Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T12:55:09.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Interaction Order: The Making of Social Facts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Anne Warfield Rawls
Affiliation:
Bentley University USA
Edward J. Lawler
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Shane R. Thye
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Jeongkoo Yoon
Affiliation:
EWHA Women's University, Seoul
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The worry that a loss of tradition will lead to chaos in modernity has been a preoccupation since the 1800s. In 1893 Durkheim championed the idea that new forms of social practice were developing in modernity that could produce coherence, morality and solidarity in the absence of tradition. The Interaction Order approach developed by Garfinkel, Goffman and Sacks develops Durkheim's idea, treating social facts – like self, identity and social objects – as made through cooperative social actions that do not depend on tradition. The cooperation and reciprocity required for social fact making replace tradition as the foundation of social coherence in modernity. The result is a post individualist post utilitarian approach that challenges conventional assumptions about the coherence of modern life. The work of these three scholars taken together comprises a comprehensive contemporary approach that completes the challenge to individualism (naturalism) and utilitarianism launched by Durkheim, changes epistemological (how we know) and ontological (how things exist) questions and exposes worries about chaos in modernity as artifacts of the individualist approach.

INTRODUCTION

The contemporary Interaction Order approach, initiated by Garfinkel, Goffman, and Sacks, is an important advance in social theory that breaks down barriers to discovery through detailed observation of “social facts.” It takes up Durkheim's proposal to replace individual centered approaches with a focus on the making of social facts. In doing so it overcomes epistemological limitations of individualist and naturalist approaches and reveals a strong cooperative and moral center to modern social life. Those hypothetical individuals, pictured as rational and utilitarian from birth, that populate other theories, are replaced by social selves that need to cooperate in interaction with others to create and sustain self, reason, sense, and value. The result is an innovative approach that locates coherence in the order properties of social practices in modern social contexts. The idea that chaos results when traditions and beliefs erode is replaced by studies of the coherence and stability created by mutual cooperation in situated interaction.

The discovery that interaction orders have performative criteria that are constitutive of the existence of social facts establishes that cooperative actions that meet these criteria can create social things.

Type
Chapter
Information
Order on the Edge of Chaos
Social Psychology and the Problem of Social Order
, pp. 227 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Comte, August. [1844] 2009. A General View of Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. [1893] 1933 The Division of Labor in Society. Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile [1912] 1995. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1940. “Color Trouble.” Opportunity, May, 144–51. Reprinted in Edward J. O'Brien (ed.), The Best Short Stories of 1941: The Yearbook of the American Short Story. Boston: Haughton Mifflin.
Garfinkel, Harold 1946. “Some Reflections on Action Theory and the Theory of Social Systems,” Unpublished Graduate Essay, Harvard University.
Garfinkel, Harold [1947] 2012. “The Red as an Ideal Object. Etnografia a Ricerca Qualitativa 1/2012.
Garfinkel, Harold [1948] 2006. Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1963. “A Conception of and Experiments with “Trust” as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions.” In Harvey, O.J. (ed), Motivation and Social Interaction, 187–238. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Boulder, CO: Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
Giddings, Franklin. [1894] 2012. The Theory of Sociology. Forgotten Books Classic Reprints.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. [1956] 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1961. Asylums. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Chuck. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. [1981] 1984. Theory of Communicative Action: Volume One. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian and Luff, P.. 2000. Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1642. De Cive. Originally published in Latin in Paris in 1642. First English translation London, Printed by J.C. for R. Royston, at the Angel in Ivie-Lane. 1651.
Jacobs, James. 1977. Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Sudnow, David (Ed), Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 294–33). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel. 1783. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics.
Luff, Paul, Hindmarsh, J., and Heath, C.. 2000. Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1997. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Doug. 2003. Bad News Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Displaying, Contesting, and Negotiating Epistemic Authorities in Social Interaction.” Discourse Studies 15: 597–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, Wanda. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28: 1435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1975. “Second Assessments.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.
Parsons, Talcott. 1938. “The Role of Theory in Social Research.” American Sociological Review 3(1): 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1960. “Response to Dubin on Pattern Variables.” American Sociological Review 25(4): 467–83.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne. 1987. “The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory.” Sociological Theory 5(2): 136–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne 1990. “Emergent Sociality: A Dialectic of Commitment and Order.Symbolic Interaction 13(1):63–82. (French Trans in The Mauss Review 2002 Number 19).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne 1996. “Durkheim's Epistemology: The Neglected Argument.American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 430–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne 1998. “Durkheim's Challenge to Philosophy: Human Reason as a Product of Enacted Social Practice.American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne 2004. Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne 2008. “Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies.” Organization Studies 29(5): 701–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne 2012. “Durkheim's Theory of Modernity: Self-Regulating Practices as Constitutive Orders of Social & Moral Facts,” Journal of Classical Sociology 12(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne, and David, Gary. 2006. “Accountably Other: Trust, Reciprocity and Exclusion in a Context of Situated Practice.” Human Studies 28(4): 469–97.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne, Mann, Dave, and Jeffrey, Adam. 2013. “Locating the Modern Sacred.” The Journal of Classical Sociology, first published on November 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne and Mann, David. 2015. “Getting Information Systems to Interact: The Social Fact Character of “Object” Clarity as a Factor in Designing Information Systems”. The Information Society. 31:2, 175–192.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992, 1995. Lectures on Conversation (Vols. 1–2), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G.. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Language 50 4: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel. 1980. “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a Question?’Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4): 104–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1851. Social Statics: Or, The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed. London: John Chapman.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., and Steensig, J., eds. 2011. Knowledge and Morality in Conversation. Rights, Responsibilities and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. [1986] 2007. Human Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, W. Graham. 1906. Folkways: a Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals.Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham. 1958. The Society of Captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Terasaki, Alene. (2004 [1982]). “Pre-Announcement Sequences in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Beyond (125): 171–223.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, John, Sorensen, J. B., and Mitchell, T. R.. 2007. The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1989. “Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination.” Academy of Management Review 14: 516–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weider, Larry. 1974. Telling the Convict Code. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Znaniecki, Florian. 1936. Social Actions. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×