Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:43:25.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Liberal and conservative approaches to justice: Conflicting psychological portraits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2009

Barbara A. Mellers
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan Baron
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Political philosophers have advocated a wide range of interpretations of justice: from the extreme libertarian to the extreme egalitarian to various compromise or value pluralism positions (e.g., Ackerman, 1980; Barry, 1989; Buchanan, 1975; Nozick, 1974; Rawls, 1971; Walzer, 1983). The prescriptive conclusions these writers reach often depend on the psychological assumptions from which they start. Rawls (1971), for example, sees the just society as one in which the maximin principle (maximize the living standards of the worst off) guides policy – as long as this egalitarian objective does not violate the essential liberty of individuals. He arrives at this conclusion by arguing that people in the hypothetical “original position” (in which they know nothing about themselves or their future life prospects) would be extremely risk averse and would agree to enter into any social contract only if they were sure that society was committed to the maximin principle. People, in this view, want to be absolutely certain that they are not assigned to the bottom rung of a social order that is indifferent or hostile toward their fate. By contrast, Nozick (1974) sees the just society as a libertarian one in which the powers of the state are limited largely to protecting individual rights and enforcing contracts. He arrives at this conclusion by positing the primacy of Lockean property rights and personal freedom – self-evident truths, to paraphrase the authors of the U.S. Constitution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Perspectives on Justice
Theory and Applications
, pp. 234 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×