Book contents
- After Marx
- After Series
- After Marx
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Black Marxism and the Antinomies of Racial Capitalism
- Chapter 2 Eco-Criticism and Primitive Accumulation in Indigenous Studies
- Chapter 3 Screening Insurrection: Marx, Cinema, Revolution
- Chapter 4 Marxist Ecology and Shakespeare
- Chapter 5 There Is No “More Commodification”: Periodizing Capitalist Transformation
- Chapter 6 The Irreconcilable: Marx after Literature
- Chapter 7 The Rise and Fall of the English-Language Literary Novel since World War II
- Chapter 8 Literature and the State
- Chapter 9 Post-Soviet Aesthetics
- Chapter 10 Lu Xun’s Literary Revolution in Chinese Marxism
- Chapter 11 Latin American Literature and Dependency Theory Today
- Chapter 12 Industry Culture: Labor and Technology in Marxist Critical Theory
- Chapter 13 In Service to Capital: Theater and Marxist Cultural Theory
- Chapter 14 Hidden Abodes and Inner Bonds: Literary Study and Marxist-Feminism
- Chapter 15 Poetry and Revolution
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - Marxist Ecology and Shakespeare
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2022
Book contents
- After Marx
- After Series
- After Marx
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Black Marxism and the Antinomies of Racial Capitalism
- Chapter 2 Eco-Criticism and Primitive Accumulation in Indigenous Studies
- Chapter 3 Screening Insurrection: Marx, Cinema, Revolution
- Chapter 4 Marxist Ecology and Shakespeare
- Chapter 5 There Is No “More Commodification”: Periodizing Capitalist Transformation
- Chapter 6 The Irreconcilable: Marx after Literature
- Chapter 7 The Rise and Fall of the English-Language Literary Novel since World War II
- Chapter 8 Literature and the State
- Chapter 9 Post-Soviet Aesthetics
- Chapter 10 Lu Xun’s Literary Revolution in Chinese Marxism
- Chapter 11 Latin American Literature and Dependency Theory Today
- Chapter 12 Industry Culture: Labor and Technology in Marxist Critical Theory
- Chapter 13 In Service to Capital: Theater and Marxist Cultural Theory
- Chapter 14 Hidden Abodes and Inner Bonds: Literary Study and Marxist-Feminism
- Chapter 15 Poetry and Revolution
- Index
- References
Summary
When read in light of Adorno’s “preponderance of the object,” The Tempest can be seen as bearing the marks of “primitive accumulation” in ways that can be made to challenge the ecologically catastrophic present. The unusual physical presence of wood in Shakespeare’s play in performance – especially given the play’s lavish display of suffering – opens it to serving as a critique of the reduction of the nonhuman world to mere “raw material” for human use, through which the subordination of some humans to others is also effected. In its physical form wood can be interruptive. Attentiveness to its refusal to reduce to human purposes in the excess of its seeming quiddity can open viewers to a “change of perspective” that, in turn, might lead to enhanced struggle for transformed conditions of existence – without the domination property relations establish – for humans and nonhumans alike: the goal of a properly Marxist ecology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- After MarxLiterature, Theory, and Value in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 71 - 85Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Adorno, Theodor. Negative Dialectics [1966], translated by Ashton, E. B. Continuum, 1973.Google Scholar
Aylmer, G. E. “The Meaning and Definition of ‘Property’ in Seventeenth Century England.” Past and Present, vol. 86, 1980, pp. 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. “Making Private Property: Enclosure, Common Right and the Work of Hedges.” Rural History, vol. 18, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). Who Owns the Forest? Forest Ownership and Tenure in the UNECE Region. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2018.Google Scholar
Gray, David. “‘Command These Elements to Silence’: Ecocriticism and The Tempest.” Literature Compass, vol. 17, nos. 3/4, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor. Dialectic of Enlightenment, translated by Jephcott, Edmund. Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Cognitive Mapping.” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. University of Illinois Press, 1988, pp. 347–360.Google Scholar
McDonagh, Briony and Rodda, Joshua. “Landscape, Memory and Protest in the Midlands Rising of 1607.” Remembering Protest in Britain since 1500, edited by Griffin, Carl J. and McDonagh, Briony. Palgrave, 2018.Google Scholar
Nardizzi, Vin. Wooden Os: Shakespeare’s Theatre’s and England’s Trees. University of Toronto Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Nichols, Robert. Theft Is Property! Dispossession and Critical Theory. Duke University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul and Klumpp, Tilmann. “Property Rights and Capitalism.” The Oxford Handbook of Capitalism, edited by Mueller, Dennis C.. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest, edited by Orgel, Stephen. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Strachey, William. “A True Reportory of the Wreck.” Voyage to Virginia, 2nd ed., edited by Wright, Louis B.. University of Virginia Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan. “Enclosing and Engrossing.” The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Vol. iv. Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. Energy and the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Julian. “What Are ‘Things’ Saying in Renaissance Studies?” Literature Compass, vol. 3, no. 5, 2006, pp. 992–1010.Google Scholar
Yelling, J. A. Common Field and Enclosure in England 1450–1850. Macmillan, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar