Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T23:27:07.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Teledentistry a Feasible Alternative for People Who Need Special Care?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2022

Mehmet Melih Omezli ,
Damla Torul Open the ORCID record for Damla Torul [Opens in a new window]  and
Eyup Birkan Yilmaz
Mehmet Melih Omezli
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
Damla Torul*
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
Eyup Birkan Yilmaz
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Damla Torul, Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of teledentistry as a vehicle that provides enhanced delivery of oral care for the people who need special care (PNSC).

Methods:

Between January 2018 and September 2020, PNSC who were admitted in the study were either waiting for a follow-up (F) appointment or on a waiting list. An examination via video call was carried out for initial examination (IE) and F purposes. The virtual examination was scored by the clinician who performed the examinations. The experience of the participants was evaluated with a satisfaction questionnaire.

Results:

Forty PNSC (26 females, 14 males) between ages 7 and 48 years (21.17 ± 10.62) participated in the study. According to the clinician ratings, the accuracy of the examination was rated as the lowest. The F group had higher scores when compared to the IE group regarding clinician rating. No significant differences were found in terms of the scoring of the clinician and patient/parent satisfaction regarding cooperation status and type of examination (P ≥ 0.05).

Conclusions:

Through adequate adaptation of the technology into clinical practice and overcoming the barriers for wider implementation, the teledentistry approach could be a reliable and feasible alternative in triaging, treatment planning, and F purposes for PNSC.

Keywords

disabilitym-Healthremote care
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023 , e129
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glassman, P, Subar, P. Creating and maintaining oral health for dependent people in institutional settings. J Public Health Dent. 2010;70:40-48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glassman, P, Harrington, M, Namakian, M, Subar, P. Interprofessional collaboration in improving oral health for special populations. Dent Clin North Am. 2016;60:843-855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivier, R, Thibault, D, Stéphane, V, et al. Oral care in facilities for disabled people: interest of teledentistry. Dent Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019;5:1-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudeau, N, Roy, O, Malthiery, E, et al. 2019: The year of teledentistry in France? J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2019;7:1-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiefel, DJ. Dental care considerations for disabled adults. Spec Care Dentist. 2002;22:26-39.Google ScholarPubMed
Harper, DC. From research to practice: telemedicine for children with disabilities in rural Iowa. Telemed Today. 2002;9:21-24.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanchez Dils, E, Lefebvre, C, Abeyta, K. Teledentistry in the United States: a new horizon of dental care. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004;2:161-164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estai, M, Kanagasingam, Y, Tennant, M, Bunt, S. A systematic review of the research evidence for the benefits of teledentistry. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:147-156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inquimbert, C, Malthierry, E, Arzens, G, et al. Teledentistry in France: example of the e-DENT project. In e-Health Care in Dentistry and Oral Medicine. Cham: Springer; 2018:143-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocca, MA, Kudryk, VL, Pajak, JC, Morris, T. The evolution of a teledentistry system within the Department of Defense. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:921-924.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhou, L, Parmanto, B. Reaching people with disabilities in underserved areas through digital interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:12981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, KM, Bezyak, J. Telehealth use among rural individuals with disabilities. Published February 2020. Accessed January 10, 2021. https://rockymountainada.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Rural%20Telehealth%20Rapid%20Response%20Report.pdf Google Scholar
Fonseca, AS, Goldenberg, DC, Stocchero, GF, et al. Validation of videoconference with smartphones in telemedicine facial trauma care: analysis of concordance to on-site evaluation. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:433-437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becevic, M, Boren, S, Mutrux, R, et al. User satisfaction with telehealth: study of patients, providers, and coordinators. Health Care Manag. 2015;34:337-349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Report on Disability. World Health Organization (WHO). Published 2011. Accessed  January 20, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182 Google Scholar
Turkey Disability Survey. Turkish Statistic Institute. Published 2002. Accessed  January 20, 2021. https://kutuphane.tuik.gov.tr/pdf/0014899.pdf Google Scholar
Dorin, M, Moysan, V, Cohen, C, et al. Evaluation of orodental health needs of children and adolescents attending a medical educational institute or establishment for multiply handicapped children and adolescents in France. Prat Organ Soins. 2006;37:299-312.Google Scholar
Langkamp, DL, McManus, MD, Blakemore, SD. Telemedicine for children with developmental disabilities: a more effective clinical process than office-based care. Telemed J E-Health. 2015;21:110-114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindgren, S, Wacker, D, Suess, A, et al. Telehealth and autism: treating challenging behavior at lower cost. Pediatrics. 2016;137:167-175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Household Information Technology Usage Survey. Turkish Statistic Institute. Published 2020. Accessed January 20, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2020-33679 Google Scholar
Hogan, SC, van Hees, C, Asiedu, KB, Fuller, LC. WhatsApp platforms in tropical public health resource-poor settings. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58:228-230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, BA, Stallard, J, West, CC. The use of WhatsApp® as a way to deliver plastic surgery teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(7):1-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariño, R, Hopcraft, M, Tonmukayakul, U, et al. Teleconsultation/telediagnosis using teledentistry technology: a pilot feasibility study. Int J Adv Life Sci. 2014;6:291-299.Google Scholar
Marino, R, Ghanim, A. Teledentistry: a systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:179-183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M, Morris, J, Deruyter, F. Mobile healthcare and people with disabilities: current state and future needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesbitt, TS. Meeting the health care needs of California’s children: the role of telemedicine. In Digital Opportunity for Youth Issue Brief. Children’s Partnership; 2007:1-15.Google Scholar
Vigil, J, Kattlove, J, Calouro, C, et al. Realizing the promise of telehealth for children with special health care needs. Palo Alto, CA: Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health; 2015.Google Scholar