Defining a Decision Analytic Structure

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611308.007

6 - Defining a Decision Analytic Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Detlof Von Winterfeldt and

Ward Edwards

Edited by

Ward Edwards ,

Ralph F. Miles Jr. and

Detlof von Winterfeldt

Show author details

Detlof Von Winterfeldt: Affiliation:
Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California
Ward Edwards: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
Ralph F. Miles Jr.: Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Detlof von Winterfeldt: Affiliation:
University of Southern California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT. This chapter is a revision and update of the chapter “Structuring for Decision Analysis” of our book Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (von Winterfeldt and Edwards 1986). More than 20 years have passed since we wrote this chapter and during this time we gained substantial experience with applying decision analysis to many different government, business, and personal problems. The one lesson that has not changed is that structuring decision problems is the most important and, at the same time, least well understood task of a decision analyst. The three-step structuring process (identifying the problem; selecting an appropriate analytical approach; refining the analysis structure) also has survived the test of time. However, more than 20 years of applying decision analysis have taught us many new lessons, some new tools, and a variety of refinements when it comes to structuring decision problems. We liberally use the text of the 1986 chapter and weave in new materials and ideas as we go along.

This chapter focuses on progressing from an ill-defined problem, articulated often vaguely by decision makers and stakeholders, to a clear definition of the problem and the associated analysis framework. Other chapters in this volume discuss specific structuring techniques using objectives hierarchies (Chapter 7), and belief networks and influence diagrams (Chapter 10). We therefore will touch only briefly on the specifics of structuring problems with these tools and will focus on the general ideas and principles guiding the decision analyst's structuring task.

Type: Chapter
Information: Advances in Decision Analysis
From Foundations to Applications
, pp. 81 - 103

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611308.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benthien, M., and Winterfeldt, D. (2001). Using decision analysis to improve seismic rehabilitation decisions. Working Paper No. WP-01–01. Institute for Civic Enterprise, School of Policy, Planning and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Edwards, W. (1979). Multiattribute utility measuremenmt: Evaluating desegregation plans in a highly political context. In Perloff, R. (ed.), Evaluator interventions: Pros and cons. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 13–54.Google Scholar

Keeney, R. (1980). Siting energy facilities. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused thinking. Cambridge, CA: Harvard Unversity Press.Google Scholar

Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Keeney, R., See, K. E., and Winterfeldt, D. (2006). Inventory and appraisal of U.S. graduate decision programs. Operations Research, 25, 1–16.Google Scholar

Keeney, R., and Winterfeldt, D. (2005). Evaluation of Capilano–Seymour tunnel project alternatives. Report to the Greater Vancouver Regional District, Vancouver, CA.Google Scholar

Winterfeldt, D. (2005). A risk analysis of grounding practices to improve utility worker safety. Report submitted to Southern California Edison Co., Rosemead, CA.Google Scholar

Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Winterfeldt, D., and Schweitzer, E. (1998). An assessment of tritium supply alternatives in support of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile. Interfaces, 28, 92–112.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winterfeldt, D., Eppel, T., Adams, J., Neutra, R., and Delpizzo, V. (2004). Managing potential health risks from electric power lines: A decision analysis caught in controversy. Risk Analysis, 24, 1487–1502.CrossRef Google Scholar