Book contents
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- 24A ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 24B ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 25A Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 25B Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 26A Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 26B Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 27A Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 27B Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 28A There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 28B There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 29A Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- 29B Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
25B - Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
Against
from Section IV - Embryology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2021
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- 24A ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 24B ICSI Should Be Used for All IVF Cycles
- 25A Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 25B Embryo Morphokinetic Analysis (Time-Lapse Imaging) Is Helpful in Selecting Euploid Blastocysts
- 26A Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 26B Time-Lapse Imaging Should Be a Routine Procedure in Clinical Embryology
- 27A Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 27B Artificial Intelligence Is Useful for Embryo Selection in IVF
- 28A There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 28B There Is No Need to Take Embryos Out of the Incubator until the Day of Embryo Transfer
- 29A Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- 29B Blastocyst Culture Should Be a Routine in All IVF Cycles
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
Summary
One of the most challenging aspects of IVF is selecting the embryo(s) most likely to implant and result in live birth. Traditional methods of embryo selection are limited to daily assessments of development and morphology. Time-lapse (TL) technology permits frequent imaging and analysis of embryos, without disturbance to culture conditions and many of the latest models are capable of complex algorithms to aid embryo selection. Aside from trying to demonstrate that TL incubators offer superior culture conditions, many studies have sought to identify morphokinetic markers that correlate with clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs), live birth rates (LBRs) and euploid status of embryos, seeking to compare TL with more traditional invasive methods of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Depending on female age, over half of all embryos may be aneuploidy, which is a possible cause of implantation failure, miscarriage and birth defects. Aneuploidy has a weak association with conventional morphology grading, but TL could provide a breakthrough in identifying discreet markers, predictive of ploidy and implantation potential. This review seeks to demonstrate that the current technology is not yet suitable for this application.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine , pp. 134 - 137Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021