“All parents are environmentalists”: Zuckerman, M. (1987). All parents are environmentalists until they have their second child. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell curve: Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

“Neat, plausible, and wrong”: Mencken, H. L. (1920). Prejudices: Second Series. Available at https://archive.org/details/prejudicessecond00mencuoft, p. 158.Google Scholar

“A vote, not a veto”: Kaplan, M. Quoted in www.myjewishlearning.com/article/mordecai-kaplan-founder-of-reconstructionist-judaism/Google Scholar

Darwin’s complete works are available at darwin-online.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Galton’s complete works are available at galton.orgGoogle Scholar

The biblical quotations are from the English Standard Version.Google Scholar

Passage from A Man in Full: Wolfe, T. A Man in Full. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, p. 306.Google Scholar

“Whenever you can, count”: Quoted in Pearson, K. (1930). The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, p. 340.Google Scholar

“Counting telephone poles”: The quotation is always attributed to Hutchins in this form, although I can’t find where he actually said it. He makes the same point a little less pithily in Hutchins, R. M. (1937). Ideals in education. American Journal of Sociology, 43, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karl Marx’s works are available online at the Marxists Internet Archive, Marxists.org.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kevles, D. J. (1995). In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (No. 95). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Positive eugenics and H. G. Wells: Wells, H. G. (1903). Mankind in the Making (Vol. 1). Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Early forms of racism: Heng, G. (2018). The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin’s abolitionism and racism: Gould, S. J. (1996). Mismeasure of Man. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Polygenism: Keel, T. D. (2013). Religion, polygenism and the early science of human origins. History of the Human Sciences, 26, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton’s early career as an explorer: Fancher, R. E. (2004). The concept of race in the life and thought of Francis Galton. In Winston, A. S (ed.), Defining Difference: Race and Racism in the History of Psychology. American Psychological Association, pp. 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher’s 1918 paper: Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation among relatives on the supposition of mendelian Inheritance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, 742–757.Google Scholar

Fisher’s two goals: Downes, S. M. & Turkheimer, E. (2022). An early history of the heritability coefficient applied to humans (1918–1960). Biological Theory, 17, 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burks’ biography: https://feministvoices.com/profiles/barbara-stoddard-burksGoogle Scholar

Meeting of National Society for the Study of Education: Whipple, G. M. (ed.) The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Nature and Nurture. Their Influence Upon Achievement. Public School Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Early history of twin studies: Rende, R. D., Plomin, R. & Vandenberg, S. G. (1990). Who discovered the twin method? Behavior Genetics, 20, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N. & Holzinger, K. J. (1937). Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jay Lush: Bell, A. E. (1977). Heritability in retrospect. Journal of Heredity, 68, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott and Fuller: Scott, J. P. & Fuller, J. L. (2012). Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog (Vol. 570). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fisher’s 1918 paper: Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation among relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, 742–757.Google Scholar

D. S. Falconer: Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Ronald Press, p. 165.Google Scholar

Cyril Burt in the 1970s: Burt, C. (1972). Inheritance of general intelligence. American Psychologist, 27, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamin’s accusations of fraud by Burt: Kamin, L. J. (2012). The Science and Politics of IQ. Routledge.Google Scholar

Hearnshaw biography: Hearnshaw, L. S. (1979). Cyril Burt, Psychologist. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

IQ correlations: BouchardJr, T. J. & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck on Kantsaywhere: Eysenck, H. J. (1947). The measurement of socially valuable qualities. The Eugenics Review, 39, 102–107.Google ScholarPubMed

Eysenck on neuroticism: Eysenck, H. J. & Prell, D. B. (1951). The inheritance of neuroticism: an experimental study. Journal of Mental Science, 97, 441–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottesman and Shields: Gottesman, I. I. & Shields, J. (1972). Schizophrenia and Genetics. A Twin Study Vantage Point. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Thomas Kuhn: Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Equal environments assumption: Conley, D., Rauscher, E., Dawes, C., Magnusson, P. K. & Siegal, M. L. (2013). Heritability and the equal environments assumption: evidence from multiple samples of misclassified twins. Behavior Genetics, 43, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scarr–Rowe interaction: Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., d’Onofrio, B. & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Genetics of TV: Plomin, R., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C. & Fulker, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in television viewing in early childhood: nature as well as nurture. Psychological Science, 1, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genetics of religiosity: Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Lykken, D. T. & Tellegen, A. (1990). Genetic and environmental influences on religious interests, attitudes, and values: a study of twins reared apart and together. Psychological Science, 1, 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genetics of divorce: McGue, M. & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3, 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Three Laws of Behavior Genetics: Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomin and Daniels on the nonshared environment: Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turkheimer and Waldron on the nonshared environment: Turkheimer, E. & Waldron, M. (2000). Nonshared environment: a theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin’s prediction about intelligence: Plomin, R. (1990). The role of inheritance in behavior. Science, 248, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin and QTLs: Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Smith, D. L. et al. (1994). DNA markers associated with high versus low IQ: the IQ quantitative trait loci (QTL) project. Behavior Genetics, 24, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Origins of QTL concept: Geldermann, H. (1975). Investigations on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers I. Methods, 46, 319–330.Google ScholarPubMed

Plomin study of candidate gene for IQ: Skuder, P., Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E. et al. (1995). A polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA associated with IQ? Intelligence, 21, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Candidate gene doesn’t replicate: Petrill, S. A., Ball, D., Eley, T. et al. (1997). Failure to replicate a QTL association between a DNA marker identified by EST00083 and IQ. Intelligence, 25, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomin’s first GWAS: Plomin, R., Hill, L., Craig, I. W. et al. (2001). A genome-wide scan of 1842 DNA markers for allelic associations with general cognitive ability: a five-stage design using DNA pooling and extreme selected groups. Behavior Genetics, 31, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Comment on Plomin GWAS: de Geus, E. J., Wright, M. J., Martin, N. G. & Boomsma, D. I. (2001). Genetics of brain function and cognition. Behavior Genetics, 31, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin’s 2010 GWAS: Davis, O. S., Butcher, L. M., Docherty, S. J. et al. (2010). A three-stage genome-wide association study of general cognitive ability: hunting the small effects. Behavior Genetics, 40, 759–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jencks’ red-haired child: Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. Basic Books.Google Scholar

First educational attainment study EA1: Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J. et al. (2013). GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science, 340, 1467–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Missing heritability problem: Maher, B. (2008). Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature, 456, 18–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Draining the pond dry: Crow, T. J. (2011). The missing genes: what happened to the heritability of psychiatric disorders? Molecular Psychiatry, 16, 362–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fourth law of behavior genetics: Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J. & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin’s blueprint: Plomin, R. (2019). Blueprint, with a New Afterword: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Visscher on GWAS: Abdellaoui, A., Yengo, L., Verweij, K. J. & Visscher, P. M. (2023). 15 years of GWAS discovery: realizing the promise. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 110, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

EA1: Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J. et al. (2013). GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science, 340, 1467–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

EA2: Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A. et al. (2016). Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature, 533, 539–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

EA3: Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., Okbay, A. et al. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50, 1112–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

EA4: Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A. et al. (2016). Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature, 533, 539–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin on specific genes: Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and Experience: The Interplay Between Nature and Nurture. Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turkheimer on specific genes: Turkheimer, E. (1998). Heritability and biological explanation. Psychological Review, 105, 782–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

PGS within sibling pairs: Howe, L. J., Nivard, M. G., Morris, T. T. et al. (2022). Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects. Nature Genetics, 54, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Non-inherited PGS: Kong, A., Thorleifsson, G., Frigge, M. L. et al. (2018). The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science, 359, 424–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

RDR heritability: Young, A. I., Frigge, M. L., Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. (2018). Relatedness disequilibrium regression estimates heritability without environmental bias. Naturex Genetics, 50, 1304–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The genetic lottery: Harden, K. P. (2021). The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Charles Spearman: Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man: Their Nature and Measurement. Public domain, available at: https://gwern.net/doc/iq/1927-spearman-theabilitiesofman.pdfGoogle Scholar

Innateness: Griffiths, P. E. (2002). What is innateness? The Monist, 85, 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur Jensen: Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adoption and intelligence: Turkheimer, E. (1991). Individual and group differences in adoption studies of IQ. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Flynn Effect: Flynn, J. R. (2012). Are We Getting Smarter? Rising IQ in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickens and Flynn: Dickens, W. T. & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108, 346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The Bell Curve: Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Simon and Schuster. A precis of The Bell Curve is at: www.aei.org/society-and-culture/the-bell-curve-explained-introduction/Google Scholar

Herrnstein’s syllogism: Herrnstein, R. J. (1973). IQ in the meritocracy. Little, Brown.Google Scholar

The genetic lottery: Harden, K. P. (2021). The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Racial categories in U.S. census: www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-race-overview.htmlGoogle Scholar

Venn diagram of genetic similarity: Donovan, B. M., Semmens, R., Keck, P. et al. (2019). Toward a more humane genetics education: learning about the social and quantitative complexities of human genetic variation research could reduce racial bias in adolescent and adult populations. Science Education, 103, 529–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman on regions: Guttman, R. & Greenbaum, C. W. (1998). Facet theory: its development and current status. European Psychologist, 3, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin’s thought experiment: Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Race and intelligence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

How data happened: Wiggins, C. & Jones, M. L. (2023). How Data Happened: A History from the Age of Reason to the Age of Algorithms. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Charles Murray on Sam Harris podcast: www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/73-forbidden-knowledgeGoogle Scholar

Warne: Warne, R. T. (2021). Between-group mean differences in intelligence in the United States are >0% genetically caused: five converging lines of evidence. The American Journal of Psychology, 134, 480–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Indian American spelling: www.nytimes.com/2021/07/03/style/spelling-bee-south-asian-americans.html. This was pointed out to me by James Tabery.Google Scholar

Twin study of sexual orientation: Bailey, J. M. & Pillard, R. C. (1995). Genetics of human sexual orientation. Annual Review of Sex Research, 6, 126–150.Google Scholar

Waddington and canalization: Waddington, C. H. (1966). Principles of Development and Differentiation. MacMillan Company.Google Scholar

Gottlieb and canalization: Gottlieb, G. (1991). Experiential canalization of behavioral development: theory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

GWAS of sexual orientation: Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J., Nivard, M. G. et al. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365, eaat7693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ian Hacking: Hacking, I. (1998). Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses. University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Twin study of vegetarianism: Wesseldijk, L. W., Tybur, J. M., Boomsma, D. I., Willemsen, G. & Vink, J. M. (2023). The heritability of pescetarianism and vegetarianism. Food Quality and Preference, 103, 104705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

GWAS of vegetarianism: Yaseen, N. R., Barnes, C. L., Sun, L., Takeda, A. & Rice, J. P. (2023). Genetics of vegetarianism: a genome-wide association study. PLoS One, 18, e0291305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ecotypes: Pigliucci, M. & Kaplan, J. (2003). On the concept of biological race and its applicability to humans. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kierkegaard: Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, Søren Kierkegaard Research Center, Copenhagen, 1997–, volume 18, p. 306. Cited at https://homepage.math.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/kierkegaardquotesource.htmlGoogle Scholar

Turkheimer on free will: Turkheimer, E. (2011). Genetics and human agency: comment on Dar-Nimrod and Heine (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 825–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daniel Dennett: Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fathers reading to children: Quach, J., Sarkadi, A., Napiza, N. et al. (2018). Do fathers’ home reading practices at age 2 predict child language and literacy at age 4? Academic Pediatrics, 18, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed