Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T22:46:54.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Lynette J. Chua
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
David M. Engel
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Sida Liu
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

This chapter contains readings on Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Confucianism, Taoism, and localized so-called “animist” religions based on spirits and nature. Although in premodern legal systems, law and religion were virtually indistinguishable, “modernity” required a separation of the two concepts. The readings address the arrival of European-style legal systems, often (but not always) imposed by colonial authorities, which carried with them some version of the principle of “secularism.” In fact, secularism took on many different forms in Asian societies, each marking out a distinctive role for law, in some instances to police the separation of law and religion and, in other instances, to ensure that a particular religion retained a preferred place in society. The chapter concludes with readings about modern interactions between law and religion in three very different societies—Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Japan.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Breen, John. 2010. “‘Conventional Wisdom’ and the Politics of Shinto in Postwar Japan.” Politics and Religion 4 (1): 6882. doi: 10.54561/prj0401068bGoogle Scholar
Davis, Donald R. Jr. 2007. “Hinduism as a Legal Tradition.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75 (2): 241–67. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfm004Google Scholar
Engel, David M. and Engel, Jaruwan. 2010. Tort, Custom, and Karma: Globalization and Legal Consciousness in Thailand. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780804773751Google Scholar
French, Rebecca Redwood and Nathan, Mark A.. 2014. Buddhism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139044134Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1972. “The Aborted Restoration of ‘Indigenous’ Law in India.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 14 (1): 5370. doi: 10.1017/s0010417500006502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Russell. 2004. Taoism: The Enduring Tradition. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203646717-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2014. “Judging in God’s Name: State Power, Secularism, and the Politics of Islamic Law in Malaysia.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 3 (1): 152–67. doi: 10.4324/9781315244624-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salim, Arskal. 2008. Challenging the Secular State: The Islamization of Law in Modern Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. doi: 10.21313/hawaii/9780824832377.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonthal, Benjamin. 2016. “Securing the Sasana through Law: Buddhist Constitutionalism and Buddhist-Interest Litigation in Sri Lanka.” Modern Asian Studies 50 (6): 19662008. doi: 10.1017/s0026749x15000426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Vineeta. 2005. “Theorising ‘Talk’ about ‘Religious Pluralism’ and ‘Religious Harmony’ in Singapore.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 20 (1): 2540. doi: 10.1080/1353790052000313891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Veer, Peter. 2012. “Smash Temples, Burn Books: Comparing Secularist Projects in India and China.” The World Religious Cultures 73 (Spring): 1726. doi: 10.4324/9781315244624-11Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780804783095Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1992. The Mythology of Modern Law. London and New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203308943Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Müller, Dominik H. 2015. “Sharia Law and the Politics of ‘Faith Control’ in Brunei Darussalam: Dynamics of Socio-Legal Change in a Southeast Asian Sultanate.” Internationales Asienforum 46 (3–4): 313–45.Google Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2006. “Secular Morality, Village Law, and Buddhism in Tibetan Societies.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12 (1): 173–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00286.xGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Yelle, Robert A., and Taussig-Rubbo, Mateo. 2011. After Secular Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvqsf0p7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, John R. 2003. Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511615122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrett, J. Duncan M. 1999. Religion, Law and the State in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.2307/2754167Google Scholar
Erie, Matthew S. 2016. China and Islam: The Prophet, the Party, and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107282063Google Scholar
Lingat, Robert. 1973. The Classical Law of India. Translated by Derrett, J. Duncan M.. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.2307/600926Google Scholar
Oraby, Mona and Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. 2020. “Law and Religion: Reimagining the Entanglement of Two Universals.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16: 257–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020520-022638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafi, Mitra. 2014. Law and Identity in Colonial South Asia: Parsi Legal Culture, 1772–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Religion
  • Lynette J. Chua, National University of Singapore, David M. Engel, State University of New York, Buffalo, Sida Liu, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Asian Law and Society Reader
  • Online publication: 02 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Religion
  • Lynette J. Chua, National University of Singapore, David M. Engel, State University of New York, Buffalo, Sida Liu, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Asian Law and Society Reader
  • Online publication: 02 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Religion
  • Lynette J. Chua, National University of Singapore, David M. Engel, State University of New York, Buffalo, Sida Liu, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Asian Law and Society Reader
  • Online publication: 02 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824.002
Available formats
×