Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General editors' preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Substantive components of an ASEAN trade agreement from an external perspective
- 3 Moving forward: different institutional models for ASEAN's external trade agreements
- 4 The rules on dispute settlement in agreements between ASEAN member states and third states: a critical inventory
- 5 From treaty-making to treaty-breaking
- Executive summary
- Appendix 1 Agreements signed by ASEAN member states with a non-ASEAN party
- Appendix 2 ‘Non-ASEAN’ agreements
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General editors' preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Substantive components of an ASEAN trade agreement from an external perspective
- 3 Moving forward: different institutional models for ASEAN's external trade agreements
- 4 The rules on dispute settlement in agreements between ASEAN member states and third states: a critical inventory
- 5 From treaty-making to treaty-breaking
- Executive summary
- Appendix 1 Agreements signed by ASEAN member states with a non-ASEAN party
- Appendix 2 ‘Non-ASEAN’ agreements
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- From Treaty-Making to Treaty-BreakingModels for ASEAN External Trade Agreements, pp. 229 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
and 2000. ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54: 54–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. ‘Does ASEAN Exist? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an International Legal Person’, Singapore Yearbook of International Law, 12:12–199.Google Scholar
1989. ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 38: 38–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘The Theory of Competence in Verdross’, European Journal of International Law, 5:5–1.Google Scholar
2010. ‘Disconnection Clauses in EU Law and Practice’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing pp. 160–86.Google Scholar
2008. Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983. ‘Mixed Agreements: A List of Problems’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
2010. ‘The (Re)turn to “Soft Law” in Reconciling the Antinomies in WTO Law’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 11: 11–241.Google Scholar
1983. ‘The European Community's Rights and Obligations under Mixed Agreements’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 133–40.Google Scholar
1983. ‘Mixed Negotiations’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 87–96.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Can International Organisations be Controlled? Accountability and Responsibility’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 97: 97–236.Google Scholar
2007. The Foundations of European Community Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Community. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organising the International Relations of the European Communityand its Member States. Kluwer Law International.
2010. ‘Adoption of Positions under Mixed Agreements (Implementation)’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 138–59.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Mixed Agreements in the Field of Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters: Treaty-making and Legal Effects’, in (eds.), Justice, Liberty, Security: New Challenges for EU External Relations. VUBPRESS Brussels University Press, pp. 211–56.Google Scholar
2010. ‘Curse or Blessing? Mixed Agreements in the Recent Practice of the European Union and its Member States’, in , and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 249–68.Google Scholar
, and 2010. ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’, World Economy, 33: 33–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.). 2012. Your Country Guide to ASEAN Competition Law. Drew & Napier.
1996. ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65: 65–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Of ‘Mixity’ and ‘Double-Hatting’: EU External Relations Law Explained. Amsterdam University Press.
2010. Conflicting Rules and Clashing Courts. The Case of the WTO, Multilateral Environmental Agreements and Free Trade Agreements. ICTSD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1996. The External Relations of the European Communities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Should Asia Emulate Europe?’ in and (eds.), Regional Integration: Europe and Asia Compared. Ashgate, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
and 2013. ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 34: 34–359.(Also available as SHARES working paper 2011/03 (revised 2012 version) on the SHARES website at: www.sharesproject.nl/publication.)Google Scholar
2010. ‘Mixity from the Outside: The Perspective of a Treaty Partner’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 331–48.Google Scholar
2011. ‘Article 18 of the 1969 Vienna Convention: A Vague and Ineffective Obligation or a Useful Means of Strengthening Legal Cooperation?’ in (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford University Press, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
2003. ‘A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature?’, European Journal of International Law, 14: 14–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘Mixed Union: Mixed Agreements’, in (ed.), International Law Aspects of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff, Kluwer Law International, pp. 125–48.Google Scholar
2010. ‘The Future of Mixity’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 367–74.Google Scholar
1983. ‘A Typology of Mixed Agreements’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
2010. ‘Mixity in Practice: A Member State Practitioner's Perspective’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 304–19.Google Scholar
2008. ‘The Genesis, Design and Effects of Regional Institutions: Lessons from East Asia and the Middle East’, International Studies Quarterly, 52: 52–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983. ‘Liability for Mixed Agreements’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 125–32.Google Scholar
2002. ‘The International Responsibility of the European Union’, in (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations. Kluwer Law International, pp. 177–92.Google Scholar
1983. ‘The External Legal Relations of Non-unitary Actors: Mixity and the Federal Principle’, in and (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 35–83.Google Scholar
. 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence. Economic Research and Statistics Division, available at: www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_e.htm.Google Scholar