Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:37:01.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Capability and Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
David A. Crocker  and
Ingrid Robeyns
Edited by
Christopher W. Morris
Christopher W. Morris
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The capability approach is one of Amartya Sen's most significant contributions to philosophy and the social sciences. His writings on the capability approach are not only of theoretical interest on their own, but also provide concepts used in his work on social choice, freedoms, and development (see the chapters by Alkire, Pettit, and Roberts in this volume). Moreover, the capability approach has practical relevance for policy design and assessment, most famously through the work of the United Nations' Human Development Reports (United Nations Development Programme 1990–2007/8).

This chapter provides an overview of the conceptual and normative foundations of the capability approach and the role of agency within the approach. It puts aside the diverse ways in which the capability approach has been applied and implemented (Robeyns 2006). The chapter is divided into two parts. The first part, of which Ingrid Robeyns is the primary author, describes the main purpose of the capability approach, the concepts of functioning and capability, and the question of selecting and weighing capabilities. The second part, of which David A. Crocker is the primary author, focuses on the nature, value, and role of agency in the capability approach.

CAPABILITY

The Capability Approach

Scholars and policy makers use the capability approach in a wide range of fields, most prominently in development studies and policymaking, welfare economics, social policy, and social and political philosophy. It can be employed in both narrower and broader ways.

Type
Chapter
Information
Amartya Sen , pp. 60 - 90
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, S. (2009). “Concepts and Measures of Agency” in Basu, and Kanbur, (eds.), Arguments for a Better World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Alvarez, M. (2005). “Agents, Actions, and Reasons,” Philosophical Books, 46, 1, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (1999). “What is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 109, 2, 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, K. (1987). “Achievements, Capabilities, and the Concept of Well-being,” Social Choice and Welfare, 4, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, K., and López-Calva, L. (forthcoming). “Functionings and Capabilities,” in Arrow, Sen, and Suzumura, (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 3 (North Holland: Elsevier Science).
Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H., and Robeyns, I. (eds.) (forthcoming). Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef
Buss, S., and Overtone, L. (eds.) (2002). Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Chakraborty, A. (1996). “On the Possibility of a Weighting System for Functionings,” Indian Economic Review, 31, 241–50.Google Scholar
Crocker, D. A. (2006). “Sen and Deliberative Democracy,” in Kaufman, (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Crocker, D. A. (2007). “Deliberative Participation in Local Development,” Journal of Human Development, 8, 3, 431–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drèze, J., and Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and Participation, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981). “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283–345.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (2002). “Development, Capabilities and Freedom,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 37, 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frolich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. (1992). Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Gastil, J., and Levine, P. (eds.) (2005). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
Graham, C., and Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness and Hardship (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1977). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. (2006a). “Capabilities and Freedom,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 3, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. (2006b). “What Goods Do to (and for) People: Duality and Ambiguity in Sen's Capabilities Approach?” in Kaufman, (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1988). “Nature, Functioning and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 6, suppl. vol., 145–84.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003). “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice,” Feminist Economics, 9, 2/3, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001). “Capability and Freedom: A Defense of Sen,” Economics and Philosophy, 17, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierik, R., and Robeyns, I. (2007). “Resources Versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory,” Political Studies, 55, 1, 133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. (2002). “Can the Capability Approach be Justified?” Philosophical Topics, 30, 2, 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Reich, R. (2002). Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2003). “Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities,” Feminist Economics, 9, 2/3, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005). “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey,” Journal of Human Development, 6, 1, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2006). “The Capability Approach in Practice,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 3, 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. (1996). Theories of Distributive Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Schokkaert, E. (2007). “Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life,” Journal of Human Development, 8, 3, 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1980). “Equality of What?’ in McMurrin, (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1984). “Rights and Capabilities,” in Resources, Values and Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985a). Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985b). “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984,” Journal of Philosophy, 82, 4, 169–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987). “The Standard of Living,” in Sen, Muellbauer , Kanbur, Hart , and Williams, , The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1990a). “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts,” in Tinker, (ed.), Persistent Inequalities (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1990b). “Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment,” New York Review of Books, 37, 10 (14 June).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Re-examined (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1993). “Capability and Well-being,” in Nussbaum, and Sen, (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1995a). “Agency and Well-Being: The Development Agenda,” in Heyzer, Kapoor , and Sandler, (eds.), A Commitment to the World's Women (New York: UNIFEM).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1995b). “Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice,” in Nussbaum, and Glover, (eds.), Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2004). “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32, 4, 315–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2005). “Human Rights and Capabilities,” Journal of Human Development, 6, 2, 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2006). “The Importance of Ethics for the Efficient Design and Implementation of Development Policies and Projects,” International Social Capital, Ethics and Development Day, Inter-American Development Bank, 24 February.
Stewart, F. (1995). “Basic Needs, Capabilities and Human Development,” Greek Economic Review, 17, 2, 83–96.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1993). “Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen,” Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1947–62.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S. (ed.) (2005). Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef
Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme (1990–2007/8). Human Development Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. (2005). “Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Wellbeing,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. (2002). “Dworkin on Capability,” Ethics, 113, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J., and de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Bank (2005). World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development (Washington, DC: World Bank / Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×