Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S. F., and Perani, D. 2001. The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, L. and Smith, N. 1995. Sranan. In: Muysken, P. and Smith, N. eds. Substrata versus univerals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 219–232.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2001. Areal diffuson and genetic inheritence: problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2006. Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2001. Language contact and language change in Amazonia. In: Blake, B. J. and Burridge, K. eds. Historical linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne 13–17 August 2001. 1–20.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2003. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39, First person–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2006. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 1–66.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2007a. Language contact along the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea. Paper presented at the Workshop on Language Contact along Rivers, Research Centre for Linguistics Typology, La Trobe University, November 2007.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2007b. Multilingual fieldwork and emergent grammars. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Albert, M. L. and Obler, L. K. 1978. The bilingual brain. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Alves, M. 2007. Sino-Vietnamese grammatical borrowing: An overview. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 343–361.

Ameka, F. K. 2006. Grammars in contact in the Volta basin (West Africa): On contact-induced grammatical change in Likpe. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 114–142.

Ameka, F. K. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Likpe (Sɛkpɛlé). In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 107–122.

Anders, K. 1993. Einflüsse der russischen Sprache bei deutschsprachigen Aussiedlern. (Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit 44.) Hamburg: Germanisches Seminar.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. S. 2006. Towards a typology of the Siberian linguistic area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 266–300.CrossRef

Appel, R. and Muysken, P. 1987. Language contact and bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Arends, J. and Bruyn, A. 1995. Gradualist and developmental hypotheses. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 111–120.

Arends, J. 1993. Towards a gradualist model of creolization. In: Byrne, F. and Holm, J. eds. Atlantic meets Pacific. A global view of pidginization and creolization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 371–380.Google Scholar

Arends, J., Kouwenberg, S., and Smith, N. 1995. Theories focusing on the non-European input. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 99–109.

Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 1995. Pidgins and creoles. An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Auer, P. 1984. Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, P. 1995. The pragmatics of code-switching: a sequential approach. In: Milroy, L. and Muysken, P. eds. 115–35.

Auer, P. 1999. From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism Third person, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, P. ed. 1998. Code-switching in conversation. London: Routledge.

Backus, A. 1996. Two in one. Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Backus, A. 2003. Can a mixed language be conventionalized alternational codeswitching? In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 237–270.

Baghbidi, H. R. 2003. The Zargari language. An endangered European Romani in Iran. Romani Studies 5/13, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, P. and Mous, M. 1994. Introduction. In: Bakker, P. and Mous, M. eds. 1–11.CrossRef

Bakker, P. and Mous, M. eds. 1994. Mixed languages. 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.

Bakker, P. and Muysken, P. 1995. Mixed languages and language intertwining. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 41–52.

Bakker, P. and Papen, R. A. 1997. Michif. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 365–363.CrossRef

Bakker, P. and Voort, H. 1991. Para-Romani languages. An overview and some speculations on their genesis. In: Bakker, P. and Cortiade, M. eds. In the margin of Romani. Gypsy languages in contact. Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics. 16–44.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1987. A Basque nautical pidgin: A missing link in the history of Fu. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages Second person, First person–30.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1989. ‘The language of the coast tribes is half-Basque’. A Basque-Amerindian pidgin in use between Europeans and Native Americans in North America ca. 1540–ca. 1640. Anthropological Linguistics 31, 117–147.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1994. Michif, the Cree-French mixed language of the Métis buffalo hunters in Canada. In: Bakker, P. and Mous, M. eds. 13–33.

Bakker, P. 1995. Pidgins. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 25–39.

Bakker, P. 1996. Language intertwining and convergence: typological aspects of genesis of mixed languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49, 9–20.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1997a. A language of our own. The genesis of Michif – the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1997b. Athematic morphology in Romani: The borrowing of a borrowing pattern. In: Matras, Y., Bakker, P., and Kyuchukov, H. eds. The typology and dialectology of Romani. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. First person–21.Google Scholar

Bakker, P. 1998. Pararomani languages and secret languages. In: Matras, Y. ed. 69–96.

Bakker, P. 2000a. Convergence intertwining: An alternative way towards the genesis of mixed languages. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 29–35.

Bakker, P. 2000b. Rapid language change: Creolization, intertwining, convergence. In: Renfrew, C., McMahon, A., and Trask, R. L. eds. 585–620.

Bakker, P. 2002. An Early vocabulary of British Romani (1616): A linguistic analysis. Romani Studies 5/12, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, P. 2003. Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 107–150.

Bakker, P. 2006. The Sri Lanka Sprachbund: The newcomers Portuguese and Malay. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 135–159.

Bakker, P., Post, M., and Voort, H. 1995. TMA particles and auxiliaries. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 247–258.

Bakker, P., Smith, N., and Veenstra, T. 1995. Saramaccan. In: Muysken, P. and Smith, N. ed. Substrata versus univerals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 165–178.Google Scholar

Bao, Z. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41, 237–267.Google Scholar

Bauer, E. B., Hall, J. K., and Kruth, K. 2002. The pragmatic role of codeswitches in play contexts. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, D. 2000. Bella Coola and North Wakashan: Convergence and diversity in the Northwest Coast Sprachbund. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 37–53.

Bentahila, A. and Davies, E. E. 1983. The syntax of Arabic-French code-switching. Lingua 59, 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentahila, A. and Davies, E. E. 1995. Patterns of code-switching and patterns of language contact. Lingua 96, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berk-Seligson, S. 1986. Linguistic constraints on intra-sentential code-switching: A study of Spanish/Hebrew bilingualism. Language in Society 15, 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, B. and Kay, P. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. 1999. The bilingual child. In: Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. eds. Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press. 569–641.Google Scholar

Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. eds. 2004. The handbook of bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1984. The Language Bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 173–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggam, C. P. 1997. Blue in Old English. An interdisciplinary semantic study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization: processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20, 519–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisang, W. 1998. Grammaticalisation and language contact, constructions and positions. In: Giacalone Ramat, A. and Hopper, P. J. eds. The limits of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 13–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisang, W. 2006. Linguistic area, language contact, and typology: Some implications from the case of Ethiopia as a linguistic area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 75–98.

Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom, J. P. and Gumperz, J. 1972. Social meaning in structure: Code-switching in Norway. In: Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. eds. Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 409–434.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. 2000. How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bolonyai, A. 1998. In-between languages: language shift/maintenance in childhood bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism Second person, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boretzky, N. and Igla, B. 1994. Romani mixed dialects. In: Bakker, P. and Mous, M. eds. 35–68.

Boretzky, N. 1983. Kreolsprachen, Substrate und Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Borg, A. and Azzopardi-Alexander, M. 1997. Maltese. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bořkovcová, M. 2006. Romský etnolekt češtiny. Případová studie. Prague: Signeta.Google Scholar

Bowern, C. 2006. Another look at Australia as a linguistic area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 244–265.CrossRef

Brody, J. 1987. Particles borrowed from Spanish as discourse markers in Mayan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 29, 507–532.Google Scholar

Brody, J. 1995. Lending the ‘Unborrowable’: Spanish discourse markers in indigenous American languages. In: Silva-Corvalán, C. ed. Spanish in four continents. Studies in language contact and bilingualism. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 132–147.Google Scholar

Broersma, M. and Bot, K. 2006. Triggered codeswtiching: A corpus-based evaluation of the original triggering hypothesis and a new alternative. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, First person–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. H. 1999. Lexical acculturation in Native American languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bruyn, A. 1996. On identifying instances of grammaticalization in Creole languages. In: Baker, P. and Syea, A. eds. Changing meanings, changing functions. Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. London: University of Westminster Press. 29–46Google Scholar

Bühler, K. 1934 [1982]. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar

Bulut, C. 2006. Syntactic traces of Turkic-Iranian contiguity. An areal survey of contact-induced shift in patterns of relativzation. In: Johanson, L. and Bulut, Ch. eds. Turkic-Iranian contact areas. Historical and linguistic aspects. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 165–208.Google Scholar

Burridge, K. 2006. Language contact and convergence in Pennsylvania German. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 179–200.

Campbell, L. 1993. On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In: Aertsen, H. and Jeffers, R. J. eds. Historical linguistics 1989. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, L. 1997. Amerind personal pronouns: A second opinion. Language 73, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, L. 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 1–31.CrossRef

Campbell, L., Kaufman, T., and Smith-Stark, Th. C. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62, 530–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlin, E. B. 2006. Feeling the need. The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 313–332.

Carroll, J. 1981. Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In: Diller, K. ed. Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press. 83–118.Google Scholar

Carroll, M. and Lambert, M. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In: Dimroth, C. and Starren, M. eds. Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamoreau, C. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Purepecha. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 465–480.

Chaudenson, R. 1992. Des îles, des hommes, des langues. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar

Chen, H. 2007. Code-switching in conversation: a case study from Taiwan. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Manchester.

Christodoulou, I. 1991. Greek outside Greece. Language use by Greek-Cypriots in Britain. Nicosia: Diaspora Books.Google Scholar

Chyet, M. 1995. Neo-Aramaic and Kurdish – an interdisciplinary consideration of their influence on each other. In: Izre'el, S. and Drory, R. eds. Israel Oriental Studies XV – Language and culture in the Near East. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 219–252.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Felsen, C. 2006. How native-like is non-native language processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 564–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clements, J. C. and Koontz-Garboden, A. J. 2002. Two Indo-Portuguese creoles in contrast. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 17, 191–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, M. and Kipp, S. 2006a. Australia's community languages. International Journal for the Sociology of Language 180, 7–21.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. and Kipp, S. 2006b. Tiles in the multilingual mosaic. Macedonian, Filipino and Somali in Melbourne. Canberra: ANU (Pacific Linguistics).Google Scholar

Clyne, M. 1967. Transference and triggering. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. 1968. Zum Pidgin-Deutsch der Gastarbeiter. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 35, 130–139.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. 1987. Constraints on code switching: How universal are they?Linguistics 25, 739–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, M. 2003. Dynamics of language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, M. ed. 1982. Foreigner Talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 28.

Coleman, W. D. 1981. From Bill 22 to Bill 101: The politics of language under the Parti Québécois. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Révue canadienne de science politique 14, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comeau, L., Genesee, F., and Lapaquette, L. 2003. The Modeling Hypothesis and child bilingual codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism 7, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, B. 1991. Comment: Yiddish is Slavic. In: Fishman, J. ed. Yiddish – the fifteenth Slavic language (= International Journal for the Sociology of Language 91). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 151–156.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 2000. Language contact, lexical borrowing, and semantic fields. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 73–86.

Comrie, B. 2004. Prolegomena to the study of loan words in Tsezic languages. Paper presented at the Loan Word Typology Workshop, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 1–2 May 2004.

Costa, A. and Caramazza, A. 1999. Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Second person, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, A. 2004. Speech production in bilinguals. In: Bhatia, T. J. and Ritchie, W. C. eds. 201–223.

Crass, J. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in K'abeena. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 91–105.

Croft, W. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, W. 2003. Mixed languages and acts of identity: An evolutionary approach. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 41–72.

Crystal, D. 2000. Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curnow, T. J. 2001. What language features can be ‘borrowed’? In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2001. 412–436.

Dahl, Ö. and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. eds. 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages: typology and contact. Vol. I & II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dal Negro, Slivia. 2005. Lingue in contatto: Il caso speciale dei segnali discorsivi. In: Banti, G., Marra, A., and Vineis, E. eds. Atti del 4° congresso di studi dell'Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni. 73–88.

Dawkins, R. M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bot, K., Lowie, W., and Verspoor, M. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camp, D. 1971. Towards a generative analysis of post-creole speech continuum. In: Hymes, D. ed. 349–370.

Houwer, A. 1990. The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rooij, V. A. 1996. Cohesion through contrast: discourse structure in Shaba Swahili/French conversations. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar

Rooij, V. A. 2000. French discourse markers in Shaba Swahili conversations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deuchar, M. and Quay, S. 1998. One vs. two systems in early bilingual syntax: Two versions of the question. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 231–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deuchar, M. and Quay, S. 2000. Bilingual acquisition. Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deuchar, M. 1999. Are function words non-language-specific in early bilingual two-word utterances?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Second person, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimmendaal, G. J. 2001. Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: an African perspective. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2001. 358–392.

Dimroth, , C. 2007. Zweitspracherwerb bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede. In: Anstatt, T. ed. Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Tübingen: Narr-Francke. 115–137.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2001. The Australian linguistic area. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 64–104.

Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages, their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2006. Grammatical diffusion in Australia: Free and bound pronouns. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 67–93.

Donakey, A. 2007. Language planning and language policy in Manchester. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Döpke, S. 1992. One parent one language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorian, N. 1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutton, T. 1997. Hiri Motu. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 9–41.CrossRef

Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1986. Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Ehlich, K. 1986. Interjektionen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlich, K. 2007. Sprache und sprachliches Handeln. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eloeva, F. A., and Rusakov, A. J. 1990. Problemy jazykovoj interferencii (cyganskie dialekty Evropy): Učebnoe posobie. Leningrad: Leningradskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar

Elšík, V. and Matras, Y. 2006. Markedness and language change: The Romani sample. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Elšík, V. and Matras, Y. 2008. Modality in Romani. In: Hansen, B., Haan, F., and Auwera, J. eds. Modality in European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.Google Scholar

Elšík, V. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Hungarian Rumungro. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 261–282.

Elšík, V. In press. Loanwords in Selice Romani, and Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia. In: Haspelmath, M. and Tadmor, U. eds. Loanword typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Emeneau, M. B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32, Third person–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic epidemiology: semantics and grammar of language. Contact in mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar

Epps, P. 2001. The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 267–289.

Epps, P. 2006. The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 237–266.

Epps, P. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Hup. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 551–565.

Ervin, S. and Osgood, C. 1954. Second language learning and bilingualism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Supplement 49, 139–146.Google Scholar

Estrada Fernández, S. and Guerrero, L. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Yaqui. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 419–433.

Evans, N. 2005. Australian languages reconsidered: A review of Dixon (2002). Oceanic Linguistics 44, 242–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Extra, G. and Yağmur, K. eds. 2004. Urban multilingualism in Europe. Immigrant minority languages at home and school. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Ferguson, C. A. 1970. The Ethiopian language area. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 8, 67–80.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C.A. 1977. Simplified registers, broken language and Gastarbeiterdeutsch. In: Molony, C., Zobl, H., and Stölting, W. eds. Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen. Kronberg: Scriptor. 25–39.Google Scholar

Field, F. W. 2002. Linguistic borrowing in bilingual contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filiputti, D., Tavano, A., Vorano, L., Luca, G., and Fabbro, F. 2002. Nonparallel recovery of languages in a quadrilingual aphasic patient. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, S. R. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Rapanui. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 387–402.

Fishman, J. 1964. Language maintenance and language shift as a field of inquiry. Linguistics 9, 32–70.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. 1965. Who speaks what language to whom and when?La Linguistique Second person, 67–87.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. 1967. Bilingualism with and without diglossia. Diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foley, W. A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Forman, M. L. 1972. Zamboangueño texts with grammatical analysis: A study of Philippine Creole Spanish. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.

Frake, C. O. 1971. Lexical origins and semantic structure in Philippine Creole Spanish. In: Hymes, D. ed. 223–242.

Frank, I. and Poulin-Dubois, D. 2002. Young monolingual and bilingual responses to violation of the Mutual Exclusivity Principle. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, B. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friederici, A. 2001. Syntactic, prosodic, and semantic processes in the brain: Evidence from event-related neuroimaging. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, V. A. 1991. Case in Romani: old grammar in new affixes. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society 5/1, 85–102.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. 2003. Turkish in Macedonia and beyond: Studies in contact, typology, and other phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Fuller, J. 2001. The principle of pragmatic detachability in borrowing: English-origin discourse markers in Pennsylvania German. Linguistics 29, 351–369.Google Scholar

Gal, S. 1979. Language shift: Social determination of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Garafanga, J. and Torras, M.-C. 2002. Interactional otherness: Towards a redefinition of codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, First person–22.Google Scholar

Garcia, O. and Fishman, J. A. 2002. The multilingual apple. Languages in New York City. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardani, F. In press. Borrowing of inflectional morphemes in language contact. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.CrossRef

Gardner-Chloros, P., Charles, R., and Cheshire, J. 2000. Parallel patterns? A comparison of monolingual speech and bilingual codeswitching discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1305–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. 1991. Language selection and switching in Strasbourg. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbers, D., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 2000. Languages in contact. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Givón, T. 1979. From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In: Givón, T. ed. Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press. 81–111.Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1982. Tense-aspect modality: The Creole proto-type and beyond. In: Hopper, P. J. ed. Tense-aspect: between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 115–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goddard, I. 1997. Pidgin Delaware. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 43–98.CrossRef

Goglia, F. 2006. Communicative strategies in the Italian of Igbo-Nigerian immigrants in Padova (Italy): a contact linguistic approach. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.

Gołąb, Z. 1956. The concept of isogrammatism. Buletin Polskiego Towarzystwa Jezykoznawczego 15, First person–12.Google Scholar

Gołąb, Z. 1959. Some Arumanian-Macedonian isogrammatisms and the social background of their development. Word 15, 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Gollan, T. H. and Silverberg, N. B. 2001. Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golovko, E. V., and Vakhtin, N. 1990. Aleut in contact: the CIA Enigma. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golovko, E. V. 1994. Copper Island Aleut. In: Bakker, P. and Mous, M. eds. 113–121.

Golovko, E. V. 1996. A case of nongenetic development in the Arctic area: The contribution of Aleut and Russian to the formation of Copper Island Aleut. In: Jahr, E. H. and Broch, I. eds. 63–77.CrossRef

Golovko, E. V. 2003. Language contact and group identity: The role of ‘folk’ linguistic engineering. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 177–207.

Goodman, M. 1987. The Portuguese element in the American creoles. In: Gilbert, G. G. ed. Pidgin and creole languages. Essays in memory of John E. Reinecke. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 361–405.Google Scholar

Goral, M., Levy, E. S., and Obler, L. K. 2002. Neurolinguistic aspects of bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 411–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, P. 2004. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306, 496–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, D. and Price, C. 2001. Functional imaging in the study of recovery patterns in bilingual aphasia. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1959. Africa as a linguistic area. In: Bascom, W. and Hertovits, W. eds. Continuity and change in African languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 15–27.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1999. Are there mixed languages? In: Fleischman, L. S.et al. eds. Essays in poetics, literary history and linguistics presented to Viacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Moscow: OGI. 626–633.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. ed. 1966. Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grenoble, L. 2000. Morphosyntactic change: The impact of Russian on Evenki. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 105–120.

Grosjean, F. 1982. Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. 1989. Neurolinguists beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language 36, Third person–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosjean, F. 1998. Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and cognition First person, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosjean, F. 2001. The bilingual's language modes. In: Nicol, J. L. ed. One mind, two languages. Bilingual language processing. Oxford: Blackwell. First person–22.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. 2004. Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. In: Bhatia, T. J. and Ritchie, W. C. eds. 32–63.

Güldemann, T. 2006. Structural isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a linguistic area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 99–134.

Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gut, Ulrike. 2000. Bilingual acquisition of intonation. A study of children speaking German and English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haase, M. 1991. Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland. Die Einflüsse des Gaskognischen und Französischen auf das Baskische. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Hackert, S. 2004. Urban Bahamian Creole. System and variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haig, G. 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: From top to bottom. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 195–224.

Hajek, J. 2006. Language contact and convergence in East Timor. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 161–178.

Hall, R. A. 1962. The life cycle of pidgin languages. Lingua 11, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, R. A. 1966. Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Halwachs, D. W. 2005. Roma and Romani in Austria. Romani Studies 5/15, 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamers, J. and Blanc, M. 2000 (second edition). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancock, I. F. 1986. The domestic hypothesis, diffusion and componentiality: An account of Anglophone creole origins. In: Muysken, P. and Smith, N. ed. Substrata versus univerals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. and Campbell, L. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?Studies in Language 22, 315–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics 37, 1043–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. eds. 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haugen, E. 1950. The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 26, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugen, E. 1953 [1969]. The Norwegian language in the Americas: A study in bilingual behavior. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayward, R. and Orwin, M. 1991. The prefix conjugation in Qafar-Saho: The survival and revival of a paradigm – Part 1. African Languages and Cultures 4, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, J. 1978. Linguistic diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Heath, J. 1984. Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology 13, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Heidelberg Project (Heidelberger Forschungsproject ‘Pidgin-Deutsch’). 1975. Sprache und Kommunikation ausländischer Arbeiter. Kronberg: Scriptor.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27, 529–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. and Miyashita, H. 2008. Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’. Language Sciences 30, 53–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. 1969. Zur Frage der Sprachmischung in Afrika. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplementa I/3, 1104–1112.Google Scholar

Heine, B. 2005a. On contact-induced syntactic change. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 58, 60–74.Google Scholar

Heine, B. 2005b. On reflexive forms in creoles. Lingua 115, 201–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B., Claudi, U., and Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hekking, E. and Bakker, D. 2007. The case of Otomi: A contribution to grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 435–464.

Herkenrath, A., Karakoç, B., and Rehbein, J. 2002. Interrogative elements as subordinators in Turkish – aspects of Turkish-German bilingual children's language use. Working Papers in Multilingualism 44. Hamburg: Sonderforschungsbereich Mehrsprachigkeit.Google Scholar

Hermans, D., Bongearts, T., Bot, K., and Scheruder, R. 1998. Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hickey, R. 2006. Contact, shift and language change. Irish English and South African Indian English. In: Tristram, H. L. C. ed. Celtic Englishes IV. Potsdam: University Press. 234–258.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, U. 1999. Die sogenannten ‘Balkanismen’ als Problem der Südosteuropa-Linguistik und der Allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. In: Hinrichs, U. ed. Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 429–462.Google Scholar

Hlavac, J. 2006. Bilingual discourse markers: Evidence from Croatian-English code-switching. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1870–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho-Dac, Tuc. 2002. Vietnamese-English bilingualism. Patterns of code-switching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, C. 1991. An introduction to bilingualism. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Höhlig, M. 1997. Kontaktbedingter Sprachwandel in der adygeischen Umgangssprache im Kaukasus und in der Türkei. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Holm, J.1988–89. Pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holm, J. 2000. An introduction to pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzinger, D. 1993. Das Rómanes: Grammatik und Diskursanalyse der Sprache der Sinte. (= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, 85.) Innsbruck: Verlag des Instituts für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Houtzagers, P. 2000. Effects of language contact as a source of (non)information: The historical reconstruction of Burgenland Kajkavian. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 157–164.

Huttar, G. 2002. Borrowing of verbs versus nouns. [Discussion summary.] Linguist List 13.588 (www.linguistlist.org/issues/13/13-588.html).

Huttar, G. L. and Velantie, F. J. 1997. Ndyuka-Trio Pidgin. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 99–124.CrossRef

Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. 2003. Maturational constraints in SLA. In: Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. eds. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 539–588.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. ed. 1971. Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Igla, B. 1996. Das Romani von Ajia Varvara. Deskriptive und historisch-vergleichende Darstellung eines Zigeunerdialekts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Ijabla, E., Obler, L. K., and Changappa, S. 2004. Bilingual aphasia. In: Bhatia, T. J. and Ritchie, W. C. eds. 71–89.

Iwasaki, S. and Horie, P. I. 2000. Creating speech register in Thai conversation. Language in Society 29, 519–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jahr, E. H. and Broch, I. eds. 1996. Language contact in the arctic. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRef

Jahr, E. H. 1996. On the pidgin status of Russenorsk. In: Jahr, E. H. and Broch, I. eds. 107–122.CrossRef

Jake, J. L. and Myers-Scotton, C. 1997. Relating interlanguage to code-switching: the composite matrix language. Proceedings of Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, 319–330.Google Scholar

Jake, J. L. 1998. Constructing interlanguage: building a composite matrix language. Linguistics 36, 333–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jendraschek, G. 2006. Basque in contact with Romance languages. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 143–162.

Jensen, A. and Canger, U. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Nahuatl. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 403–418.

Johanson, L. 2002. Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. E. and Wilson, I. L. 2002. Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, B. 1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kainz, F. 1960. Speech pathology I: Aphasic speech. In: Paradis, M.Readings on aphasia in bilinguals and polyglots. Montreal: Didier.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. B. and Baldauf, R. B. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Kapp, D. B. 2004. Basic colour terms in South Dravidian tribal languages. Indo-Iranian Journal 47, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keesing, R. M. 1988. Melanesian Pidgin and the Oceanic substrate. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Keesing, R. M. 1991. Substrates, calquing and grammaticalization in Melanesian Pidgin. In: Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B. eds. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization – Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, G. 2004. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Sulemaniyya and Ḥalabja. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khasanova, M. 2000. The lower Amur languages in contact with Russian. In: Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 179–185.

Klein, W. and Dittmar, N. 1979. Developing grammars. The acquisition of German syntax by foreign workers. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Klein, W. 1986. Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klepsch, A. 1996. Das Lachoudische: Eine jiddische Sondersprache in Franken. In: Siewert, K. ed. 81–93.

Kluge, F. 1901. Rotwelsch. Quellen und Wortschatz der Gaunersprache. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar

König, E. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, H. (with Sutton, P.) 2008. Australian languages: A singular vision. (Review article on R. M. W. Dixon's Australian languages: their nature and development. Cambridge University Press, 2002.)Journal of Linguistics 44, 471–504.Google Scholar

Köppe, R. 1996. Language differentiation in bilingual children: the development of grammatical and pragmatic competence. Linguistics 34, 927–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. 2000. Romani genitives in cross-linguistic perspective. In: Elšík, V. and Matras, Y. eds. Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. 2006. The circle that won't come full: Two potential isoglosses in the Circum-Baltic area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 182–226.

Kossmann, M. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Tasawaq. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 75–89.

Kouwenberg, S. and LaCharité, D. 2004. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 19, 285–331.

Kouwenberg, S. and Muysken, P. 1995. Papiamento. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 205–218.

Kouwenberg, S. 1994. A grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krier, F. 1980. Lehnwort und Fremdwort im Maltesischen. Folia Linguistics 14, 179–184.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F. and Dussias, P. E. 2004. The comprehension of words and sentences in two languages. In: Bhatia, T. J. and Ritchie, W. C. eds. 169–200.

Kroll, J. F. and Stewart, E. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence and asymmetric connection between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, J. F. and Sunderman, G. 2003. Cognitive processes in second language learners and bilinguals: The development of lexical and conceptual representations. In: Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. eds. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., and Wodniecka, Z. 2006. Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. 1972a. Language in the inner city. Studies in Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1972b. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Ladstätter, O. and Tietze, A. 1994. Die Abdal (Äynu) in Xinjiang. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Lambert, W., Havelka, E., and Crosby, C. 1958. The influence of language acquisition contexts on bilingualism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lanvers, U. 2001. Language alternation in infant bilinguals: A developmental to codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism 5, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanza, E. 1997. Language mixing in infant bilingualism. A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. H. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C. 1993. The role of relexification and syntactic reanalysis in Haitian Creole: methodological aspects of a research program. In: Mufwene, S. ed. Africanisms in Afro-American language varieties. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 254–279.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: the case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C. 2004. Coordinating constructions in Fongbe with reference to Haitian Creole. In: Haspelmath, M. ed. Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 123–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leopold, W. F. 1949. Speech development of a bilingual child: Volume 3. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, First person–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levin, S. 1995. Semitic and Indo-European: the principal etymologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wei, Li and Milroy, L. 1995. Conversational codeswitching in a Chinese community in Britain: a sequential analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wei, Li. 1998. The ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions in the analysis of conversational code-switching. In: Auer, P. ed. 156–179.

Wei, Li. 2002. ‘What do you want me to say?’ On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society 31, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wei, Li. 2005. How can you tell? Towards a commonsense explanation of conversational code-switching. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, J. J. and Padilla, A. M. 1978. Language mixing in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 5, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipski, J. M. 1992. New thoughts on the origins of Zamboangueño (Philippine Creole Spanish). Language Sciences 14, 197–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo, Y. S. 2007. Cantonese-English code-switching in the Manchester Chinese immigrant community. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.

Long, M. H. 2003. Stabilization and fossilization in interlangauge development. In: Doughty, C. J. and Long, Michael H. eds. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 487–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lötzsch, R. 1996. Interferenzbedingte grammatische Konvergenzen und Divergenzen zwischen Sorbisch und Jiddisch. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49, 50–59.Google Scholar

Loveday, L. 1996. Language contact in Japan. A socio-linguistic history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Macalister, R. A. S. 1914. The language of the Nawar of Zutt, the nomad smiths of Palestine. (Gypsy Lore Society Monographs 3.) London: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Macswan, J. 2000. The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: evidence from intrasentential code switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Third person, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maschler, Y. 1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23, 325–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maschler, Y. 1997. Emergent bilingual grammar: The case of contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 28, 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maschler, Y. 1998. On the transition from codeswitching to a mixed code. In: Auer, P. ed. 125–149.

Maschler, Y. 2000. Towards fused lects: discourse markers in Hebrew-English bilingual conversation twelve years later. International Journal of Bilingualism 4, 529–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masica, C. 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Masica, C. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Masica, C. 2001. The definition and significance of linguistic areas: methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area). In: Singh, R., Bhaskararao, P., and Subbarao, K. V. eds. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 2001. Tokyo symposium on South Asian languages: Contact, convergence and typology. New Delhi: Sage. 205–267.Google Scholar

Masliyah, S. 1996. Four Turkish suffixes in Iraqi Arabic: -li, -lik, -siz and −çi. Journal of Semitic Studies 41, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matisoff, J. A. 2001. Genetic versus contact relationship: Prosodic diffusibility in south-East Asian languages. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 291–327.

Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. 2003. The study of mixed languages. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 1–20.CrossRef

Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 2003. The mixed language debate. Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Matras, Y. and Bührig, K. eds. 1999. Sprachtheorie und sprachliches Handeln. Festschrift für Jochen Rehbein. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. 2007a. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern-replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31, 829–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. 2007b. Introduction. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 1–13.

Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Matras, Y. and Sasse, H.-J. eds. 1995. Verb-subject order and theticity in European languages. (Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 48, 1–2.) Berlin: Akademie.

Matras, Y. and Schiff, L. 2005. Spoken Israeli Hebrew revisited: Structures and variation. In: Studia Semitica. Journal of Semitic Studies Jubilee Volume. (Journal of Semitic Studies Supplement 16), 145–193.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. and Shabibi, M. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Khuzistani Arabic. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 137–149.CrossRef

Matras, Y. and Tufan, Ş. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Macedonian Turkish. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 215–227.CrossRef

Matras, Y. 1988. Lekoudesch: Integration jiddischer Wörter in die Mundart von Rexingen bei Horb. Mit vergleichbarem Material aus Buttenhausen bei Münsingen. [Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit 33/1988.] Hamburg: Germanisches Seminar.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1991. Zur Rekonstruktion des jüdisch-deutschen Wortschatzes in den Mundarten ehemaliger “Judendörfer” in Südwestdeutschland. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 58, 267–293.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1994. Untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Diskurs des Romanes – Dialekt der Kelderaša/Lovara. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1996a. Sondersprachliche Hebraismen. Am Beispiel der südwestdeutschen Viehhändlersprache. In: Siewert, K. ed. 43–58.

Matras, Y. 1996b. Prozedurale Fusion: Grammatische Interferenzschichten im Romanes. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49, 60–78.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1998a. Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics 36, 281–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 1998b. Convergent development, grammaticalization, and the problem of ‘mutual isomorphism’. In: Boeder, W., Schroeder, Ch., and Wagner, K.-H. eds. Sprache in Raum und Zeit. Tübingen: Narr. 89–103.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1998c. Para-Romani revisited. In: Matras, Y. ed. 1–27.

Matras, Y. 1998d. Convergence vs. fusion in linguistic areas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Halle, 5–7 March 1998.

Matras, Y. 1998e. The Romani element in Jenisch and Rotwelsch. In: Matras, Y. ed. 193–230.

Matras, Y. 1999a. The state of present-day Domari in Jerusalem. Mediterranean Language Review 11, First person–58.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1999b. The speech of the Polska Roma: Some highlighted features and their implications for Romani dialectology. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society 5/9, First person–28.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2000a. Mixed Languages: A functional-communicative approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Third person, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 2000b. Fusion and the cognitive basis for bilingual discourse markers. International Journal of Bilingualism 4, 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 2000c. How predictable is contact-induced change in grammar? In: Renfrew, C., McMahon, A., and Trask, R. L. eds. 563–583.

Matras, Y. 2002. Romani: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 2003. Mixed languages: re-examining the structural prototype. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 151–175.

Matras, Y. 2004a. Layers of convergent syntax in Macedonian Turkish. Mediterranean Language Review 15, 63–86.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2004b. Romacilikanes: The Romani dialect of Parakalamos. Romani Studies 5/14, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 2005a. The full extent of fusion: A test case for connectivity and language contact. In: Bisang, W., Bierschenk, T., Kreikenbom, D., and Verhoeven, U. eds. Kulturelle und sprachliche Kontakte: Prozesse des Wandels in historischen Spannungsfeldern Nordostafrikas/Westasiens. Akten zum 2. Symposium des SFB 295. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag. 241–255.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2005b. Language contact, language endangerment, and the role of the ‘salvation linguist’. In: Austin, P. K. ed. Language documentation and description, Volume Third person. London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project. 225–251.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2007a. Contact, connectivity and language evolution. In: Rehbein, J., Hohenstein, C., and Pietsch, L. eds. Connectivity in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matras, Y. 2007b. The borrowability of grammatical categories. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 31–74.

Matras, Y. 2007c. Grammatical borrowing in Domari. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 151–164.

Matras, Y. ed. 1998. The Romani element in non-standard speech. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Matras, Y., Gardner, H., Jones, C., and Schulman, V. 2007. Angloromani: A different kind of language?Anthropological Linguistics 49, 142–164.Google Scholar

Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 2006. Linguistic areas. Convergence in historical and typological perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave.

Maurais, J. 2003. Towards a new global linguistic order? In: Maurais, J. and Morris, M. A. eds. Languages in a globalising world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConvell, P. and Meakins, F. 2005. Gurindji Kriol: A mixed language emerges from code-switching. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConvell, P. 2002. Mix-im-up speech and emergent mixed languages in indigenous Australia. Texas Linguistic Forum 44, 328–349.Google Scholar

McMahon, A. 2005. Heads I win, tails you lose. In: Carr, P., Durand, J., and Eden, C. eds. Headhood. elements, specification and contrastivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 1997. Towards a new model of creole genesis. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language 74, 788–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 2000. The missing Spanish creoles. Recovering the birth of plantation contact languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meeuwis, M. and Blommaert, J. 1998. A monolectal view of code-switching: Layered code-switching among Zairians in Belgium. In: Auer, P. ed. 76–98.

Meisel, J. M. 1975. Ausländerdeutsch und Deutsch ausländischer Arbeiter. Zur möglichen Entstehung eines Pidgin in der BRD. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 18, 9–53.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In: Hyltenstam, K. and Obler, L. eds. Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2001. The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In: Cenoz, J. and Genesee, F. eds. Trends in bilingual acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisinger, O. 1902. Lotekhôlisch. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der fränkischen Händlersprache. Zeitschrift für hochdeutsche Mundarten Third person, 121–127.Google Scholar

Migge, B. and Smith, N. 2007. Substrate influence in creole formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22, First person–15.Google Scholar

Migge, B. and Winford, D. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22, 73–99.Google Scholar

Migge, B. 2003. Creole formation as language contact. The case of the Suriname Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, L. and Muysken, P. eds. 1995. One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Minett, J. W. and Wang, S.-Y. 2003. On detecting borrowing. Distance-based and character-based approaches. Diachronica 20, 289–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mithun, M. 2004. Typology and diachrony: How stable is the grammar of argument structure? Keynote paper presented at annual meeting of the LAGB, Roehampton, September 2004.

Moormann, J. 1920. ‘Louter Lekoris’. Een levende geheimtaal. Tijdschrift voor taal en letteren 8, 235–239, 306–333.Google Scholar

Moormann, J. 1922. Losche Nekôdesch. Een Limburgsche geheimtaal. Tijdschrift voor taal en letteren 10, 26–43, 68–87.Google Scholar

Morag, Sh. 1993. The emergence of Modern Hebrew: Some sociolinguistic perspectives. In: Glinert, L. ed. Hebrew in Ashkenaz; A language in exile. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. 208–221.

Moravcsik, E. 1975. Verb borrowing. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 8, Third person–30.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, E. 1978. Universals of language contact. In: Greenberg, J. H. ed. Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 94–122.Google Scholar

Mous, M. 2003a. The making of a mixed language. The case of Ma'a/Mbugu. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mous, M. 2003b. The linguistic properties of lexical manipulation and its relevance for Ma'á. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 209–235.

Mufwene, S. S. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13, 83–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, S. S. 1997a. Jargons, pidgins, creoles, and koines: what are they? In: Spears, A. K. and Winford, D. eds. The structure and status of pidgins and creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, S. S. 1997b. Kitúba. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 173–208.

Mufwene, S. S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mühlhäusler, P. 1977. Bemerkungen zum “Pidgin Deutsch” von Neuguinea. In: Molony, C.et al. eds. German in contact with other languages. Kronberg: Scriptor. 58–70.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, P. 1986. Pidgin and creole linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, P. 2001. Die deutsche Sprache im Pazifik. In: Hiery, H. J. ed. Die deutsche Südsee 1884 – 1914: ein Handbuch. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh. 239–260.Google Scholar

Müller, N. 1998. Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muysken, P. and Smith, N. 1995. The study of pidgin and creole languages. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 3–14.

Muysken, P. and Veenstra, T. 1995. Serial verbs. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 289–315.

Muysken, P. 1981. Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: the case for relexification. In: Highfield, A. and Valdman, A. eds. Historicity and variation in Creole studies. Ann Arbor: Karoma. 52–78.Google Scholar

Muysken, P. 1997. Media Lengua. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 365–426.CrossRef

Muysken, P. 2000a. Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Muysken, P. 2000b. From linguistic areas to areal linguistics: A research proposal. In: Gilbers, D.G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. eds. 263–275.

Myers-Scotton, C. and Bolonyai, A. 2001. Calculating speakers: Codeswitching in a rational choice model. Language in Society 30, First person–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. and Jake, J. 2000. Four types of morpheme: Evidence from aphasia, codeswitching, and second language acquisition. Linguistics 38, 1053–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 1992. Codeswitching as a mechanism of deep borrowing, language shift, and language death. In: Brenzinger, M. ed. Language death. Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 31–58.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 1993a. Social motivations for codeswitching. Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 1993b. Duelling languages. Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 1998. A way to dusty death: the Matrix Language turnover hypothesis. In: Grenoble, L. A. and Whaley, L. J. eds. Endangered languages: language loss and community response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 2002a. Frequency and intentionality in (un)marked choices in codeswitching: ‘This is a 24-hour country’. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 2002b. Contact Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. 2003. What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena. In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 73–106.

Myers-Scotton, C. 2006. Multiple voices: an introduction to bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Nahir, M. 1998. Micro language planning and the revival of Hebrew: A schematic framework. Language in Society 27, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nau, Nicole. 1995. Möglichkeiten und Mechanismen kontaktbewegten Sprachwandels – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Finnischen. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Nelde, P. H. 1993. Contact or conflict? Observations on the dynamics and vitality of European languages. In: Jahr, E. H. ed. Language conflict and language planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 165–177.Google Scholar

Nettle, D. and Romaine, S. 2000. Vanishing voices. The extinction of the world's languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. and Peterson, D. A. 1996. The Amerind personal pronouns. Language 72, 336–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nichols, J. and Peterson, D. A. 1998. Amerind personal pronouns: A reply to Campbell. Language 74, 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nichols, J. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicoladis, E. 1998. First clues to the existence of two input languages: Pragmatic and lexical differentiation in a bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nortier, J. 1990. Dutch/Moroccan Arabic code-switching among young Moroccans in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Nortier, J. 1995. Code-switching in Moroccan Arabic/Dutch versus Moroccan Arabic/French language contact. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 112, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Grady, G. N. and Hale, K. 2004. The coherence and distinctiveness of the Pama-Nyungan language family within the Australian linguistic phylum. In: Bowern, C. and Koch, H. eds. Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neil, S. 2006. Mythic and poetic dimensions of speech in Northwestern California: From cultural vocabulary to linguistic relativity. Anthropological Linguistics 48, 305–334.Google Scholar

O'Shannessy, C. 2005. Light Walpiri: A new language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogura, M. and Wang, S.-Y. 1996. Evolution theory and lexical diffusion. In: Fisiak, J. and Krygier, M. eds. Advances in English historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 293–314.Google Scholar

Olshtain, E. and Blum-Kulka, S. 1989. Happy Hebrish: Mixing and switching in American-Israeli family interactions. In: Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., and Selinker, L. eds. Variation in second language acquisition. Volume I: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 59–83.Google Scholar

Osman, M. F. 2006. Language choice among Arabic-English bilinguals in Manchester. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Manchester.

Owens, J. 1997. Arabic-based pidgins and creoles. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 125–172.

Paradis, J. 2001. Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems?International Journal of Bilingualism 5, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, M. 1990. Language lateralisation in bilinguals. Enough already!Brain and Language 39, 576–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, M. ed. 1995. Aspects of bilingual aphasia. Oxford: Pergamon.

Pasch, H. 1997. Sango. In: Thomason, S. G. ed. 209–270.CrossRef

Patrick, P. L. 1999. Urban Jamaican Creole. Variation in the mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J. R. 1995. Inflecting postpositions in Indic and Kashmiri. In: Plank, F. ed. Double case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. New York: Oxford University Press. 283–298.Google Scholar

Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, Sl. C., and Oller, D. K. 1993. Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning 43, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfaff, C. 1979. Constraints on language mixing: intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language 55, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998. Language processing and second language development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitrès, A. 1895. Etude sur l'aphasie chez les polyglottes. Revue de Medecine 15, 873–899.Google Scholar

Plag, I. 2002. On the role of grammaticalization in creolization. A reassessment. In: Gilbert, G. G. ed. Pidgin and creole linguistics in the 21st century. Essays at millennium's end. New York: Lang. 229–246.Google Scholar

Poplack, S. 1980. Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español. Linguistics 18, 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, S. 1981. Syntactic structure and social function of code-switching. In: Duran, R. ed. Latino language and communicative behavior. Norwood: Ablex. 169–184.Google Scholar

Poplack, S., Sankoff, D., and Miller, C. 1988. The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics 26, 47–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulisse, N. 1999. Slips of the tongue. Speech errors in first and second language production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Queen, R. M. 2001. Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society 30, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramat, P. and Roma, E. eds. 2007. Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas. Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Ramat, P. and Stolz, T. eds. 2002. Mediterranean languages. Papers from the MEDTYP workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000. Bochum: Brockmeyer.

Rebuck, M. 2002. The function of English loanwords in Japanese. NUCB Journal of Language, Culture and Communication 4, 53–64.Google Scholar

Redlinger, W. and Park, T.-Z. 1980. Language mixing in young bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 7, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reershemius, G. 2002. Bilingualismus oder Sprachverlust? Zur Lage und zur aktiven Verwendung des Niederdeutschen in Ostfriesland am Beispiel einer Dorfgemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 69, 163–181.Google Scholar

Rehbein, J. 1977. Kompexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorie der Sprache. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Rehbein, J. 1979. Sprechhandlungsaugmente. Zur Organisation der Hörersteuerung. In: Weydt, H. ed. Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter. 58–74.Google Scholar

Rendón, J. G. 2007a. Grammatical borrowing in Imbabura Quechua (Ecuador). In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 481–521.

Rendón, J. G. 2007b. Grammatical borrowing in Paraguayan Guarani. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 523–550.

Renfrew, C., McMahon, A., and Trask, R. L. eds. 2000. Time depth in historical linguistics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archeological Research.

Ribot, T. 1881. Les maladies de la mémoire. Paris: Baillère.Google Scholar

Rießler, M. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Kildin Saami. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 229–244.

Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., Hengeveld, K., and Kahrel, P. 1993. A method of language sampling. Studies in Language 17, 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, P. 2003. Attention and memory during SLA. In: Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. eds. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 631–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romaine, S. 1995. Bilingualism (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ronjat, J. 1913. Le developpement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Ross, M. 1996. Contact-induced change and the Comparative Method. In: Durie, M. and Ross, M. eds. The comparative method reviewed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 180–217.Google Scholar

Ross, M. 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in north-west Melanesia. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R.M.W. eds. 134–166.

Rozencvejg, V. J. 1976. Linguistic interference and convergent change. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudolph, E. 1996. Adversative and concessive relations and their expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portugese on sentence and text level. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakel, J. and Matras, Y. 2008. Modelling contact-induced change in grammar. In: Stolz, T., Bakker, D., and Salas Palomo, R. eds. Aspects of language contact. New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romanisation processes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 63–87.Google Scholar

Sakel, J. 2007a. Language contact between Spanish and Mosetén: A study of grammatical integration. International Journal of Bilingualism 11, 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakel, J. 2007b. Language contact and recursion: the case of Pirahã. Paper presented at the international workshop ‘Variations et Changements morphosyntaxiques en situation de contacts de langues’, Ministère de la Recherche, Paris, 20–24 September 2007.

Sakel, J. 2007c. Mosetén borrowing from Spanish. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 567–580.

Salmons, J. 1990. Bilingual discourse marking: code switching, borrowing, and convergence in some German-American dialects. Linguistics 28, 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samely, U. 1991. Kedang (Eastern Indonesia). Some aspects of its grammar. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Sandefur, J. R. 1979. An Australian creole in the Northern Territory: A description of Ngukurr-Bamyili dialects (Part 1). Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.Google Scholar

Sandfeld, K. 1930. Linguistique balkanique: problèmes et resultants. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Sankoff, D. and Poplack, S. 1981. A formal grammar of code-switching. Papers in Linguistics 14, Third person–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, D. 1998. A formal production-based explanation of the facts of code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition First person, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, G. 1990. The grammaticalisation of tense and aspect in Tok Pisin and Sranan. Language Variation and Change Second person, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savić, J. M. 1995. Structural convergence and language change: Evidence from Serbian/English code-switching. Language in Society 24, 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. 1989. The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Scheuermann, U. 2001. Friesische Relikte im ostfriesischen Niederdeutsch. In: Muske, H. H. ed. Handbuch des Friesischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 443–448.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schirmer, A., Alter, K., Kotz, S., and Friederici, A. 2001. Lateralization of prosody during language production: A lesion study. Brain and Language 76, First person–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung. A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Nijmegen: MPI.Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, E. 2007. Recent grammatical borrowing into an Australian Aboriginal language: The case of Jaminjung and Kriol. In: Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. eds. 363–386.

Sebba, M. 1997. Contact languages. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shabibi, M. 2006. Contact-induced grammatical change in Khuzestani Arabic. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.

Sharewood Smith, M. 1991. Language modules and bilingual processing. In: Bialystok, E. ed. Language processing in bilingual children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siewert, K. ed. 1996. Rotwelschdialekte. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Siewierska, A. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language contact and change. Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Simango, S. R. ‘My Madame is fine’: The adaptation of English loans in Chichewa. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21, 487–507.CrossRef

Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. 1995. Linguistic human rights, past and present. In: Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. eds. 71–110.CrossRef

Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. eds. 1995. Linguistic human rights. Overcoming linguistic discrimination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Smith, N. 1995. An annotated list of creoles, pidgins, and mixed languages. In: Arends, J., Muysken, P., and Smith, N. eds. 331–374.

Smith, N. 1998. Complex personal pronouns in the secret languages of nomadic castes. In: Bruyn, A. and Arends, J. eds. Mengelwerk voor Muysken. Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics. 44–49.Google Scholar

Solta, G. R. 1980. Einfuhrung in die Balkanlinguistik mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des Substrats und des Balkanlateinischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stewart, W. 1962. Creole languages in the Caribbean. In: Rice, F. A. ed. Study of the role of second languages in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics. 34–53.Google Scholar

Stolz, C. and Stolz, T. 1996. Funktionswortentlehnung in Mesoamerika. Spanisch-amerindischer Sprachkontakt Hispanoindiana II. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49, 86–123.Google Scholar

Stolz, C. and Stolz, T. 1997. Universelle Hispanismen? Von Manila über Lima bis Mexiko und zurück: Muster bei der Entlehnung spanischer Funktionswörter in die indigenen Sprachen Amerikas und Austronesiens. Orbis 39, First person–77.Google Scholar

Stolz, C. and Stolz, T. 2001. Hispanicised comparative constructions in Indigenous languages of Austronesia and the Americas. In: Zimmermann, K. and Stolz, T. eds. Lo propio y lo ajeno en las lenguas austronésicas amerindias. Madrid: Iberoamericana. 35–56.Google Scholar

Stolz, T. 1991. Sprachbund im Baltikum? Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum eine sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Stolz, T. 1996. Grammatical Hispanisms in Amerindian and Austronesian languages. The other kind of Transpacific isoglosses. Amerindia 21, 137–160.Google Scholar

Stolz, T. 2003. Not quite the right mixture: Chamorro and Malti as candidates for the status of mixed language: In: Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. eds. 271–315.

Stolz, T. 2006. All or nothing. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. eds. 32–50.CrossRef

Stolz, T. 2007. Allora. On the recurrence of function-word borrowing in contact situations with Italian as donor language. In: Rehbein, J., Hohenstein, C., and Pietsch, L. eds., Connectivity in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storch, A. 2006. How long do linguistic areas last? Western Nilotic grammars in contact. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. eds. 2006. 94–113.