Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:19:47.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Preference, Choice, and Rationality

Amartya Sen's Critique of the Theory of Rational Choice in Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Shatakshee Dhongde  and
Prasanta K. Pattanaik
Edited by
Christopher W. Morris
Christopher W. Morris
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The theory of preference and rational choice of individuals constitutes the foundation of much of positive economic theory. It is also intimately linked to normative economics, especially the part of normative economics that studies welfare properties of the competitive market mechanism. It is not, therefore, surprising that the theory of individual preference and rational choice has engaged some of the leading economic theorists of our time, such as Kenneth J. Arrow (1958, 1959, 1971), J. R. Hicks (1939, 1956), P. Samuelson (1938, 1947), and A. K. Sen (1969, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1977a, 1977b, 1981, 1986a, 1986b, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995). The role of Sen in this foundational area of economic theory has been somewhat different from that of many other prominent theorists. Though, in some of his earlier works (see Sen 1969, 1971, 1977a), Sen has made important contributions to the traditional economic theory of rational choice and preference, several aspects of this theory have come under searching criticism by him. He has repeatedly asked probing questions about the intuitive significance and realism of various elements in the mainstream economic theory of rational choice and drawn attention to many limitations of the theory. The purpose of this chapter is to review Sen's contributions to the theory of rational choice by individuals, especially his contributions as a critic of the conventional economic theory of rational choice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Amartya Sen , pp. 13 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951). “An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics,” in Neyman, (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1958). “Utilities, Attitudes, Choices: A Review Note,” Operations Research, 5, 765–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1959). “Rational Choice Functions and Orderings,” Economica, 26, 121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1969). “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocation,” in Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1971). “Exposition of the Theory of Choice under Uncertainty,” in McGuire, and Radner, (eds.), Decision and Organization (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., and Hurwicz, L. (1972). “An Optimality Criterion for Decision-Making under Ignorance,” in Carter, and Ford, (eds.), Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honour of G.L.S. Shackle (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Boland, L. (1981). “On the Futility of Criticizing the Neo-classical Maximization Hypothesis,” American Economic Review, 71, 1030–6.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. (1983). “The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Comment,” American Economic Review, 73, 824–30.Google Scholar
Chernoff, H. (1954). “Rational Selection of Decision Functions,” Economica, new ser. 22, 422–43.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, I., Kumar, S., and Pattanaik, P. K. (2000). “Consistent Choice and Falsifiability of the Maximization Hypothesis,” in Pollin, (ed.), Capitalism, Socialism and Radical Political Economy: Essays in Honour of Howard J. Sherman (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Skeath, S. (2004). Games of Strategy, 2nd ed. (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making (New York: Wiley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. (2003). Microeconomics and Behavior, 5th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin).Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M. (1994). “Bosses of Different Stripes: A Cross-National Perspective on Monitoring and Supervision,” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84, 375–9.Google Scholar
Herzberger, H. (1973). “Ordinal Choice Structures,” Econometrica, 41, 187–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. (1950). “Ordinal Preference and Rational Choice,” Economica, 17, 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and Capital (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1956). A Revision of Demand Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Kannai, Y., and Peleg, B. (1984). “A Note on the Extension of an Order on a Set to the Power Set,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32, 172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T. (1957). Three Essays on the State of Economic Science (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1988). Notes on the Theory of Choice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar
Little, I. M. D. (1949). “A Reformulation of the Theory of Consumer's Behaviour,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1, 90–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, I. M. D. (1957). A Critique of Welfare Economics, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica, 18, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Richter, M. K. (1966). “Revealed Preference Theory,” Econometrica, 34, 987–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumers' Behaviour,” Economica, 5, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1969). “Quasi-transitivity, Rational Choice and Collective Decisions,” Review of Economic Studies, 36, 381–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden-Day).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1971). “Choice Functions and Revealed Preference,” Review of Economic Studies, 38, 307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1973). “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference,” Economica, 40, 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1974). “Choice, Ordering and Morality,” in Körner, (ed.), Practical Reason (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977a). “Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination,” Econometrica, 45, 53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977b). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1981). “Plural Utility,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new ser., 81, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982). Choice, Welfare, and Measurement (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1986a). “Rationality, Interest and Identity,” in Foxley, McPherson , and O'Donnell, (eds.), Development, Democracy, and the Art of Trespassing (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1986b). “Prediction and Economic Theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 407, 1832, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987a). On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987b). Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987c). The Standard of Living (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1989). “Economic Methodology, Heterogeneity and Relevance,” Social Research, 56, 299–328.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1991). “Utility,” Economics and Philosophy, 7, 277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1993). “Internal Consistency of Choice,” Econometrica, 61, 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1994). “The Formulation of Rational Choice,” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84, 385–90.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1995). “Rationality and Social Choice,” American Economic Review, 85, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×