Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:18:38.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Veto Bargaining

Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Steven S. Smith
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Jason M. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Ryan J. Vander Wielen
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Cameron examines the role of the presidential veto in the legislative process. He contends that the veto, while sparingly used, provides the president with a powerful tool for influencing legislative outcomes. Cameron develops and tests a theoretical framework in which Congress and the president bargain over policy and finds that the veto empowers the president with the ability to extract policy concessions from Congress.

INTERBRANCH BARGAINING

The separation-of-powers system was explicitly predicated on the notion of internal balance and dynamic tension among the three branches. What passes for governance in the American system is often the product of pulling and hauling, haggling and bargaining among the three branches. Though this cliché can be found in any textbook on American government, it is only recently that political scientists have placed interbranch bargaining at the center of theories of American politics.

I study a particular kind of interbranch bargaining, one in which the president looms large: veto bargaining. I study which bills get vetoed, what happens to bills after they are vetoed, how presidents use vetoes and veto threats to wrest policy concessions from Congress, and their success and failure in doing so. I also study the depressing effect of the veto power on Congress's legislative productivity. In other words, I study the president and the politics of “negative power” – the consequences of an institutionalized ability to say no. The research I report is often the first systematic empirical evidence on these matters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×