Abboub, N., Nazzi, T., & Gervain, J. (2016). Prosodic grouping at birth. Brain and Language, 162, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.002Google Scholar

Aboh, E. (2020). Lessons from neuro-(a)-typical brains: Universal multilingualism, codemixing, recombination, and executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128, 466–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014Google Scholar

Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Gonzaga, A. K. C., Keim, R., Costa, A., & Perani, D. (2013). The role of the left putamen in multilingual language production. Brain and Language, 125, 307–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Green, D. W., et al. (2012). Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2076–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr287Google Scholar

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2016). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: Neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 689–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728916000225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acuña, E. (2019). Tracing the Romani Atlantic: An ethnography of trans-local interconnections and mobilities among Romani groups. Doctoral dissertation at Albert Ludwig University, Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar

Acuña, E., & Adamou, E. (2013). How did linguistic innovations spread in the Romani varieties of the Americas? A social interconnection approach. Paper presented at the International Conference on Romani Studies, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 12–14 September 2013.Google Scholar

Adamou, E. (2009). Le marquage différentiel de l’objet en nashta et en pomaque (slave, Grèce). Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 104, 383–409. https://doi.org/10.2143/bsl.104.1.2046996CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E. (2010). Bilingual speech and language ecology in Greek Thrace: Romani and Pomak in contact with Turkish. Language in Society, 39, 147–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000035Google Scholar

Adamou, E. (2011). Temporal uses of definite articles and demonstratives in Pomak (Slavic, Greece). Lingua, 121, 871–89.Google Scholar

Adamou, E. (2012). Verb morphologies in contact: Evidence from the Balkan area. In Vanhove, M., Stolz, T., Urdze, A., and Otsuka, H., Morphologies in Contact. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 143–62.Google Scholar

Adamou, E. (2013a). Replicating Spanish estar in Mexican Romani. Linguistics, 51, 1075–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013–0045CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E. (2013b). Change and variation in a trilingual setting: Evidentiality in Pomak (Slavic, Greece). In Léglise, I. and Chamoreau, C., eds., The Interplay of Variation and Change in Contact Settings: Morphosyntactic Studies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar

Adamou, E. (2016). A Corpus-Driven Approach to Language Contact: Endangered Languages in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E. (2017a). Spatial language and cognition among the last Ixcatec-Spanish bilinguals (Mexico). In Bellamy, K., Child, M. W., González, P., Muntendam, A., and Parafita Couto, M. C., eds., Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.13.08adaGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E. (2017b). Subject preference in Ixcatec relative clauses (Otomanguean, Mexico). Studies in Language, 41, 872–913. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16055.adaGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E. (in press). How sentence processing sheds light on mixed language creation. In Mazzoli, M. and Sippola, E., eds., Mixed Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Adamou, E., & Arvaniti, A. (2014). Greek Thrace Xoraxane Romane. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44, 223–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100313000376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., Breu, W., Scholze, L., & Shen, X. R. (2016). Borrowing and contact intensity: A corpus-driven approach from four Slavic minority languages. Journal of Language Contact, 9(3), 515–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629–00903004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., De Pascale, S., García-Márkina, Y., & Padure, C. (2019). Do bilinguals generalize estar more than monolinguals and what is the role of conceptual transfer? International Journal of Bilingualism, 23, 1549–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918812175Google Scholar

Adamou, E., & Fanciullo, D. (2018). Why Pomak will not be the next Slavic literary language. In Stern, D., Nomachi, M., and Belić, B., eds., Linguistic Regionalism in Eastern Europe and Beyond: Minority, Regional and Literary Microlanguages. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 40–65.Google Scholar

Adamou, E., Feltgen, Q., & Padure, C. (2020, August 26). A unified approach to the study of language contact: How cross-language priming drives change in noun-adjective order. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hg6eaGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., Gordon, M., & Gries, S. T. (2018). Prosodic and morphological focus marking in Ixcatec (Otomanguean). In Adamou, E., Haude, K., and Vanhove, M., eds., Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.03adaGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., & Granqvist, K. (2015). Unevenly mixed Romani languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 525–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914524645CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., & Haendler, Y. (2020). An experimental approach to nominal tense: Evidence from Pomak (Slavic). Language, 96(3): 507–550. doi: 10.1353/lan.2020.0040CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., & Shen, X. R. (2017). Beyond language shift: Spatial cognition among the Ixcatecs in Mexico. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 17, 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., & Shen, X. R. (2019). There are no language switching costs when codeswitching is frequent. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917709094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adolphs, R. (2010). Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron, 65(6), 752–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.006Google Scholar

Alvarado Solís, N. (2014). Le spectacle des Tsiganes en France et au Mexique. Etudes tsiganes, 51, 92–117. https://doi.org/10.4000/nuevomundo.69151Google Scholar

Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01301.xGoogle Scholar

Anand, P., Chung, S., & Wagers, M. (2011). Widening the net: Challenges for gathering linguistic data in the digital age. Submitted to the National Science Foundation SBE 2020 planning activity. www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/2020_pdfs/Wagers_Matthew_121.pdf (accessed 21 October 2019)Google Scholar

Arias, B. (2005). El aspecto resultativo en las construcciones haber, ser, estar y tener + participio pasado en el castellano medieval. In Lubbers, M. and Maldonado, R., eds., Dimensiones del aspecto en español. Mexico City: UNAM/UAQ. pp. 99–123.Google Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602Google Scholar

Ashaie, S., & Obler, L. (2014). Effect of age, education, and bilingualism on confrontation naming in older illiterate and low-educated populations. Behavioural Neurology, 970520. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/970520Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002397Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., et al. (2015). Two languages, two minds: Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science, 26, 518–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Athanasopoulos, P., Dering, B., Wiggett, A., Kuipers, J.-R., & Thierry, G. (2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116, 437–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atkinson, Q. D., & Gray, R. D. (2005). Curious parallels and curious connections: Phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Systematic Biology, 54, 513–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590950317Google Scholar

Auer, P. (1999). From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 309–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069990030040101Google Scholar

Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (eds.). (2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Avarguès-Weber, A., Dyer, A. G., Combe, M., & Giurfa, M. (2012). Simultaneous mastering of two abstract concepts by the miniature brain of bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7481–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202576109Google ScholarPubMed

Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M. (2013). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: An explanation of n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative learning. Language and Speech, 56, 329–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0023830913484896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Backus, A. (2015). A usage-based approach to codeswitching: The need for reconciling structure and function. In Stell, G. and Yakpo, K., eds., Code-switching between Structural and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, A. (2021).Usage-based approaches. In Adamou, E. and Matras, Y., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language Contact. London: Routledge, pp. 110–26.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. (1994). Michif, the Cree-French mixed language of the Métis buffalo hunters in Canada. In Bakker, P. and Mous, M., eds., Mixed Languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT, pp. 13–33.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. (2003). Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In Matras, Y. and Bakker, P., eds., The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 107–50.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 637–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99532147Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01Google Scholar

Beatty-Martínez, A. L., & Dussias, P. E. (2017). Bilingual experience shapes language processing: Evidence from codeswitching. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 173–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bek, J., Blades, M., Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2010). Language and spatial reorientation: Evidence from severe aphasia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 646–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018281Google ScholarPubMed

Bellamy, K., Parafita Couto, M., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2018). Investigating gender assignment strategies in mixed Purepecha–Spanish nominal constructions. Languages, 3, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3030028Google Scholar

Belmar, F. (1899). Idiomas indígenas del estado de Oaxaca. El Chocho. Oaxaca.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Defining an “ideal” heritage speaker: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Reply to peer commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 259–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013–0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G. J. L., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2011). Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45, 459–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.009Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.19.2.290Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00044149Google Scholar

Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2013). Repertoires revisited: ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, Vol. 67. London: King’s College.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A. (2010). Remembrances of times East: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–9. doi:10.1177/0956797610386621Google Scholar

Boutonnet, B., Athanasopoulos, P., & Thierry, G. (2012). Unconscious effects of grammatical gender during object categorisation. Brain Research, 1479, 72–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowern, C., & Warner, N. (2015). ‘Lone Wolves’ and collaboration: A reply to Crippen and Robinson (2013). Language Documentation and Conservation, 9, 59–85.Google Scholar

Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Featherston, S. and Sternefeld, W., eds., Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 75–96.Google Scholar

Bromham, L., Hua, X., Algy, C., & Meakins, F. (2020). Language endangerment: A multidimensional analysis of risk factors. Journal of Language Evolution, 5, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzaa002Google Scholar

Brown, D. E. (2004). Human universals, human nature and human culture. Daedalus, 133, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365645CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2011). Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000064Google Scholar

Brownstone, A. (ed.). 2015. The Lienzo of Tlapiltepec. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1831–40. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0028Google Scholar

Bullock, B., Guzmán, W., Serigos, J., Sharath, V., & Toribio, A. J. (2018). Predicting the presence of a Matrix Language in code-switching. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Code-Switching, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-3208Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers-Heinlein, K., Morin-Lessard, E., & Lew-Williams, C. (2017). Bilingual infants control their languages as they listen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 9032–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703220114Google ScholarPubMed

Bylund, E. (2009). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning, 59, 687–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9922.2009.00521.xGoogle Scholar

Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., Hyltenstam, K., & Norrman, G. (2019). Revisiting the bilingual lexical deficit: The impact of age of acquisition. Cognition, 182, 45–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.020Google Scholar

Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2017). The Whorfian time warp: Representing duration through the language hourglass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 911–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000314Google ScholarPubMed

Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S. (2011). L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calderón, E. (in progress). Bilinguisme et cognition spatiale chez les Ngiguas (Mexique). Doctoral dissertation at the INALCO, Paris, France.Google Scholar

Calderón, E., De Pascale, S., & Adamou, E. (2019). How to speak ‘geocentric’ in an ‘egocentric’ language: A multimodal study among Ngigua-Spanish bilinguals and Spanish monolinguals in a rural community of Mexico. Language Sciences, 74, 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.001Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2011). Précis of ‘The origin of concepts’. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 113–24; discussion 124–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 473–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033297Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., & Pitt, B. (2019). The faulty magnitude detector: Why SNARC-like tasks cannot support a generalized magnitude system. Cognitive Science, 43, e12794. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12794Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chee, M. W. L., Soon, C. S., Lee, H. L., & Pallier, C. (2004). Left insula activation: A marker for language attainment in bilinguals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 15265–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403703101Google Scholar

Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010–0277(86)90041–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–508; discussion 509–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004998Google Scholar

Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002Google Scholar

Coderre, E. L., Smith, J. F., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Horwitz, B. (2016). The functional overlap of executive control and language processing in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 471–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000188Google Scholar

Connor, L. T., Spiro, A., Obler, L. K., & Albert, M. L. (2004). Change in object naming ability during adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59, P203–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.5.p203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Contemori, C., & Dussias, P. E. (2019). Prediction at the discourse level in Spanish-English bilinguals: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2001). Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01800–3Google Scholar

Cook, S. F., & Borah, W. (1968). The Population of the Mixteca Alta, 1520–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cortés-Torres, M. (2004). ¿Ser o estar? La variación lingüística y social de estar más adjetivo en el español de Cuernavaca, México. Hispania, 87, 788–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/20140911Google Scholar

Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001Google Scholar

Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365–97. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002Google Scholar

Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Vaughn, C., Schmale, R., Bradlow, A., & Floccia, C. (2012). Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00479Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Google Scholar

Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278–7393.30.2.498Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (2010). Cognitive processing in bilinguals: From static to dynamic models. In Kaplan, R. B., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 348–35.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–96. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096–3445.122.3.371Google Scholar

de la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Román, A., Dumitrache, C., & Casasanto, D. (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you. Psychological Science, 25, 1682–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534695Google Scholar

Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123Google Scholar

Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20120394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0394Google Scholar

DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., & Pliatsikas, C. (2018). Linguistic immersion and structural effects on the bilingual brain: a longitudinal study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–16. Published online https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918000883Google Scholar

Demirdache, H. (1997). Predication times in St’at’imcets Salish. In Workshop on the Syntax and Semantics of Predication, Texas Linguistics Society Conference. Austin: University of Austin at Texas Publications, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728902003012Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., et al. (2019). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 657–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000287Google Scholar

Dorian, N. C. (1981). Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512815580Google Scholar

Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2014). Embodiment and second-language: automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm. Brain and Language, 132, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.02.002Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263112000915Google Scholar

Ecke, P. (2004). Language attrition and theories of forgetting: A cross-disciplinary review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 321–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069040080030901Google Scholar

Eikmeier, V., Alex-Ruf, S., Maienborn, C., & Ulrich, R. (2015). How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left-right axis? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1878–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000129Google Scholar

Elšík, V., & Matras, Y. (2006). Markedness and Language Change. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T. H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728907003203Google Scholar

Evans, N. (2010). Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Oxford and Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999094xGoogle Scholar

Falk, J. (1979). Ser y estar con atributos adjetivales: anotaciones sobre el empleo de la cópula en catalán y en castellano. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Feldman, R. (2015). The adaptive human parental brain: Implications for children’s social development. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(6), 387–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.004Google Scholar

Fernández Leborans, M. J. (1995). Las construcciones con el verbo estar: aspectos sintácticos y semánticos. Verba, 22, 253–284.Google Scholar

Favier, S., Wright, A., Meyer, A., & Huettig, F. (2019). Proficiency modulates between- but not within-language structural priming. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3, 105–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019–00029-1Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E. (2014). The role of domain-general cognitive control in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00335Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E., & Kanwisher, N. (2009). Neuroimaging of language: Why hasn’t a clearer picture emerged? Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 839–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00143.xGoogle Scholar

Fedorenko, E., & Varley, R. (2016). Language and thought are not the same thing: Evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 132–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13046Google Scholar

Feyereisen, P. (1997). A meta-analytic procedure shows an age-related decline in picture naming: Comments on Goulet, Ska, and Kahn (1994). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1328–33. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4006.1328Google Scholar

Fields, R. D. (2008). White matter in learning, cognition and psychiatric disorders. Trends in Neurosciences, 31, 361–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Five Graces Group, Beckner, C., Blythe, R., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9922.2009.00533.xGoogle Scholar

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022–3956(75)90026–6Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Z. (2013). Non-aprioristic typology as a discovery tool. In Thornes, T., Andvik, E., Hyslop, G., and Jansen, J., eds., Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.103.01fraGoogle Scholar

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in Our Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11173.001.0001Google Scholar

Friedman, V. (2013). Compartmentalized grammar: The variable (non)-integration of Turkish verbal conjugation in Romani dialects. Romani Studies, 23, 107–20. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2013.5Google Scholar

Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551–6709.2010.01105.xGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Sierra, A., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Percaccio, C. R., et al. (2011). Bilingual language learning: An ERP study relating early brain responses to speech, language input, and later word production. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 546–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.07.002Google Scholar

Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 365–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728908003593Google Scholar

Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F. (2013). Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Nature Communications, 4, 1490. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2430Google Scholar

Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.Google Scholar

Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2013). The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 88–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080Google Scholar

Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Jara-Ettinger, J., et al. (2017). Color naming across languages reflects color use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(40), 10785–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619666114Google Scholar

Giedd, J. N. (2008). The teen brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 335–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.007Google Scholar

Gippert, J., Himmelmann, N. P., & Mosel, U. (2006). Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545067Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 905–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701625550Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Golestani, N. (2016). Neuroimaging of phonetic perception in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 674–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000644Google Scholar

Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001Google Scholar

Goral, M., Clark-Cotton, M., Spiro, A., Obler, L. K., Verkuilen, J., & Albert, M. L. (2011). The contribution of set switching and working memory to sentence processing in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 37, 516–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073x.2011.619858Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(86)90016–7Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728998000133Google Scholar

Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377Google Scholar

Green, D. W., & Wei, Li. (2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.882515Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. (1974). Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Greene, B. (2004). The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2006). Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Geeslin, K. L. (2006). Copula choice in the Spanish of Galicia: The effects of bilingualism on language use. Spanish in Context, 3, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.3.1.06guiGoogle Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2011). Thinking, speaking and gesturing about motion in more than one language. In Pavlenko, A., ed., Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar

Gullifer, J. W., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2013). When language switching has no apparent cost: Lexical access in sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00278Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, M. J. (1994). Ser y estar en el habla de Michoacán, México. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Gülsen, Y., & Schmid, M. (2019). First language attrition and contact linguistics. In Darquennes, J., Salmons, J. C., and Vandenbussche, W., eds., Language Contact: An International Handbook. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 198–209.Google Scholar

Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062Google Scholar

Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2016). Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition, 150, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2017). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 219–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000164Google Scholar

Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. NeuroImage, 15, 647–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1001Google Scholar

Haude, K. (2004.) Nominal tense marking in Movima: Nominal or clausal scope? Linguistics in the Netherlands, 21, 80–90.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. (1953). The Norwegian Language in America: A Study in Bilingual Behavior. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Heider, E. R., & Olivier, D. C. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010–0285(72)90011–4Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029aGoogle Scholar

Henry, A. (2005). Non-standard dialects and linguistic data. Lingua, 115, 1599–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.006Google Scholar

Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00714–7Google Scholar

Hermer-Vazquez, L., Moffet, A., & Munkholm, P. (2001). Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: The case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition, 79, 263–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00120-7Google Scholar

Hernandez, A. E., Bates, E. A., & Avila, L. X. (1996). Processing across the language boundary: A cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 846–64. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278–7393.22.4.846Google Scholar

Hernandez, A. E., & Li, P. (2007). Age of acquisition: Its neural and computational mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 638–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.133.4.638Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36, 161–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161Google Scholar

Hofweber, J., Marinis, T., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2016). Effects of dense code-switching on executive control. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6, 648–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15052.hofGoogle Scholar

Hopp, H. (2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892943Google Scholar

Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459Google Scholar

Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning, 56, 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9922.2006.00365.xGoogle Scholar

Irizarri van Suchtelen, P. (2018). Chilean Xoraxane: Fieldwork notes. Research report presented at the 13th International Conference on Romani Linguistics, Paris, 13–14 September 2018.Google Scholar

Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 251–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728917000050Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013Google Scholar

Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J., Keating, G. D., & VanPatten, B. (2016). On-line relative clause attachment strategy in heritage speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 254–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914552288Google Scholar

Johns, M. A., Valdés Kroff, J. R., & Dussias, P. E. (2019). Mixing things up: How blocking and mixing affect the processing of codemixed sentences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23, 584–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917752570Google Scholar

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.Google Scholar

Joseph, B. (2010). Language contact in the Balkans. In Hickey, R., ed., The Handbook of Language Contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 618–33.Google Scholar

Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0079–1636.2004.00135.xGoogle Scholar

Kappler, M., & Tsiplakou, S. (2018). Miş and miʃimu: An instance of language contact in Cyprus. In Bulut, C., ed., Linguistic Minorities in Turkey and Turkic-Speaking Minorities of the Periphery. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 275–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvckq4v1.16Google Scholar

Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2007). Color naming universals: The case of Berinmo. Cognition, 102, 289–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.008Google Scholar

Keijzer, M. (2010). The regression hypothesis as a framework for first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728909990356Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kheder, S., & Kaan, E. (2019). Lexical selection, cross-language interaction, and switch costs in habitually codeswitching bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 569–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918000500Google Scholar

Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006Google Scholar

Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301–47. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396Google Scholar

Kong, F., & You, X. (2012). Space-time compatibility effects in the auditory modality. Experimental Psychology, 59, 82–7. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618–3169/a000129Google Scholar

Kootstra, G. J., & Şahin, H. (2018). Crosslinguistic structural priming as a mechanism of contact-induced language change: Evidence from Papiamento-Dutch bilinguals in Aruba and the Netherlands. Language, 94, 902–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0050Google Scholar

Kostopoulos, T. (2009). To ‘makedoniko’ tis Thrakis [The ‘Macedonian issue’ of Thrace]. Athens: Bibliorama.Google Scholar

Krauss, M. (2008). Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In Brenzinger, M., ed., Language Diversity Endangered. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905694–003Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 128, 416–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 377–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514–124937Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891000009XGoogle Scholar

Kwachka, P. (1992). Discourse structures, cultural stability, and language shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 93, 67–73.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1996). When intuitions fail. In McNair, L., Singer, K., Dolbrin, L. and Aucon, M., eds., Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in Linguistics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283Google Scholar

Lecarme, J. (2004). Tense in nominals. In Guéron, J. and Lecarme, J., eds., The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 440–75.Google Scholar

Lecarme, J. (2012). Nominal Tense. In Binnick, R. I., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0024Google Scholar

Le Guen, O. (2011). Speech and gesture in spatial language and cognition among the Yucatec Mayas. Cognitive Science, 35, 905–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551–6709.2011.01183.xGoogle Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613609Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., & Schmitt, B. (1993). Animals in a row. Cognition and Space Kit Version, 1, 65–9.Google Scholar

Levy, B. J., McVeigh, N. D., Marful, A., & Anderson, M. C. (2007). Inhibiting your native language. Psychological Science, 18, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2007.01844.xGoogle Scholar

Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20, 1507–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02480.xGoogle Scholar

Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00009–4Google Scholar

Li, Wei. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39: 9–30.Google Scholar

Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654Google Scholar

Lipski, J. M. (2019). Field-testing code-switching constraints: A report on a strategic languages project. Languages, 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010007Google Scholar

Liu, S., Yu, Q., Tse, P. U., & Cavanagh, P. (2019). Neural correlates of the conscious perception of visual location lie outside visual cortex. Current Biology: CB, 29(23), 4036–4044.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.033Google Scholar

Loebell, H., & Bock, K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41(5), 791–824. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026Google Scholar

Lövdén, M., Wenger, E., Mårtensson, J., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2013). Structural brain plasticity in adult learning and development. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(9Pt B), 2296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.014Google Scholar

Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2011). The dynamics of multilingualism: Levelt’s speaking model revisited. In Schmid, M. and Lowie, W., eds., Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 267–88.Google Scholar

Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Grady, C. L. (2011). Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31, 16808–13. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4563–11.2011Google Scholar

Luk, G., & Pliatsikas, C. (2016). Converging diversity to unity: Commentary on ‘The neuroanatomy of bilingualism’. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 349–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1119289Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Clark, A. (2015). Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 279–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415570732Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010). Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5, p. e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559Google Scholar

Ma, F., Chen, P., Guo, T., & Kroll, J. F. (2017). When late second language learners access the meaning of L2 words: Using ERPs to investigate the role of the L1 translation equivalent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 41, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.09.006Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226Google Scholar

MacLean, P. D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution: Role in Paleocerebral Functions. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

MacSweeney, M., Capek, C. M., Campbell, R., & Woll, B. (2008). The signing brain: The neurobiology of sign language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 432–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.010Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2018). A unified model of first and second language learning. In Hickmann, M., Veneziano, E., and Jisa, H., eds., Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar

Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009Google Scholar

Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 108–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malotki, E. (1983). Hopi Time. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822816Google Scholar

Marghetis, T., McComsey, M., & Cooperrider, K., (2014). Spatial reasoning in bilingual Mexico: Delimiting the influence of language. In Bello, P., Guarini, M., McShane, M., and Scassellati, B., eds., Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 940–5.Google Scholar

Martinet, A. (1962). A Functional View of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Marton, K., Goral, M., Campanelli, L., Yoon, J., & Obler, L. K. (2017). Executive control mechanisms in bilingualism: Beyond speed of processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 613–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000930Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–24. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011–0168-7Google Scholar

Matras, Y. (2003). Mixed languages: Re-examining the structural prototype. In Matras, Y. and Bakker, P., eds., The Mixed Language Debate. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 151–76.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. (2009). Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McConvell, P., & Meakins, F. (2005). Gurindji Kriol: A mixed language emerges from code-switching. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600500110456Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. (2001). The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2–3), 125–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001Google Scholar

Meakins, F. (2011). Spaced out: Intergenerational changes in the expression of spatial relations by Gurindji People. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 31, 43–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2011.532857Google Scholar

Meakins, F. (2012). Which mix – code-switching or a mixed language? – Gurindji Kriol. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 27, 105–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.1.03meaGoogle Scholar

Meakins, F. (2013). Mixed languages. In Bakker, P. and Matras, Y., eds., Contact Languages. Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 159–228.Google Scholar

Meakins, F., Hua, X., Algy, C., & Bromham, L. (2019). Birth of a contact language did not favor simplification. Language, 95, 294–332. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0032Google Scholar

Meakins, F., Jones, C., & Algy, C. (2016). Bilingualism, language shift and the corresponding expansion of spatial cognitive systems. Language Sciences, 54, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.06.002Google Scholar

Mileva, E. (2009). Linguistic effects on the contact between Greek and Bulgarian languages for recent Bulgarian immigrants to Northern Greece. M.A. dissertation presented at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167Google Scholar

Mineroff, Z., Blank, I. A., Mahowald, K., & Fedorenko, E. (2018). A robust dissociation among the language, multiple demand, and default mode networks: Evidence from inter-region correlations in effect size. Neuropsychologia, 119, 501–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.011Google Scholar

Mishra, R. C., & Dasen, P. R. (2013). Development of spatial language and cognition in Hindi- and Sanskrit-medium schools. Psychological Studies, 58, 446–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-013–0232-8Google Scholar

Mladenova, O. M. (2007). Definiteness in Bulgarian: Modelling the Processes of Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mock, C. (1982). Los casos morfosintácticos del chocho. Anales de Antropología 19, 345–78.Google Scholar

Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2009). Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.010Google Scholar

Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028–7Google Scholar

Montrul, S. (2006). On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical-semantics and processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10, 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100010301Google Scholar

Montrul, S. A. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.39Google Scholar

Montrul, S., & Foote, R. (2014). Age of acquisition interactions in bilingual lexical access: A study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912443431Google Scholar

Moore, K. E. (2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 759–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.003Google Scholar

Moreno, E. M., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching languages, switching palabras (words): an electrophysiological study of code switching. Brain and Language, 80, 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2588Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. S. (2001). The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. S. (2017). Language vitality: The weak theoretical underpinnings of what can be an exciting research area. Language, 93, e202–e223. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0065Google Scholar

Muysken, P. (1994). Media-Lengua. In Bakker, P. and Mous, M., eds., Mixed Languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT, pp. 207–11.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. (1998). A way to dusty death: The Matrix Language Turnover hypothesis. In Grenoble, L. and Whaley, L. J., eds., Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289–316.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. M., & Jake, J. L. (2017). Revisiting the 4-M model: Codeswitching and morpheme election at the abstract level. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 340–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915626588Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2002). Culture and cognition. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471214426.pas0213Google Scholar

Nordlinger, R., & Sadler, L. (2004). Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language, 80, 776–806. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0219Google Scholar

Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62Google Scholar

Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D., & Wassmann, J. (2012). Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition, 124, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.007Google Scholar

Obler, L. K., Fein, D., Nicholas, M., & Albert, M. L. (1991). Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 433–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400005865Google Scholar

Olkowicz, S., Kocourek, M., Lučan, R. K., Porteš, M., Tecumseh Fitch, W., Herculano-Houzel, S., & Němec, P. (2016). Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 7255–60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517131113Google Scholar

Ortiz López, L. (2000). Extensión de ‘estar’ en contextos de ‘ser’ en el español de Puerto Rico. Boletín de la academia puertorriqueña de la lengua española, 98–118.Google Scholar

O’Shannessy, C. (2012). The role of codeswitched input to children in the origin of a new mixed language. Linguistics, 50, 305–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012–0011Google Scholar

O’Shannessy, C. (2013). The role of multiple sources in the formation of an innovative auxiliary category in Light Warlpiri, a new Australian mixed language. Language, 89, 328–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0025Google Scholar

O’Shannessy, C., & Meakins, F. (2012). Comprehension of competing argument marking systems in two Australian mixed languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 378–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728911000307Google Scholar

Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017176Google Scholar

Padure, C., De Pascale, S., & Adamou, E. (2018). Variation between the copula si ‘to be’ and the l-clitics in Romani spoken in Mexico. Romani Studies, 28, 263–92. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2018.11Google Scholar

Palmer, B., Lum, J., Schlossberg, J., & Gaby, A. (2017). How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. Linguistic Typology, 21, 457–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017–0011Google Scholar

Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PloS One, 4, e4508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004508Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (1985). On the representation of two languages in one brain. Language Sciences, 7, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(85)80010–3Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18Google Scholar

Parker, S. (1999). On the behavior of definite articles in Chamicuro. Language, 75, 552–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/417060Google Scholar

Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/3–540-57207–4_20Google Scholar

Peña, M., Maki, A., Kovacic, D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Koizumi, H., Bouquet, F., Mehler, J. (2003). Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11702–05. 10.1073/pnas.1934290100Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (2016). Language policy and local practices. In García, O., Flores, N., and Spotti, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society. Oxford Handbooks Online, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.013.11Google Scholar

Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2015). Bilingualism, dementia, cognitive and neural reserve. Current Opinion in Neurology, 28(6), 618–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000267Google Scholar

Petersson, K. M., Reis, A., Askelöf, S., Castro-Caldas, A., & Ingvar, M. (2000). Language processing modulated by literacy: A network analysis of verbal repetition in literate and illiterate subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 364–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562147Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000056Google Scholar

Pickett, D. W. (1962). Prolegomena to the study of Gypsies of Mexico. M.A. dissertation presented at the Syracuse University, United States.Google Scholar

Pitt, B., & Casasanto, D. (2019). The correlations in experience principle: How culture shapes concepts of time and number. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000696Google Scholar

Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Understanding structural plasticity in the bilingual brain: The Dynamic Restructuring Model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000130Google Scholar

Pliatsikas, C., Johnstone, T., & Marinis, T. (2014). FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language. PloS One, 9(5), e97298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097298Google Scholar

Ponsonnet, M. (2019). Difference and Repetition in Language Shift to a Creole: The Expression of Emotions. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Poplack, S., & Dion, N. (2012). Myths and facts about loanword development. Language Variation and Change, 24, 279–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095439451200018xGoogle Scholar

Porroche Ballesteros, M. (1988). Ser, estar y verbos de cambio. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar

Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000580Google Scholar

Pyers, J. E., Shusterman, A., Senghas, A., Spelke, E. S., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12116–20. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914044107Google Scholar

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna and Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar

R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/ (accessed 10 October 2019)Google Scholar

Rangel-Landa, S., Casas, A., Rivera-Lozoya, E., Torres-García, I., & Vallejo-Ramos, M. (2016). Ixcatec ethnoecology: Plant management and biocultural heritage in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016–0101-3Google Scholar

Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 439–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001Google Scholar

Reis, A., Faísca, L., Ingvar, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2006). Color makes a difference: Two-dimensional object naming in literate and illiterate subjects. Brain and Cognition, 60, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.09.012Google Scholar

Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129, 369–98.Google Scholar

Royall, D. R., Lauterbach, E. C., Cummings, J. L., et al. (2002). Executive control function: A review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 14, 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.14.4.377Google Scholar

Rusakov, A. (2001). The North Russian Romani dialect: Interference and code switching. In Dahl, Ö and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., eds., Circum-Baltic Languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 313–38.Google Scholar

Sakoda, K., & Siegel, J. (2004). Hawai‘i creole: Phonology. In Kortmann, B. and Schneider, E. W., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English, Volume I: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 729–49.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar

Sapolsky, R. (2017). Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Sato, M., Grabski, K., Garnier, M., Granjon, L., Schwartz, J.-L., & Nguyen, N. (2013). Converging toward a common speech code: Imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00422Google Scholar

Sato, S., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2018). Grammatical gender affects gender perception: Evidence for the structural-feedback hypothesis. Cognition, 176, 220–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.014Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 773–86. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2087Google Scholar

Schmid, M. S. (2013). First language attrition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.1.05schGoogle Scholar

Schmid, M. S. (2014). The debate on maturational constraints in bilingual development: A perspective from first-language attrition. Language Acquisition, 21, 386–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892947Google Scholar

Schmid, M. S., & Jarvis, S. (2014). Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 729–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728913000771Google Scholar

Schmid, M. S., & Keijzer, M. (2009). First language attrition and reversion among older migrants. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 200, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2009.046Google Scholar

Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. (2017). The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7, 637–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17058.schGoogle Scholar

Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., & de Bot, K. (2013). Language attrition as a complex, non-linear development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 675–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912454619Google Scholar

Schreiweis, C., Bornschein, U., Burguière, E., et al. (2014). Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14253–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414542111Google Scholar

Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 48, 991–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.009Google Scholar

Schwieter, J. W. (ed.) (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2009). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, J. F. and De Groot, A. M. B., eds., Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 371–88.Google Scholar

Seifart, F., Evans, N., Hammarström, H., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Language documentation twenty-five years on. Language, 94, e324–e345. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0070Google Scholar

Shao, Z., van Paridon, J., Poletiek, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2019). Effects of phrase and word frequencies in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 47–165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000570Google Scholar

Shapero, J. A. (2017). Does environmental experience shape spatial cognition? Frames of reference among Ancash Quechua speakers (Peru). Cognitive Science, 41, 1274–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12458Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, M., Perez-Leroux, A. T., & Johns, A. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 301–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000210Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. (1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62, 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0023Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994/1996). Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Singh, N. C., Rajan, A., Malagi, A., et al. (2018). Microstructural anatomical differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728917000438Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for Speaking. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 435. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sorGoogle Scholar

Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339810Google Scholar

Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002Google Scholar

Sutre, A. (2017). Du parcours du monde à son invention. Géographies tsiganes en Amérique du Nord des années 1880 aux années 1950. Doctoral dissertation at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. E., Twyman, A. D., Joanisse, M. F., & Newcombe, N. S. (2012). Geometry three ways: An fMRI investigation of geometric information processing during reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1530–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028456Google Scholar

Swadesh, M. (1948). Sociologic notes on obsolescent languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 14, 226–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/464009Google Scholar

Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(11), 4567–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811155106Google Scholar

Thomas, M. S. C., & Allport, A. (2000). Language switching costs in bilingual visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2700Google Scholar

Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, S. G. (2015). Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139033817Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Construing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. (2018). Bilingualism in the Community: Code-Switching and Grammars in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67Google Scholar

Trueswell, J. C., & Papafragou, A. (2010). Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.006Google Scholar

Tsitsipis, L. D. (1998). A Linguistic Anthropology of Praxis and Language Shift: Arvanítika (Albanian) and Greek in Contact. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114Google Scholar

Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010–0285(91)90005–9Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2, 717–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573Google Scholar

Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001Google Scholar

VanPatten, B. (2010). Some verbs are more perfect than others: Why learners have difficulty with ser and estar and what it means for instruction. Hispania, 93, 29–38.Google Scholar

Vañó-Cerdá, A. (1982). Ser y estar + adjetivos: un estudio sincrónico y diacrónico. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Vargha-Khadem, F., Carr, L. J., Isaacs, E., Brett, E., Adams, C., & Mishkin, M. (1997). Onset of speech after left hemispherectomy in a nine-year-old boy. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 120, 159–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.1.159Google Scholar

Vaughn, K. A., & Hernandez, A. E. (2018). Becoming a balanced, proficient bilingual: Predictions from age of acquisition and genetic background. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 46, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.012Google Scholar

Veerman-Leichsenring, A. (2000). Gramática del chocho de Santa Catarina Ocotlán, Oaxaca. Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Vega-Mendoza, M., West, H., Sorace, A., & Bak, T. H. (2015). The impact of late, non-balanced bilingualism on cognitive performance. Cognition, 137, 40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.008Google Scholar

Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (eds.) (2011). A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development. Methods and Techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Walker, E. J., Bergen, B. K., & Núñez, R. (2017). The spatial alignment of time: Differences in alignment of deictic and sequence time along the sagittal and lateral axes. Acta Psychologica, 175, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.02.001Google Scholar

Wang, C., Chen, X., Lee, H., Deshmukh, S. S., Yoganarasimha, D., Savelli, F., & Knierim, J. J. (2018). Egocentric coding of external items in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Science, 362(6417), 945–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau4940Google Scholar

Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426–30.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Technological Review, 42, 229–31, 247–8. Reprinted in J. B. Carroll, ed., Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York and London: MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons, pp. 207–19.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1941). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In Spier, L., ed., Language, Culture, and Personality: Essays in Memory of Edward Sapir. Menasha: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund, pp. 75–93. Reprinted in J. B. Carroll, ed., Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York and London: MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons, pp. 134–59.Google Scholar

Wichmann, S. (2019). How to distinguish languages and dialects. Computational Linguistics, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00366Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, J. (2009). A Typology of Verbal Borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219340Google Scholar

Woodbury, A. C. (1993). A defense of the proposition, “When a language dies, a culture dies.” Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin (SALSA). Texas Linguistic Forum 33, 101–29.Google Scholar

Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. A. (2011). Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London’s layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21(24), 2109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018Google Scholar

Yim, O., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Degree of conversational code-switching enhances verbal task switching in Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 873–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000478Google Scholar

Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 528–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3045Google Scholar

Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic Speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165–90. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537054068660Google Scholar

Zenner, E., Backus, A., & Winter-Froemel, E. (eds.). (2019). Cognitive Contact Linguistics: Placing Usage, Meaning and Mind at the Core of Contact-Induced Variation and Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Zirnstein, M., van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F. (2018). Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognition, 176, 87–106.Google Scholar