Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:51:59.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2022

Monika Nalepa
Monika Nalepa
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
After Authoritarianism
Transitional Justice and Democratic Stability
 , pp. 311 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015), ‘Comparative politics and the synthetic control method’, American Journal of Political Science 59(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abente-Brun, D. (1999), ‘Latin America’s imperiled progress: “People power” in Paraguay’, Journal of Democracy 10(3), 93–100.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. & Menaldo, V. (2014), ‘Gaming democracy: Elite dominance during transition and the prospects for redistribution’, British Journal of Political Science 44(3), 575–603.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. & Menaldo, V. (2018), Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. & Menaldo, V. (2018 b), Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alivizatos, N. C. & Diamandouros, P. N. (1997), ‘Politics and the judiciary in the Greek transition to democracy’, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. 27–60.Google Scholar
Ang, M. (2019), Corrupting Accountability: Crime, Orphaned Bureaucracies, and the Failure of the Democratic State, University of Chicago, May 2018, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ang, M. & Nalepa, M. (2019), ‘Can transitional justice improve the quality of representation in new democracies?’, World Politics 71(4), 631–666.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J. S. (2008), Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. & Samuels, D. (2010), ‘Inequality and democratization: A contractarian approach’, Comparative Political Studies 43(12), 1543–1574.Google Scholar
Archive, f. t. (February 1992), ‘War’s end in El Salvador. But peace needs time to grow’, United Press International.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M. & Thachil, T. (2018), ‘How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums’, American Political Science Review 112(4), 775–791.Google Scholar
Baik, C. J. (2011), The Park Chung Hee Era, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bakiner, O. (2016), Truth Commissions: Memory, Power, and Legitimacy, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Balcells, L., Valeria, P., & Elsa, V. (2022), ‘Do transitional justice museums persuade visitors? Evidence from a field experiment’,. The Journal of Politics 84(1), 496–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barahona de Brito, A., González-Enríquez, C., & Aguilar, P., eds. (2001), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, G. (2021), Holding Their Feet to the Fire: Negotiated Accountability in the Shadow of the International Community, PhD thesis. The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bendor, J. & Meirowitz, A. (2004), ‘Spatial models of delegation’, American Political Science Review 98(2), 293–310.Google Scholar
Beres, W. & Skoczylas, J. (1991), General Kiszczak mowi–prawie wszystko, Polska Oficyna Wydawnicza “BGW.” Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. G. (2003), Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernhard, M. & Kubik, J. (2014), Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T. & Burgess, R. (2004), ‘Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(1), 91– 134.Google Scholar
Binnendijk, A. L. & Marovic, I. (2006), ‘Power and persuasion: Nonviolent strategies to influence state security forces in Serbia (2000) and Ukraine (2004)’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3), 411–429.Google Scholar
Binningsbø, H. M., Loyle, C. E., Gates, S., & Elster, J. (2012 a), ‘Armed conflict and post-conflict justice, 1946–2006: A dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 49(5), 731–740.Google Scholar
Binningsbø, H. M., Loyle, C. E., Gates, S., & Elster, J. (2012 b), ‘Post-conflict justice dataset codebook’, available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justice-data.com%2Fpcj-dataset%2FPCJ%2520codebook%2520-%2520Binningsb%25C3%25B8%2520et%2520al%2520JPR_49(5).pdf&clen=450960&chunk=true.Google Scholar
Blaydes, L. (2010), Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaydes, L. (2018), State of Repression: Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Borchert, J. (2006), Die Zusammenarbeit des Ministeriums fur Staatssicherheit (MfS) mit dem sowjetischen KGB in den 70er und 80er Jahren: ein Kapitel aus der Geschichte der SED-Herrschaft, LIT Verlag Munster.Google Scholar
Bouguerra, B. (2014), Reforming Tunisia’s Troubled Security Sector, Atlantic Council, Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. O. & Gates, S. (1999), Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brun, D. A. & Diamond, L. (2014), Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Callander, S. (2008), ‘A theory of policy expertise’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3(2), 123–140.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2020), ‘Democracy and retribution: Transitional justice and regime support in postwar West Germany’, Comparative Political Studies 53(3–4), 399–433.Google Scholar
Carey, J. M. & Shugart, M. S. (1995), ‘Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas’, Electoral Studies 14(4), 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. & Nalepa, M. (2014), ‘Can parties represent after communism? The dissipation of the regime divide cleavage in post-communist party systems’, in 21st International Conference of Europeanists, CES, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. & Nalepa, M. (2020), ‘The personal vote and party cohesion: Modeling the effects of electoral rules on intraparty politics’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 32(1), 36–69.Google Scholar
Cepl, V. (1992), ‘Ritual sacrifices’, East European Constitutional Review 1, 24.Google Scholar
Chapman, A. R. (2009), ‘Truth finding in the transitional justice process’, in eds. Van der Merwe, Hugo, Baxter, Victoria, and Chapman, Audrey R. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research, Publisher is US Institute of Peace Press, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010), ‘Democracy and dictatorship revisited’, Public Choice 143(1–2), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. A., & Nalepa, M. (2020), ‘Revisiting electoral personalism’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 32(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Childs, D. & Popplewell, R. (2016), The Stasi: The East German Intelligence and Security Service, Springer.Google Scholar
Chiopris, C., Nalepa, M., & Vanberg, G. (2022), ‘A wolf in sheep’s clothing: Citizen uncertainty and democratic backsliding’, Harvard University, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Chodakiewicz, M. J. (2009), ‘Agent Bolek’, Intelligencer: Journal of US Intelligence Studies 17(2), 108–110.Google Scholar
Chromiak, L. (2019), ‘Cracks in Tunisia’s democratic miracle’, published as issue 292/3 (Fall/Winter 2019), available at: https://merip.org/2019/12/cracks-in-tunisias-democratic-miracle/.Google Scholar
Chromiak, L. & Salman, L. (2016), ‘Refusing to forgive: Tunisia’s Maneesh M’Sameh campaign’ Lana Salman, Laryssa Chomiak In: 281 (Winter 2016), available at: https://merip.org/2017/05/refusing-to-forgive/.Google Scholar
European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice, Closa Montero, C., Study on how the memory of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes in Europe is dealt with in the Member States, European Commission, 2014, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/62564 Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1995), ‘State crimes of previous regimes: Knowledge, accountability, and the policing of the past’, Law & Social Inquiry 20(1), 7–50.Google Scholar
Congreso de los Diputados, Comisión de Cultura (2013), ‘161/002111’, Boletín Oficial de Las Cortes Generales D(360), 27–28.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M. (2012), Democratization and Research Methods, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Krusell, J., Medzihorsky, J., Pernes, J., … & Lindberg, S. I. (2019), ‘The Methodology of “Varieties of Democracy” (V-Dem)’, Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 143(1), 107–133.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M., John, G., Staffan, I. L., Svend-Erik, S., Jan, T., David, A., Michael, B., Fish, M. Steven, Adam, G., Allen, H., Carl, H. K., Kyle, L. M., Kelly, M., Valeriya, M., Pamela, P., Daniel, P., Laura, S., Brigitte, S., Rachel, S., & Jeffrey, S., (2017). ‘V-Dem Codebook v7.1’ Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Dancy, G. & Montal, F. (2017), ‘Unintended positive complementarity: Why International Criminal Court investigations may increase domestic human rights prosecutions’, American Journal of International Law 111(3), 689–723.Google Scholar
Dancy, G. & Thoms, O. T. (2022), ‘Do truth commissions really improve democracy?’, Comparative Political Studies 55(4), 555–587.Google Scholar
Dancy, G. & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2018), ‘The impact of criminal prosecutions during intrastate conflict’, Journal of Peace Research 55(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
Darden, K. A. (2001), ‘Blackmail as a tool of state domination: Ukraine under kuchma’, European Constitutional Law Review 10, 67.Google Scholar
David, R. (2003), ‘Lustration laws in action: The motives and evaluation of lustration policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989–2001)’, Law & Social Inquiry 28(2), 387–439.Google Scholar
David, R. (2006), ‘From Prague to Baghdad: Lustration systems and their political effects’, Government and Opposition 41(3), 347–372.Google Scholar
David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
De Brito, A. B., Enríquez, C. G., & Aguilar, P. (2001), The Politics of Memory and Democratization: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Greiff, P. & Mayer-Rieckh, A. (2007), Justice as prevention: Vetting public employees in transitional societies, SSRC.Google Scholar
Debs, A. (2016), ‘Living by the sword and dying by the sword? Leadership transitions in and out of dictatorships’, International Studies Quarterly 60(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
Deming, M. (2020), The strategic foundations of Authoritarian successor parties, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Dragu, T. (2017), ‘On repression and its effectiveness’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 29(4), 599–622.Google Scholar
Dragu, T. & Lupu, Y. (2018), ‘Collective action and constraints on repression at the endgame’, Comparative Political Studies 51(8), 1042–1073.Google Scholar
Dragu, T. & Przeworski, A. (2019), ‘Preventive repression: Two types of moral hazard’, American Political Science Review 113(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Dudek, A. & Gryz, R. (2003), Komunisci i Kosciol w Polsce: 1945-1989, Znak.Google Scholar
Earle, J. S. & Gehlbach, S. (2015), ‘The productivity consequences of political turnover: Firm-level evidence from Ukraine’s Orange Revolution’, American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 708–723.Google Scholar
Egorov, G. & Sonin, K. (2011), ‘Dictators and their viziers: Endogenizing the loyalty–competence trade-off’, Journal of the European Economic Association 9(5), 903–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, M. S. (1996), ‘Purging the past: The current state of lustration laws in the former communist bloc’, Law and Contemporary Problems 59(4), 181–196.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1998), ‘Coming to terms with the past. A framework for the study of justice in the transition to democracy’, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 39(1), 7–48.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2004), Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2005), ‘Preference formation in transitional justice’, Katznelson, Ira/Weingast, Barry R, pp. 247–278.Google Scholar
Encarnacion, O. G. (2014), Democracy without Justice in Spain: The Politics of Forgetting, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. & O’Halloran, S. (1999), Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Escriba-Folch, A. & Wright, J. (2015), ‘Human rights prosecutions and autocratic survival’, International Organization 69(02), 343–373.Google Scholar
Europe: A Rude Awakening; Spain’s Past (2007).Google Scholar
Europe: Painful Memories; Spain’s Civil War (2006).Google Scholar
Feit, E. (1973), ‘Greece: The military coup of april, 1967’, in eds. Feit, Edward The Armed Bureaucrats; Military-Administrative Regimes and Political Development, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Go.Google Scholar
Felli, L. & Hortala-Vallve, R. (2015), ‘Collusion, blackmail and whistle-blowing’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11, 279–312.Google Scholar
Finch, W. H., Bolin, J. E., & Kelley, K. (2019), Multilevel Modeling Using R, Crc Press.Google Scholar
Frye, T. (2010), Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. & Lust-Okar, E. (2009), ‘Elections under authoritarianism’, Annual Review of Political Science 12, 403–422.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. & Przeworski, A. (2007), ‘Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies 40(11), 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, M. J. (1995), ‘Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis’, American Political Science Review 89(4), 882–897.Google Scholar
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014), ‘Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set’, Perspectives on Politics 12(2), 313–331.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, S. (2013), Formal Models of Domestic Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. (2006), ‘Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation?’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 603(1), 82–110.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. & Simpser, A. (2013), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2006), Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021), ‘Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing’, Journal of Econometrics 225(2), 254–277.Google Scholar
Dudek, A. (2020), Od Mazowieckiego do Suchockiej. (From Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Otwarte).Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2001), ‘Coalition formation and the regime divide in new democracies: East central Europe’, Comparative Politics, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007), Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2019), ‘Hoist on their own petards? The reinvention and collapse of authoritarian successor parties’, Party Politics 25(4), 569–582.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. M. (2002), Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A., & Nalepa, M. (2022), How illiberal populists gain and stay in power: programmatic cohesion and government performance. Unpublished Manuscript, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. & Kaufman, R. R. (2012), ‘Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule’, American Political Science Review 106(3), 495–516.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. & Kaufman, R. R. (2016), Dictators and Democrats: Masses, Elites, and Regime Change, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. K., & Sigman, R. (2021), ‘Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research’, The Journal of Politics 83(4), 1495–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, P. B. (1994), ‘Fifteen truth commissions-1974 to 1994: A comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly 16, 597.Google Scholar
Hayner, P. B. (2001), Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity, Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Henry, C. (2007), ‘Tunisia’s ‘sweet little’ regime’, in Worst of the Worst: Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations, pp. 300–323.Google Scholar
Hicken, A. & Martínez Kuhonta, E. (2011), ‘Shadows from the past: Party system institutionalization in Asia’, Comparative Political Studies 44(5), 572–597.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Q. (2021), ‘Helping the contras: The effectiveness of Us support for foreign rebels during the Nicaraguan Contra War (1979–1990)’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 44(6), 521–541.Google Scholar
Hollenbach, F. M. (2019), ‘Elite interests and public spending: Evidence from Prussian cities’, The Review of International Organizations, 1–23.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1994), ‘The end of decommunization’, European Constitutional Law Review 3, 33.Google Scholar
Horne, C. M. (2017a), Vetting, purges, and lustration: Measurement choices and empirical implications. In Conference Proceedings of the American Political Science Association Meeting, September (Washington, DC, September 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Horne, C. M. (2017 b), Building Trust and Democracy in Transition: Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Countries, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horne, C. M. & Levi, M. (2004), ‘Does lustration promote trustworthy governance? An exploration of the experience of Central and Eastern Europe’, in Kornai, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (Eds.). (2004). Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 52–74.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. & McCarty, N. (2004), ‘Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform’, American Political Science Review 98(3), 481–494.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. & Shipan, C. R. (2002), Deliberate Discretion?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hübert, R., & Little, A. T. (2021), ‘Kompromat Can Align Incentives but Ruin Reputations’. American Journal of Political Science. First published: 13 May 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12620 Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1993), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Vol. 4, University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E., & Weymouth, S. (2014), ‘Unbundling the relationship between authoritarian legislatures and political risk’, British Journal of Political Science 44(3), 655–684.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. & Yang, D. L. (2016), ‘Lying or believing? measuring preference falsification from a political purge in china’, Comparative Political Studies 49(5), 600–634.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. M. & Nalepa, M. (2006), ‘Judging transitional justice: A new criterion for evaluating truth revelation procedures’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(3), 383–408.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. M. & Nalepa, M. (2014), ‘A model of strategic preemption: Why do post-communists hurt themselves?’, Decyzje (21), 31–66.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. M., Nalepa, M., & O’Neill, B. (2006), ‘Normative and strategic aspects of transitional justice’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(3), 295–302.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. (2007), ‘Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies’, American Journal of Political Science 51(4), 804–821.Google Scholar
Keesing’s Record of World Events. (1974), ‘Announcement of general election date. – resumption of party politics. – other internal developments.’, vol. 20, p. 26781.Google Scholar
Keesing’s Record of World Events. (1998), ‘South Africa’, vol. 44, p. 42536.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra F., The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013), ‘How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression’, American Political Science Review 107(2), 326–343.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1999), Post-communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-party Cooperation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. & Freeze, K. (2010), Programmatic party system structuration: Developing and comparing cross-national and cross-party measures with a new global data set, in APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, Vol. Available at https://goo.gl/xhxeyj.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. & Singer, M. (2018), ‘Linkage strategies of authoritarian successor parties’, in Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide, pp. 53–83.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koehler, J. O. (1999), STASI: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kovras, I. (2013), ‘Explaining prolonged silences in transitional justice: The disappeared in Cyprus and Spain’, Comparative Political Studies 46(6), 730–756.Google Scholar
Krauss, C. (2000), ‘New Argentine president orders purge of ‘dirty war’ remnants’, New York Times, p. 6.Google Scholar
Laplante, L. J. & Phenicie, K. (2009), ‘Mediating post-conflict dialogue: The media’s role in transitional justice processes’, Available at https://goo.gl/tvDDs6.Google Scholar
Leon-Roesch, M. (1993), ‘Paraguay’, in Handbuch der Wahldaten Lateinamerikas und der Karibik, Springer, pp. 631–650.Google Scholar
Leskiewicz, R. (2016), ‘Od sluzby bezpieczenstwa do urzedu ochrony panstwa’, Dzieje Najnowsze 48(1), 165–188.Google Scholar
Lessing, B. (2017), ‘Counterproductive punishment: How prison gangs undermine state authority’, Rationality and Society 29(3), 257–297.Google Scholar
Letki, N. (2002), ‘Lustration and democratisation in East-Central Europe’, Europe-Asia Studies 54(4), 529–552.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J., Stepan, A., & Valenzuela, A. (1978), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, Vol. 1, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loyle, C. E. & Appel, B. J. (2017), ‘Conflict recurrence and postconflict justice: Addressing motivations and opportunities for sustainable peace’, International Studies Quarterly 61(3), 690–703.Google Scholar
Lundy, P. & McGovern, M. (2008), ‘Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up’, Journal of Law and Society 35(2), 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, G. & Waggoner, L. (2018), ‘Dashed hopes and extremism in tunisia’, Journal of Democracy 29(1), 126–140.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2006), Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico, Vol. 296, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (1999), Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mallinder, L. (2008), Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide, Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Malloy, J. M. & Gamarra, E. (1988), Revolution and Reaction: Bolivia, 1964–1985, Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Masri, S. M. (2017), Tunisia: An Arab Anomaly, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. C. (2019), The Art of Political Control in China, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, F. (1997), ‘The military republic 1964-85 in a country study: Brazil’, available at: www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-1700.html Washington: The Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Medina, L. F. & Stokes, S. (2007), ‘Monopoly and monitoring: An approach to political clientelism’, Patrons, Clients, and Policies, pp. 68–83.Google Scholar
Meng, A. (2020), Constraining Dictatorship: From Personalized Rule to Institutionalized Regimes, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1998), ‘Settling accounts with a secret police: The German law on the Stasi records’, Europe-Asia Studies 50(2), 305–330.Google Scholar
Montagnes, B. P. & Wolton, S. (2019), ‘Mass purges: Top-down accountability in autocracy’, American Political Science Review 113(4), 1045–1059.Google Scholar
Muller, J. W. (2002), Memory and Power in Post-war Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naff, K. C. & Capers, K. J. (2014), ‘The complexity of descriptive representation and bureaucracy: The case of South Africa’, International Public Management Journal 17(4), 515–539.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2008), ‘To punish the guilty and protect the innocent comparing truth revelation procedures’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 20(2), 221–245.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2010 a), ‘Captured commitments: An analytic narrative of transitions with transitional justice’, World Politics 62(2), 341–380.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2010 b), Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-communist Europe, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2012 a), ‘Reconciliation, refugee returns, and the impact of international criminal justice: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Nomos 51, 316–359.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2012 b), ‘Tolerating mistakes: How do popular perceptions of procedural fairness affect demand for transitional justice?’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(3), 490–515.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2020), ‘Transitional justice and authoritarian backsliding’, Constitutional Political Economy, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Nalepa, M. & Sonin, K. (2022), ‘How does kompromat affect politics? A model of transparency regimes’ University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper, 2020–29.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, N. (2013), ‘From velvet revolution to velvet justice: The case of Slovakia’, After Oppression, pp. 390–417.Google Scholar
Nugent, E. (2020), ‘The Psychology of Repression and Polarization’, World Politics 72(2), 291–334. doi:10.1017/S0043887120000015 Google Scholar
Nugent, E. R. (2020), After Repression: How Polarization Derails Democratic Transition, Vol. 24, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. (2013), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
of World Events (Formerly Keesing’s Contemporary Archives 1931-1988), K. R. (2001), ‘Life expectancy’.Google Scholar
Olimpieva, E. (2021), Putin’s Prosecutors: How Law Enforcement Helps Build Authoritarian States, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. G. (2010), ‘The justice balance: When transitional justice improves human rights and democracy’, Human Rights Quarterly 32(4), 980–1007.Google Scholar
Otis, J. (1992), ‘Chamorro backers warn of ‘new dictatorship’ in Nicaragua’. URL: www.upi.com/Archives/1992/06/05/Chamorro-backers-warn-of-new-dictatorship-in-Nicaragua/5442707716800/Google Scholar
Paine, J. (forthcoming). Reframing the Guardianship Dilemma: How the Military’s Dual Disloyalty Options Imperil Dictators, American Political Science Review. Google Scholar
Payne, S. G. (2011), The Franco Regime, 1936–1975, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., & Miri, F. (2017), ‘The v-dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data’, University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 21, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Perkins, K. (2014), A History of Modern Tunisia, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettai, E.-C. & Pettai, V. (2014), Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the Baltic States, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, A. C. (2001), ‘Settling accounts with the past in a troubled transition to democracy: The portuguese case’, in The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, pp. 65–91.Google Scholar
Pinto, A. C. (2008), ‘Political purges and state crisis in portugal’s transition to democracy, 1975-76’, Journal of Contemporary History 43(2), 305–332.Google Scholar
Pinto, A. C. (2010), ‘The authoritarian past and South European democracies: An introduction’, South European Society and Politics 15(3), 339–358.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. (2007), ‘Historical legacies and post-communist regime change’, Journal of Politics 69(4), 908–926. URL: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00598.x Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. (2010), ‘Throwing out the bums: Protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism’, World Politics 62(2), 221–260.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. & Tucker, J. A. (2011), ‘Communism’s shadow: Postcommunist legacies, values, and behavior’, Comparative Politics 43(4), 379–408.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. (2013), ‘Associated with the past? Communist legacies and civic participation in post-communist countries’, East European Politics and Societies 27(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. M. (2014), ‘Trading coups for civil war: The strategic logic of tolerating rebellion’, African Security Review 23(4), 329–338.Google Scholar
Preysing, D. (2016), Transitional Justice in Post-revolutionary Tunisia (2011– 2013): How the Past Shapes the Future, Springer.Google Scholar
Price, R. M. (1991), The Apartheid State in Crisis: Political Transformation in South Africa, 1975-1990, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prorok, A. K. (2017), ‘The (in) compatibility of peace and justice? the international criminal court and civil conflict termination’, International Organization 71(2), 213–243.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rauch, J. E. & Evans, P. B. (2000), ‘Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries’, Journal of Public Economics 75(1), 49–71.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Vol. 1, Sage.Google Scholar
Remmer, K. L. (1990), ‘Democracy and economic crisis: The Latin American experience’, World Politics 42(3), 315–335.Google Scholar
Renewed Threats to Peace Process Purge of Army Officers Keesing’s Record of World Events (1993) vol 39, page 39265, January 2,1993. (1993).Google Scholar
Rev, I. (2005), Retroactive Justice: Prehistory of Post-Communism, Stanford University press.Google Scholar
Riedl, R. B. (2014), Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roett, R. & Sacks, R. S. (1991), Paraguay: The Personalist Legacy, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. (1997), ‘Constitution-making, identity building, and peaceful transition to democracy: Theoretical reflections inspired by the Spanish example’, Cardozo Law Review 19, 1891.Google Scholar
Sang-Hun, C. (2015), ‘Kim Young-Sam, South Korean president who opposed military, dies at 87’, New York Times.Google Scholar
Sekelj, L. (2000), ‘Parties and elections: The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia-change without transformation’, Europe-Asia Studies 52(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Serra, G. (2012), ‘The risk of partyarchy and democratic backsliding: Mexico’s electoral reform’, Repositorio digital CIDE: http://repositorio-digital.cide.edu/handle/11651/1356.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. (2011), The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (The Norton Series in World Politics), WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. & Walling, C. B. (2007), ‘The impact of human rights trials in Latin America’, Journal of Peace Research 44(4), 427–445.Google Scholar
Simon, H., Smithburg, D., & Thompson, V. (1950), Public Administration, Knopf.Google Scholar
Skidmore, T. E. (1989), The Politics of Military Rule in Brazil, 1964-1985, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979), States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. & Vinjamuri, L. (2004), ‘Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice’, International Security 28(3), 5–44.Google Scholar
Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2007), ‘Swift gradualism and variable outcomes: Vetting in post-authoritarian Greece’, Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, pp. 121–145.Google Scholar
Southall, R. (2020), ‘Flight and fortitude: The decline of the middle class in Zimbabwe’, Africa 90(3), 529–547.Google Scholar
Stan, L. (2006), ‘The vanishing truth? politics and memory in post-communist Europe’, East European Quarterly 40(4), 383–409.Google Scholar
Stan, L. (2012), ‘Witch-hunt or moral rebirth? Romanian parliamentary debates on lustration’, East European Politics and Societies 26(2), 274–295.Google Scholar
Stan, L. (2013), ‘Reckoning with the communist past in Romania: A scorecard’, Europe-Asia Studies 65(1), 127–146.Google Scholar
Stan, L. & Nedelsky, N. (2015), Post-communist Transitional Justice: Lessons from Twenty-five Years of Experience, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stan, L. et al. (2009), Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the communist Past, Routledge.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013), Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subotic, J. (2010), Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Svolik, M. W. (2012), The Politics of Authoritarian Rule, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, A. (2002), ‘Dealing with the communist past or the politics of the present? lustration in post-communist Poland’, Europe-Asia Studies 54(4), 553–572.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2005), ‘The development of stable party support: Electoral dynamics in post-communist europe’, American Journal of Political Science 49(2), 283–298.Google Scholar
Teitel, R. G. (2003), ‘Transitional justice genealogy’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 16, 69.Google Scholar
The Economist, j. (2021), ‘The world must not accept the jailing of Alexei Navalny’, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
The Guardian (2020), “Experience: my brother spied on me for the Stasi” (by Peter Keup September 18, 2020.)Google Scholar
Thoms, O. N., Ron, J., & Paris, R. (2010), ‘State-level effects of transitional justice: what do we know?’, International Journal of Transitional Justice 4(3), 329–354.Google Scholar
Tillack, H.-M. (n.d.), ‘A tale of gazoviki, money and greed’, Stern Magazine, p. 192.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. et al. (1992), Coercion, capital, and European States, AD 990-1992, Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. et al. (2007), A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1-11, Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (2000), Lysias (Vol. 2). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Tyson, S. A. (2018), ‘The agency problem underlying repression’, The Journal of Politics 80(4), 1297–1310.Google Scholar
UN Integrated Regional Information Networks (Nairobi) (2011), ‘Comoros; missing guns delay demobilization process’, Africa News.Google Scholar
United States Institute of Peace (2011 a), ‘Truth commission: Ecuador 07’.Google Scholar
(2011 b), ‘Truth commission: Ecuador 96’.Google Scholar
(2011 c), ‘Truth commission: Germany 92’.Google Scholar
(2011 d), ‘Truth commission: Germany 95’.Google Scholar
(2011 e), ‘Truth commission: Kenya’.Google Scholar
(2011 f), ‘Truth commission: Liberia’.Google Scholar
(2011 g), ‘Truth commission: Paraguay’.Google Scholar
(2011 h), ‘Truth commission: Peru 01’.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, H., Baxter, V., & Chapman, A. R. (2009), Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research, US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Veremis, T. (1985), ‘Greece: Veto and impasse, 1967–74’, The Political Dilemmas of Military Regimes, pp. 27–45.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. & Pettifer, J. (2006), Albanian Question: Reshaping the Balkans, IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Vilasi, A. C. (2015), The History of the Stasi, AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, L. & Snyder, J. (2004), ‘Advocacy and scholarship in the study of international war crime tribunals and transitional justice’, Annual Review of Political Science 7, 345–362.Google Scholar
Waldmeir, P. (1997), Anatomy of a Miracle: The End of Apartheid and the Birth of the New South Africa, WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968), ‘Economy and society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, eds.)’, New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Weeks, J. (2014), Dictators at War and Peace, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, A. (1999), ‘Irruptions of memory: Expressive politics in chile’s transition to democracy’, Journal of Latin American Studies 31(02), 473–500.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Fowler, B., & Szczerbiak, A. (2005), ‘Explaining lustration in central Europe: A ‘post-communist politics’ approach’, Democratization 12(1), 22–43.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (2019), Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Woldense, J. (2018), ‘The ruler’s game of musical chairs: Shuffling during the reign of Ethiopia’s last emperor’, Social Networks 52, 154–166.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (2008), ‘Do authoritarian institutions constrain? how legislatures affect economic growth and investment’, American Journal of Political Science 52(2), 322–343.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, K. (2013), ‘Tying hands behind closed doors: The logic and practice of secret reassurance’, Security Studies 22(3), 405–435.Google Scholar
Zakharov, A. V. (2016), ‘The loyalty-competence trade-off in dictatorships and outside options for subordinates’, The Journal of Politics 78(2), 457–466.Google Scholar
Zvobgo, K. (2019 a), ‘Demanding truth: The global transitional justice network and the creation of truth commissions’ PhD Dissertation, University of Southern California, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zvobgo, K. (2019 b), ‘Designing truth: Facilitating perpetrator testimony at truth commissions’, Journal of Human Rights 18(1), 92–110.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Monika Nalepa, University of Chicago
  • Book: After Authoritarianism
  • Online publication: 15 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072540.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Monika Nalepa, University of Chicago
  • Book: After Authoritarianism
  • Online publication: 15 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072540.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Monika Nalepa, University of Chicago
  • Book: After Authoritarianism
  • Online publication: 15 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072540.014
Available formats
×