Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zpzq9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T16:34:00.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Bankruptcy prediction and structural credit risk models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

By
Andreas Charitou ,
Neophytos Lambertides  and
Lenos Trigeorgis
Edited by
Stewart Jones  and
David A. Hensher
Stewart Jones
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
David A. Hensher
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Default is triggered by a firm's failure to meet its financial obligations. Default probabilities and changes in expected default frequencies affect markets participants, such as investors and lenders, since they assume responsibility for the credit risk of their investments. The lack of a solid economic understanding of the factors that determine bankruptcy makes explanation and prediction of default difficult to assess. However, the accuracy of these predictors is essential for sound risk management and for evaluation of the vulnerability of corporations and institutional lenders. In recognition of this, the new capital adequacy framework (Basel II) envisages a more active role for banks in measuring the default risk of their loan books. The need for reliable measures of default or credit risk is clear to all.

The accounting and finance literature has produced a variety of models attempting to predict or measure default risk. There are two primary types of models that describe default processes in the credit risk literature: structural models and reduced-form models. Structural models use the evolution of a firm's structural variables, such as asset and debt values, to determine the timing of default. Merton's model (1974) is considered the first structural model. In Merton's model, a firm defaults if, at the time of servicing the debt at debt maturity, its assets are below its outstanding debt. A second approach within the structural framework was introduced by Black and Cox (1976). In this approach default occurs when a firm's asset value falls below a certain threshold.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Credit Risk Modelling and Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction , pp. 154 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altman, E., ‘Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy’, Journal of Finance, September, 1968, 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. I., Haldeman, R. and Narayanan, P., ‘ZETA analysis: A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 10, 1977, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. W., Sundaresan, S. and Tychon, P., ‘Strategic analysis of contingent claims’, European Economic Review, 40, 1996, 871–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, W., ‘Financial ratios as predictors of failure’, Journal of Accounting Research, 1966, 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharath, S. T. and Shumway, T., ‘Forecasting default with the KMV–Merton model’, Working Paper, University of Michigan, 2005.Google Scholar
Black, F. and Scholes, M., ‘The pricing of options and corporate liabilities’, Journal of Political Economy, May/June, 1973, 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F., and Cox, J. C., ‘Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions’, Journal of Finance, 31, 1976, 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briys, E. and Varenne, F., ‘Valuing risky fixed rate debt: an extension’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 1997, 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., Hilscher, J. and Szilagyi, J., ‘In search of distress risk’, Working Paper, Harvard University, 2004.Google Scholar
Charitou, A. and Trigeorgis, L., ‘The probability of intermediate default in explaining financial distress: an option-based approach’, Working Paper, University of Cyprus, 2006.Google Scholar
Chava, S. and Jarrow, R., ‘Bankruptcy prediction with bankruptcy effects, market versus accounting variables, and reduced form credit risk models’, Working Paper, Cornell University, 2001.Google Scholar
Cheung, J., ‘A review of option-pricing theory in accounting research’, Journal of Accounting Literature, 10, 1991, 51–84.Google Scholar
Collin-Dufresne, P. and Goldstein, R., ‘Do credit spreads reflect stationary leverage ratios?’, Journal of Finance, 56, 2001, 1929–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core, J. and Schrand, C., ‘The effect of accounting-based debt covenants on equity valuation’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(1), 1999, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouhy, M., Galai, D. and Mark, R., Risk Management, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001.Google Scholar
Crosbie, P. and Bohn, J., Modeling Default Risk, 2002, KMV.Google Scholar
Du, Yu, and Wulin, Suo, ‘Assessing credit quality from equity markets: Is a structural approach a better approach?’, Working Paper, Queen's University, 2004.Google Scholar
Duffie, D. and Ke, Wang, ‘Multi-period corporate failure prediction with stochastic covariates’, Working Paper, Stanford University, 2004.Google Scholar
Edmister, R. O., ‘An empirical test of financial ratio analysis for small business failure prediction’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 1972, 1477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeis, R. A., ‘Pitfalls in the application of discriminant analysis in business, finance and economics’, The Journal of Finance, 22, 1977, 875–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, A., ‘Credit risk models I: default correlation in intensity models’, 2005a, available at www.abelelizalde.com.
Geske, R., ‘The valuation of compound options’, Journal of Financial Economics, 7(1), 1979, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R., Ju, N. and Leland, H., ‘An EBIT-based model of capital structure’, Journal of Business, 74(4), 2001, 483–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillegeist, S., Keating, E., Cram, D. and Lundstedt, K., ‘Assessing the probability of bankruptcy’, Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 2004, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J., Saá-Requejo, J. and Santa-Clara, P., ‘Bond Pricing with Default Risk’, Working Paper, UCLA, 2004.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Huang, M., ‘How much of the corporate-treasury yield spread is due to credit risk’, Working Paper, Penn State University, 2003.Google Scholar
Kealhofer, S. and Kurbat, M., The Default Prediction Power of the Merton Approach, Relative to Debt Ratings and Accounting Variables, KMV, 2001.Google Scholar
Kealhofer, S., Kwok, S. and Weng, W., Uses and Abuses of Bond Default Rates, KMV, 1998.Google Scholar
Kiefer, N. M., ‘Economic duration data and hazard functions’, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1988, 646–79.Google Scholar
Kim, I. J., Ramaswamy, K. and Sundaresan, S. M., ‘Does default risk in coupons affect the valuation of corporate bonds?: A contingent claims model’, Financial Management, 22, 1993, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, T., The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Leland, H. E., ‘Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure’, Journal of Finance, 49, 1994, 987–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H., ‘Predictions of expected default probabilities in structural models of debt’, Journal of Investment Management, 2(2), 2004.Google Scholar
Leland, H. and Toft, K., ‘Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure on credit spreads’, Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1996, 987–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F. and Schwartz, E., ‘Valuing risky debt: a new approach’, Journal of Finance, 50, 1995, 789–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mella-Barral, P., and Perraudin, W., ‘Strategic debt service’, Journal of Finance, 52(2), 1997, 531–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensah, Y. M., ‘An examination of the stationarity of multivariate bankruptcy prediction models: a methodological study’, Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 1984, 380–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C., ‘Theory of rational option pricing’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 1973, 141–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C., ‘On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates’, Journal of Finance, 29, 1974, 449–70.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C., ‘On the Ppricing of contingent claims and the Modigliani–Miller theorem’, Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 1977, 241–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, L. T., Saá-Requejo, J. and Santa-Clara, P., ‘Default risk and interest rate risk: the term structure of default spreads’, Working Paper, 1993, INSEAD.Google Scholar
Ohlson, J., ‘Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy’, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 1980, 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronn, E. I. and Verma, A. K., ‘Pricing risk-adjusted deposit insurance: an option based model’, Journal of Finance, 41, 1986, 871–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, T., ‘Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model’, Journal of Business, 74(1), 2001, 103–24.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O., ‘An equilibrium characterization of the term structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 1977, 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasicek, O., Credit Valuation, KMV, 1984.Google Scholar
Vassalou, M. and Xing, Y., ‘Default risk in equity returns’, Journal of Finance, 59(2), 2004, 831–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., ‘The role of credit ratings in timing public debt issue, and debt maturity choice’, Working Paper, Queen's University, 2005.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. W., ‘A prediction of business failure using accounting data’, Empirical Research in Accounting, 2, 1973, 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavgren, C. V., ‘The prediction of corporate failure: the state of the art’, Journal of Accounting Literature, 2, 1983, 1–38.Google Scholar
Zmijewski, M., ‘Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models’, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 1984, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×