Wilcox, AJ, Weinberg, CR, Baird, DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1517–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Karabinus, DS, Marazo, DP, Stern, HJ, et al. The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort(R)) for influencing a child’s sex. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirshenbaum, M, Feldman, B, Aizer, A, et al. Preimplantation embryos sex ratios in couples with four or more children of same sex, what should be expected from a preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycle? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(6):515–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nisker, JA. Rachel’s ladders or how societal situation determines reproductive therapy. Hum Reprod. 1996 June;11(6):1162–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nisker, JA. Anniversary of injustice: April Fool’s Day, 1994. Will the Enactment of Bill C-6 be the birthday of equitable reproductive health care in Canada? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 April 1;26(4):321–4.Google ScholarPubMed

Minister of Justice. Canada Health Act, RSC, 1985, c. C-6. Available from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-6.pdf.Google Scholar

WHO. 2002. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction Report of a meeting on ‘Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction,’ held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42576/9241590300.pdf;jsessionid=6F5FA04D8407B19F4A6527EC188A48F7?sequence=1.Google Scholar

WHO. Social Determinants of Health. 2020. Available from: www.who.int/social_determinants/en.Google Scholar

Golombok, S, Blake, L, Casey, P, Roman, G, Jadva, V. Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. J Child Psychol Psyc. 2013;54:653–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, G. Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:969–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, G. Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:786–90.Google ScholarPubMed

Golombok, S. Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1532–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harper, JC, Kennett, D, Reisel, D. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1135–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Illioi, E, Blake, L, Jadva, V, Roman, G, Golombok, S. The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2017;58:315–34.Google Scholar

Pennings, G. Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:969–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skoog Svanberg, A, Sydsjo, G, Lampic, C. Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation – perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring. Upsala J Med Sci. 2019, Online https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2019.1696431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ASRM. Position statement on UT: a practice committee opinion. Fert Ster. 2018;110:605–10.Google Scholar

Kvarnstrom, N, Enskog, A, Dahm-Kähler, P. Live versus deceased donor in uterus transplantation. Fert Ster. 2019;112:24–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whittaker, A, Inhorn, MC, Shenfield, F. Globalised quests for assisted conception: reproductive travel for infertility and involuntary childlessness. Global Public Health. 2019;14(12):1669–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Cross border reproductive care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;11:190–1.Google Scholar

Brännström, M, Johannesson, L, Bokström, H, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;14:607–16.Google Scholar

Ejzenberg, D, Andraus, W, Baratelli Carelli Mendes, LR, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation from a deceased donor in a recipient with uterine infertility. Lancet. 2019;392:2697–704.Google Scholar

Johannesson, L, Kvarnström, N, Mölne, J, et al. Uterus transplantation trial, 1-year outcome. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Järvholm, S, Kvarnström, N, Dahm-Kähler, P, Brännström, M. Donor´s health-related quality-of-life and psychosocial outcomes 3 years after uterus donation for transplantation. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1270–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Järvholm, S, Johannesson, L, Clarke, A, Brännström, M. Uterus transplantation trial: psychological evaluation of recipients and partners during the post-transplantation year. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1010–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milliez, J. Uterine transplantation FIGO committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106:270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCulloch, P, Altman, DG, Campbell, WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374:1105–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Esterhuizen, TM, Thabane, L. Con: Meta-analysis; some key limitations and potential solutions. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:882–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broeze, K, Opmeer, BC, van der Veen, F, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(6):561–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dhont, M. Evidence-based reproductive medicine: a clinical appraisal. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013;5(3):233–40.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Pell, JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003;327(7429):1459–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193–54.Google Scholar

Brown, JA, Buckingham, K, Abou-Setta, A, Buckett, W. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD006107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006107.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, Akl, EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, R, Seidler, AL, Askie, L, et al. Network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine: challenges and opportunities. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(8):1723–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed