Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:45:14.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - Prince Dido of Didotown and ‘Human Zoos’ in Wilhelmine Germany: Strategies for Self-Representation under the Othering Gaze

from I - Enacting Identity: Individuals, Families and Communities

Albert Gouaffo
Affiliation:
University of Dschang
Eve Rosenhaft
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Robbie Aitken
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Get access

Summary

Participation in ethnographic exhibitions or ‘human zoos’ can be counted among the many vehicles for transnational mobility around the turn of the twentieth century. Such exhibitions offered a European audience the chance to experience contact with non-Europeans up close and to learn more about them and their cultures. There were also advantages to be gained by the non-European participants. For some of them, able to draw on a cosmopolitan experience and a transnational perspective on the world, ethnographic exhibitions presented an opportunity to stage their own personalities for a European audience through practices of self-representation. This chapter proposes that one of those participants, the Cameroonian Prince Samson Dido of Douala, who visited Imperial Germany in 1886, can be seen as a cultural hybrid in the sense in which the term is used by the postcolonial theorist Homi K. Bhabha. It explores the possibilities and limits of self-representation implicit in that condition and in the cultural practices of the period.

Dido was an African by colour, a Duala notable through his cultural background and his everyday practices, and a German above all through his love of German aristocratic forms of dress. This in turn made him a middle-man, or rather a ‘mimic man’, of the Germans, who had become the colonial rulers of Cameroon in 1884. His experience thus exemplifies the way in which colonial subjects show themselves to be good collaborators in the colonial project through their tendency to imitate the colonisers and their culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Africa in Europe
Studies in Transnational Practice in the Long Twentieth Century
, pp. 19 - 33
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×