Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Social Psychology of Social Order: An Introduction
- 2 The Evolutionary Biology and Sociology of Social Order
- 3 Social Rationality and Weak Solidarity: A Coevolutionary Approach to Social Order
- 4 An Integrative Theory of Action: The Model of Frame Selection
- 5 The Center Cannot Hold: Networks, Echo Chambers, and Polarization
- 6 Social Exchange and Social Order: An Affect Theory Approach
- 7 Institutions, Trust, and Social Order
- 8 Identity Verifi cation and the Social Order
- 9 Identities, Roles, and Social Institutions: An Affect Control Account of Social Order
- 10 The Gender Frame and Social Order
- 11 Status, Power, and Social Order
- 12 Interaction Order: The Making of Social Facts
- 13 The Arts of Together: Social Coordination as Dyadic Achievement
- 14 Dignity as Moral Motivation: The Problem of Social Order Writ Small
- 15 The Legitimacy of Groups and the Mobilization of Resources
- Commentary: Contrasts and Complementarities
- Index
- References
10 - The Gender Frame and Social Order
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Social Psychology of Social Order: An Introduction
- 2 The Evolutionary Biology and Sociology of Social Order
- 3 Social Rationality and Weak Solidarity: A Coevolutionary Approach to Social Order
- 4 An Integrative Theory of Action: The Model of Frame Selection
- 5 The Center Cannot Hold: Networks, Echo Chambers, and Polarization
- 6 Social Exchange and Social Order: An Affect Theory Approach
- 7 Institutions, Trust, and Social Order
- 8 Identity Verifi cation and the Social Order
- 9 Identities, Roles, and Social Institutions: An Affect Control Account of Social Order
- 10 The Gender Frame and Social Order
- 11 Status, Power, and Social Order
- 12 Interaction Order: The Making of Social Facts
- 13 The Arts of Together: Social Coordination as Dyadic Achievement
- 14 Dignity as Moral Motivation: The Problem of Social Order Writ Small
- 15 The Legitimacy of Groups and the Mobilization of Resources
- Commentary: Contrasts and Complementarities
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
There is good evidence that gender acts as primary cultural framework that people rely on to initiate the process of making sense of one another in order to organize social relations. People's everyday use of gender as a cultural device for creating micro order has widespread consequences for the persistence of gender as social system of difference and inequality. This process continually exposes cultural beliefs about gender to another micro-ordering process, the development of status hierarchies, so that gender becomes a status difference. Acting in goal-oriented encounters in the workplace and home, gender status beliefs create biases in women's expected competence and authority compared to men that, in turn, contribute to the sex-segregation of jobs, the gender gap in wages and authority, and the unequal household division of labor. Acting in sites of innovation, these same processes also rewrite gender inequality into new social and economic arrangements as society changes, in effect reinventing gender inequality for the new era.
Gender, as a social system of difference among individuals based on sex categories of male and female, is a universal feature of human societies (Wood and Eagly 2002). Gender is typically also a basis for social hierarchy and inequality between men and women. At least in Western society, gender, as a system of inequality, also has had a perplexing feature. It has shown a remarkable ability to persist over major transformations in the material-economic and social arrangements on which the inequality between men and women is based in any given era. A social hierarchy based on gender in Western society survived the profound transformation from an agrarian to an industrialized society. In the more recent era, as women have flooded into the paid labor force and into many formally male jobs, gender inequality has nevertheless managed to persist in modified form (Cotter, Hermsen, and Vanneman 2004; England 2010).
I argue that these distinctive aspects of the broad social system of gender – that it is a powerful system of social difference among persons and a basis of social inequality that shows troubling powers of persistence – arise from the way people use gender as a primary cultural framework for organizing their social relations with others (Ridgeway 2011).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Order on the Edge of ChaosSocial Psychology and the Problem of Social Order, pp. 189 - 207Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, and Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2012. “Micropolitics: A New Model of Status Hierarchies in Teams.” Pp. 49–80 in Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 15, edited by and . Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2007. “In the Company of Women: Gender Inequality and the Logic of Bureaucracy in Start-Up Firms.” Work and Occupations 34: 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
and . 1996. “Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1989. “The Primacy of Age and Sex in the Structure of Person Categories.” Social Cognition 7: 262–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2011. “Understanding Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science.” PNAS 8: 3157–62.Google Scholar
, and . 2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2007. “Stereotypes Help People Connect with Others in the Community: A Situated Functional Analysis of the Stereotype Consistency Bias in Communication.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 1028–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and . 1996. “Status, Communality, and Agency: Implications for Stereotypes of Gender and Other Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 1691–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2004. “Gender Inequality at Work.” The American People Census 2000. Russell Sage Foundation and Population Reference Bureau.
, and . 2000. “Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 1171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1997. “Stereotypes and Trait Inference.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Towards Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109: 573–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society 24: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination.” Pp. 357–411 in The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by , , and . 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 878–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and . 1999. “Sexism and Other “Isms”: Interdependence, Status, and the Ambivalent Content of Stereotypes.” Pp. 193–221 in Sexism and Stereotypes in Modern Society, edited by , , and . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . 2004. “Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 713–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. 1st ed. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
2005. “Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women: Evidence from Law Firms.” American Sociological Review 70: 702–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Intergroup Relations.” Pp. 479–502 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by . New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Gender Inequality in the Welfare State: Sex Segregation in Housework, 1965–2003.” American Journal of Sociology 115: 1480–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and . 2003. “Race and Gender on the Brain: Electrocortical Measures of Attention to the Race and Gender of Multiply Categorizable Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(4): 616–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 2003. “When Do Stereotypes Come to Mind and When Do They Color Judgment? A Goal-Based Theoretical Framework for Stereotype Activation and Application.” Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 522–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 2008. “Social Hierarchy: The Self-reinforcing Nature of Power and Status.” Academy of Management Annals 2: 351–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1999. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 329–65.Google Scholar
2005. “Organizational Genealogies and the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Case of Silicon Valley Law Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 440–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26: 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2006. “Essentializing Differences between Women and Men.” Psychological Science 17: 129–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces 70: 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 79: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 2009. “How Easily Does a Social Difference Become a Status Distinction? Gender Matters.” American Sociological Review 74: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.”American Sociological Review 63: 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Cultural Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender and Society 18: 510–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 579–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 2012. “Status Incongruity and Backlash Effects: Defending the Gender Hierarchy Motivates Prejudice against Female Leaders.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Just One of the Guys: Transgender Men and the Persistence of Gender Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. “Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 509–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. “Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes: What Do They Signify?” Psychology of Women Quarterly 24: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 1992. “Categorization of Individuals on the Basis of Multiple Social Features.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2003. “The Symbolic Interactionist Frame.” Pp. 3–28 in The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by . New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
, and . 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” Pp. 7–24 in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by and . Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
, , and . 1995. “On the Role of Encoding Processes in Stereotype Maintenance.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 27: 177–254.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. “Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts.” Sociological Perspectives 40: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Employment Sectors as Opportunity Structures: Male and Female: The Effects of Location on Male and Female Scientific Dissemination.” PhD diss., Stanford, CA: Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
, and . 2008. “Women Inventors in Context: Disparities in Patenting Across Academia and Industry.” Gender and Society 22: 194–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 2005. “Recognition of Gender Identity and Task Performance.” Pp. 177–202 in Social Identification in Groups, Vol. 22, edited by and . San Diego, CA: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128: 699–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 1990. “Person Categorization and Stereotyping.” Social Cognition 8: 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by