We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part II - Theory of reference and quantification
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Introduction
Work on the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite nominals has grown in the last thirty years to form a subfield of its own within the already focused field of nominal semantics. In this area of study, clearly circumscribing the domain of inquiry amounts to giving a theory of its object. Defining indefinites, therefore, cannot be a first step in a chapter like the present one, whose aim is to provide an overview of some of the solutions developed to the semantic and pragmatic problems they raise. Instead of attempting a definition of indefinites, then, we begin with a quick empirical tour of the type of nominals that are uncontroversially or arguably indefinite, after which we outline the issues the rest of the chapter focuses on.
As a first step, we can divide determiner phrases (DPs) into definite and indefinite based on whether they are headed by a definite or an indefinite D(eterminer). In English then, the expressions in (1) count as indefinite while those in (2) count as definite.
(1) Mary visited a garden, some garden(s), some of the gardens, a certain garden.
(2) Maurice visited the / this garden, these gardens / the capital of Albania / the largest museum in the world.
Within formal semantics, rooted in Aristotelian logic, the italicized DPs in these examples share the interpretive property of being existential, a property that distinguishes them from universal DPs such as every garden or each garden. Definite existentials are distinguished from their indefinite sisters in that their referent is supposed to be uniquely identified somehow, either because it is familiar or unique in context, or because it is inherently unique.
Classifying further types of nominals as definite or indefinite is intimately connected with analytic choices. Staying again with English, the italicized nominals below are uncontroversially accepted among the indefinite group even though this is a definite D and the plural in (4) is bare.
(3) We visited this splendid garden in Suzhou that was offered to a Chinese scholar by his disciples.
(4) Muriel visited gardens when she traveled to France this summer.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
