Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:08:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Supersessionism and the Politics of Time

Reforming Organisational Studies with Gadamer’s Hermeneutics of Trust

from Part II - Re-orienting Critique in Organization Studies? Exploring Jointly Time and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2023

François-Xavier de Vaujany
Affiliation:
Universite Paris Dauphine-PSL
Robin Holt
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Albane Grandazzi
Affiliation:
Grenoble Ecole de Management
Get access

Summary

The doctrine of historical supersessionism proposes that the distant past is of no importance to the present. This chapter argues that Positivism, a child of the Enlightenment, and a dominant paradigm in management and organisational research has resulted in the supersessionist rejection of Aristotelian thought. The chapter will draw on Alasdair MacIntyre’s apologia for Aristotle, and the contemporary discovery of phronesis in the social sciences. It will discuss how Gadamer’s hermeneutics of trust can facilitate dialogue between Positivist and Aristotelian scholars. Consequently, Gadamer’s concept can contribute to the study of organisations, artefacts, and practices, as it advocates the necessity for cultivating hermeneutic sensitivity and phronesis in all dimensions of human life. The study also proposes Husserl’s idea of epoché as a methodology to examine historical supersessionism and assist the work of resolving contemporary prejudices and misunderstandings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organization as Time
Technology, Power and Politics
, pp. 99 - 115
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle (1961). Aristotle’s Physics with an Analytical Index of Technical Terms. Trans. Richard Hope. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. & Moore, G. (2011). MacIntyre, neo-Aristotelianism and Organization Theory. In Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (eds.), Philosophy and Organization Theory Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 32, pp. 85121). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (2002). The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory and Deconstruction. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. (2005). Teleological Explanation. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., p. 911). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brittan, G. G. J. (1999). Enlightenment. In Audi, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (p. 266). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brough, J. B. (1977). The Emergence of an Absolute Consciousness in Husserl’s Early Writings on Time-Consciousness. In Elliston, F. A. & McCormick, P. (eds.), Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Butler, T. (1998). Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 285300.Google Scholar
Costello, G. J. (2017). Phenomenological realism: A pragmatic lens for information systems research. Systems, Signs & Actions SYSIAC (An International Journal on Information Technology, Action, Communication and Workpractices), 10(1), 3453. Available at: https://sysiac.org/?pageId=45Google Scholar
Critchley, S. (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Costa, G. (2017). Supersessionism: Harsh, Mild or Gone for Good? European Judaism: A Journal for the New Europe, 50(1), 99107.Google Scholar
Daintith, J. & Gjertsen, D. (eds.) (1999). Oxford Dictionary of Scientists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dante (1984 translation). The Divine Comedy, Volume 1: Inferno by Dante Aligheri. Trans. Mark Musa. New York: Penguin ClassicsGoogle Scholar
Davison, R. M. & Martinsons, M. G. (2011). Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: An inclusive–exclusive perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 26, 288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, P. & Love, P. (2004). Realist and postmodernist perspectives on information systems research: Points of connection. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v3112i3121.3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostal, R. J. (2002). Introduction. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowie, R. S. (2005). Burke, Edmund. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dube, L. & Pare, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597635.Google Scholar
Fish, S. (1990). Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary & Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Trans. Stephen Sampson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 301–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2018). What is Phronesis and Phronetic Social Science? Available at: https://linkedin.com/pulse/what-phronesis-phronetic-social-science-bent-flyvbjerg-%E5%82%85%E4%BB%A5%E6%96%8C-/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar
Fotion, N. (2005). Logical Positivism. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, B. S. (2012). The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2018). Aristotle’s Way: How Ancient Wisdom Can Change Your Life. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology: And Other Essays (pp. 335). New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. J. (2005a). Enlightenment. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 252–3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. J. (2005b). Gadamer, Hans Georg. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jancar, B. (1966). The Philosophy of Aristotle. New York: Monarch Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1979). Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s Psychology. In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., & Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (2010). A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Practitioner Reflection and Judgement as Phronesis. In Kinsella, E. A. & Pitman, A. (eds.), Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, E. A. & Pitman, A. (eds.) (2012). Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 6794.Google Scholar
Kock, N., Avison, D. & Malaurent, J. (2017). Positivist information systems action research: Methodological issues. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(3), 754–67. DOI: 710.1080/07421222.07422017.01373007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, A. (2005). Positivism. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawlor, L. & Moulard-Leonard, V. (2021). Henri Bergson. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.). Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/bergson/>. Accessed January 2022..+Accessed+January+2022.>Google Scholar
Lawrence, F. (2002). Gadamer, the Hermeneutic Revolution, and Theology. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, A. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, March, 3350.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2005). Time. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 919–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. (2002). A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the 20th Century. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. (2006). Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1913–1922. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After Virtue (3rd ed.). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2018). Hans-Georg Gadamer. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/gadamer/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14, 87103.Google Scholar
Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795802.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2005). Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Moran, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. C. (ed.) (2003). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, M. D. (2022). Qualitative Research in Information Systems. Available at: https://qual.auckland.ac.nz/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar
ODE. (2006). Aristotle. In Oxford Dictionary of English (Rev. 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ODS. (1999). Aristotle. In Daintith, J. & Gjertsen, D. (eds), Oxford Dictionary of Scientists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, S. (2005). Transcendence. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Randall, J. H. (1961). Foreword. In Aristotle’s Physics with an Analytical Index of Technical Terms. Trans. Richard Hope. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2005). Comte, Isidore Auguste Marie Francois Xavier. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint. (1961). Confessions. Trans. R. S. Pine-Coffin. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soulen, R. K. (1996). The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (2005). Phronēsis. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (2011). How To Do Your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Toadvine, T. (2019). Maurice Merleau-Ponty. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/merleau-ponty/. Accessed January 2022.Google Scholar
Tredennick, H. (1969). Introduction. In Plato: The Last Days of Socrates. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. (ed.) (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waliaula, A. J. P. (2022). Positivism. Salem Press Encyclopedia Research Starters. EBSCOhost. Accessed March 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Wernick, A. (2001). Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity: The Post-Theistic Program of French Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, C. H. (2002). Hermeneutics in Practice: Gadamer on Ancient Philosophy. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×