Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:41:03.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learner Corpus Research and Second Language Acquisition: an attempt at bridging the gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2020

By
Bert Le Bruyn  and
Magali Paquot
Edited by
Bert Le Bruyn  and
Magali Paquot
Bert Le Bruyn
Affiliation:
UIL-OTS, Utrecht University
Magali Paquot
Affiliation:
FNRS – Centre for English Corpus Linguistics, UCLouvain
Get access

Summary

Learner corpora are traditionally defined as ‘systematic collections of authentic, continuous and contextualized language use (spoken or written) by L2 learners stored in electronic format’ (Callies & Paquot 2015). With this characterization, it appears very clearly that learner corpus researchers have always been interested in exploring the output of the more open-ended types of contextualized production tasks assigned to L2 learners (e.g. Granger 2008; Tracy-Ventura & Myles 2015). The term ‘learners’ here refers to Foreign and/or Second Language learners rather than to learners acquiring their native language (L1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition , pp. 1 - 9
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bestgen, Y. & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 26, 28–41.Google Scholar
Bonilla, C. L. (2015). From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 31(1), 53–74.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Paquot, M. (2015). Learner Corpus Research: An interdisciplinary field on the move. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. (1993). The International Corpus of Learner English. In Aarts, J., de Haan, P., & Oostdijk, N (eds.), English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation, 57–69. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2008). Learner Corpora. In Lüdeling, A. & Kytö, M. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, 259–275. Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (eds.) (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Bernaisch, T. (2016). Exploring epicentres empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 37(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S. (2014). Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9(1), 109–136.Google Scholar
Herdina, P. & Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Changing the Psycholinguistic Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Housen, A. & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 461–473.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12(1), 3–69.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990149Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Möller, V. (2017). A statistical analysis of learner corpus data, experimental data and individual differences: Monofactorial vs. multifactorial approaches. In de Haan, P., van Vuuren, S., & de Vries, R. (eds.), Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, 409–439. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Myles, F. (2015). Second language acquisition theory and learner corpus research. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, 309–332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research 35(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317694221Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1993). Linguistic, psycholinguistic, and neurolinguistic aspects of ‘interference’ in bilingual speakers: The Activation Threshold Hypothesis. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(2), 133–145.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rankin, T. (2009). Verb second in advanced L2 English: A learner corpus study. In Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, 46–59. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N. & Myles, F. (2015). The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 58–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N. & Paquot, M. (eds). (in press). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×