Book contents
- 50 Big Debates in Gynecologic Oncology
- 50 Big Debates in Gynecologic Oncology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section I Perioperative Management
- Section II Screening, Prevention, and Early Diagnosis
- Debate 3A Should Women with BRCA Mutations be Offered Bilateral Salpingectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction?
- Chapter 3B Should Women with BRCA Mutations be Offered Bilateral Salpingectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction?
- Debate 4A Can High-risk HPV Testing be Used Alone as the Primary Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer?
- Debate 4B Can High-risk HPV Testing be Used Alone as the Primary Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer?
- Section III Ovarian Cancer
- Section IV Endometrial Cancer
- Section V Cervical Cancer
- Section VI Vaginal and Vulvar Cancer
- Index
- References
Debate 4A - Can High-risk HPV Testing be Used Alone as the Primary Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer?
Yes
from Section II - Screening, Prevention, and Early Diagnosis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2023
- 50 Big Debates in Gynecologic Oncology
- 50 Big Debates in Gynecologic Oncology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section I Perioperative Management
- Section II Screening, Prevention, and Early Diagnosis
- Debate 3A Should Women with BRCA Mutations be Offered Bilateral Salpingectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction?
- Chapter 3B Should Women with BRCA Mutations be Offered Bilateral Salpingectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction?
- Debate 4A Can High-risk HPV Testing be Used Alone as the Primary Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer?
- Debate 4B Can High-risk HPV Testing be Used Alone as the Primary Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer?
- Section III Ovarian Cancer
- Section IV Endometrial Cancer
- Section V Cervical Cancer
- Section VI Vaginal and Vulvar Cancer
- Index
- References
Summary
Randomized clinical trials, a large NCI-Kaiser Permanente real-world follow-up study involving over one million women, and the three US FDA registration trials clearly demonstrate that HPV primary screening for cervical cancer is safe and effective. Co-testing that combines both HPV testing and cytology offers minimal, if any, additional benefit over HPV primary testing and increases costs, requires follow-up of HPV-negative women with ASCUS and LSIL that can lead to unnecessary colposcopies/biopsies and retains the medico-legal risk of false-negative cytology results. A number of countries have adopted HPV primary screening for their national screening programs and in the United States HPV primary screening is now classified as the preferred screening approach for women >25 years by the 2020 American Cancer Society guidelines.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 50 Big Debates in Gynecologic Oncology , pp. 16 - 19Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023