There has been substantial debate among students of Congress concerning the theoretical and empirical applicability of various theories of legislative behavior and organization. Some scholars contend that one perspective is a sufficient explanation of legislative organization and decision making, but others argue that various theories apply at varying times and under differing circumstances. “Rather than seek a single, universal account of congressional politics – whether distributive, informational, partisan, or anything else – we should recognize that all of these considerations operate in varying degrees and that the variation is systematic and predictable.” This study is an effort to extend and apply the latter view.

We want to assist in the effort to see that these varying legislative theories are “knitted together.” To that end, we analyze agriculture policymaking in the 104th House. The House Agriculture Committee is considered a classic constituency committee.