Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. From Treaty-Making to Treaty-Breaking
  • Cited by 5
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
April 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781316182765
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316182765
Subjects:
Public International Law, Law, South-East Asian Government, Politics and Policy, Politics and International Relations, International Relations and International Organisations
Series:
Integration through Law The Role of Law and the Rule of Law in ASEAN Integration (6)
Information

Book description

From Treaty-Making to Treaty-Breaking is the first high-level analysis of ASEAN's external trade agreements with non-ASEAN states. It clearly sets out the intended, and unintended, consequences of ASEAN's prevailing method of treaty making, with suggested guidelines for the future. The book begins by asking whether ASEAN trade agreements follow worldwide trends in the substantive content of such agreements. It raises questions such as: to what extent is it possible to continue concluding trade agreements through individual member states?; what are the legal consequences - from negotiation and conclusion (treaty-making) through to possible breach of the agreements (treaty-breaking)?; should ASEAN resort to mixed treaty-making? This study does not seek to give a definitive answer to these questions, rather it opens up the topic to readers by suggesting different possible models for ASEAN trade agreements. This thought-provoking book will appeal to anyone interested in trade negotiations and trade agreements, particularly in Asia.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. 2000. ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54: 54–421.
Chesterman, S. 2008. ‘Does ASEAN Exist? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an International Legal Person’, Singapore Yearbook of International Law, 12:12–199.
Chinkin, C. 1989. ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 38: 38–850.
Conforti, B. 1994. ‘The Theory of Competence in Verdross’, European Journal of International Law, 5:5–1.
Cremona, M. 2010. ‘Disconnection Clauses in EU Law and Practice’, in C., Hillion and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing pp. 160–86.
De Baere, G. 2008. Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations. Oxford University Press.
Dorr, O. and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.). 2012. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. Springer.
Ehlermann, C. D. 1983. ‘Mixed Agreements: A List of Problems’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 3–21.
Footer, M. E. 2010. ‘The (Re)turn to “Soft Law” in Reconciling the Antinomies in WTO Law’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 11: 11–241.
Gaja, G. 1983. ‘The European Community's Rights and Obligations under Mixed Agreements’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 133–40.
Groux, J. 1983. ‘Mixed Negotiations’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 87–96.
Gruchalla-Wesierski, T. 1984. ‘A Framework for Understanding “Soft Law”’, McGill Law Journal, 30: 40.
Guzman, A. T. and Meyer, T. L. 2010. ‘International Soft Law’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2:2–171.
Hafner, G. 2003. ‘Can International Organisations be Controlled? Accountability and Responsibility’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 97: 97–236.
Hartley, T. C. 2007. The Foundations of European Community Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Community. Oxford University Press.
Heliskoski, J. 2001. Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organising the International Relations of the European Communityand its Member States. Kluwer Law International.
Heliskoski, J. 2010. ‘Adoption of Positions under Mixed Agreements (Implementation)’, in C., Hillion and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 138–59.
Hix, J. P. 2008. ‘Mixed Agreements in the Field of Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters: Treaty-making and Legal Effects’, in B., MartenczukandS., Van Thiel (eds.), Justice, Liberty, Security: New Challenges for EU External Relations. VUBPRESS Brussels University Press, pp. 211–56.
Hoffmeister, F. 2010. ‘Curse or Blessing? Mixed Agreements in the Recent Practice of the European Union and its Member States’, in C., Hillion, and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 249–68.
Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. and Sapir, A. 2010. ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’, World Economy, 33: 33–1565.
Kin, L. C. and Joy, N. E. (eds.). 2012. Your Country Guide to ASEAN Competition Law. Drew & Napier.
Klabbers, J. 1996. ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65: 65–167.
Kuijper, P. J. 2008. Of ‘Mixity’ and ‘Double-Hatting’: EU External Relations Law Explained. Amsterdam University Press.
Kuijper, P. J. 2010. Conflicting Rules and Clashing Courts. The Case of the WTO, Multilateral Environmental Agreements and Free Trade Agreements. ICTSD.
Macleod, I., Hendry, I. D. and Hyett, S. 1996. The External Relations of the European Communities. Oxford University Press.
Murray, P. 2005. ‘Should Asia Emulate Europe?’ in W., Moon and B., Andreosso-O'Callaghan (eds.), Regional Integration: Europe and Asia Compared. Ashgate, pp. 197–213.
Nollkaemper, A. and Jacobs, D. 2013. ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 34: 34–359.(Also available as SHARES working paper 2011/03 (revised 2012 version) on the SHARES website at: www.sharesproject.nl/publication.)
Olson, P. 2010. ‘Mixity from the Outside: The Perspective of a Treaty Partner’, in C., Hillion and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 331–48.
Palchetti, P. 2011. ‘Article 18 of the 1969 Vienna Convention: A Vague and Ineffective Obligation or a Useful Means of Strengthening Legal Cooperation?’ in E., Cannizzarro (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford University Press, pp. 25–36.
Pauwelyn, J. 2003. ‘A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature?’, European Journal of International Law, 14: 14–907.
Rosas, A. 1998. ‘Mixed Union: Mixed Agreements’, in M., Koskenniemi (ed.), International Law Aspects of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff, Kluwer Law International, pp. 125–48.
Rosas, A. 2010. ‘The Future of Mixity’, in C., Hillion and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 367–74.
Schermers, H. G. 1983. ‘A Typology of Mixed Agreements’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 23–33.
Smyth, I. 2010. ‘Mixity in Practice: A Member State Practitioner's Perspective’, in C., Hillion and P., Koutrakos (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, pp. 304–19.
Solingen, E. 2008. ‘The Genesis, Design and Effects of Regional Institutions: Lessons from East Asia and the Middle East’, International Studies Quarterly, 52: 52–261.
Tomuschat, C. 1983. ‘Liability for Mixed Agreements’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 125–32.
Tomuschat, C. 2002. ‘The International Responsibility of the European Union’, in E., Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations. Kluwer Law International, pp. 177–92.
Weiler, J.H.H. 1983. ‘The External Legal Relations of Non-unitary Actors: Mixity and the Federal Principle’, in D., O'Keeffe and H. G., Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements. Kluwer Law and Taxation, pp. 35–83.
WTO, Secretariat. 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence. Economic Research and Statistics Division, available at: www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_e.htm.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.