Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:24:06.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Default recovery rates and LGD in credit risk modelling and practice: An updated review of the literature and empirical evidence

An updated review of the literature and empirical evidence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

By
Edward I. Altman
Edited by
Stewart Jones  and
David A. Hensher
Stewart Jones
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
David A. Hensher
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Three main variables affect the credit risk of a financial asset: (i) the probability of default (PD), (ii) the ‘loss given default’ (LGD), which is equal to one minus the recovery rate in the event of default (RR), and (iii) the exposure at default (EAD). While significant attention has been devoted by the credit risk literature on the estimation of the first component (PD), much less attention has been dedicated to the estimation of RR and to the relationship between PD and RR. This is mainly the consequence of two related factors. First, credit pricing models and risk management applications tend to focus on the systematic risk components of credit risk, as these are the only ones that attract risk-premia. Second, credit risk models traditionally assumed RR to be dependent on individual features (e.g. collateral or seniority) that do not respond to systematic factors, and therefore to be independent of PD.

This traditional focus only on default analysis has been partly reversed by the recent increase in the number of studies dedicated to the subject of RR estimation and the relationship between the PD and RR (Fridson et al. 2000, Gupton et al. 2000, Altman et al. 2001, Altman et al. 2003, 2005, Frye 2000a, 2000b, 2000c, Hu and Perraudin 2002, Hamilton et al. 2001, Jarrow 2001 and Jokivuolle and Peura 2003). This is partly the consequence of the parallel increase in default rates and decrease of recovery rates registered during the 1999–2002 period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Credit Risk Modelling and Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction , pp. 175 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V. V., Bharath, S. T. and Srinivasan, A., ‘Understanding the recovery rates on defaulted securities’, Working Paper, London Business School, 2003.
Acharya, V. V., Bharath, S. T. and Srinivasan, A., ‘Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? – evidence from creditor recoveries’, Journal of Political Economy, 2007 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Altman, E., ‘Measuring corporate bond mortality and performance’, Journal of Finance, 44, 1989, 909–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. and Eberhart, A., ‘Do seniority provisions protect bondholders’ investments?', Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer, 1994, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. I., ‘Are historically based default and recovery models still relevant in today's credit environment’, NYU Salomon Center Special Report, October, 2006.Google Scholar
Altman, E. I., Brady, B., Resti, A. and Sironi, A., ‘The link between default and recovery rates: theory, empirical evidence and implications’, NYU Salomon Center Working Paper Series #S–03–4, 2003; Journal of Business, 78(6), 2005, 2203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E., Haldeman, R. and Narayanan, P., ‘ZETA analysis: a new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 1977, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. I. and Kishore, V. M., ‘Almost everything you wanted to know about recoveries on defaulted bonds’, Financial Analysts Journal, November/December, 1996, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. and Ramayanam, S., ‘The high-yield bond default and return report: third-quarter 2006 review’, NYU Salomon Center Special Report (November, 2006) and 2006 Annual Report, January, 2007.
Altman, E. I., Resti, A. and Sironi, A., ‘Analyzing and explaining default recovery rates’, ISDA Research Report, London, December, 2001.
Altman, E. I., Resti, A. and Sironi, A., Recovery Risk, Risks Books, London, 2005.
Araten, M., Jacobs, M. and Varshny, P., ‘Measuring LGD on commercial loans’, The RMA Journal, May, 2004.Google Scholar
Asarnow, E. and Edwards, D., ‘Measuring loss on defaulted bank loans: a 24 year study’, Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, 77(7), 1995, 11–23.Google Scholar
Bakshi, G., Madan, D. and Zhang, F., Understanding the Role of Recovery in Default Risk Models: Empirical Comparisons and Implied Recovery Rates, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Washington, DC. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, 2001, pp. 2001–37.Google Scholar
,Basel Commission on Bank Regulation, International Convergence on Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, BIS, June, 2004.
,Basel Commission on Bank Regulation, Guidance on Paragraph 468 of the Framework Document, BIS, July, 2005.
Black, F. and Cox, J. C., ‘Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions’, Journal of Finance, 31, 1976, 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. and Scholes, M., ‘The pricing of options and corporate liabilities’, Journal of Political Economics, May, 1973, 637–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, M. and Gordy, M., ‘Systematic risk in recoveries on defaulted debt’, Mimeo, Washington: Federal Reserve Board, 2003.Google Scholar
Chabane, A., Laurent, J.-P. and Salomon, J., ‘Double impact: credit risk assessment and collateral value’, Revue Finance, 25, 2004, 157–78.Google Scholar
CreditRisk+. A Credit Risk Management Framework, Technical Document, Credit Suisse Financial Products, 1997.
Crosbie, P. J., ‘Modeling Default Risk’, Mimeo, San Francisco, CA, KMV Corporation, 1999.
Crouhy, M., Galai, D. and Mark, R., ‘A comparative analysis of current credit risk models’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 24, 2000, 59–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffee, G. R., ‘Estimating the price of default risk’, Review of Financial Studies, Spring, 12(1), 1999, 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D., ‘Defaultable term structure models with fractional recovery of par’, Writing Paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1998.
Duffie, D. and Singleton, K. J., ‘Modeling the term structures of defaultable bonds’, Review of Financial Studies, 12, 1999, 687–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D. and Lando, D., ‘Term structure of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information’, Econometrica, 2000.Google Scholar
Dullman, K. and Trapp, M., ‘Systematic risk in recovery rates – an empirical analysis of U.S. corporate credit exposures’, EFWA Basel Paper, 2004.
Eales, R. and Bosworth, E., ‘Severity of loss in the event of default in small business and large consumer loans’, Journal of Lending and Credit Risk Management, May, 1998, 58–65.Google Scholar
Emery, K., Moody's Loan Default Database as of November 2003, Moody's Investors Service, December, 2003.
Eom, Y. H., Helwege, J. and Huang, J.-Z., ‘Structural models of corporate bond pricing: an empirical analysis’, Mimeo, 2001.
Finger, C., Conditional approaches for creditmetrics® portfolio distributions, CreditMetrics® Monitor, April, 1999.
Franks, J., and Torous, W., ‘A comparison of financial recontracting in distressed exchanges and Chapter 11 reorganizations’, Journal of Financial Economics, 35, 1994, 349–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridson, M. S., Garman, C. M. and Okashima, K., ‘Recovery Rates: The Search for Meaning’, Merrill Lynch & Co., High Yield Strategy, 2000.
Frye, J., ‘Collateral damage’, Risk, April, 2000a, 91–4.Google Scholar
Frye, J., ‘Collateral damage detected’, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, Emerging Issues Series, October, 2000b, 1–14.
Frye, J., ‘Depressing Recoveries’, Risk, November, 2000c.Google Scholar
Geske, R., ‘The valuation of corporate liabilities as compound options’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12, 1977, 541–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordy, M., ‘A comparative anatomy of credit risk models’, Journal of Banking and Finance, January, 2000, 119–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupton, G., Finger, C. and Bhatia, M., CreditMetrics™ Technical Document, New York, J. P. Morgan, 1997.Google Scholar
Gupton, G. M., Gates, D. and Carty, L. V., Bank Loan Loss Given Default, Moody's Investors Service, Global Credit Research, November, 2000.
Gupton, G. M. and Stein, R. M., LossCalc: Moody's Model for Predicting Loss Given Default (LGD), New York, Moody's KMV, 2002.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. T., Gupton, G. M. and Berthault, A., Default and Recovery Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers: 2000, Moody's Investors Service, February, 2001.Google Scholar
Hu, Y.-T. and Perraudin, W., ‘The dependence of recovery rates and defaults’, Birkbeck College Mimeo; February, and CEPR Working Paper, 2002.
Hull, J. and White, A., ‘The impact of default risk on the prices of options and other derivative securities’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 19, 1995, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R. A., ‘Default parameter estimation using market prices’, Financial Analysts Journal, 57(5), 2001, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R. A., Lando, D. and Turnbull, S. M., ‘A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads’, Review of Financial Studies, 10, 1997, 481–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R. A. and Turnbull, S. M., ‘Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk’, Journal of Finance, 50, 1995, 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokivuolle, E. and Peura, S., ‘A model for estimating recovery rates and collateral haircuts for bank loans’, European Financial Management, 2003, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Jones, E., Mason, S. and Rosenfeld, E., ‘Contingent claims analysis of corporate capital structures: an empirical investigation’, Journal of Finance, 39, 1984, 611–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keisman, D., ‘Ultimate recovery rates on bank loan and bond defaults,’ Loss Stats, S&P, 2004.Google Scholar
Kim, I. J., Ramaswamy, K. and Sundaresan, S., ‘Does default risk in coupons affect the valuation of corporate bonds? a contingent claims model’, Financial Management, 22(3), 1993, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lando, D., ‘On Cox processes and credit risky securities’, Review of Derivatives Research, 2, 1998, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litterman, R. and Iben, T., ‘Corporate bond valuation and the term structure of credit spreads’, Financial Analysts Journal, Spring, 1991, 52–64.Google Scholar
Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S., ‘A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt’, Journal of Finance, 50, 1995, 789–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madan, D. and Unal, H., ‘Pricing the risks of default’, Review of Derivatives Research, 2, 1995, 121–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C., ‘On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates’, Journal of Finance, 2, 1974, 449–71.Google Scholar
Miu, P. and Ozdemir, B., ‘Basel requirements of downturn loss-given-default: modeling and estimating probability of default and LGD correlations,’ Journal of Credit Risk, 2(2), 2006, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, Carvalho and Dermine, J., ‘Bank loan losses-given-default – empirical evidence’, Working Paper, INSEAD, 2003.
Nielsen, L. T., Saà-Requejo, J. and Santa-Clara, P., ‘Default risk and interest rate risk: the term structure of default spreads’, Working Paper, INSEAD, 1993.
Pykhtin, M., ‘Unexpected recovery risk’, Risk, 16, 2003, 74–8.Google Scholar
Resti, A., The New Basel Capital Accord: Structure, Possible Changes, Micro- and Macroeconomic Effects, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, 2002.
Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘Liquidation values and debt capacity: a market equilibrium approach’, Journal of Finance, 47, 1992, 1343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuermann, T., ‘What do we know about loss given default?’, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2004; also in Shimko, D. (eds.), Credit Risk Models and Management, 2nd edition, London, Risk Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Castle, K. and Keisman, D., ‘Suddenly structure mattered: insights into recoveries of defaulted,’ Corporate Ratings, S&P, May 24, 1999.Google Scholar
Varma, P., Cantor, R. and Hamilton, D., Recovery Rates on Defaulted Corporate Bonds and Preferred Stocks, Moody's Investors Service, December, 2003.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O. A., Credit Valuation, KMV Corporation, March, 1984.
Verde, M., ‘Recovery rates return to historic norms’, FITCH Ratings, September, 2003.
Wilson, T. C., ‘Portfolio credit risk’, Federal Reserve Board of New York, Economic Policy Review, October, 1998, 71–82.Google Scholar
Zhou, C., ‘The term structure of credit spreads with jump risk’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 25, 2001, 2015–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×