Book contents
- Reviews
- The Asian Law and Society Reader
- The Asian Law and Society Reader
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Detailed Table of Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Publisher’s Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Religion
- 2 Legal Pluralism
- 3 Disputing
- 4 Legal Consciousness
- 5 Legal Mobilization
- 6 Legal Professions
- 7 Courts
- 8 Crime and Justice
- 9 Practicing Law and Society Scholarship in Asia
- Index
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2023
Book contents
- Reviews
- The Asian Law and Society Reader
- The Asian Law and Society Reader
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Detailed Table of Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Publisher’s Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Religion
- 2 Legal Pluralism
- 3 Disputing
- 4 Legal Consciousness
- 5 Legal Mobilization
- 6 Legal Professions
- 7 Courts
- 8 Crime and Justice
- 9 Practicing Law and Society Scholarship in Asia
- Index
- References
Summary
This introductory chapter defines and describes the field of law and society in general and the rapidly expanding body of law and society research conducted in Asia in particular. It distinguishes law and society research from three close intellectual "cousins": traditional legal scholarship, law and development studies, and critical legal studies. It then traces the various strands of Asian law and society scholarship as they developed quite differently in four Asian countries: Indonesia, Japan, China, and India. The Introduction concludes with a description of the nine chapters contained in the Reader and the five crosscutting themes that appear in each chapter.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Asian Law and Society Reader , pp. 1 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet and Turner, Bertram. 2018. “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50 (3): 255–74. doi:10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674Google Scholar
Chu, Tung-Tsu. 1965. Law and Society in Traditional China, 2nd ed. Paris: Mouton. doi: 10.2307/2050688Google Scholar
Derrett, J. Duncan M. 1999. Religion, Law, and the State in India. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/iclqaj/13.1.371Google Scholar
Diamond, Shari Seidman. 2019. “Empirical Legal Scholarship: Observations on Moving Forward.” Northwestern University Law Review 113: 1229–41.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen. 1936. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203791127Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1984. Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1093/iclqaj/34.3.658Google Scholar
Liu, Sida and Wang, Zhizhou. 2015. “The Fall and Rise of Law and Social Science in China.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11: 373–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, Lynn. 2008. “Law and Society.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Caldeira, Gregory, Keleman, Daniel, and Whittington, Keith, chapter 39. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0039 [Reprinted in Goodin, Robert E., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press (2009). doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.001.0001].Google Scholar
Murayama, Masayuki. 2013. “Kawashima and the Changing Focus on Japanese Legal Consciousness: A Selective History of the Sociology of Law in Japan.” International Journal of Law in Context 9 (4): 565–89. doi: 10.1017/s174455231300030xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabibhadana, Akin. 1969. The Organization of Thai Society in the Early Bangkok Period, 1782–1873. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1987. “Development of Sociology in India: An Overview.” Economic and Political Weekly 22 (4): 135–8.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226089980.001.0001Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. and Engel, David M.. 2015. “State and Personhood in Southeast Asia: The Promise and Potential for Law and Society Research.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 2 (2): 211–28. doi: 10.1017/als.2015.10Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio, and Gómez, Manuel A., eds. 2011. Law in Many Societies: A Reader. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1017/s0020589312000383Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. “Mapping Law and Society.” In Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research, edited by Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan, 21–80. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1993. “Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life.” In Law in Everyday Life, edited by Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., 21–61. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23345Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana, Clarke, Kamari, Darian-Smith, Eve, and Kotiswaran, Prabha, eds. 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Law and Society. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429293306Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226089980.001.0001Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. and Engel, David M.. 2015. “State and Personhood in Southeast Asia: The Promise and Potential for Law and Society Research.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 2 (2): 211–28. doi: 10.1017/als.2015.10Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio, and Gómez, Manuel A., eds. 2011. Law in Many Societies: A Reader. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1017/s0020589312000383Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. “Mapping Law and Society.” In Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research, edited by Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan, 21–80. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1993. “Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life.” In Law in Everyday Life, edited by Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., 21–61. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23345Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana, Clarke, Kamari, Darian-Smith, Eve, and Kotiswaran, Prabha, eds. 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Law and Society. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429293306Google Scholar
Suggested Readings
Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226089980.001.0001Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. and Engel, David M.. 2015. “State and Personhood in Southeast Asia: The Promise and Potential for Law and Society Research.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 2 (2): 211–28. doi: 10.1017/als.2015.10Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio, and Gómez, Manuel A., eds. 2011. Law in Many Societies: A Reader. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1017/s0020589312000383Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. “Mapping Law and Society.” In Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research, edited by Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan, 21–80. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1993. “Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life.” In Law in Everyday Life, edited by Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., 21–61. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23345Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana, Clarke, Kamari, Darian-Smith, Eve, and Kotiswaran, Prabha, eds. 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Law and Society. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429293306Google Scholar