholar

Native Business Staff. “Chairman Fox: Oil Crisis Threatens to ‘Knockout’ MHA Nation’s Economy.” Native Business, April 30, 2020. www.nativebusinessmag.com/chairman-fox-oil-crisis-threatens-to-knockout-mha-nations-economy/+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca.Google Scholar

Davies, P.. “Homeland of Opportunity: The Bakken Oil Boom Has Brought Unprecedented Prosperity – and Daunting Challenges – to the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation.” Fed Gazette, October 2014. www.minneapolisfed.org/~/media/files/pubs/fedgaz/14-10/fedgazette_oct2014_homeland_of-opportunity.pdf.Google Scholar

Finn, K. et al. “Responsible Resource Development and Prevention of Sex Trafficking: Safeguarding Native Women and Children on the Fort Berthold Reservation.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 40, no. 1 (2017): 1–51.Google Scholar

Grisafi, L.. “Living in the Blast Zone: Sexual Violence Piped onto Native Land by Extractive Industries.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 53, no. 4 (2020): 509–539.Google Scholar

Lustgarten, A.. “Land Grab Cheats North Dakota Tribes out of $1 Billion, Suits Allege.” ProPublica, February 23, 2013. www.propublica.org/article/land-grab-cheats-north-dakota-tribes-out-of-1-billion-suits-allege.Google Scholar

Scheyder, E.. “Can American Indian Reformers Slow an Oil Boom?” Reuters, November 3, 2014. www.reuters.com/article/idUKKBN0IN0AR20141103.Google Scholar

Wold Tice, J.. “Under the Earthlodge: Extraction of the MHA Nation.” Lehigh University Theses and Dissertations (December 8, 2016). https://core.ac.uk/reader/228656910.Google Scholar

ICF International. Onshore Petroleum and Natural Gas Operations on Federal and Tribal Lands in the United States: Analysis of Emissions and Abatement Opportunities (September 16, 2015). www.edf.org/sites/default/files/content/federal_and_tribal_land_analysis_presentation_091615.pdf.Google Scholar

Konkel, L.. “Salting the Earth: The Environmental Impact of Oil and Gas Wastewater Spills.” Environmental Health Perspectives 124, no. 12 (December 1, 2016). https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/full/10.1289/ehp.124-A230.Google Scholar

Lauer, N. E., Harkness, J.S. and Vengosh, A.. “Brine Spills Associated with Unconventional Oil Development in North Dakota.” Environmental Science & Technology 50, no. 10 (May 17, 2016): 5389–5397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06349.Google Scholar

Shogren, E.. “Loophole Lets Toxic Oil Water Flow Over Indian Land.” NPR, November 15, 2012. www.npr.org/2012/11/15/164688735/loophole-lets-toxic-oil-water-flow-over-indian-land.Google Scholar

Department of the Interior and US Geological Survey. Delineation of Brine Contamination in and near the East Poplar Oil Field, Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Northeastern Montana, 2004–09. Report by J. N. Thamke and B. D. Smith (April 2, 2014). https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2014/5024.Google Scholar

Zoanni, D. K.. “Traditional Knowledge Systems and Tribal Water Governance on Fort Peck Indian Reservation, MT.” Montana State University Theses (November 2017). https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/14058/ZoanniD1217.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar

Conde, K.. “The Damage Done: A Montana Community Braces for the Next Oil Boom while Still Dealing with the Devastating Effects of the Last One.” Missoula Independent, February 20, 2014.Google Scholar

Quintana, E. L.. “Identification of Man-Made Hazards in Aneth Chapter, Navajo Nation, Utah.” University of New Mexico Thesis (2012). www.mobt3ath.com/uplode/book/book-73532.pdf.Google Scholar

Royster, J. V.. “Oil and Water in the Indian Country.” Natural Resources Journal 37, no. 2 (Spring 1997): 457–490. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1694&context=nrj.Google Scholar

Thomas, P. M.. Testimony Addressing the Urgent Needs of Our Tribal Communities. Submitted to US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce. July 8, 2020.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Indian Energy Development: Poor Management by BIA Has Hindered Energy Development on Indian Lands. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (June 8, 2015). www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-502.Google Scholar

Barrasso, J., senator from Wyoming. Testimony on the GAO Report on Indian Energy Development: Poor Management by BIA Has Hindered Development on Indian Lands. Submitted to US Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. October 21, 2015.Google Scholar

Jack, L., chairman of the board of directors at Oceti Sakowin Power Authority. Testimony about the Oceti Sakowin Power Authority. Submitted to US House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources. April 2019.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office. Tribal Energy: Opportunities Exist to Increase Federal Agencies’ Use of the Tribal Preference Authority. Report by F. Rusco, director of Natural Resources and Environment (April 2019). www.gao.gov/assets/700/698642.pdf.Google Scholar

Morales, L.. “Navajo Nation President Proclaims Renewable Energy Top Priority.” Arizona Public Media, April 3, 2019. www.azpm.org/p/home-articles-news/2019/4/3/148995-navajo-nation-president-proclaims-renewable-energy-top-priority.Google Scholar

Curley, A.. “A Failed Green Future: Navajo Green Jobs and Energy ‘Transition’ in the Navajo Nation.” Geoforum 88 (January 2018): 57–65. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671851730324X.Google Scholar

Spector, J.. “Developer sPower Teams Up with Navajo Power to Replace Coal Plant with Solar.” Greentech Media News, May 6, 2020. www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/navajo-power-spower-funds-raised-solar.Google Scholar

Necefer, L., Wong-Parodi, G. and Small, M. J.. “Governing Energy in Conflicted Resource Contexts: Culture, Cost, and Carbon in the Decision-Making Criteria of the Navajo Nation.” Energy Research & Social Science 70 (2020). www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620302899#b0105.Google Scholar

Department of Energy and Department of the Interior. Report to Congress: Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1813 Indian Land Rights-of-Way Study (May 2007). www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/EPAct_1813_Final.pdf.Google Scholar

Donovan, B.. “Oil & Gas Seeks $40 Million Bailout but Prez Is Barrier.” Navajo Times, March 29, 2018. https://navajotimes.com/reznews/oil-gas-seeks-40-million-bailout-but-prez-is-barrier.Google Scholar

Helman, C.. “The Navajo Wanted to Go Green and Then This Surprise Deal Made Them America’s Third Largest Miner.” Forbes, June 10, 2020. www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2020/06/10/the-navajo-wanted-to-go-green-then-this-surprise-deal-made-them-americas-3rd-largest-coal-miner/?sh=64e8d9ff2eee.Google Scholar

Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Tribal Utility-Scale Solar Initiatives Advance Across Southwest US. Report by K. Cates, IEEFA research editor, and D. Wamsted, IEEFA editor/analyst (October 2019). http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Tribal-Utility-Scale-Solar-Initiatives-Advance-Across-SW-US_October-2019.pdf.Google Scholar

Reuters Staff. “Nevada Utility Announces Three Major Solar Projects with Battery Storage.” Reuters, June 25, 2019. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-nevada-solar/nevada-utility-announces-three-major-solar-projects-with-battery-storage-idUSKCN1TQ2H5.Google Scholar

Deloria, V., Jr. Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of Independence. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Fletcher, M. L. M.. “The Iron Cold of the Marshall Trilogy.” North Dakota Law Review 82 (2006): 628–696.Google Scholar

Davis, S.. “American Colonialism and Constitutional Redemption.” California Law Review 105, no. 6 (December 2017): 1751–1806.Google Scholar

Eco-Hawk, W.. In the Courts of the Conqueror: The 10 Worst Indian Law Cases Ever Decided. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. Chaco Cultural Heritage Area Protection Act of 2019. S. 1079, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in Senate April 9, 2019.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Bears Ears Expansion and Respect for Sovereignty Act. H.R. 871, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in House January 30, 2019.Google Scholar

US Congress. Senate. America’s Natural Treasures of Immeasurable Quality Unite, Inspire, and Together Improve the Economies of States Act. S. 367, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. Introduced in Senate February 7, 2019.Google Scholar

Grabar, H.. “The Battle for San Juan County, Utah.” Slate, August 25, 2020.Google Scholar

Phillips, K.. “It’s Time to Recognize the Forgotten Americans Who Helped Elect Joe Biden.” Washington Post, November 9, 2020.Google Scholar

Biden, J. and Harris, K.. Biden–Harris Plan for Tribal Nations (2020). https://joebiden.com/tribalnations.Google Scholar

Beitsch, R.. “House Democrats Push Biden to pick Haaland As Next Interior Secretary.” The Hill, November 20, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/526853-house-democrats-push-biden-to-pick-haaland-as-next-interior.Google Scholar

Biden, J.. E.O. 13990 Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis. Executive Office of the President. January 20, 2021. www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01765/protecting-public-health-and-the-environment-and-restoring-science-to-tackle-the-climate-crisis.Google Scholar

Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico, 490 US 163 (Supreme Court 1989).Google Scholar

Gates, T., president of the Seneca Nation. “Letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs.” August 30, 2017. www.BureauofIndianAffairs.gov/sites/BureauofIndianAffairs.gov/files/assets/as-ia/raca/pdf/13%20-%20Seneca%20Nation.pdf.Google Scholar

Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima, 492 US 408 (Supreme Court 1989).Google Scholar

Montana v. United States, 450 US 544 (Supreme Court 1981).Google Scholar

Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535 (Supreme Court 1974).Google Scholar

Parravano v. Babbitt, 70 F.3d 539, 545 (9th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar

Miller, R. J.. “The Doctrine of Discovery in American Indian Law.” Idaho Law Review 42 (2005): 1–122.Google Scholar

Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 388 F.2d 998, 1005–06 (Ct. Cl. 1967).Google Scholar

Campbell, B.. The Lac-Mégantic Rail Disaster: Public Betrayal, Justice Denied. Toronto, ON: Lorimer, 2018.Google Scholar

Obama, B.. “Remarks by the President at the White House Tribal Nations Conference.” December 16, 2010. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2010/12/16/remarks-president-white-house-tribal-nations-conference.Google Scholar

Obama., B. Veto Message to the Senate: S. 1, Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act. 2015 WL 758544. February 24, 2015.Google Scholar

Auffhammer, M.. “Why I Think Not Building Keystone XL Will Likely Leave a Billion Barrels Worth of Bitumen in the Ground.” Hass Energy Institute Blog, March 24, 2014. https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/it-just-doesnt-add-up-why-i-think-not-building-keystone-xl-will-likely-leave-a-billion-barrels-worth-of-bitumen-in-the-ground.Google Scholar

Leonard, C.. The Secret History of Koch Industries and Corporate Power in America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, C. F. and Volkman, J. M.. “Judicial Review of Indian Treaty Abrogation: As Long As Water Flows, or Grass Grows upon the Earth – How Long a Time Is That.” California Law Review 63 (1975): 601–661.Google Scholar

City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 US 197 (Supreme Court 2005).Google Scholar

Klamath and Modoc Tribes v. Maison, 338 F.2d. 620 (9th Cir. 1964).Google Scholar

Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar

Pearson, M.. “Hunting Rights: Retention of Treaty Rights after Termination: Kimball v. Callahan.” American Indian Law Review 4, no. 1 (1976): 121–133.Google Scholar

Diné Citizens v. Bernhardt, No. 18-2089 (10th Cir. 2019).Google Scholar