Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:50:30.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Exploring the Acquisition of L3 Phonology

Challenges, New Insights, and Future Directions

from Part II - L3/Ln across Linguistic Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

By
Magdalena Wrembel
Edited by
Jennifer Cabrelli ,
Adel Chaouch-Orozco ,
Jorge González Alonso ,
Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares ,
Eloi Puig-Mayenco  and
Jason Rothman
Jennifer Cabrelli
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Adel Chaouch-Orozco
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Jorge González Alonso
Affiliation:
Universidad Nebrija, Spain and UiT, Arctic University of Norway
Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Eloi Puig-Mayenco
Affiliation:
King's College London
Jason Rothman
Affiliation:
UiT, Arctic University of Norway and Universidad Nebrija, Spain
Get access

Summary

This chapter aims to contribute to further understanding of the acquisition of speech from a multilingual perspective by offering a state-of-the-art overview of findings and discussing methodological considerations in research on L3 phonological acquisition. As the discipline grows, the methodologies employed advance, yet certain aspects continue to pose a challenge, including divergent research designs; varied types of L3 learners; comprehensive measures of multilingual production and perception, and phonological proficiency assessment. From a theoretical perspective, the applicability of the established L3 morphosyntactic models to phonological data is critically evaluated and alternative explanatory approaches are discussed. Further, the chapter focuses on new insights into the field by overviewing findings from a longitudinal “Multi-Phon” project on crosslinguistic influence in multilingual phonological acquisition. Finally, some avenues for further research in the area are suggested.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition , pp. 115 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amengual, M. (2021). The Acoustic Realization of Language-Specific Phonological Categories despite Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Influence in Bilingual and Trilingual Speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149, 1271–1284.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., & Keyvani Chahi, A. (2018). The Language and Social Background Questionnaire: Assessing Degree of Bilingualism in a Diverse Population. Behaviour Research Methods 50, 250–263.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. (2015). The Bilingual Advantage in Phonetic Learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balas, A. (2018). Non-native Vowel Perception: The Interplay of Categories and Features. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Balas, A., Kopečková, R., & Wrembel, M. (2019). Perception of Rhotics by Multilingual Children. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3725–3729). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the L2 in L3 Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 Status Factor and the Declarative/Procedural Distinction. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barkley, S. (2010). The Acquisition of Orthographic-Phonological Correspondence Rules in L2 and L3 Portuguese: Error Resolution, Interference, and Generalizability. PhD dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2012). Language Learning and Control in Monolinguals and Bilinguals. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1129–1147.Google Scholar
Benrabah, M. (1991). Learning English Segments with Two Languages. In ICPhS (Ed.), Actes Du XIIème Congrès International Des Sciences Phonétiques (pp. 334–337). Aix-En-Provence: Université De Provence Service Des Publications.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A Direct Realist View of Cross-Language Speech Perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Non-native and Second Language Speech Perception: Commonalities and Complementaries. In Munro, M. J. and Bohn, O.-S. (Eds.), Second Language Speech Learning (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/.Google Scholar
Birner, B. (1995). Pragmatic Constraints on the Verb in English Inversion. Lingua, 97, 233–256.Google Scholar
Blank, C., & Zimmer, M. (2009). A transferência fonético-fonológica L2 (francês) – L3 (inglês): um estudo de caso. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 17(1), 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2012). L3 Phonology: An Understudied Domain. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 33–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013). The Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: Measuring Regressive L3 Influence to Test L2 Phonological Representations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017). Testing the Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: L3 Phonological Effects on L1 versus L2 Systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Wrembel, M. (2016). Investigating the Acquisition of Phonology in a Third Language: A State of the Science and an Outlook for the Future. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 395–409.Google Scholar
Cebrian, J., Mora, J. C., & Aliaga-Garcia, C. (2011). Assessing Crosslinguistic Similarity by Means of Rated Discrimination and Perceptual Assimilation Tasks. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wrembel, M., & Kul, M. (Eds.), Achievements and Perspectives in the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: New Sounds 2010, vol. 1 (pp. 41–55). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and Multifaceted Effects of Second-Language Learning on First-Language Speech Production. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 249–268.Google Scholar
De Bot, K. (2012). Rethinking Multilingual Processing: From a Static to a Dynamic Approach. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 79–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Bot, K. (2017). Complexity Theory and Dynamic Systems Theory: Same or different? In Ortega, L. & Han, Z.-H. (Eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 51–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Domeno Moreno, C., & Kabak, B. (in press). Monolingual-Bilingual (Non-) Convergence in L3 Rhythm. In Fuchs, R. (Ed.), Speech Rhythm in L1, L2 and Learner Varieties of English (Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Donegan, P. J., & Stampe, D. (2009). Hypotheses of Natural Phonology, Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (1990). A Theory of Second Language Acquisition within the Framework of Natural Phonology. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Wrembel, M. (2017). Natural Growth Model: Explaining Third Language Phonological Acquisition. Paper presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea SLE 2017, Zürich.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Wrembel, M. (2022). Natural Growth Theory of Acquisition (NGTA): Evidence from (Mor)phonotactics. In Sardegna, V. G. & Jarosz, A. (Eds.), Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic Perception of “Similar” L2 Sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S. (Eds.), Phonology in Perception (pp. 151–190). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Problems, Findings. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R. (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model of Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Thulke, J., & Kupisch, T. (2014). Production and Perception of Non-native Accent in French as a Foreign Language: Multilingual Learners with Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language. Paper presented at SLE 2014 Workshop on Advances in the Investigation of L3 Phonological Acquisition.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Krause, M., & Dittmers, T. (2018). VOT Production in Multilingual Learners of French as a Foreign Language: Cross-Linguistic Influence from the Heritage Languages Russian and Turkish. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 1, 59–72.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., et al. (2012). MAIN – Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 56. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Gallardo Del Puerto, F. (2003). English FL Sounds in School Learners of Different Ages. In Garcia Mayo, M. P. & Garcia Lecumberri, M. L. (Eds.), Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 115–135). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Geiss, M., Gumbsheimer, S., Lloyd-Smith, A., Schmid, S., & Kupisch, T. (2021). Voice Onset Time in Multilingual Speakers: Italian Heritage Speakers in Germany with L3 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 435–459.Google Scholar
Golin, C., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Lowie, W. (2019). A Case Study of Adult Multilingual Phonological Development in the Initial Stages of L3 Learning. Presented at New Sounds: The 9th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2010). Cross-Linguistic Influence in L3 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 19–38.Google Scholar
Gut, U., Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E-M. (2015). Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (1997). Conditions on Transfer in Phonology. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Second Language Speech: Structure and Process (pp. 161–180) Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B., & Hammarberg, B. (2005). Re-setting the Basis of Articulation in the Acquisition of New Languages: A Third-Language Case Study. In Hufeisen, B. & Fouser, R. (Eds.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 11–18). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Karpf, A. (1990). Selbstorganisationsprozesse in der sprachlichen Ontogenese. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R. (2015). Differences in the Perception of English Vowel Sounds by Child L2 and L3 Learners. In Gut, U., Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E.-M. (Eds.), Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology (pp. 71–90). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R. (2016). The Bilingual Advantage in L3 Learning: A Developmental Study of Rhotic Sounds. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 410–425.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R. (2018). Exploring Metalinguistic Awareness in L3 Phonological Acquisition: The Case of Young Instructed Learners of Spanish in Germany. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 153–166.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R., Marecka, M., Wrembel, M., & Gut, U. (2016). Interactions Between Three Phonological Subsystems of Young Multilinguals: The Influence of Language Status. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 426–443.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R., Dimroth, C., & Gut, U. (2019). Children’s and Adults’ Initial Phonological Acquisition of a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(3), 374–401.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R, Wrembel, M., Gut, U., & Balas, A. (2021). Differences in Phonological Awareness of Young L3 Learners: An Accent Mimicry Study. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1897127.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, W. A., Jr. (2015). Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. (2020). Bilingualism as a Lens to the Mind, the Brain, and Society. Presentation at the Bilingualism Matters Research Symposium, September 22.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdes-Kroff, J. (2012). Juggling Two Languages in One Mind: What Bilinguals Tell Us about Language Processing and Its Consequences for Cognition. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 229–262). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic Experience and the “Perceptual Magnet Effect.” In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 121–154). York Press: Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Lewandowska, H., & Wrembel, M. (2019). The Mutual Influence of Vowel Length Perception in the Second and Third Language. In Calhoun, S, Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3750–3753). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Gorba, C., & Cebrian, J. (2019). Effects of Learning an Additional Language on VOT Perception. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P. (2016). VOT Production by Spanish Heritage Speakers in a Trilingual Context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 444–458.Google Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The Influence of Language Distance and Language Status on the Acquisition of L3 Phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A. (2021). Perceived Foreign Accent in L3 English: The Effects of Heritage Language Use. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1957899.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., & Kupisch, T. (2017). Transfer into L3 English: Global Accent in German-Dominant Heritage Speakers of Turkish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7, 131–162.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967.Google Scholar
Missaglia, F. (2010). The Acquisition of L3 English Vowels by Infant German–Italian Bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 58–74.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. (2020). The Younger, the Better? Speech Perception Development in Adolescent vs. Adult L3 Learners. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting, 6(1), 27–58.Google Scholar
Nelson, C., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Lowie, W. (2019). A Case Study of Adult Multilingual Phonological Development in the Initial Stages of L3 Learning. Poster presented at New Sounds: The 9th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Nelson, C., Krzysik, I., Lewandowska, H., & Wrembel, M. (2021). Multilingual Learners’ Perceptions of Cross-Linguistic Distances: A Proposal for a Visual Psychotypological Measure. Language Awareness, 30(2), 176–194.Google Scholar
Onishi, H. (2016). The Effect of L2 Experience on L3 Perception. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 459–475.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages, vol. 40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Patience, M. (2018). An Analysis of Global and Local Crosslinguistic Influence in L1 Mandarin–L2 English Learners of L3 Spanish. Estudos Da Língua (Gem), 17(2), 187–208.Google Scholar
Patihis, L., Oh, J. S., & Mogilner, T. (2015). Phoneme Discrimination of an Unrelated Language: Evidence for a Narrow Transfer but Not a Broad-Based Bilingual Advantage. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Some Thoughts on “Normalization” in Speech Perception. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W. (Eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2018). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.Google Scholar
Ren, X., & Mok, P. (2019). The Acquisition of Korean Prosodic Prominence by Cantonese–English Bilinguals. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2019) Melbourne, Australia. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2013). Linguistic and Cognitive Motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of Third Language (L3) Transfer: Timing of Acquisition and Proficiency Considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and Cognitive Motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of Third Language (L3) Transfer: Timing of Acquisition and Proficiency Considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26(2), 219–218.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2020). L1 Attrition in a Wider Perspective. Second Language Research, 36(2), 203–206.Google Scholar
Sypiańska, J. (2013). Quantity and quality of language use and attrition of L1 Polish due to L2 Danish and L3 English. PhD thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Sypiańska, J. (2016). Multilingual Acquisition of Vowels in L1 Polish, L2 Danish and L3 English. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 476–495.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. (2019). Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic Influence in the Acquisition of a Third Language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 666–682.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2010). L2-Accented Speech in L3 Production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2011). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition of Voice Onset Time. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 17-21 August 2011. Hong Kong. CD-ROM. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, 2157–2160.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2012). Foreign Accentedness in Third Language Acquisition. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 281–310). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2015a). Metaphonological Awareness in Multilinguals: A Case of L3 Polish, Language Awareness, 24(1), 60–83.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2015b). In Search of a New Perspective: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2020). Multilingual Acquisition Property by Property: A View from a Wider Perspective, Second Language Research, 37(3), 441–447.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2021). Transfer vs. Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Interactions: Exploring Alternative Avenues in L3 Research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 109–115.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2023). Exploring the Acquisition of L3 Phonology: Challenges, New Insights and Future Directions. In Cabrelli, J., Chaouch-Orozco, A., González Alonso, J., et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (Eds.) (2018). Advances in the Investigation of L3 Phonological Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Gut, U., & Mehlhorn, G. (Eds.) (2010). L3 Phonology. Special issue, International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1).Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Krzysik, I., Lewandowska, H., & Balas, A. (2019a). Acquisition of Rhotics by Multilingual Children. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 954–958). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopečková, R. (2019b). Extending Perceptual Assimilation Model to L3 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2020). Cross-Linguistic Interactions in Third Language Acquisition: Evidence from Multi-Feature Analysis of Speech Perception. Languages, 5(4), article 52.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M, Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2022). The Relationship between the Perception and Production of L2 and L3 Rhotics in Young Multilinguals: An Exploratory Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2036158.Google Scholar
Wunder, E-M. (2011). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Multilingual Language Acquisition: Phonology in Third or Additional Language Acquisition. In De Angelis, G., & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.), New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research (pp. 105–128). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×