Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:02:51.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Functional markers in sign languages

from II - SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Sandro Zucchi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Carol Neidle
Affiliation:
Boston University
Carlo Geraci
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Quinn Duffy
Affiliation:
Boston University
Carlo Cecchetto
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Diane Brentari
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Lexical morphemes and grammatical morphemes

It is a common observation that grammatical morphemes often develop gradually from lexical morphemes. Some languages show this fact more transparently than others. For example, Sebba (1997) observes that creoles and pidgins often use lexically contentful elements with the meaning of ‘finish’ or ‘done’ as functional markers signaling that the event described by the sentence occurs before the time of utterance:

(1) mo fin mahze (Mauritian Creole)

I finish eat

‘I ate.’

(2) me waka kba (Sranan Tongo)

I walk finished

‘I had walked.’

(3) mipela I ting olsem i mas dai pinis (Tok Pisin)

we him think anyhow him must die finish

‘We think he must have died.’

(4) a don kom (Pidgin of West Africa)

I done come

‘I have come.’

Similar examples from other spoken languages are offered by Pfau and Steinbach (2006). In Rama (a spoken language of Nigeria), the verb aktul meaning ‘finish’ is now used as a completive marker, and in Lhasa (spoken in Tibet), the verb tshaa meaning ‘finish’ marks perfective aspect.

Examples of this sort are also quite common in sign languages. For instance, the signs FINISH and FATTO belonging, respectively, to American Sign Language (ASL) and Italian Sign Language (LIS), can both occur as lexically contentful main verbs with the meaning of ‘finish’ (or ‘done’) and as aspectual/temporal morphemes. Both signs, when acting as grammatical morphemes, also exhibit a peculiar behavior with negation and negative quantifiers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sign Languages , pp. 197 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×