Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:45:55.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - English Varieties and Targets for L2 Assessment

from Part IV - Assessing English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2019

Christopher J. Hall
Affiliation:
York St John University
Rachel Wicaksono
Affiliation:
York St John University
Get access

Summary

Given the widespread use of English, this chapter explores two critical issues: (1) what varieties and standards of English are taught and tested in English as second/foreign language (L2) learning contexts and (2) what role is assigned to communication strategies and plurilingual competences in learning, teaching, and assessing English, particularly in lingua franca contexts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ontologies of English
Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment
, pp. 165 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E. G. et al. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351366.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics, Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229242.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 923939.Google Scholar
Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1981). A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Palmer, A. S., Groot, P., and Trosper, G., eds., The Construct Validation of Tests of Communicative Competence (pp. 3136). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2012). Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches. Online. Accessed 10 August 2018 from http://carap.ecml.atGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018). CEFR Companion Volume. Online. Accessed 7 June 2018 from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989Google Scholar
Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 6579.Google Scholar
English Profile. (n.d.). English Profile - What the CEFR Means for English. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.englishprofile.orgGoogle Scholar
ETS (n.d.). TOEFL iBT® Test Content. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from http://www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/about/contentGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., and Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond Smarter: Mediated Learning and the Brain’s Capacity for Change. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J. and Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. and Taylor, L. (2013). Examining Listening: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376385.Google Scholar
Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163180.Google Scholar
Harding, L. (2015). Adaptability and ELF communication: The next steps for communicative language testing? In Dawadi, S., Mader, J., and Urkun, Z., eds., Selected Proceedings from the IATEFL TEA SIG 2014 Conference. Granada: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Harsch, C. and Martin, G. (2012). Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach. Assessing Writing, 17, 228250.Google Scholar
Harsch, C. and Poehner, M. (2016). Enhancing student experience abroad: The potential of dynamic assessment to develop student interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 470490.Google Scholar
Harsch, C., Pant, H. A., and Köller, O., eds. (2010). Calibrating Standards-Based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language. Standard-setting Procedures in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Harsch, C., Ushioda, E., and Ladroue, C. (2017). Investigating the Predictive Validity of TOEFL iBT® Scores and Their Use in Informing Policy in a UK University Setting. ETS Research Monograph. Princeton: ETS.Google Scholar
IELTS. (2015). Ensuring quality and fairness in international language testing. Online. Accessed 21 August 2017 from www.ielts.org/-/media/publications/quality-and-fairness/quality-and-fairness-2015-uk.ashx?la=enGoogle Scholar
IELTS. (2017). Speaking band decriptors. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/IELTS_Speaking_band_descriptors.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., and Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281315.Google Scholar
Kim, H. and Elder, C. (2009). Understanding aviation English as a lingua franca. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 23.123.17.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. and Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 , 4974.Google Scholar
Little, D. and Erickson, G. (2015). Learner identity, leaner agency and the assessment of language proficiency. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 120139.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2012). Language Assessments as Shibboleths: A Poststructuralist Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 564581.Google Scholar
Pearson. (2017). PTE General. Specification. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PTE-General-Specification-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269282.Google Scholar
Rupp, A. A., Vock, M., Harsch, C., and Köller, O. (2008). Developing Standards-based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language – Context, Processes and Outcomes in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Said, H. (2011). Phraseology: Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers Phraseology Study. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.Google Scholar
Trinity College London. (2016). Exam Information: Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/resource/?id=5755Google Scholar
Trinity College London. (n.d.). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/site/?id=3108Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. In Hanfmann, E. and Vakar, G., eds. and trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wicaksono, R. (2012). Raising students’ awareness of the construction of communicative (in)competence in international classrooms. In Ryan, J., ed., Cross Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×