We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
GENERAL INTRODUCTORY AND COMPARATIVE REMARKS ON CASE 9
Case 9 poses the question of whether an unlawful occupier who offers to purchase or rent the occupied land (in casu Anna) can still acquire it through her longterm use of the land. All examined jurisdictions eventually reach the result that Anna does not acquire the land through long-term use. The jurisdictions under examination can be divided into three groups.
(1) NO ACQUISITION DUE TO STRICT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The first group of jurisdictions does not permit acquisitions by persons who knowingly occupy land. This group consists of England and Wales under the Land Registration Act of 2002, Finland, Germany, Norway, Russia, Scotland, Slovakia, and Sweden.
(2) NO ACQUISITION DUE TO OFFER
In the second group of jurisdictions, consisting of Alberta, Belgium, Catalonia, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and South Africa, Anna’s offer to purchase or rent the land would interrupt the running of the required period of use. In some jurisdictions, this rule is more nuanced or additional requirements apply for the offer to purchase or rent the land to have this effect. The law of Alberta requires the offer to be in writing in order for it to constitute an acknowledgement of the owner’s right. Under Irish law, a mere offer to rent would not be an expression of such an acknowledgement. This interruption does not necessarily preclude that a time period for an acquisition can start running anew, but the jurisdictions set different requirements for the period to recommence.
(3) OFFER DOES NOT AFFECT ACQUISITION
Only in Louisiana does the offer to purchase or rent the land not affect the acquisition. As Anna meets all the general requirements under the law of Louisiana, she will acquire the land. This prevailing opinion may change in the time to come, and Louisiana may then join the second group.
(4) CONCLUDING REFLECTION
The rationale behind the common norm within the second group is that an acknowledgement of the owner’s right stands in the way of an acquisition of land by a non-owner through long-term use. This offer shows that the occupier does not intend to acquire any right in the land, and the owner no longer needs to suspect a looming loss of the land.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
