Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:56:06.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Insiders, outsiders and participatory evaluation

from II - CASE STUDIES OF CURRENT PRACTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

J. Charles Alderson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University, Lancaster, England
Mike Scott
Affiliation:
The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
J. Charles Alderson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Alan Beretta
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter reports on the evaluation of a nation-wide project in English for Specific Purposes in Brazilian Federal Universities. The Project evaluation was designed from the beginning to involve as many as possible of the Project participants in the design, execution and interpretation of the evaluation, in an attempt to reflect the voluntary and participant-oriented nature of the ESP Project, to take account of a strong distrust of outside evaluators and externally oriented evaluations, and, perhaps above all, to carry out an evaluation that reflected as closely as possible the concerns and insights of those involved in Project implementation. The chapter presents the rationale, design, execution and results of this attempt and concludes with reflections on the problems and limitations of the evaluation and recommendations for future attempts at participatory evaluation.

A common paradigm for the conducting of formal evaluations of language education projects, particularly those funded by British aid agencies, is that of the JIJOE: the Jet-In Jet-Out Expert. Some eminent ‘expert’ in applied linguistics, syllabus design, methodology or a related aspect of language education is approached by an organisation like the British Council or the Overseas Development Administration (ODA), and invited to visit a project in some exotic location, for a period of up to three weeks. During that time, the expert is to familiarise him or herself with the project, its aims and objectives, its history, personnel, achievements, problems and hopes, and at the end she or he submits a report on the project, with recommendations as to the future development, abandonment or modification of the project.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×