Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Midden, C. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<971::AID-EJSP963>3.0.CO;2-AGoogle Scholar

Abelson, R. P. (1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(4), 343–352.Google Scholar

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2008). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 147–181). Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch18Google Scholar

Abrams, D., Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctiveness, social identity and gender salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00889.xGoogle Scholar

Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.xGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328(5986), 1712–1715. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993Google Scholar

Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270–279.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (2019). TPB measurement. Retrieved from https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1356–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00485.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1990). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 157–162.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513137Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031930Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). Theory-based behavior change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305048552Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 197–255). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4Google Scholar

Albarracín, D. (1997). Processing of behavior-related communications as a function of cognitive elaboration: A multiple-stage model (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 61–130. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260102800041Google Scholar

Albarracín, D. (2012). Craving activity and losing objectivity: Effects of general action concepts on approach to decision-consistent information. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611408620Google Scholar

Albarracín, D. (2017). Action and inaction content in message. Unpublished raw data, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Cohen, J., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). When communications collide with recipients’ actions: Effects of post-message behavior on intentions to follow the message recommendation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 834–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007003Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., Earl, A., Gunnoe, J. B., & Leeper, J. (2008). Beyond the most willing audiences: A meta-intervention to increase exposure to HIV-prevention programs by vulnerable populations. Health Psychology, 27(5), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.038Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005). A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 856–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Handley, I. M. (2007). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023245Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Handley, I. M., Albarracín, D., & Handley, I. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023245Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., … Hart, W. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012833Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Hart, W. (2011). Positive mood plus action = negative mood plus inaction: Effects of general action and inaction concepts on decisions and performance as a function of affect. Emotion, 11(4), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024130Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Hart, W., & McCulloch, K. C. (2006). Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 732–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Hepler, J., & Tannenbaum, M. (2011). General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402666Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Ho, R. M., McNatt, P. S., Williams, W. R., Rhodes, F., Malotte, C. K., … Grp, P. R. S. (2000). Structure of outcome beliefs in condom use. Health Psychology, 19(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.5.458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albarracín, D., Hornik, R., & Ajzen, I. (2007). Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.) (2005). The handbook of attitudes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Jones, C., Hepler, J., & Li, I. H. (2017). Liking for action and the vertical/horizontal dimension of culture in nineteen nations: Valuing equality over hierarchy promotes positivity towards action. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v51i3.359Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.453Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Kumkale, G. T., & Poyner-Del Vento, P. (2017). How people can become persuaded by weak messages presented by credible communicators: Not all sleeper effects are created equal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 171–180.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Leeper, J., Earl, A., & Durantini, M. R. (2008). From brochures to videos to counseling: Exposure to HIV-prevention programs. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 354–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9320-xGoogle Scholar

Albarracín, D., McNatt, P. S. P., Klein, C. T. F., Ho, R., Mitchell, A. L., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Persuasive communications to change actions: An analysis of behavioral and cognitive impact in HIV prevention. Health Psychology, 22(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.166Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Mitchell, A. L. (2004). The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271180Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Noguchi, K., & Earl, A. N. (2006). Joyce’s “Ulysses” and Woolf’s “Jacob’s Room” as the phenomenology of reasoning: Intentions and control as emergent of language and social interaction. Psychological Inquiry, 17(3), 236–245.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Noguchi, K., & Fischler, I. (2011). The syntax of defection and cooperation: The effects of the implicit sentences nice act versus act nice on behavior change. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 298–305.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., & Dai, W. (2018). Action, inaction, and actionability: Definitions and implications for communications and interventions to change behaviors. In Bevins, R. A. & Hope, D. (Eds.), The 65th annual Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Change and maintaining change (pp. 75–99). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Dai, W., & White, B. X. (2019). The social creation of action and inaction: From concepts to goals to behaviors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 223–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.04.001Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Lohmann, S., Chan, M. S., Jiang, D., Chan, M. P. S., & Jiang, D. (2019). The psychology of attitudes, motivation, and persuasion. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 3–44). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Vargas, P. (2010). Attitudes and persuasion: From biology to social responses to persuasive intent. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 394–427). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wallace, H. M., & Glasman, L. R. (2004). Survival and change in judgments: A model of activation and comparison. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 251–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36005-3Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wallace, H. M., Hart, W., & Brown, R. D. (2012). How judgments change following comparison of current and prior information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637480Google Scholar

Albarracín, J., Wang, W., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Are confident partisans disloyal? The role of defensive confidence in party defection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1576–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00896Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wang, W., & Leeper, J. (2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17(7), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.16Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wang, W., Li, H., & Noguchi, K. (2011). Structure of attitudes: Judgments, memory, and implications for change. In Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R. (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 19–39). New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838068Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wang, W., & McCulloch, K. C. (2018). Action dominance: The performance effects of multiple action demands and the benefits of an inaction focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 966–1007.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wilson, K., Chan, M., Pui, S., Durantini, M., & Sanchez, F. (2017). Action and inaction in multi-behaviour recommendations: A meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions. Health Psychology Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1369140Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Wilson, K., Durantini, M. R., & Livingood, W. (2013). When is retention in health promotion interventions intentional? Predicting return to health promotion interventions as a function of busyness. Acta de Investigacion Psicologica, 3(3), 1311–1321.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 5.Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2001). Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276005Google Scholar

Albarracín, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167288142002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span: The Bennington women after fifty years. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Vol. 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-195209000-00035Google Scholar

Anderson, C. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2883%2990037-9Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (2013). The architecture of cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. H. (1968). Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(4), 354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration theory: A brief survey. Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, 2, 236–305.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory (Vol. 578). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1938). The Organon, The Categories (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Armitage, C. J. (1995). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychology, 24(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar

Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Effect of severity of threat on devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 66(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039901CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronson, , E., & Mills, , J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1940). Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes: II. Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards. Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 433–465.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1957). An experimental investigation of group influence. In Symposium on preventive and social psychiatry (pp. 15–17). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation: Vol. 9. Engineering. Oxford, England: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Avishai, A., Conner, M., & Sheeran, P. (2019). Setting realistic health goals: Antecedents and consequences. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaz012Google Scholar

Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1Google Scholar

Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Avnet, T., Laufer, D., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Are all experiences of fit created equal? Two paths to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.011Google Scholar

Bae, R. E., Maloney, E. K., Albarracín, D., & Cappella, J. N. (2018). Does interest in smoking affect youth selection of pro-smoking videos? A selective exposure experiment. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 21, 539–546.Google Scholar

Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg015Google Scholar

Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208543Google Scholar

Bailenson, J. N., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 64–68). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.Google Scholar

Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons – Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16(10), 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01619.xGoogle Scholar

Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_01Google Scholar

Banaji, M. R., Lemm, K. M., & Carpenter, S. J. (2001). The social unconscious. In Tesser, A. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 134–158). Oxford, England: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (Series in Social Learning Theory Vol. 1). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1Google Scholar

Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805Google Scholar

Barden, J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta-cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12078Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In Wyer, R. S. (Ed.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (2014, January). Unconscious impulses and desires impel what we think and do in ways Freud never dreamed of. Scientific American. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0114-30Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (2016). Awareness of the prime versus awareness of its influence: implications for the real-world scope of unconscious higher mental processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.006Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S. R., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S. R., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(1), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0005Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1014.Google Scholar

Barnidge, M., & Peacock, C. (2019). A third wave of selective exposure research? The challenges posed by hyperpartisan news on social media. Media and Communication, 7(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2257Google Scholar

Baron, R. S., Hoppe, S. I., Kao, C. F., Brunsman, B., Linneweh, B., & Rogers, D. (1996). Social corroboration and opinion extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0024Google Scholar

Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Goldberg, M. (1982). Helping behavior among preschool children: An observational study. Child Development, 53(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128982Google Scholar

Bassili, J. N., & Brown, R. D. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 543–574). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.xGoogle Scholar

Beentjes, J. W. J., de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 199–218.Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1968). The epistemological status of interpersonal simulations: A reply to Jones, Linder, Kiesler, Zanna, and Brehm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(3), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90055-3Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6Google Scholar

Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020916Google Scholar

Bensley, L. S., & Wu, R. (1991). The role of psychological reactance in drinking following alcohol prevention messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00461.xGoogle Scholar

Berger, I. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (1989). The effect of advertising on attitude accessibility, attitude confidence, and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 269–279.Google Scholar

Berkman, E. T., Burklund, L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 47(2), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.084Google Scholar

Betsch, T., Fiedler, K., & Brinkmann, J. (1998). Behavioral routines in decision making: The effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 861–878.Google Scholar

Bettes, B. A., Dusenbury, L., Kerner, J., James‐Ortiz, S., & Botvin, G. J. (1990). Ethnicity and psychosocial factors in alcohol and tobacco use in adolescence. Child Development, 61(2), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02800.xGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48Google Scholar

Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002Google Scholar

Blankenship, K. L., Allen, J. J., Kane, K. A., & Anderson, C. A. (2019). The role of attitudes in violence and aggression. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 299–336). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01Google Scholar

Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.Google Scholar

Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.Google Scholar

Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 977–997.Google Scholar

Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265.Google Scholar

Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7–27.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. M., Hamby, S., Löw, A., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Brain potentials in perception: Picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology, 44(3), 364–373.Google Scholar

Brandstatter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 946–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.946Google Scholar

Brauer, M., Judd, C. M., & Gliner, M. D. (1995). The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647585Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, England: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20027Google Scholar

Brehm, J. (1972). Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 363–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brindal, E., Freyne, J., Saunders, I., Berkovsky, S., Smith, G., & Noakes, M. (2012). Features predicting weight loss in overweight or obese participants in a web-based intervention: Randomized trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2156Google Scholar

Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1123Google Scholar

Brock, T. C., & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(4), 413. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021225Google Scholar

Bromberg, J. E., Augustson, E. M., & Backinger, C. L. (2012). Portrayal of smokeless tobacco in YouTube videos. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 14(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr235Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1995). The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. In Connel, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B., & Weiss, C. H. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 201–237). Washington, DC: Aspen.Google Scholar

Brown, R., & Albarracín, D. (2003). Unpublished data.Google Scholar

Brown, R., & Albarracín, D. (2004). Unpublished data on evaluative procedures.Google Scholar

Brown, S. A., Christiansen, B. A., & Goldman, M. S. (2015). The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1987.48.483Google Scholar

Brunel, F. F., Collins, C. M., Greenwald, A. G., & Tietje, B. C. (1999). Making the private public, accessing the inaccessible: Marketing applications of the Implicit Association Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Consumer Research, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123.Google Scholar

Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.Google Scholar

Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google Scholar

Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the “social norm approach.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1395Google Scholar

Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2Google Scholar

Burger, J. M., & Caldwell, D. F. (2003). The effects of monetary incentives and labeling on the foot-in-the-door effect: Evidence for a self-perception process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_06Google Scholar

Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (1961). Response to attitude similarity-dissimilarity as a function of affiliation need. American Psychologist, 16(7), 358.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90013-2Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Crites, S. L. (1996). Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological arousal and response. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 72–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25.Google Scholar

Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 330–350.Google Scholar

Camus, T., Hommel, B., Brunel, L., & Brouillet, T. (2018). From anticipation to integration: the role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1308-6Google Scholar

Cannon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In Festinger, L. (Ed.), Conflict, decision and dissonance (pp. 83–95). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior. Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.101Google Scholar

Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in information conversations: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.xGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, C. J., & Boster, F. J. (2013). The relationship between message recall and persuasion: More complex than it seems. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12042Google Scholar

Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., Aguilar, P., & Albarracín, D. (2014). Cómo el tiempo verbal afecta a la interpretación de las acciones: El pasado simple conduce a las personas a un nivel de representación abstracto. Psicologica, 35, 209–223.Google Scholar

Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., & Albarracín, D. (2012). The present projects past behavior into the future while the past projects attitudes into the future: How verb tense moderates predictors of drinking intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.001Google Scholar

Carroll, M. V., Shensa, A., & Primack, B. A. (2013).A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube. Tobacco Control, 22, 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Ganellen, R. J., Froming, W. J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90019-7Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319Google Scholar

Casadio, M., Pressman, A., Acosta, S., Danzinger, Z., Fishbach, A., Mussa-Ivakli, F. A., … Chen, D. (2011). Body machine interface: Remapping motor skills after spinal cord injury. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).Google Scholar

Cavallo, D. N., Tate, D. F., Ries, A. V., Brown, J. D., DeVellis, R. F., & Ammerman, A. S. (2012). A social media-based physical activity intervention: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.019Google Scholar

Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 1194–1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185231Google Scholar

Centola, D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334, 1269–1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207055Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. R. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. R. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. R., & Bargh, J. A. (1993). Occurrence versus moderation of the automatic evaluation effect: Reply. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.759Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. R., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.4.605Google Scholar

Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Countering false beliefs: An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation. In Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D. M., & Scheufele, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37Google Scholar

Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579Google Scholar

Chan, M. P. S., Lohmann, S., Morales, A., Zhai, C., Ungar, L. H., Holtgrave, D. R., & Albarracín, D. (2018). An online risk index predicting HIV and other STIs across US counties and across years. AIDS and Behavior, 22, 2322–2333.Google Scholar

Chan, M. P. S., Morales, A., Farhadloo, M., Palmer, R. P., & Albarracín, D. (2019). Harvesting and harnessing social media data for psychological research. In Blanton, H. & Webster, G. D. (Eds.), Social psychological research methods: Social psychological measurement (pp. 228–264). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2009). How extending your middle finger affects your perception of others: Learned movements influence concept accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.012Google Scholar

Chang, C. (2004). The interplay of product class knowledge and trial experience in attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639156Google Scholar

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893Google Scholar

Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2007). Mindfulness and the intention–behavior relationship within the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297401Google Scholar

Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic–systematic model in its broader context. In Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1170.Google Scholar

Cheung, S.-F., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2000). The role of perceived behavioral control in predicting human behavior: A meta-analytic review of studies on the theory of planned behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Herman, C. P., Levy, A., Kozlowski, L. T., & Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.4.663Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., & Evenbeck, S. (1973). Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034265Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik Durose, M. (2001). The differential impact of two social influence principles on individualists and collectivists in Poland and the United States. In Wosinska, W., Cialdini, R. B. et al. (Eds.), The practice of social influence in multiple cultures: Applied social research (pp. 33–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 133–147.Google Scholar

Clark, J. K., & Evans, A. T. (2014). Source credibility and persuasion: The role of message position in self-validation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214534733Google Scholar

Clark, J. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312527Google Scholar

Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Sawicki, V., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2013). Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1571–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499238Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. B., & Andrade, E. B. (2018). The ADF framework: A parsimonious model for developing successful behavior change interventions. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 3(2), 81–119. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000046Google Scholar

Conner, M., & Higgins, A. R. (2010). Long-term effects of implementation intentions on prevention of smoking uptake among adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 29(5), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020317Google Scholar

Converse, P. E., & Apter, D. (1964). Ideology and discontent. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar

Cook, T. D., & Flay, B. R. (1978). The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60004-0Google Scholar

Cooper, J., Zanna, M. P., & Taves, P. A. (1978). Arousal as a necessary condition for attitude change following induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(10), 1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1101Google Scholar

Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2006). Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.887Google Scholar

Crano, W. D., & Hannula-Bral, K. A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1012Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95–111.Google Scholar

Czyzewska, M., & Ginsburg, H. J. (2007). Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements. Addictive Behaviors, 32(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.025Google Scholar

Dalton, A. N., Chartrand, T. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). The schema-driven chameleon: How mimicry affects executive and self-regulatory resources, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017629Google Scholar

Darkes, J., & Goldman, M. S. (1998). Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction: Process and structure in the alcohol expectancy network. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.6.1.64Google Scholar

Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-XGoogle Scholar

Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990–present. Harvard Dataverse.Google Scholar

Davis, J. P., Smith, D. C., & Briley, D. A. (2017). Substance use prevention and treatment outcomes for emerging adults in non-college settings: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000267Google Scholar

Davis, L. E., Ajzen, I., Saunders, J., & Williams, T. (2002). The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.810Google Scholar

de Bruin, W. B., & Keren, G. (2003). Order effects in sequentially judged options due to the direction of comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1–2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00080-3Google Scholar

De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024Google Scholar

de la Corte, L., Kruglanski, A. W., de Miguel, J., Manuel Sabucedo, J., & Diaz, D. (2007). Seven psychosocial principles to explain terrorism. Psicothema, 19(3), 366–374.Google Scholar

De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005Google Scholar

DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397Google Scholar

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.Google Scholar

Devine, P. G., & Ostrom, T. M. (1985). Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 5.Google Scholar

DiGirolamo, A., Thompson, N., Martorell, R., Fein, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2005). Intention or experience? Predictors of continued breastfeeding. Health Education and Behavior, 32(2), 208–226.Google Scholar

Dillard, J. P., Plotnick, C. A., Godbold, L. C., Freimuth, V. S., & Edgar, T. (1996). The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001002Google Scholar

Dittrich, W. H., & Lea, S. E. (1993). Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115Google Scholar

Dolcos, S., & Albarracín, D. (2014). The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2048Google Scholar

Doll, J., Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1991). Optimal-scaling and judgment in different domains: A reanalysis. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 22(2), 102–111.Google Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Schellhaas, F. M. H., & Pearson, A. R. (2019). The role of attitudes in intergroup relations. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 419–454). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C. L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029081Google Scholar

Driscoll, D. M., Blascovich, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the functional value of attitudes: The influence of accessible attitudes on the ease and quality of decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292184002Google Scholar

Dulany, D. E. (2006). Review of consciousness and behavior. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews, 30, 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/023670Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., & Ehlebracht, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 107(1), 122–141.Google Scholar

Durantini, M. R., & Albarracín, D. (2009). Material and social incentives to participation in behavioral interventions: A meta-analysis of gender disparities in enrollment and retention in experimental human immunodeficiency virus prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 28(5), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015200Google Scholar

Durantini, M. R., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Men and women have specific needs that facilitate enrollment in HIV-prevention counseling. AIDS Care, 24(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.661834Google Scholar

Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Mitchell, A. L., Earl, A. N., & Gillette, J. C. (2006). Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 212.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036202Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Psychology of attitudes. In Psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. R. (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 743–767). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. R. (2001). Do attitudes affect memory? Tests of the congeniality hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00102Google Scholar

Earl, A., Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., Gunnoe, J. B., Leeper, J., & Levitt, J. H. (2009). Participation in counseling programs: High-risk participants are reluctant to accept HIV-prevention counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 668.Google Scholar

Earl, A., Crause, C., Vaid, A., Albarracín, D., & Albarracín, D. (2016). Disparities in attention to HIV-prevention information. AIDS Care, 28(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1066747Google Scholar

Earl, A., Hart, W., Handley, I., & Albarracín, D. (2004). Effects of action goals on prevention and promotion. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Earl, A., Nisson, C. A., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Stigma cues increase self-conscious emotions and decrease likelihood of attention to information about preventing stigmatized health issues. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 5(1), 1860–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(15)30006-5Google Scholar

Eckes, T., & Six, B. (1994). Fakten und Fiktionen in der Einstellungs-Verhaltens-Forschung: Eine Meta-Analyse. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 253–271.Google Scholar

Economist. (2018). American attitudes towards gun control. Retrieved from www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/02/23/american-attitudes-towards-gun-controlGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, D., & Leippe, M. R. (2005). Dissonance and importance: Attitude change effects of personal relevance and race of the beneficiary of a counterattitudinal advocacy. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.4.447-468Google Scholar

Eiser, J. R. (1973). Judgement of attitude statements as a function of judges’ attitudes and the judgemental dimension. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12(3), 231–240.Google Scholar

Eiser, J. R., & White, C. J. M. (1973). Affirmation and denial in evaluative descriptions. British Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 399–403.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1973). Universal facial expressions in emotion. Studia Psychologica, 15, 140–147.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.268Google Scholar

Elkin, L., Thomson, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). Connecting world youth with tobacco brands: YouTube and the internet policy vacuum on Web 2.0. Tobacco Control, 19, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.035949Google Scholar

Elkin, R. A., & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance arousal link and a don’t remind effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.55Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218.Google Scholar

Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229Google Scholar

Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8Google Scholar

Epstude, K., Scholl, A., & Roese, N. J. (2016). Prefactual thoughts: Mental simulations about what might happen. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000064Google Scholar

Erb, H. P., & Bohner, G. (2007). Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts. In Fiedler, K. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 191–221). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Erb, H. P., & Bohner, G. (2010). Consensus as the key: Towards parsimony in explaining majority and minority influence. In Martin, M. & Hewstone, R. (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 79–103). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Esses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2019). The role of attitudes in migration. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 455–487). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Etter, J., Humair, J., Bergman, M., & Perneger, T. (2000). Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Smoking Scale (ATS‐18). Addiction, 95(4), 613–625.Google Scholar

Everett, J. A. C., Caviola, L., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2015). Doing good by doing nothing? The role of social norms in explaining default effects in altruistic contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2080Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria: An experimental application of modern learning theory to psychiatry. New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar

Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79–124). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Farhadloo, M., Winneg, K., Chan, M.-P. S., Jamieson, K. H., & Albarracín, D. (2018). Associations of topics of discussion on twitter with survey measures of attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to Zika: Probabilistic study in the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.8186Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object – evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Chen, J.-M., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(4), 339–357.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Ledbetter, J. E., & Towles-Schwen, T. (2000). On the costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object has changed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.197Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.723Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280–288.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.404Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1978). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: Information processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400109Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1963). Cognitive-dissonance, sensitivity, and evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 66(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049383Google Scholar

Feldman, G., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009Google Scholar

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.Google Scholar

Fennis, B. M., & Stel, M. (2011). The pantomime of persuasion: Fit between nonverbal communication and influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.015Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593Google Scholar

Fishbach, A., Steinmetz, J., & Tu, Y. (2016). Motivation in a social context: Coordinating personal and shared goal pursuits with others. In Elliot, A. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 3, pp. 35–79). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2015.12.005Google Scholar

Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676301600302Google Scholar

Fishbein, M. (2008). A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08326092Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). Acceptance, yielding and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. In Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 339–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937082Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011a). Attitudes, norms, and control as predictors of intentions and behavior. In Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach (pp. 179–219). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (2011b). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.563209Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Hanson, M. J. S. (1999). Fishbein–Ajzen–Hanson Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/nciguide_measure/Fishbein-Ajzen-Hanson_Questionnaire.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & McArdle, J. (1980). Changing the behavior of alcoholics: Effects of persuasive communication. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 217–242). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. D., Fisher, W. A., Bryan, A. D., & Misovich, S. J. (2002). Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. Health Psychology, 21(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.177Google Scholar

Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Rye, B. J. (1995). Understanding and promoting AIDS-preventive behavior: Insights from the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology, 14, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.255Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fitzsimons, G. J., & Williams, P. (2000). Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 195.Google Scholar

Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.xGoogle Scholar

Fong, C. P. S., & Wyer, R. S. (2003). Cultural, social, and emotional determinants of decisions under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 90(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00528-9407Google Scholar

Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39.Google Scholar

Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53Google Scholar

Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1996). Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 421.Google Scholar

Forsyth, S. R., & Malone, R. E. (2010). “I’ll be your cigarette – light me up and get on with it”: Examining smoking imagery on YouTube. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 12, 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq101Google Scholar

Fransen, M. L., Fennis, B. M., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). When fit fosters favoring: The role of private self-focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.004Google Scholar

Fraser, R. T., Johnson, K., Hebert, J., Ajzen, I., Copeland, J., Brown, P., & Chan, F. (2010). Understanding employers’ hiring intentions in relation to qualified workers with disabilities: Preliminary findings. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9220-1Google Scholar

Freedman, J. L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(5), 778.Google Scholar

Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552Google Scholar

Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1966). Selective exposure. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 57–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60103-3Google Scholar

Freeman, B. F. (2012). New media and tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 21, 139–144.Google Scholar

Freeman, B., & Chapman, S. (2007). Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control, 16, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020024Google Scholar

Freire, P., & da Veiga Coutinho, J. (1972). Cultural action for freedom (Vol. 48). London, England: Penguin Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00401Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1912). La dynamique du transfert. La Technique Psychanalytique, 16, 50–60.Google Scholar

Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033Google Scholar

Galante, J., Galante, I., Bekkers, M.-J., & Gallacher, J. (2014). Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(6), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037249Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.530Google Scholar

Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2009). Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: A cross-cultural comparison. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2196–2202. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.160234Google Scholar

Garling, T., Bamberg, S., & Friman, M. (2019). The role of attitude in choice of travel, satisfaction with travel, and change to sustainable travel. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Ed.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 562–586). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Gartner, L. M., Morton, J., Lawrence, R. A., Naylor, A. J., O’Hare, D., Schanler, R. J., & Eidelman, A. I. (2005). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 115(2), 496–506.Google Scholar

Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2000). Do you have to pay attention to your feelings to be influenced by them? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200268005Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: Conceptual, empirical, and metatheoretical issues: Reply to Albarracín, Hart, and McCulloch (2006), Kruglanski and Dechesne (2006), and Petty and Brinol (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.745Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition, 25(5), 687–717.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2019). Attitudes and the implicit-explicit dualism. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 158–196). Hoboken, NJ: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.005Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 85–117). New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809884Google Scholar

Gebauer, J. E., Maio, G. R., & Pakizeh, A. (2013). Feeling torn when everything seems right: Semantic incongruence causes felt ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481679Google Scholar

Geers, A. L., Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2019). An analysis of the basic processes of formation and change of placebo expectations. Review of General Psychology, 23(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000171Google Scholar

Geers, A. L., Helfer, S. G., Kosbab, K., Weiland, P. E., & Landry, S. J. (2005). Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(2), 121–127.Google Scholar

Geers, A. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1999). Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4), 394–413.Google Scholar

Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2010). The implicit “go”: Masked action cues directly mobilize mental effort. Psychological Science, 21, 1389–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384149Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters and teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.xGoogle Scholar

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television’s contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00500.xGoogle Scholar

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1980). Television violence, victimization, and power. American Behavioral Scientist, 23(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428002300506Google Scholar

Gerlach, J. T., Diepolder, H. M., Zachoval, R., Gruener, N. H., Jung, M. C., Ulsenheimer, A., … Pape, G. R. (2003). Acute hepatitis C: High rate of both spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance. Gastroenterology, 125(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00668-1Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psychological Review, 105, 602–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.602Google Scholar

Gist, M., Rosen, B., & Schwoerer, C. (1988). The influence of training method and trainee age on the acquisition of computer skills. Personnel Psychology, 41, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02384.xGoogle Scholar

Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2003a). Models of health-related behavior. AIDS and Behavior, 7(2), 183–193.Google Scholar

Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2003b). Unpublished data.Google Scholar

Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude–behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778Google Scholar

Glasman, L. R., & Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J. (2019). The role of attitudes in HIV prevention, testing, and treatment. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 121–151). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Vézina-Im, L.-A., Amireault, S., & Bilodeau, A. (2012). Question-behaviour effect: A randomised controlled trial of asking intention in the interrogative or declarative form. Psychology and Health, 27(9), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.671617Google Scholar

Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87–98.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P M. (1996). How goals and plans affect social behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 31(3–4), 2642.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (2004). The psychology of goals. International Journal of Psychology, 39(5–6), 502.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mindsets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1119Google Scholar

Gowans, C. W. (2004). Philosophy of the Buddha. International Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 1–240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203480793Google Scholar

Graham, A., Cobb, N., Papandonatos, G., Moreno, J. L., Kang, H., Tinkelman, D. G., … Abrams, D. B. (2011). A randomized trial of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171, 46–53.Google Scholar

Graton, A., Ric, F., & Gonzalez, E. (2016). Reparation or reactance? The influence of guilt on reaction to persuasive communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.016Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In Explorations in temperament (pp. 105–128). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). Fundamentals of the septo-hippocampal system. In The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed., pp. 204–232). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl. 1), S163–S183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.xGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Albert, R. D. (1968). Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(1, Pt. 1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021237Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699–1702.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93(2), 216.Google Scholar