Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Can There Be an “After Socialism”?
- The Cultural Contradictions of Socialism
- The Idol of History
- Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Postsocialist Critique of Market Society
- What's Left of the Welfare State?
- The Roots and Rationale of Social Democracy
- An Interpretation and Defense of the Socialist Principle of Distribution
- Some Feasible Alternatives to Conventional Capitalism
- After Socialism: Mutualism and a Progressive Market Strategy
- Sovereignty, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism: Lessons from Early America for the Future of the World
- Beyond Fear and Greed?
- Liberalism's Divide, After Socialism and Before
- INDEX
The Cultural Contradictions of Socialism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Can There Be an “After Socialism”?
- The Cultural Contradictions of Socialism
- The Idol of History
- Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Postsocialist Critique of Market Society
- What's Left of the Welfare State?
- The Roots and Rationale of Social Democracy
- An Interpretation and Defense of the Socialist Principle of Distribution
- Some Feasible Alternatives to Conventional Capitalism
- After Socialism: Mutualism and a Progressive Market Strategy
- Sovereignty, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism: Lessons from Early America for the Future of the World
- Beyond Fear and Greed?
- Liberalism's Divide, After Socialism and Before
- INDEX
Summary
Render possessions ever so equal, men's different degrees of art, care, and industry will immediately break that equality. Or if you check these virtues, you reduce society to the most extreme indigence; and instead of preventing want and beggary in a few, render it unavoidable to the whole community. The most rigorous inquisition too is requisite to watch every inequality on its first appearance; and the most severe jurisdiction, to punish and redress it. But besides, that so much authority must soon degenerate into tyranny, and be exerted with such great partialities; who can possibly be possessed of it, in such a situation as is here supposed?
—David HumeSOCIALISM'S DESTINY
While no one has yet announced the death of capitalism, reports of its imminent demise have been as numerous as they have been exaggerated. Such reports have usually been bolstered by thoughtful analyses of the fundamental contradictions of capitalism, which was expected to come sliding—if not crashing—down under the weight of its own inconsistencies. Leaving aside Karl Marx's own predictions, twentieth–century analysts as diverse as Joseph Schumpeter, Daniel Bell, and Jurgen Habermas have asserted that the contradictions of capitalism could only mean that its days were numbered. Alas, all that has been established by these analyses is that predictive failure is no impediment to market success: either the consumer's demand for such theories of capitalism's failures is naturally robust, or supply continues to generate its own demand.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- After Socialism , pp. 18 - 37Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003