Theoretical and Methodological Considerations

Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019

Edited by

Roberto R. Heredia and

Anna B. Cieślicka

Show author details

Roberto R. Heredia: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Anna B. Cieślicka: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , pp. 1 - 68

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535967 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2016). Bilingual and monolingual idiom processing is cut from the same cloth: The role of the L1 in literal and figurative meaning activation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01350 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295–308.Google Scholar PubMed

Cieślicka, A. B. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 22, 115–144.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2016). Priming and online multiple language activation. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 123–156). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, C., Sánchez-Casas, R., García-Albea, J. E., Guasch, M., Molero, M., & Ferré, P. (2010). Masked translation priming: Varying language experience and word type with Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990393 CrossRef Google Scholar

De Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001–1018.Google Scholar

De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 397–428.Google Scholar

Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36.Google Scholar

Fernández, E. M., & De Souza, R. A. (2016). Walking bilinguals across language boundaries: On-line and off-line techniques. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 33–60). New York: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferreira, F., & Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language? In Gernsnacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 33–56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 305–315.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., & Blumentritt, T. L. (2002). On-line processing of social stereotypes during spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology, 49, 208–221.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.). (2015). Bilingual figurative language processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heredia, R.R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2016). Metaphoric reference: An eye movement analysis of Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilingual readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00439 Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., & Muñoz, M. E. (2015). Metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 89–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hernández, A. E., Bates, E., & Ávila, L. X. (1996). Processing across the language boundary: A cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 846–864.Google Scholar

Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements. Bilingualism, 19(2), 347–360.Google Scholar

Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Asymmetrical cross-language priming effects. Memory and Cognition, 22(11), 70–84.Google Scholar

Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.CrossRef Google Scholar

Li, P., & Yip, M. C. (1998). Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 223–243.CrossRef Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 381–390.Google Scholar

Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Martín, M. C. (2010). Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Spanish-English interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 232–244.CrossRef Google Scholar

McLaughlin, B. (1965). “Intentional” and “incidental” learning in human subjects: The role of instructions to learn and motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 63(5), 359–376.Google Scholar

Mason, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 3–23.Google Scholar

Morris, D. C., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.Google Scholar

Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 225–236.CrossRef Google Scholar

Roediger, H. L. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 197–212.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stewart, M. T., & Heredia, R. R. (2002). Comprehending spoken metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. Experimental Psychology, 49, 34–44.Google Scholar

Swaab, T., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (2003). Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 86, 326–343.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A. (1982). The structure and time-course of information interaction during speech comprehension: Lexical segmentation, access, and interpretation. In Mehler, J., Walker, E. C. T., & Garrett, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 151–167). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Swinney, D., Love, T., Walenski, M., & Smith, E. E. (2007). Conceptual combination during sentence comprehension: Evidence for compositional processes. Psychological Science, 18(5), 397–400.Google Scholar

Tabossi, P. (1996). Cross-modal semantic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 569–576.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals, Acta Psychological, 128, 431–451.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movement methods to investigate bilingual reading. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B.(Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension (pp. 183–211). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

References

Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823.Google Scholar

Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of memory and language, 38(4), 419–439.CrossRef Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. L. (2003). Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theorical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 159–170.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 477–492.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chen, Q., Huang, X., Bai, L., Xu, X., Yang, Y., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2017). The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(2), 510–518.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

De Groot, A. M., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), 397–428.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and language, 41(4), 496–518.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7(2–3), 195–225.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 301–306.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.Google Scholar

Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Memory and Language, 12(6), 627–635.Google Scholar

French, R. M. (1998). A simple recurrent network model of bilingual memory. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Derry, S. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 368–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., & Matlock, T. (2001). Psycholinguistic perspectives on polysemy. In Cuyckens, H. & Zawada, B. (Eds.), Polysemy in cognitive linguistics. (pp. 213–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1994). Individual bilingualism . In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 1656–1660). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1995). A psycholinguistic approach to code-switching: The recognition of guest words by bilinguals. In Milroy, L. & Muysken, P. (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp. 259–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., & Smith, L. (2010). The associative structure of language: Contextual diversity in early word learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 259–273.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R. (1980). Metaphor in science. In Honeck, R. P. & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of figurative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Jacquet, M., & French, R. M. (2002). The BIA++: Extending the BIA+ to a dynamical distributed connectionist framework. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 202–205.Google Scholar

Johns, B. T., Dye, M., & Jones, M. N. (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), 1214–1220.Google Scholar

Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318.Google Scholar

Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2004). Activation of non-target language phonology during bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from eye-tracking. In Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Regier, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26^th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 654–659). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: a distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474–516.Google Scholar

Kim, K. H., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388(6638), 171–174.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 497–514.Google Scholar

Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic fields and lexical structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Li, P. (1996). Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 757–774.Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390.Google Scholar PubMed

Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1963). Structural semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter(1992) and Waters and Caplan(1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54.Google Scholar

Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Memory and Language, 10(5), 480.Google Scholar

Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2004). Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 190–201.Google Scholar

Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003a). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193.Google Scholar

Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003b). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115.Google Scholar

Marian, V., Spivey, M., & Hirsch, J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language, 86(1), 70–82.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., & Johnston, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 22(3), 249–261.CrossRef Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.Google Scholar

Meuter, R. F., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of memory and language, 40(1), 25–40.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 175–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moreno, E. M., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching languages, switching palabras (words): An electrophysiological study of code switching. Brain and Language, 80(2), 188–207.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Onnis, L., Spivey, M. J. (2012). Toward a new scientific visualization for the language sciences. Information, 3, 124–150.Google Scholar

Plummer, P., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 275–283.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 197–212.Google Scholar

Spevack, S. C., Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B., & Spivey, M. J. (2018). Interactivity of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(7), e12282.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J. (2008). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Cardon, C. D. (2015). Methods for studying adult bilingualism. In Schwieter, J. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual language processing. (pp. 108–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207–211.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284.Google Scholar

Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. (1996). Integration of visual and linguistic information: Human data and model simulations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar

Strauss, J., Harris, H. D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2007). jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 19–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645–659.Google Scholar

Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324–340.Google Scholar

Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 427–440.Google Scholar

Toscano, J. C., Anderson, N. D., & McMurray, B. (2013). Reconsidering the role of temporal order in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(5), 981–987.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

van Hell, J. G., & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross‐language lexical activation. Language Learning, 62, 148–171.Google Scholar

van Heuven, W. J., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483.Google Scholar

Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 979–1001.Google Scholar

Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

References

Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. L. (2003). Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50, 159–170.Google Scholar

Ando, E., Jared, D., Nakayama, M., & Hino, Y. (2014). Cross-script phonological priming with Japanese Kanji primes and English targets. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 853–870.Google Scholar

Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 658–672.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., Lagrou, E., & Stevens, M. (2017). Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 530–548.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., van Dyck, G., & van de Poel, M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 137–148.Google Scholar

Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Midgley, K. J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Are phonological representations in bilinguals language specific? An ERP study on interlingual homophones. Psychophysiology, 49, 531–543.Google Scholar

Costa, A. (2005). Lexical access in bilingual production. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 308–325). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Semantic ambiguity resolution within and across languages: An integrative review. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1266–1303.Google Scholar

De Bruijn, E., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., & Schriefers, H. J. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 155–168.Google Scholar

De Groot, A. M. B. (2011). Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., De Bruijn, E., Schriefers, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (2000). More on interlingual homograph recognition: Language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 69–78.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schriefers, H. (2000). On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 445–464.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51–66.Google Scholar

Doctor, E. A., & Klein, D. (1992). Phonological processing in bilingual word recognition. In Harris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 237–252). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 951–961.Google Scholar

Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–446.Google Scholar

Durlik, J., Szewczyk, J., Muszyński, M., & Wodniecka, Z. (2016). Interference and inhibition in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Polish-English interlingual homographs. PLoS ONE, 11 (3).Google Scholar

Duyck, W. (2005). Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1340–1359.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008). The frequency effects in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 850–855.Google Scholar

Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 57–70.Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1995). Reading skill and suppression revisited. Psychological Science, 6, 165–169.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., Midgley, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2010). Re-thinking the bilingual interactive-activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d). In Kail, M. & Hickmann, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp. 267–284). New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J. L. (Eds.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haigh, C. A., & Jared, D. (2007). The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 623–644.Google Scholar PubMed

Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–274.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 347–360.Google Scholar

Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations from one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 2–31.Google Scholar

Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 225–239.Google Scholar

Jouravlev, O., & Jared, D. (2014). Reading Russian-English homographs in sentence contexts: Evidence from ERPs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 153–168.Google Scholar

Kerkhofs, R., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., & De Bruijn, E. R. A. (2006). Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Brain Research, 1068, 170–183.Google Scholar

Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar

Kuperman, V., & van Dyke, J. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 802–823.Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.Google Scholar

Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R., & Duyck, W. (2011). Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 952–965.Google Scholar

Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R., & Duyck, W. (2013). Interlingual lexical competition in a spoken sentence context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 963–972.Google Scholar

Lalor, E., & Kirsner, K. (2001). The representation of “false cognates” in the bilingual lexicon. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 552–559.Google Scholar

Lee, C. H., Nam, K., & Katz, L. (2005). Nonselective access of spelling-sound knowledge for Korean-English bilinguals. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 407–415.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 32, 533–550.Google Scholar

Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107–128.Google Scholar

Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331–353.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.Google Scholar

Mercier, J., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2014). Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,17, 89–117.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2012). Cross-script phonological priming for Japanese-English bilinguals: Evidence for integrated phonological representations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1563–1583.Google Scholar

Paulmann, S., Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Is bilingual access influenced by language context? Neuroreport, 17, 727–731.Google Scholar

Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139–156.Google Scholar

Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2014). Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 787–796.Google Scholar

Poort, E. D., Warren, J. E., & Rodd, J. M. (2016). Recent experience with cognates and interlingual homographs in one language affect subsequent processing in another language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 206–212.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245–266.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 197–212.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Parallel activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284.Google Scholar

Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412–1431.Google Scholar

van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 88–107.Google Scholar

van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 174.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128, 431–451.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 780–789.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning, 62, 148–171.Google Scholar

van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar

van Wijnendaele, I., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 616–627.Google Scholar

Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25.Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Chen, B., Yang, M., & Dunlap, S. (2010). Language nonselective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2051–2066.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Considerations

Summary

Access options

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Book contents

Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Considerations

Summary

Access options

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive