Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- 2 Ecological limits of adaptation to climate change
- 3 Adapting to the effects of climate change on water supply reliability
- 4 Protecting London from tidal flooding: limits to engineering adaptation
- 5 Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?
- 6 Learning to crawl: how to use seasonal climate forecasts to build adaptive capacity
- 7 Norse Greenland settlement and limits to adaptation
- 8 Sea ice change in Arctic Canada: are there limits to Inuit adaptation?
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
5 - Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- 2 Ecological limits of adaptation to climate change
- 3 Adapting to the effects of climate change on water supply reliability
- 4 Protecting London from tidal flooding: limits to engineering adaptation
- 5 Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?
- 6 Learning to crawl: how to use seasonal climate forecasts to build adaptive capacity
- 7 Norse Greenland settlement and limits to adaptation
- 8 Sea ice change in Arctic Canada: are there limits to Inuit adaptation?
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Projections of future climate and its impacts on society and the environment have been crucial for the emergence of climate change as a global problem for public policy and decision-making. Climate projections are based on a variety of scenarios, models and simulations which contain a number of embedded assumptions. Central to much of the discussion surrounding adaptation to climate change is the claim – explicit or implicit – that decision-makers need accurate, and increasingly precise, assessments of the future impacts of climate change in order to adapt successfully. According to Füssel (2007), ‘the effectiveness of pro-active adaptation to climate change often depends on the accuracy of regional climate and impact projections, which are subject to substantial uncertainty’. Similarly, Gagnon-Lebrun and Agrawala (2006) note that the level of certainty associated with climate change and impact projections is often key to determining the extent to which such information can be used to formulate appropriate adaptation responses. If true, these claims place a high premium on accurate and precise climate predictions at a range of geographical and temporal scales. But is effective adaptation tied to the ability of the scientific enterprise to predict future climate with accuracy and precision?
This chapter addresses this important question by investigating whether or not the lack of accurate climate predictions represents a limit – or perceived limit – to adaptation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adapting to Climate ChangeThresholds, Values, Governance, pp. 64 - 78Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, , , , , , , and 2007. ‘Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity’, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 717–743.Google Scholar
1993. ‘Exploratory modeling for policy analysis’, Operations Research 41: 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Info-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty, 2nd edn. Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978. ‘What might man-induced climate change mean’, Foreign Affairs 56: 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Robust adaptation decisions amid climate change uncertainties’, unpublished, PhD thesis, Norwich: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
and 2004. ‘Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?’, Climate Policy 4: 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. ‘Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England’, Global Environmental Change 17: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2007. The Federal Role in Terrorism Insurance: Evaluating Alternatives in an Uncertain World, MG-679-CTRMP. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
2008. ‘A new look at the interaction of scientific models and policymaking’, workshop report, 13 February 2008, Policy Foresight Programme, James Martin Institute, Oxford University, Oxford.Google Scholar
2007. ‘Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research’, Global Environmental Change 17: 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Progress on Adaptation to Climate Change in Developed Countries: An Analysis of Broad Trends. ENV/EPOC/GSP(2006)1/FINAL. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
, , , and 2008a. Presenting Uncertainty about Climate Change to Water Resource Managers, RAND TR-505-NSF. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
, , and 2008b. Preparing for an Uncertain Climate Future Climate in the Inland Empire: Identifying Robust Water Management Strategies, RAND DB-550-NSF. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
2007. ‘Probabilistic climate scenarios may misrepresent uncertainty and lead to bad adaptation decisions’, Hydrological Processes 21: 1127–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘Convex analysis of flood inundation model uncertainties and info-gap flood management decisions’, in et al. (eds.) Stochastic Hydraulics ‘05, Proc. 9th Int. Symp. on Stochastic Hydraulics, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
2000. ‘Managing uncertainty in climate change projections: issues for impact assessment’, Climatic Change 45: 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
and 2007. ‘Managing the risk of uncertain threshold response: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches’, Risk Analysis 27: 1009–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2000. ‘Robust strategies for abating climate change’, Climatic Change 45: 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2006. ‘A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios’, Management Science 52: 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. Climate Research at the Met Office Hadley Centre: Informing Government Policy into the Future. Exeter: Met Office Hadley Centre.
, , , , , and 2004. ‘Quantifying uncertainties in climate change from a large ensemble of general circulation model predictions’, Nature 430: 768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 2007. ‘A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 365: 1993–2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007. Next Generation Science for Planet Earth: NERC Strategy 2007–2012. Swindon: Natural Environment Research Council.Google Scholar
, , and 2007. ‘Challenges in using probabilistic climate change information for impact assessments: an example from the water sector’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 365: 2117–2131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and 1994. ‘Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences’, Science 263: 641–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and 2000. ‘Decision making and the future of nature: understanding and using predictions’, in , and (eds.) Prediction: Science, Decision Making and the Future of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 361–387.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Models as metaphors’, in , , and (eds.) Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and 2005. ‘Robust decision-making under severe uncertainty for conservation management’, Ecological Applications 15: 1471–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. ‘Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?’, Science 318: 629–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2007. ‘Inference in ensemble experiments’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 365: 2133–2143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1999. ‘Prediction in science and policy’, Technology in Society 21: 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 2005. ‘Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases’, Nature 433: 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2007. ‘Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 365: 2145–2161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2007. ‘The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 365: 2053–2075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and 2006. ‘Impacts of climate change on in-stream nitrogen in a lowland chalk stream: an appraisal of adaptation strategies’, Science of the Total Environment 365: 260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment’, Hydrological Processes 19: 3201–3219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK’, Water Resources Research 42: doi 02410.01029/02005WR004065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Future Climate Change Research and Observations: GCOS, WCRP and IGBP Learning from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, GCOS-117, WCRP-127, IGBP Report No. 58, WMO/TD No. 1418. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
- 106
- Cited by