Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Thompson, William R.
1992.
Dehio, Long Cycles, and the Geohistorical Context of Structural Transition.
World Politics,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
James, Patrick
1993.
Neorealism as a Research Enterprise: Toward Elaborated Structural Realism.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
123.
Spiezio, K. Edward
1993.
Power Cycle Theory and State Involvement in Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976.
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Mace, Gordon
Bélanger, Louis
and
Thérien, Jean Philippe
1993.
Regionalism in the Americas and the Hierarchy of Power.
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.
Russett, Bruce
1995.
Processes of Dyadic Choice for war and Peace.
World Politics,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 2,
p.
268.
Copeland, Dale C.
1996.
Neorealism and the myth of bipolar stability: Toward a new dynamic realist theory of major war.
Security Studies,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
29.
Hebron, Lui
and
James, Patrick
1997.
Great powers, cycles of relative capability and crises in world politics.
International Interactions,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.
Sucharov, Mira
1998.
Regional identity and the sovereignty principle: Explaining Israeli‐Palestinian peacemaking.
Geopolitics,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
177.
Kugler, Jacek
1998.
The Policy Implications of Power Parity.
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
99.
Kohout, Franz
2003.
Cyclical, Hegemonic, and Pluralistic Theories of International Relations: Some Comparative Reflections on War Causation.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
Yoon, Young-Kwan
2003.
Introduction: Power Cycle Theory and the Practice of International Relations.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.
Schmidt, Gustav
2003.
Asia, Europe, North America, and the “Asian Capitalist Miracle”: Changing “Power Cycles” and Evolving Roles in Regional and International Structures.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
Lahneman, William J.
2003.
Changing Power Cycles and Foreign Policy Role-power Realignments: Asia, Europe, and North America.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
97.
Geller, Daniel S.
2003.
Nuclear Weapons and the Indo-pakistani Conflict: Global Implications of a Regional Power Cycle.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Kumar, Sushil
2003.
Power Cycle Analysis of India, China, and Pakistan in Regional and Global Politics.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
Chiu, Daniel Y.
2003.
International Alliances in the Power Cycle Theory of State Behavior.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
Parasiliti, Andrew T.
2003.
The Causes and Timing of Iraq's Wars: a Power Cycle Assessment.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Inoguchi, Takashi
2003.
Conclusion: Generating Equilibrium, Generating Power Cycles.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Doran, Charles F.
2003.
Economics, Philosophy of History, and the “Single Dynamic” of Power Cycle Theory: Expectations, Competition, and Statecraft.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
James, Patrick
and
Lusztig, Michael
2003.
The US Power Cycle, Expected Utility, and the Probable Future of the FTAA.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
83.