IN SEARCH OF A DURABLE CONCEPT OF WORLD ORDER

A central proposition of this study is that major war can be dissociated from systems transformation. We have demonstrated that failure to manage systems transformation properly has led to extensive war. But while systems transformation cannot be avoided, it can and must be made more responsive to administrative control.

To use an analogy, systems transformation is a period in history which is like the traffic situation at a busy intersection. Along normal stretches of the road, drivers are allowed to pass each other and do so without catastrophe according to well-developed “rules of the road” that are akin to the “norms” of the balance of power. But when drivers attempt anything unusual in a busy intersection (e.g., acceleration, deceleration, change of lanes, passing, or taking their eyes off the road), they are inviting accident, major accident. Too much traffic activity is taking place to make clear judgments.

Hence we come to the crux of the problem of maintaining international political order and of coping with structural change. Statesmen must have sufficient vision as well as diplomatic skill so as to constitute a new world order even as the old equilibrium is being undermined by change which cannot be halted.

From the power cycle perspective, world order is a set of variable relations among states that is reasonably compatible with their values and goals and that is constructed on a stable equilibration of power and interests.